School District of Philadelphia |
---|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
District details |
Superintendent: William R. Hite Jr. |
# of school board members: 9 |
Website: Link |
The School District of Philadelphia is a school district in Pennsylvania.
Click on the links below to learn more about the school district's...
This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates. |
William R. Hite Jr. is the superintendent of the School District of Philadelphia. Hite was appointed superintendent in October 2012.[1]
The School District of Philadelphia school board consists of nine members appointed by the mayor of Philadelphia to four-year terms.[2] The mayor appoints board members from a list of names submitted by the Education Nominating Panel and approved by the Philadelphia City Council.[2] The district was previously under the control of a School Reform Commission (SRC) from 2001 to 2018. The commission was dissolved on June 30, 2018.[3][4]
Office | Name | Date assumed office |
---|---|---|
School District of Philadelphia | Julia Danzy | 2018 |
School District of Philadelphia | Leticia Egea-Hinton | 2018 |
School District of Philadelphia | Mallory Fix Lopez | 2018 |
School District of Philadelphia | Maria McColgan | 2018 |
School District of Philadelphia | Angela McIver | 2018 |
School District of Philadelphia | Lisa Salley | February 19, 2021 |
School District of Philadelphia | Reginald Streater | February 19, 2021 |
School District of Philadelphia | Cecelia Thompson | February 19, 2021 |
School District of Philadelphia | Joyce Wilkerson | 2018 |
This officeholder information was last updated on April 26, 2021. Please contact us with any updates. |
The School District of Philadelphia school board maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[5]
“ |
The Board reaffirms the right of the public to deliver comments to the Board on matters of general concern, on formal actions of the Board, or on deliberations regarding matters that are or may be before the Board. Speakers present at a Board meeting may address the Board in accordance with law and Board policy and administrative procedures posted on the Board website. If a motion from the floor is made to amend, revise or edit a resolution on the list of proposed resolutions, or to propose a substitute for it, and the public has had a reasonable opportunity to comment on the original resolution, then the Board may proceed to vote on the amended or substituted resolution without further public comment, if the amendment, revision, edit, or substitute resolution pertains to the same subject which is addressed in the original resolution. If a motion from the floor is used to propose a resolution which does not pertain to a subject that is already addressed in a resolution that has been posted in advance of that meeting, the Board may vote on the proposed resolution made from the floor at the next or later Board action meeting after the public has been notified of the proposed resolution and has had an opportunity to comment on the proposed resolution. When a Board member proposes a new resolution by a motion from the floor and the President calls for a vote at that meeting, the Board will provide for public comment before the Board takes action. If no speakers request to be heard, then the Board may proceed to vote. [6] |
” |
From 1993 to 2013, the School District of Philadelphia had an average of $2,067,427,429 in revenue and $2,225,548,286 in expenditures, according to the United States Census Bureau's survey of school system finances. The district had a yearly average of $2,139,091,810 in outstanding debt. The district retired $272,307,048 of its debt and issued $430,354,238 in new debt each year on average.[7]
The table below separates the district's revenue into the three sources identified by the agency: local, state, and federal.
