A “yes” vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.12 per square foot for residential and commercial properties and $16.00 per acre for agricultural land, thereby generating an estimated $300,000 per year for the Kenwood Fire Protection District, as well as increasing the District's spending limit to allow for spending of the revenue generated by the parcel tax.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $0.12 per square foot for residential and commercial properties and $16.00 per acre for agricultural land.

A “yes” vote supported renewing for 10 years an existing annual parcel tax of $250 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $3,800,000 per year for hospital services.

A “no” vote opposed renewing for 10 years an existing annual parcel tax of $250 per parcel, thereby allowing the existing parcel tax to expire on June 30, 2022.

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to impose for eight years an annual parcel tax within Special Tax Zone 1 of $400 per residential parcel, $400 per commercial parcel, and $50 per vacant parcel to generate an estimated $50,000 per year in revenue and increasing the district's appropriations limit for four years to allow the district to spend the additional revenue.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to impose for eight years an annual parcel tax within Special Tax Zone 1 of $400 per residential parcel, $400 per commercial parcel, and $50 per vacant parcel.

A “yes” vote supports authorizing an additional 4% hotel tax in West County for hotels and short-term rentals with revenue dedicated to paramedic emergency medical and rescue services provided by local fire agencies, and West County schools and education; increasing the total hotel tax in West County from 12% to 16%, and generating an estimated  $2,700,000 per year.

A “no” vote opposes authorizing an additional 4% hotel tax in West County for hotels and short-term rentals with revenue dedicated to paramedic emergency medical and rescue services provided by local fire agencies, and West County schools and education; thereby leaving the existing total hotel tax in West County at 12%.

A “yes” vote supports authorizing for three years an annual parcel tax of $48 per parcel with an exception for seniors, thereby generating an estimated $1,150,000 per year for education.

A “no” vote opposes authorizing for three years an annual parcel tax of $48 per parcel with an exception for seniors.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension to the 3% utility users tax generating an estimated $445,000 per year for city services including street repair, installation of power backup systems, natural disaster and health emergency preparedness, and youth programs.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension to the 3% utility users tax generating an estimated $445,000 per year for city services including street repair, installation of power backup systems, natural disaster and health emergency preparedness, and youth programs.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension of a 1% sales tax generating an estimated $2.2 million per year for city services including emergency response, public safety, domestic violence response, natural disaster preparedness, street repair and parks.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension of a 1% sales tax generating an estimated $2.2 million per year for city services including emergency response, public safety, domestic violence response, natural disaster preparedness, street repair and parks.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for eight years an annual parcel tax of $48 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $34,000 per year for support of academic programs, library services and transportation services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for eight years an annual parcel tax of $48 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $34,000 per year for support of academic programs, library services and transportation services.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension of a 0.5% sales tax generating an estimated $2.1 million per year for essential services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension of a 0.5% sales tax generating an estimated $2.1 million per year for essential services, thereby allowing the tax to expire in 2022.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an increase to the district's appropriations limit for four years.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an increase to the district's appropriations limit for four years.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the sale of Healdsburg District Hospital to NorCal HealthConnect, LLC to continue the provision of emergency, inpatient and outpatient services to local residents.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the sale of Healdsburg District Hospital to NorCal HealthConnect, LLC to continue the provision of emergency, inpatient and outpatient services to local residents.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $13.5 million per year for essential services including natural disaster and health emergency preparedness, emergency response, fire services, law enforcement, street repair, public safety and local businesses thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Petaluma from 8.25% to 9.25%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 1% generating an estimated $13.5 million per year for essential services including natural disaster and health emergency preparedness, emergency response, fire services, law enforcement, street repair, public safety and local businesses thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Petaluma at 8.25%.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the sale of Petaluma Valley Hospital to NorCal HealthConnect, LLC for $52.6 million to continue provision of 24/7 walk-in emergency care for at least 20 years.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the sale of Petaluma Valley Hospital to NorCal HealthConnect, LLC for $52.6 million to continue provision of 24/7 walk-in emergency care for at least 20 years.

A “yes” vote supported extending a sales tax of 0.5% for ten years generating an estimated $18 million per year for city services including emergency response, disaster, wildfire and pandemic preparedness, park maintenance, street repair, and senior and youth programs.

