Note: Redistricting takes place every 10 years after completion of the United States Census. The information here pertains to the 2010 redistricting process. For information on more recent redistricting developments, see this article. |
Redistricting in Massachusetts | |
General information | |
Partisan control: Democrat | |
Process: Legislative Authority | |
Deadline: Before 2012 Election | |
Total seats | |
Congress: 9 | |
State Senate: 40 | |
State House: 160 |
This article details the timeline of redistricting events in Massachusetts following the 2010 census. It also provides contextual information about the redistricting process and census information.
The 2010 Census resulted in Massachusetts losing one Congressional seat after a decade of population growth below the national average.
During the 2010 redistricting cycle, the Massachusetts State Legislature had jurisdiction over state and Congressional redistricting.
The Massachusetts Constitution provided authority to the Massachusetts General Court for redistricting in Section 2 of Article Cl.
A total of 13 public hearings across the state were planned. Additionally, redistricting authorities planned an interactive website for citizens.[1][2] The hearings were scheduled to be completed by June, 2011, at which point the map-drawing process would begin. This redistricting process was the first time in Massachusetts history that the public had contact with the redistricting committee on the Internet.[2]
Video from all 13 meetings were made available online.[3]
Thirteen meetings were held. Those dates were:[4]
Stanley Rosenberg (D) led the Senate redistricting process. Representative Michael Moran (Massachusetts) (D) oversaw House efforts.[5]
On February 10, 2011, the Senate voted 32-4 to create a 28-member committee to be charged with redistricting. The committee would be made up of 28 legislators -- 23 Democrats and 5 Republicans. The bill moved to the House for approval.[6]
On March 2, the House passed the legislation to establish the redistricting committee. The vote was 121-31.[7] The vote was along party lines, with all Republican members voting against the legislation.[8] Concurrently, House members defeated a Republican-sponsored amendment to establish an independent redistricting commission.[9]
In mid-March the official committee was named, consisting of 28 total members.[10] "Looking at the map, clearly they were gerrymandered to help specific legislators. The committee's goal is to rectify that situation," said Brad Hill (R), a member of the redistricting committee.[11]
The 2011 special joint committee on redistricting had 7 senators and 21 representatives on the committee. The members were:
Sen. Stanley Rosenberg Senate Chair |
House Members: |
Rep. Anne Gobi |
On March 16, the Joint Redistricting Committee held its first official meeting at the State House.[12] The schedule for public hearings and new website were unveiled.[13] The committee heard testimony from legal experts on redistricting laws.[14] "It’s no secret ... that those of us on the Republican side wanted to use a process other than the one that has been laid out. But the process that has been laid out today and going forward is different than the process that has been used in the past, and I would say different in a positive way," said Bradley Jones, Jr. (R), a member of the committee.[15]
The population in the Bay State increased 3.1 percent from 2000 to 2010, bringing the state's population to 6,547,629. The increase was below the national average of 9.7 percent.[16] Massachusetts lost one seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, falling from 10 to nine as a result of the census data.[17] Each new redrawn Congressional district needed to have approximately 727,514 constituents.[18]
At the end of July 2011, the redistricting committee received new precinct population data from the Secretary of State. There were 2,151 precincts with an average of 3,043 residents per precinct.[19]
Massachusetts received its population counts on March 22, 2011. These tables show the change in population in the five largest cities and counties in Massachusetts from 2000-2010.[20]
|
|
On October 26, 2011, Rep. John Olver announced that he would retire from Congress at the end of his term in 2012. His announcement ended months of speculation over which two incumbents would be paired into one district.[21]
On November 7, 2011, state legislative leaders released the draft map for the nine U.S. House districts in Massachusetts. The new map put incumbent Stephen Lynch (D) and Bill Keating (D) into one district along the coast. Keating, who had a second home in Cape Cod, said he would move to that house in order to avoid a primary race with Lynch. That district was drawn with no current incumbent, setting the stage for all nine current incumbents to safely run for re-election in 2012. The new map also had the state's first majority-minority district, then represented by Michael Capuano (D).[22]
On November 10, the map passed out of committee and was set for a final vote on November 15.[23] The state Senate approved the Congressional map by a vote of 31-6. The state House approved the map with a 122-29 vote.[24] Republicans had proposed an alternate map during floor debates but the amendments were defeated on a party-line vote.[25]
On November 21, 2011, Gov. Deval Patrick (D) signed the new map into law.[26]
At the June 13, 2011, redistricting committee hearing in Lawrence, a citizens group offered a proposal to legislators that would create additional Latino majority-minority districts in the Massachusetts General Court. The Dominican American National Roundtable offered a version of the maps that would alter the districts then held by Sens. Barry Finegold (D) and Steven Baddour (D). The proposal would have moved Lawrence from Finegold's district to Baddour's. The two House district proposals would have created two Lawrence-based districts each with more than 70 percent of the population composed of Latino voters. At the time, Lawrence had the highest Latino population as a percentage of the total of any New England city.[27]
On October 18, 2011, the state legislature released draft state Senate and state House maps. Among the changes in the proposed maps were:
2000 Population Deviation[34] | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Office | Percentage | ||||||
Congressional Districts | 0.29% | ||||||
State House Districts | 9.68% | ||||||
State Senate Districts | 9.33% | ||||||
Under federal law, districts may vary from an Ideal District by up to 10%, though the lowest number achievable is preferred. Ideal Districts are computed through simple division of the number of seats for any office into the population at the time of the Census. |
|