Revenue by Source | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year |
Local | State | Federal | Revenue Total | |||||||
Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue |
Click [show] on the right to display the revenue data for prior years. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | $545,329,000 | 38.08% | $709,341,000 | 49.53% | $177,364,000 | 12.39% | $1,432,034,000 | ||||
1994 | $537,613,000 | 37.95% | $715,157,000 | 50.49% | $163,776,000 | 11.56% | $1,416,546,000 | ||||
1995 | $541,323,000 | 37.95% | $721,578,000 | 50.59% | $163,445,000 | 11.46% | $1,426,346,000 | ||||
1996 | $587,851,000 | 39.06% | $757,631,000 | 50.34% | $159,471,000 | 10.60% | $1,504,953,000 | ||||
1997 | $649,732,000 | 40.59% | $775,718,000 | 48.46% | $175,280,000 | 10.95% | $1,600,730,000 | ||||
1998 | $600,720,000 | 38.65% | $771,302,000 | 49.63% | $182,186,000 | 11.72% | $1,554,208,000 | ||||
1999 | $633,557,000 | 38.69% | $810,100,000 | 49.48% | $193,693,000 | 11.83% | $1,637,350,000 | ||||
2000 | $615,170,000 | 36.89% | $831,061,000 | 49.84% | $221,366,000 | 13.27% | $1,667,597,000 | ||||
2001 | $639,457,000 | 36.92% | $854,006,000 | 49.30% | $238,677,000 | 13.78% | $1,732,140,000 | ||||
2002 | $674,462,000 | 36.45% | $924,052,000 | 49.93% | $252,091,000 | 13.62% | $1,850,605,000 | ||||
2003 | $701,504,000 | 34.98% | $1,020,091,000 | 50.87% | $283,834,000 | 14.15% | $2,005,429,000 | ||||
2004 | $721,367,000 | 34.16% | $1,057,020,000 | 50.05% | $333,586,000 | 15.79% | $2,111,973,000 | ||||
2005 | $794,794,000 | 34.68% | $1,152,984,000 | 50.31% | $343,999,000 | 15.01% | $2,291,777,000 | ||||
2006 | $796,963,000 | 33.90% | $1,211,038,000 | 51.51% | $342,845,000 | 14.58% | $2,350,846,000 | ||||
2007 | $826,059,000 | 33.83% | $1,303,631,000 | 53.40% | $311,782,000 | 12.77% | $2,441,472,000 | ||||
2008 | $887,680,000 | 34.57% | $1,368,208,000 | 53.29% | $311,595,000 | 12.14% | $2,567,483,000 | ||||
2009 | $864,614,000 | 32.37% | $1,479,741,000 | 55.40% | $326,710,000 | 12.23% | $2,671,065,000 |
2010 | $859,639,000 | 30.36% | $1,415,203,000 | 49.98% | $556,585,000 | 19.66% | $2,831,427,000 |
2011 | $848,447,000 | 29.29% | $1,411,582,000 | 48.73% | $636,770,000 | 21.98% | $2,896,799,000 |
2012 | $936,603,000 | 34.92% | $1,292,598,000 | 48.20% | $452,562,000 | 16.88% | $2,681,763,000 |
2013 | $980,119,000 | 35.73% | $1,333,752,000 | 48.62% | $429,562,000 | 15.66% | $2,743,433,000 |
Avg. | $725,857,286 | 35.72% | $1,043,609,238 | 50.38% | $297,960,905 | 13.91% | $2,067,427,429 |
The table below separates the district's expenditures into five categories identified by the agency:
Expenditures by Category | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year |
Instruction | Support Services | Capital Spending | Debt & Gov. Payments | Other | Budget Total | |||||
Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget |
Click [show] on the right to display the expenditure data for prior years. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | $830,498,000 | 55.05% | $472,478,000 | 31.32% | $46,422,000 | 3.08% | $32,307,000 | 2.14% | $126,817,000 | 8.41% | $1,508,522,000 |