A “no” vote opposed extending a sales tax of 0.5% for ten years generating an estimated $18 million per year for city services including emergency response, disaster, wildfire and pandemic preparedness, park maintenance, street repair, and senior and youth programs.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for eight years an annual parcel tax of $76 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $331,000 per year for academic programs including reading, writing, math, art, science and music and counseling services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for eight years an annual parcel tax of $76 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $331,000 per year for academic programs including reading, writing, math, art, science and music and counseling services.

A “yes” vote supported renewing for eight years an existing annual parcel tax of $212 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1 million per year for enhancing and maintaining education programs including science, technology, engineering, math, art, music, reading and writing programs.

A “no” vote opposed renewing for eight years an existing annual parcel tax of $212 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1 million per year for enhancing and maintaining education programs including science, technology, engineering, math, art, music, reading and writing programs.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for ten years an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.94 million per year for wildfire prevention, clearing dry brush, protecting open space, park ranger patrols, and protecting water quality.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for ten years an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $1.94 million per year for wildfire prevention, clearing dry brush, protecting open space, park ranger patrols, and protecting water quality.

A "yes" vote supported prohibiting parking vehicles that are more than 22 feet in length, seven feet in height, or seven feet in width (such as RVs, boats, and large trucks) on streets 40 feet or less in width, with exceptions for certain wheelchair accessible vehicles with disabled placards.

A "no" vote opposed this measure prohibiting parking vehicles that are more than 22 feet in length, seven feet in height, or seven feet in width (such as RVs, boats, and large trucks) on streets 40 feet or less in width, with exceptions for certain wheelchair accessible vehicles with disabled placards.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing the district to issue up to $12 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing the district to issue up to $12 million in bonds and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $30 per $100,000 in assessed value.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing regulations and licensing requirements for industrial marijuana businesses.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing regulations and licensing requirements for industrial marijuana businesses.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 20 years an extension of a 0.25% sales tax generating an estimated $26 million per year for transportation including road repair, traffic reduction, safer biking and walking paths, local bus services, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, improvements to evacuation routes and enhanced services for seniors and students.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 20 years an extension of a 0.25% sales tax generating an estimated $26 million per year for transportation including road repair, traffic reduction, safer biking and walking paths, local bus services, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, improvements to evacuation routes and enhanced services for seniors and students.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% for ten years generating an estimated $25 million per year for mental health, addiction and homeless services, thereby increasing the total sales tax rate in Sonoma County from 8.25% to 8.5%.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an additional sales tax of 0.25% for ten years generating an estimated $25 million per year for mental health, addiction and homeless services, thereby leaving the existing total sales tax rate in Sonoma County at 8.25%.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing an extension to the 3.25% utility users tax for nine years, generating an estimated $2.75 million per year for city services including emergency response, public safety, street repair, parks, law enforcement and crime and gang prevention.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing an extension to the 3.25% utility users tax for nine years, thereby allowing the tax to expire on December 31, 2020.

A “yes” vote supported authorizing for 15 years an annual parcel tax of $185 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $92,500 per year for fire and rescue training, equipment and services.

A “no” vote opposed authorizing for 15 years an annual parcel tax of $185 per parcel, thereby generating an estimated $92,500 per year for fire and rescue training, equipment and services.

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to increase its annual parcel tax to $61 per unit of benefit (ranging from $61 to $1,220 per year depending on the property type), thereby generating an estimated $1.18 million per year in revenue to fund emergency medical services.

A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to increase its annual parcel tax to $61 per unit of benefit (ranging from $61 to $1,220 per year depending on the property type), thereby leaving the existing rate of $44 per unit of benefit (ranging from $44 to $880 per year depending on property type.

A "yes" vote supported authorizing the district to increase its annual parcel tax rate to between $160 and $240 for residential parcel depending on size and to $0.11 per sq. ft. for non-residential buildings, $54 per building for agricultural structures, and $170 for every vacant parcel or parcel above 20 acres for fire services; allow for inflation adjustments; and increase the districts spending limit by the amount of the tax revenue (an estimated $650,000 per year).

A "no" vote opposed authorizing the district to increase its annual parcel tax rate to between $160 and $240 for residential parcel depending on size and to $0.11 per sq. ft. for non-residential buildings, $54 per building for agricultural structures, and $170 for every vacant parcel or parcel above 20 acres for fire services.