1994 | $667,970,000 | 45.77% | $456,703,000 | 31.29% | $62,707,000 | 4.30% | $53,297,000 | 3.65% | $218,816,000 | 14.99% | $1,459,493,000 |
1995 | $683,068,000 | 50.47% | $419,350,000 | 30.99% | $8,400,000 | 0.62% | $31,857,000 | 2.35% | $210,637,000 | 15.56% | $1,353,312,000 |
1996 | $716,376,000 | 49.29% | $457,199,000 | 31.46% | $11,876,000 | 0.82% | $32,261,000 | 2.22% | $235,679,000 | 16.22% | $1,453,391,000 |
1997 | $742,685,000 | 48.82% | $474,222,000 | 31.17% | $13,339,000 | 0.88% | $46,279,000 | 3.04% | $244,753,000 | 16.09% | $1,521,278,000 |
1998 | $733,824,000 | 48.57% | $479,846,000 | 31.76% | $13,584,000 | 0.90% | $43,776,000 | 2.90% | $239,755,000 | 15.87% | $1,510,785,000 |
1999 | $728,268,000 | 41.90% | $524,252,000 | 30.16% | $150,838,000 | 8.68% | $51,231,000 | 2.95% | $283,471,000 | 16.31% | $1,738,060,000 |
2000 | $726,001,000 | 39.69% | $584,904,000 | 31.97% | $156,675,000 | 8.56% | $49,624,000 | 2.71% | $312,095,000 | 17.06% | $1,829,299,000 |
2001 | $788,137,000 | 40.21% | $609,509,000 | 31.10% | $161,899,000 | 8.26% | $55,004,000 | 2.81% | $345,581,000 | 17.63% | $1,960,130,000 |
2002 | $794,278,000 | 39.97% | $613,515,000 | 30.88% | $141,936,000 | 7.14% | $53,476,000 | 2.69% | $383,815,000 | 19.32% | $1,987,020,000 |
2003 | $834,962,000 | 40.94% | $620,639,000 | 30.43% | $67,160,000 | 3.29% | $72,219,000 | 3.54% | $444,409,000 | 21.79% | $2,039,389,000 |
2004 | $907,007,000 | 37.45% | $715,853,000 | 29.56% | $147,005,000 | 6.07% | $157,514,000 | 6.50% | $494,379,000 | 20.41% | $2,421,758,000 |
2005 | $922,485,000 | 36.44% | $733,786,000 | 28.99% | $209,732,000 | 8.29% | $130,817,000 | 5.17% | $534,603,000 | 21.12% | $2,531,423,000 |
2006 | $903,805,000 | 34.66% | $749,560,000 | 28.74% | $237,165,000 | 9.09% | $136,140,000 | 5.22% | $581,162,000 | 22.29% | $2,607,832,000 |
2007 | $840,547,000 | 31.28% | $760,947,000 | 28.32% | $334,395,000 | 12.44% | $154,819,000 | 5.76% | $596,706,000 | 22.20% | $2,687,414,000 |
2008 | $872,336,000 | 30.82% | $750,851,000 | 26.53% | $387,859,000 | 13.70% | $172,100,000 | 6.08% | $647,291,000 | 22.87% | $2,830,437,000 |
2009 | $956,638,000 | 34.64% | $774,387,000 | 28.04% | $249,282,000 | 9.03% | $84,701,000 | 3.07% | $697,014,000 | 25.24% | $2,762,022,000 |
2010 | $1,082,196,000 | 36.68% | $809,468,000 | 27.43% | $180,847,000 | 6.13% | $135,772,000 | 4.60% | $742,259,000 | 25.16% | $2,950,542,000 |
2011 | $1,109,832,000 | 35.31% | $824,572,000 | 26.24% | $203,291,000 | 6.47% | $147,097,000 | 4.68% | $858,187,000 | 27.30% | $3,142,979,000 |
2012 | $993,871,000 | 35.32% | $689,868,000 | 24.52% | $89,663,000 | 3.19% | $132,414,000 | 4.71% | $908,096,000 | 32.27% | $2,813,912,000 |
2013 | $1,695,669,000 | 46.74% | $688,221,000 | 18.97% | $80,438,000 | 2.22% | $150,225,000 | 4.14% | $1,012,963,000 | 27.92% | $3,627,516,000 |
Avg. | $882,402,524 | 40.95% | $629,053,810 | 29.04% | $140,691,095 | 5.86% | $91,568,095 | 3.85% | $481,832,762 | 20.29% | $2,225,548,286 |
The table below shows the amount of debt retired, issued, and outstanding in the district for each year.
Debt | |||
---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year |
Retired | Issued | Outstanding |
Click [show] on the right to display the debt data for prior years. | |||
---|---|---|---|
1993 | $236,283,000 | $214,816,000 | $782,436,000 |
1994 | $30,686,000 | $184,985,000 | $936,268,000 |
1995 | $35,452,000 | $18,484,000 | $690,995,000 |
1996 | $89,744,000 | $234,769,000 | $832,000,000 |
1997 | $90,722,000 | $166,204,000 | $908,728,000 |
1998 | $15,097,000 | $33,417,000 | $915,981,000 |
1999 | $146,529,000 | $257,328,000 | $1,021,706,000 |
2000 | $115,688,000 | $221,537,000 | $1,118,670,000 |
2001 | $47,189,000 | $206,309,000 | $1,261,372,000 |
2002 | $35,223,000 | $475,029,000 | $1,974,107,000 |
2003 | $100,834,000 | $180,130,000 | $2,053,403,000 |
2004 | $1,460,637,000 | $2,396,537,000 | $2,989,303,000 |
2005 | $411,733,000 | $454,850,000 | $3,032,421,000 |
2006 | $36,691,000 | $141,361,000 | $3,137,091,000 |
2007 | $757,616,000 | $1,009,225,000 | $3,336,074,000 |
2008 | $749,376,000 | $724,300,000 | $3,275,519,000 |
2009 | $284,718,000 | $496,565,000 | $3,496,553,000 |
2010 | $429,497,000 | $676,295,000 | $3,738,134,000 |
2011 | $439,412,000 | $425,880,000 | $2,980,922,000 |
2012 | $91,117,000 | $254,423,000 | $3,144,227,000 |
2013 | $114,204,000 | $264,995,000 | $3,295,018,000 |
Avg. | $272,307,048 | $430,354,238 | $2,139,091,810 |
The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.
Year | Minimum | Maximum |
---|---|---|
2020-2021[8] | $47,191 | $90,218 |
Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[9]
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[10]
School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 23 | 57 | 13 | 15 | 20-24 | 29 | 44 |
2017-2018 | 22 | 55 | 13 | 14 | 15-19 | 30 | 41 |
2016-2017 | 20 | 53 | 12 | 13 | 25-29 | 26 | 39 |
2015-2016 | 21 | 52 | 13 | 14 | 25-29 | 25 | 39 |
2014-2015 | 19 | 51 | 12 | 12 | 20-24 | 24 | 36 |
2013-2014 | 44 | 76 | 36 | 38 | 50-54 | 49 | 64 |
2012-2013 | 46 | 75 | 38 | 40 | 45-49 | 53 | 66 |
2011-2012 | 49 | 79 | 41 | 43 | 55-59 | 59 | 68 |
2010-2011 | 57 | 83 | 52 | 53 | 65-69 | 67 | 73 |
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[10]
School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 37 | 65 | 28 | 29 | 35-39 | 41 | 59 |
2017-2018 | 37 | 65 | 28 | 28 | 35-39 | 43 | 58 |
2016-2017 | 35 | 63 | 27 | 26 | 40-44 | 40 | 55 |
2015-2016 | 35 | 61 | 27 | 26 | 35-39 | 39 | 55 |
2014-2015 | 34 | 60 | 27 | 26 | 45-49 | 40 | 54 |
2013-2014 | 43 | 66 | 38 | 35 | 45-49 | 47 | 62 |
2012-2013 | 44 | 66 | 38 | 37 | 50-54 | 50 | 62 |
2011-2012 | 44 | 66 | 39 | 38 | 55-59 | 53 | 63 |
2010-2011 | 51 | 70 | 47 | 45 | 60-64 | 61 | 69 |
The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:[10][11]
School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-2018 | 63 | 85 | 61 | 56 | ≥50 | 62 | 68 |
2016-2017 | 67 | 85 | 65 | 61 | 60-79 | 74 | 74 |
2015-2016 | 69 | 83 | 66 | 63 | 60-79 | 75-79 | 75 |
2014-2015 | 65 | 80 | 65 | 53 | 60-79 | 70-74 | 71 |
2013-2014 | 68 | 83 | 67 | 60 | 60-79 | 80-84 | 70 |
2012-2013 | 70 | 84 | 69 | 62 | 40-59 | 75-79 | 77 |
2011-2012 | 62 | 75 | 61 | 53 | 40-59 | 60-64 | 65 |
2010-2011 | 55 | 72 | 56 | 44 | 40-59 | ≤5 | 55 |
Year[12] | Enrollment | Year-to-year change (%) |
---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 128,647 | 1.1 |
2017-2018 | 127,202 | -2.9 |
2016-2017 | 131,052 | -0.2 |
2015-2016 | 131,295 | 0.5 |
2014-2015 | 130,664 | -2.3 |
2013-2014 | 133,703 | -4.2 |
2012-2013 | 139,503 | -4.8 |
2011-2012 | 146,482 | -6.0 |
2010-2011 | 155,856 | -0.6 |
2009-2010 | 156,790 | -1.9 |
2008-2009 | 159,867 | -5.1 |
2007-2008 | 168,457 | -3.6 |
2006-2007 | 174,718 | -4.6 |
2005-2006 | 183,188 | -1.5 |
2004-2005 | 186,051 | -2.0 |
2003-2004 | 189,779 | -1.5 |
2002-2003 | 192,683 | -2.2 |
2001-2002 | 197,083 | -2.0 |
2000-2001 | 201,190 | -2.0 |
1999-2000 | 205,199 | -1.1 |
1998-1999 | 207,465 | -2.5 |
1997-1998 | 212,865 | 0.3 |
1996-1997 | 212,150 | 0.8 |
1995-1996 | 210,503 | 0.9 |
1994-1995 | 208,710 | 0.5 |
1993-1994 | 207,667 | 3.1 |
1992-1993 | 201,496 | 2.9 |
1991-1992 | 195,735 | 2.5 |
1990-1991 | 190,978 | 0.8 |
1989-1990 | 189,451 | -0.9 |
1988-1989 | 191,141 | 1.1 |
1987-1988 | 189,031 | -4.5 |
1986-1987 | 197,843 | - |
During the 2018-2019 school year, 99.9% of the district's students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 12.1% were English language learners, and 18.2% of students had an Individual Education Plan (IEP) .[14]
Racial Demographics, 2018-2019 | ||
---|---|---|
Race | School District of Philadelphia (%) | Pennsylvania K-12 students (%) |
American Indian/Alaska Native | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander | 8.9 | 4.0 |
Black | 48.6 | 14.8 |
Hispanic | 21.4 | 12.1 |
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Two or More Races | 6.5 | 4.2 |
White | 14.2 | 64.7 |
Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.
The School District of Philadelphia has never been run by an elected school board, a unique situation among Pennsylvania school districts. The board was selected by the city's common pleas judge from 1905 to 1965 when the mayor was given the power to appoint members. In 2001, the mayor consented to the creation of the School Reform Commission (SRC), a five-member board with three members appointed by the governor and two members appointed by the mayor. The SRC was created in the midst of public concerns over district finances and academic performance.[15] The commission was dissolved in 2018.[3]
A push for local control gained momentum in 2015 with voter approval of a non-binding ballot question seeking the end of the SRC. Former Mayor Michael Nutter called for the end of the commission before leaving office, and successor James Kenney supported more local control once the district improved its finances.[16] The SRC was also analyzed by The Pew Charitable Trusts in a January 2016 report. The Pew report concluded with the following statement:[15]
“ |
Education experts say that state takeovers of local districts have, at least in some cases, cured financial ills created through mismanagement. But there is no indication that any particular system for governing urban school districts is superior to another in improving long-term academic performance. Too many other factors, experts say, help determine what happens in the classroom, including the quality of principals and teachers, funding, and parental expectations. There is broad agreement on at least one conclusion: Governance systems that produce uncertainty, distrust, and ambiguous accountability can impede districts’ progress on any front.[6] |
” |
School District of Philadelphia
440 N. Broad St.
Philadelphia, PA 19130
Phone: 215-400-4000
Pennsylvania | School Board Elections | News and Analysis |
---|---|---|
|
State of Pennsylvania Harrisburg (capital) | |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2021 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |