Click here to view the results of the 2024 state legislative elections.
In the 50 states, there are 99 state legislative chambers altogether. Across 44 states, 85 of those chambers held regular legislative elections in 2024. These elections were for 5,807 of the country's 7,386 state legislative seats (79%). The general election for state legislative races was held on November 5, 2024.
Two state legislative chambers, the Michigan and Minnesota state Houses, changed party control following the 2024 general election. Republicans won control of the Michigan House from Democrats, and won a tie in the Minnesota House.
To learn more about the state legislative races that were on your ballot, click here to use our Sample Ballot Lookup tool.
Two state legislative chambers, the Michigan and Minnesota state Houses, changed party control following the 2024 general election. Republicans won control of the Michigan House from Democrats, and secured a tie in the Minnesota House.
There were elections for the members of 85 of the nation's 99 legislative chambers in 2024, representing 5,807 of the country's 7,386 state legislative seats (79%). Heading into the elections, Democrats controlled 33 of those chambers, Republicans controlled 50, and two chambers had power-sharing agreements. Afterwards, Democrats controlled 31, Republicans controlled 51, two had power-sharing agreements, and one was tied.
In total, Democrats controlled 39 chambers after the 2024 elections, Republicans controlled 57 chambers, power-sharing coalitions controlled two chambers, and one chamber was tied.
As a result of the 2024 elections, Democrats had a net loss of 32 state legislative seats, Republicans had a net gain of 42 seats, and Independents and minor party officeholders had a net gain of 16 seats.
Most chambers saw minor changes to partisan composition. Republicans recorded their biggest gains in New Hampshire, Maine, Michigan, and Vermont. Republicans expanded their majority in both New Hampshire chambers, reduced the Democratic majority in both Maine legislative chambers, won control of the Michigan House and broke the state’s Democratic trifecta, and broke the Democratic supermajority in Vermont.
Democrats recorded their biggest gains in Montana and Wisconsin. Democrats broke the Republican supermajority in Montana and in the Wisconsin Senate.
Democratic trifectas in Michigan and Minnesota were lost as a result of the 2024 elections. Republicans neither gained nor lost trifectas.
Forty-four states held elections for at least one state legislative chamber. Heading into the elections, 15 of those states had Democratic trifectas, 20 had Republican trifectas, and nine had divided governments. Afterwards, 13 had Democratic trifectas, 20 had Republican trifectas, and 11 had divided governments.
In total, there were 17 Democratic trifectas, 23 Republican trifectas, and 10 divided governments before the 2024 elections. After the elections, there were 15 Democratic trifectas (a loss of two), 23 Republican trifectas, and 12 divided governments (an increase of two).
Of states that held legislative elections in 2024, eight state legislatures had Democratic supermajorities in both chambers, 18 had Republican supermajorities in both chambers, and neither party had a supermajority in 18 states before the election. After the election, seven state legislatures had Democratic supermajorities in both chambers, 18 had Republican supermajorities in both chambers, and neither party had a supermajority in 19 states.
In total across all 50 states, there were veto-proof majorities in 29 state legislatures before the election—nine Democratic and 20 Republican. After the election, there were veto-proof majorities in 28 state legislatures—eight Democratic (a loss of one) and 20 Republican.
Heading into the 2024 elections, four states had a governor of one party and a veto-proof state legislative majority of the opposing party: Kansas, Kentucky, North Carolina, and Vermont. After the elections, Kansas and Kentucky maintained that status, North Carolina and Vermont lost that status, and no new state became a veto-proof legislature with an opposing party governor.
The average margin of victory in the 2024 state legislative elections was 27.3%. Click here to read more.
The map below highlights states that held state legislative elections in 2024 by partisan control.
As of January 25th, 2026, Republicans controlled 55.12% of all state legislative seats nationally, while Democrats held 43.83%. Republicans held a majority in 57 chambers, and Democrats held the majority in 39 chambers. Two chambers (Alaska House and Alaska Senate) were organized under multipartisan, power-sharing coalitions. One chamber (Minnesota House of Representatives) was split evenly between both parties.
Partisan balance of all 7,386 state legislative seats
State government trifecta is a term to describe single-party government, when one political party holds the governorship and majorities in both chambers of the state legislature.
After the 2024 elections, there were 15 Democratic trifectas, 23 Republican trifectas, and 12 divided governments.
Alaska's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Alaska legislators assume office on the third Tuesday of January following their election.[1][2]
Arizona's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Arizona legislators assume office on the first day of the session after they are elected. Each regular session begins on the second Monday in January.[3] Members are limited to four consecutive terms, or a total of eight years in each chamber.
Arkansas' state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Arkansas legislators assume office on the second Monday of January following their election.[4] Members are limited to 16 years in the general assembly.
California's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
California legislators assume office the first Monday in the December following their election.[5] Members are limited to 12 years in the state legislature.
Colorado's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Colorado legislators assume office on the first day of the legislative session after their election. The legislative session must begin no later than 10:00 AM on the second Wednesday of January.[6] The state constitution requires the newly elected governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, treasurer, and secretary of state to take office on the second Tuesday of January.[7] In the year after those offices are elected, the legislative session must begin before the second Tuesday of January to declare the winners of those races.[8][9] Senators are limited to two consecutive terms and representatives are limited to four consecutive terms, or a total of eight years in each chamber.
Connecticut's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Connecticut legislators assume office the Wednesday following the first Monday of January after their election.[10]
Delaware's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Delaware legislators assume office the first Wednesday after the first Monday in November (the day after election day).[11][12]
Florida's state senators are elected to two or four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Florida legislators assume office on the day they are elected in the general election.[13] Senators are limited to two consecutive terms and representatives are limited to four consecutive terms, or a total of eight years in each chamber.
Hawaii's state senators are elected to two or four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Hawaii legislators assume office on the day they are elected in the general election.[15]
Idaho's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Idaho legislators assume office on the first day in December following the general election.[16]
Illinois' state senators are elected to two or four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Illinois legislators assume office the second Wednesday in January.[17]
Indiana's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Indiana legislators assume office the day after their general election.[18]
Iowa's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Iowa state senators assume office on the first day of January which is not a Sunday or legal holiday.[19][20]
Iowa state representatives always assume office the first day of January after their election.[21]
Kansas' state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Kansas legislators assume office the second Monday of January after their election.[22]
Kentucky's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Kentucky legislators assume office the first day of January after their election.[23]
Maine's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Maine legislators assume office the day before the first Wednesday of December following the general election.[24][25] Members are limited to four consecutive terms, or a total of eight years in each chamber.
Massachusetts' state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Massachusetts legislators assume office the first Wednesday in January after the election.[26]
Michigan did not hold any regular state senate elections in 2024. Michigan's state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Michigan legislators assume office at noon on the first day of January.[27] Representatives are limited to 12 combined years in the Legislature.
Minnesota did not hold any regular state senate elections in 2024. Minnesota's state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Minnesota legislators assume office on the first Tuesday after the second Monday in January after the election.[28][29]
Missouri's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Missouri legislators assume office the first day of the legislative session, which is the first Wednesday after the first Monday in January at 12:00pm.[30] Senators are limited to two consecutive terms and representatives are limited to four consecutive terms, or a total of eight years in each chamber.
Montana's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Montana legislators assume office the first Monday of January following the election. If January 1 is a Monday, legislators assume office on the first Wednesday.[31] Senators are limited to two terms and representatives are limited to four terms, or a total of eight years in each chamber.
Nebraska's state senators are elected to four-year terms.
Nebraska legislators assume office the first Wednesday after the first Monday in January.[32] Members are limited to two consecutive terms, or a total of eight years in the chamber.
Nevada's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Nevada legislators assume office on the first Wednesday after the first Monday in November (the day after election day).[33] Senators are limited to three terms and representatives are limited to six terms, or a total of 12 years in each chamber.
New Hampshire's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
New Hampshire legislators assume office on the first Wednesday of December following the general election.[34]
New Mexico's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
New Mexico legislators assume office on the first day of January after a general election.[35]
New York's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
New York legislators assume office the first day of January after a general election.[36]
North Carolina's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
North Carolina legislators assume office on January 1 the year after their election.[37]
North Dakota's state senators and representatives are elected to four-year terms.
North Dakota legislators assume office December 1st.[38] Members are limited to two four-year terms. The first year that the term limits enacted in 2022 will impact the ability of incumbents to run for office is 2030.
Ohio's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Ohio legislators assume office the first day of January after a general election.[39][40] Senators are limited to two consecutive terms and representatives are limited to four consecutive terms, or a total of eight years in each chamber.
Oklahoma's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Oklahoma legislators assume office 15 days following the general election.[41][42] Members are limited to 12 years in the state legislature.
Oregon's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Oregon legislators assume office the second Monday in January following the election.[43]
Pennsylvania's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Pennsylvania legislators assume office on the first day of December after a general election.[44]
Rhode Island's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Rhode Island legislators assume office the first Tuesday in January.[45]
South Carolina's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
South Carolina legislators assume office the Monday after the election.[46]
South Dakota's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
South Dakota legislators assume office the second Tuesday in January after the general election.[47] Members are limited to four consecutive terms, or a total of eight years in each chamber.
Tennessee's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Tennessee legislators assume office on the day they are elected in the general election.[48]
Texas' state senators are elected to two or four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Texas legislators assume office at the beginning of the legislative session, which starts at noon on the second Tuesday in January in the year after the election.[49][50]
Utah's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Utah legislators assume office the first day in January.[51][52]
Vermont's state senators and representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Vermont legislators assume office the first Wednesday after the first Monday in January after the election.[53]
Washington's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Washington legislators assume office the second Monday of January.[54]
West Virginia's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
West Virginia legislators assume office on the first day of December following their election.[55]
Wisconsin's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Wisconsin legislators assume office the first Monday in January following the election, unless the first Monday of January falls on January 1 or 2. In those cases, legislators assume office on January 3.[56]
Wyoming's state senators are elected to four-year terms and state representatives are elected to two-year terms.
Wyoming legislators assume office the first Monday in January in odd-numbered years.[57]
The following legislative chamber race ratings came from CNalysis and Sabato's Crystal Ball.[58][59] Use the arrows in the upper righthand corner of the table below to see more states' chamber ratings. You may also search by state, chamber, or rating in the upper lefthand corner.
Of the 85 chambers that held regularly-scheduled elections in 2024, Ballotpedia identified 11 battleground chambers in seven states. We anticipated that these chambers would be more competitive overall and had the potential to see major shifts in party control.
The columns in the chart below list the following:
Seats up in 2024: This was the number of seats that were up for election in 2024.
Margin: This was the difference in seats between the majority and minority parties.
Majority share of seats: This was the percentage of the chamber's seats controlled by the majority party.
Last time party control changed: This was the election where the majority at the time of the 2024 elections took control of the chamber.
The 2024 elections resulted in the continuation of the bipartisan coalition first established after the November 2022 elections. Click here for more details.
Ten of the Alaska state Senate's 20 seats were up for election on November 5, 2024. Before the election, Republicans represented 11 seats and Democrats represented nine. Following the election, Republicans and Democrats maintained their 11-9 proportion.
Before the election, the Senate was controlled by a 17-member bipartisan governing coalition of all nine Democrats and eight Republicans.[62] Following the election, Senate leadership announced that the coalition would continue.[63] To read more about the Senate's coalition, click here.
Of the 10 seats up for election in 2024, Democrats represented five and Republicans represented five. In the 2024 elections, Democrats were elected to five and Republicans were elected to five. One incumbent did not run for re-election, and one was defeated in the general elections.
Senators serve four-year terms, and half of the Senate is up for election every two years.
Before the election, the Alaska Beacon reported that "a Senate bipartisan majority is expected to continue past this election" due to the number of coalition members who weren't up for re-election, ran unopposed, or won their primaries by a large margin of victory.[64] The outlet reported that "Republicans could still cut the supermajority’s size, which would hobble it on hotly contested issues."[64]
This election used ranked-choice voting. In 2020, Alaska voters approved a ballot measure that implemented a top-four primary system and ranked-choice voting general elections in the state. To read more about the state's voting system, click here.
Of the 10 seats up for election, Ballotpedia identified seven battleground districts. Democrats represented two of these districts, and Republicans represented five. Incumbents ran in six of these districts. Because of Alaska's top-four primary system, incumbents could face challengers from any party in the general election. To read more about the battleground elections, click here.
Alaska is one of 10 states that had a divided government at the time of the 2024 elections, since Republicans controlled the governorship while bipartisan governing coalitions controlled both chambers of the legislature. The outcome of the Senate elections alone could not have changed Alaska's trifecta status because a coalition also controlled the Alaska House of Representatives. If Republicans in both legislative chambers won enough seats to govern without a coalition, the state could have become a Republican trifecta. To read more on potential trifectas in the 2024 elections, click here.
Alaska was one of 44 states holding regular legislative elections across 85 of 99 state legislative chambers in 2024. The primaries were held on August 20, 2024.
A 21-member coalition with a Democratic majority assumed control of the Alaska House of Representatives after the 2024 elections, with the new coalition majority leader being Charles Kopp (R). Click here for more details. As a result of the 2024 elections, there were 21 Republicans, 14 Democrats, and 5 independent members in the chamber.
Elections for all 40 seats in the House took place on November 5, 2024. Ballotpedia identified elections in 15 districts as battleground elections.
Members of the Alaska House formed multipartisan majority coalitions including both Democrats and Republicans after every election between 2016 and 2022. Although Republicans won a majority of seats in all four election years, the coalitions that formed after the 2016, 2018, and 2020 elections all included Democratic majorities, while the coalition that formed after the 2022 election included a Republican majority. The pre-election majority coalition included 20 Republicans, two Democrats, and one independent.
All four majority coalitions included the members of the Bush Caucus, a group of Democratic and independent legislators representing four rural districts in Alaska's north (Districts 37, 38, 39, and 40). Before the election, the Alaska Beacon wrote that the Bush Caucus had influenced Alaska politics for more than five decades because its members "have frequently put regional interests above those of party loyalty, and their willingness to cross the partisan aisle has frequently given them outsized power in the Capitol."[65] The minority coalition included the remaining Democrats and independents as well as Louise Stutes (R). David Eastman (R) did not caucus with either group.[66]
The general election made use of ranked-choice voting, a system where voters rank the candidates on their ballot by preference order rather than being required to vote for a single candidate. Under ranked-choice voting, voters are permitted to vote for a single candidate or to rank fewer than four choices. The primaries used a top-four system where all candidates running for a given office appeared on the same ballot and the top four finishers advanced to the general election. Alaska voters approved both systems via a ballot measure in 2020. Another measure repealing the changes and returning to partisan primaries and single-vote general elections was on the 2024 ballot.
Ballotpedia identified 15 of the 40 House districts as battlegrounds. Members of the Republican-led majority represented 10 battleground districts, while members of the Democratic-led minority represented the other five. The 15 battleground districts included four where the incumbent placed second or third in the top-four primary and five where one or more challengers raised more money than the incumbent. Click here for more on the 15 battleground districts.
The Alaska House elections had the potential to determine the state's trifecta status. Ten of the 20 state Senate seats were also up for election. Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R) was not up for re-election. If Republicans had won control of both chambers, they would have gained a trifecta. Otherwise, Alaska would have retained a divided government. At the time of the 2024 elections, there were 23 states with Republican trifectas, 17 states with Democratic trifectas, and 10 states with divided government. Click here for more on potential changes to state trifecta status in the 2024 elections. For more information on other battleground state legislative elections in 2024, click here.
Before the election, local political observers said a multipartisan coalition including the Bush Caucus in the majority was a possible outcome. According to the Alaska Beacon, before the 2016 elections, "it was common for the Bush Caucus to join Republicans in the majority, the better to advocate for rural priorities."[67] According to the Beacon, "neither Republicans nor Democrats are in position to hold [23] seats, meaning that control of the House could come down to post-election negotiations. "[66]
The Alaska House of Representatives was one of 85 state legislative chambers with elections in 2024. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
All 30 seats in the state Senate were up for election. Following the election, Republicans maintained a 17-13 majority. Arizona also remained a divided government, with a Democrat holding the governorship and Republicans maintaining majorities in the state legislature.
Heading into the elections, Republicans had a 16-14 majority, meaning Democrats needed to win two additional seats to gain a majority, while Republicans needed not to lose any seats to maintain it. The last time Democrats controlled the chamber was in 1992.[68]
The outcome of the Senate elections alone could not change Arizona's trifecta status because Republicans also controlled the House. Arizona was a Republican trifecta from 2009 to 2023. The last time the state was a Democratic trifecta was in 1966.[68]
Before the election, Arizona Mirror’s Jim Small wrote that “Democrats are portraying their Republican opponents as ‘extreme’ and aligned with MAGA politics, while Republicans are casting their challengers as socialists who are too radical for Arizona.”[69]
The general elections took place against the backdrop of the Arizona Supreme Court's 2024 ruling regarding abortion. At the time of the ruling, Arizona had two conflicting abortion laws—an 1864 territorial law banning abortion and a 2022 law with a 15-week ban.[70] The court ruled that the 1864 law took precedence.[70] Before the election, NPR's Ryland Barton wrote, "Democrats are taking aim at GOP lawmakers who voted against repealing the ban.”[71] The Senate voted to repeal the law 16-14.[70]
Before the election, NPR’s Ben Giles wrote that Republicans “view immigration as a key issue here in Arizona, where voters do feel like there is a problem at the border with the number of border crossings that are happening day to day here in Arizona.”[72]NBC News’ Adam Edelman wrote that the Republican State Leadership Committee released “ads on behalf of Republicans in three competitive districts that attacked Democrats on those issues.”[73]
Ballotpedia identified seven battleground districts. Before the election, CNalysis identified one as Lean Democratic, one as Tilt Democratic, two as Likely Democratic, two as Toss-Up, and one as Very Likely Republican. Incumbents ran in six races, while one was in an open district, meaning an incumbent did not run. Click here to read more about the battleground elections.
Two incumbents lost in the primaries and one lost in the generals. Click here to learn more.
All 60 seats in the state House were up for election. Heading into the elections, Republicans had a 31-29 majority. Following the election, Republicans maintained a 33-27 majority. Arizona also remained a divided government, with a Democrat holding the governorship and Republicans maintaining majorities in the Legislature. The last time Democrats controlled the chamber was in 1966.[68]
At the time of the election, Arizona was one of 10 states with a divided government, since Democrats controlled the governorship and Republicans controlled both chambers of the Legislature. The outcome of the House elections alone could not have changed Arizona's trifecta status because Republicans also controlled the Senate. Arizona had a Republican trifecta from 2009 to 2023. The last time the state had a Democratic trifecta was in 1966.[68]
Before the election, Arizona Mirror’s Jim Small wrote, “Democrats are portraying their Republican opponents as ‘extreme’ and aligned with MAGA politics, while Republicans are casting their challengers as socialists who are too radical for Arizona.”[74]
The general elections took place against the backdrop of the Arizona Supreme Court's 2024 ruling regarding abortion. At the time of the ruling, Arizona had two conflicting abortion laws—an 1864 territorial law banning abortion and a 2022 law with a 15-week ban.[70] The court ruled that the 1864 law took precedence.[70] Before the election, NPR's Ryland Barton wrote, "Democrats are taking aim at GOP lawmakers who voted against repealing the ban.”[75] The House voted to repeal the law 32-28.[76]
Before the election, NPR’s Ben Giles wrote that Republicans “view immigration as a key issue here in Arizona, where voters do feel like there is a problem at the border with the number of border crossings that are happening day to day here in Arizona.”[77]NBC News’ Adam Edelman wrote that the Republican State Leadership Committee released “ads on behalf of Republicans in three competitive districts that attacked Democrats on those issues.”[78]
Arizona is one of 10 states in which at least one chamber uses multi-member districts. In the case of Arizona, the top two vote-getting candidates in each House race represent one district.
Ballotpedia identified nine battleground districts. Before the election, CNalysis identified the seats in these districts as ranging from Solid Republican or Solid Democratic to Toss-Up. Both incumbents ran in four districts, while at least one incumbent did not run in five districts. Click here to read more about the battleground elections.
One incumbent lost in the primary elections and two incumbents lost in the general elections. Click here to learn more.
All 40 seats in the Kansas Senate were up for election on November 5, 2024. Before the election, Republicans held a 29-11 veto-proof majority in the chamber, and members were elected to four-year terms. Following the election, Republicans maintained a 31-9 veto-proof majority.
Democrats would have needed to gain three House seats or three Senate seats to block a Republican supermajority. To maintain their supermajority, Republicans needed to lose fewer than two House seats and fewer than three Senate seats.
Kansas was one of 10 states that had a divided government. The outcome of the Senate elections alone could not have changed Kansas' trifecta status because Republicans also controlled the House.
Before the elections, Kansas City News Service's Zane Irwin said the partisan composition of the Legislature could have implications on the state's abortion policies. In 2022, voters rejected a ballot measure that would have prohibited the state from adding a Constitutional right to abortion. In 2024, the Legislature overrode Gov. Kelly's veto on HB2749, which requires healthcare providers ask women questions about why they're getting an abortion.[79] Irwin also said, "[Democrats] are trying to block a flat tax. Republicans repeatedly have tried to pass a flat tax. Right now we have a multi-tiered tax system, and Republicans would like to bring it to where there's one rate that you pay in Kansas whether you are a low-income individual or are a millionaire. Republicans say that would provide broad-base tax relief at a time when our coffers are relatively flush. Democrats say that it would bring us back to a more austere era under Gov. Sam Brownback (R) where there were major tax cuts, and Democrats were worried that that would cause cuts to social services like schools and roads."[80]
There were 11 open seats in the Senate, the most since Ballotpedia began tracking this data in 2012. Of those open districts, Ballotpedia identified two as battlegrounds. Ballotpedia also identified six battleground districts in which incumbents sought re-election. Republicans represented five of the eight total battleground districts and Democrats represented three. As of Oct. 30, 2024, CNalysis identified four of these districts as Toss-Up, one as Tilt Democratic, one as Lean Democratic, one as Likely Republican, and one as Very Likely Republican.[81]Click here to read more about the battleground elections.
All 125 seats in the Kansas House were up for election on Nov. 5, 2024. Before the election, Republicans held an 85-39 majority in the House, with one vacancy, and members were elected to two-year terms. As of 11:30 p.m. ET on November 5, 2024, Republicans had won enough districts in both chambers to maintain their legislative supermajority.[82]
Democrats would have needed to gain three House seats or three Senate seats to block a Republican supermajority. To maintain their supermajority, Republicans needed to lose fewer than two House seats and fewer than three Senate seats.
Kansas was one of 10 states that had a divided government. The outcome of the Senate elections alone could not have changed Kansas' trifecta status because Republicans also controlled the House.
2024 was the first year since redistricting that Kansas held state legislative elections. Before the elections, Kansas City News Service's Zane Irwin said the partisan composition of the Legislature could have implications on the state's abortion policies. In 2022, voters rejected a ballot measure that would have prohibited the state from adding a Constitutional right to abortion. In 2024, the Legislature overrode Gov. Kelly's veto on HB2749, which requires healthcare providers ask women questions about why they're getting an abortion.[83] Irwin also said, "[Democrats] are trying to block a flat tax. Republicans repeatedly have tried to pass a flat tax. Right now we have a multi-tiered tax system, and Republicans would like to bring it to where there's one rate that you pay in Kansas whether you are a low-income individual or are a millionaire. Republicans say that would provide broad-base tax relief at a time when our coffers are relatively flush. Democrats say that it would bring us back to a more austere era under Gov. Sam Brownback (R) where there were major tax cuts, and Democrats were worried that that would cause cuts to social services like schools and roads."[80]
There were 20 open seats in the House, slightly more than the 19.6 open seats per year since Ballotpedia began tracking this data in 2010.
Ballotpedia identified 23 battleground districts. Ahead of the Nov. 2024 elections, Heading into the election Republicans represented 17 of those battleground districts and Democrats represented six. Click here to read more about the battleground elections.
Three incumbents lost in the primaries. Two of those incumbents lost against first-time House candidates, and one lost to a former House member. Click here to learn more.
Republicans gained a 58-52 majority in the state House following the 2024 general elections. This led to the state losing its Democratic trifecta and becoming a divided government.
All 110 seats were up for election. Heading into the election, Democrats held 56 seats and Republicans held 54. Republicans gained a net four seats, enough to gain a majority in the chamber.
Ballotpedia identified 24 districts as battlegrounds—14 with a Democratic incumbent and 10 with a Republican incumbent. Incumbents ran for re-election in all 24. Donald Trump (R) won the 2020 presidential election in four of the 14 districts with Democratic incumbents and Joe Biden (D) won in two of the 10 with Republican incumbents. Before the election, CNalysis rated 11 of the 24 battleground races as leaning towards Democrats, eight as leaning towards Republicans, and five as toss-ups. Click here for more on the battleground districts.
Four Democratic incumbents running in House Districts 27, 44, 58, and 109 lost to Republican challengers. The other 10 Democratic and 10 Republican incumbents won re-election.
This was the first election to take place under the new legislative district maps Michigan adopted after the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan ruled that the maps used for the 2022 elections were unconstitutional. A group of Detroit voters sued ahead of the 2022 elections, saying that the Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission had drawn the maps in use that year with race as the primary consideration and had reduced the number of majority-Black districts relative to the previous map. Before the election, the Detroit Free Press wrote, "Overall, the [new 2024] maps skew slightly more Republican compared with the districts currently in place."[84] Click here for more on the redistricting process.
The elections determined Michigan's trifecta status. Heading into the election, Michigan was a Democratic trifecta because the governor was a Democrat and Democrats controlled both legislative chambers. Democrats gained their existing trifecta after winning majorities in both legislative chambers in 2022. All 110 Michigan House seats are up for election in every even-numbered year. The governorship and state senate were next up for election in 2026. Click here for more about potential changes to trifecta status in the 2024 elections.
Both parties ran on the Democratic majority's legislative record. Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee President Heather Williams said the election was a chance "to protect the incredible progress made under Democratic majorities. Michigan Democrats in the statehouse passed common sense gun safety legislation, improved access to Medicaid, and protected fundamental reproductive freedoms."[85] Michigan House Republican Campaign Committee spokesman Greg Manz said: "Michiganders, who have not yet fled, are going to hold House Democrats accountable for incentivizing criminal invaders who cross our southern border to flock to Michigan neighborhoods, hiking taxes on the middle class, and prioritizing corporate welfare over working-class families."[86]
The Michigan House of Representatives was one of 85 state legislative chambers with elections in 2024. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
At the time of the election, Democrats held a 68-64 majority in the chamber with two vacancies. Following the election, the chamber was evenly split with 67 Democrats and 67 Republicans.
Democrats lost majority control of the chamber in this election as a result of the split after having previously won control in 2018.
Final control of this chamber was determined by two recounts.[87][88] Minnesota automatically holds recounts if a post-election audit finds that an error occurred. A losing candidate can also request a recount paid for by the state if the final margin is less than 0.5% of the total number of votes cast.[89] The race in House District 54A fell within the margin where a state-funded candidate-requested recount was possible, while Sherburne County announced it would pay for a recount for House District 14B despite the vote total falling outside the margin:
In House District 14B, incumbent Dan Wolgamott (D) led Sue Ek (R) 10,005 to 9,814 votes, a margin of 191 votes, or 0.96% of the total votes cast.[90] Sherburne County released a statement that an upload failure on election night made it appear that Ek initially won by four votes and that the county would pay for a recount.[91] The recount reflected that Wolgamott won by 190 votes, one fewer than the original count.[87]
In House District 54A, incumbent Brad Tabke (D) led Aaron Paul (R) 10,973 to 10,959 votes, a margin of 14 votes, or 0.06% of the total votes cast.[92] The recount reflected that Tabke won by 15 votes, one more than the original count.[87]
Because Democrats won the recounts in both House District 14B and 54A, the chamber was split 67-67. This last occurred following the 1978 elections.[88]
Before the election, the MinnPost reported that House Democrats campaigned on legislation they passed since the party gained control of the Minnesota Senate in 2023, while Republicans campaigned on balancing political control of the Minnesota Legislature.[93] House Speaker Melissa Hortman (D) said she believed the Legislature faced gridlock when control was split between chambers.[93] House Minority Leader Lisa Demuth (R) said she believed Democratic control of the Legislature and governorship was detrimental to Minnesota.[93]
Both parties set fundraising records in 2024, with the Democratic caucus raising $5.5 million and the Republican caucus raising $1.8 million as of September 25.[94]
Ballotpedia identified 34 battleground districts. Democrats represented 17 of these districts and Republicans represented 17. Incumbents ran in 28 of these races, while the other six were in open districts, meaning no incumbents ran. Democrats won 14 of the races in battleground districts, and Republicans won 20. To read more about the battleground elections, click here.
One incumbent lost in a primary. Twenty incumbents did not seek re-election, a 50% decrease from the 40 incumbents who retired in 2022. To read more about incumbents who did not advance to the general election, click here.
Minnesota was one of 17 states that had a Democratic trifecta, since Democrats controlled the governorship and both legislative chambers. The outcome of this election changed Minnesota's trifecta status to a divided government, as Democrats lost control of the House. Ballotpedia identified Minnesota's Democratic trifecta as moderately vulnerable leading up to the election. To read more about trifecta vulnerability in the 2024 elections, click here.
Fifteen of the chamber's 134 seats were decided by a margin of victory of 5.0% or less in the 2022 elections.
The Minnesota House of Representatives was one of 85 state legislative chambers with elections in 2024 across 99 chambers throughout the country. The primaries were held on August 13, 2024.
There were nine contested Republican primaries for the Missouri Senate on August 6, 2024. An incumbent ran in two of those primaries, and seven of those primaries were open, meaning an incumbent did not seek re-election in those districts.
Ballotpedia identified the Republican primaries in Districts 3, 15, 21, 23, and 27 as battleground primaries, all but two of which were for open seats. The Missouri Senate had the most turnover since the state implemented term-limits in 2002. Of the nine members leaving the chamber in 2024, six left due to term limits. Three of those six senators—Sen. Bill Eigel (R), Sen. Denny Hoskins (R), and Sen. Andrew Koenig (R)—were members of the Missouri Freedom Caucus.[95] Of the two other members of the Senate who formally identified as Freedom Caucus members, Sen. Rick Brattin (R) advanced from the Republican primary in District 31, and Sen. Nick Schroer's seat was not up for election.
The 2024 primaries took place in the context of a conflict among Senate Republicans over the future of the party. According to Jonathan Shorman and Kacen Bayless of The Kansas City Star, two groups of Republican senators "have grown more divided this session after senators announced the formation of the new Freedom Caucus with backing from the national States Freedom Caucus."[96] Several Senate Republicans who were not members of the Freedom Caucus criticized the group for their use of the filibuster after the Freedom Caucus filibustered approval of the chamber's journal, a committee referral increasing threshold requirements for initiative petitions to qualify for the ballot, approval of a new congressional map, and the state's budget.[97][98][99]
Following the Caucus' January filibuster of a bill that increased requirements for initiative petitions to qualify for the ballot, President Pro Tempore Caleb Rowden (R) removed four Republican senators who identified with the Freedom Caucus from their committee chairmanships.[97] In explaining why he removed caucus members from their chairmanships, Rowden criticized the caucus' filibuster efforts and said they made it too hard for the Senate to pass legislation. Rowden said, "They [filibustered] repeatedly, day after day for two weeks, basically...It became necessary for us to do something that would indicate that we’re not going to let four guys run the place; it’s just not how this works."[100]
Several members of the Freedom Caucus, including Sen. Bill Eigel (R), said Republicans outside of the Freedom Caucus, including Rowden, opposed the caucus because he believed they tried to preserve power. Eigel said, "It’s never been about policy for them. It’s been about individuals trying to preserve power at the expense of what we believe are the issues that Republicans sent us to Jefferson City for."[101]
Missouri was, at the time of the election, one of 23 states with a Republican trifecta. A state government trifecta is a term used to describe a single-party government where one political party holds the governor's office and a majority in both chambers of the state legislature.
The Missouri State Senate was one of 85 state legislative chambers with elections in 2024. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
Elections for 10 of the 21 seats in the Nevada Senate took place on November 5, 2024. The Nevada Senate was one of 85 state legislative chambers with elections in 2024. There were 99 chambers throughout the country.
Following the election, Democrats maintained a 13-8 majority. Nevada remained a divided government, with a Republican holding the governorship and Democrats maintaining majorities in the state legislature.
Nevada Current's April Corbin Girnus wrote, "Democrats already have a supermajority in the Assembly. If Democrats can maintain that and flip a Senate seat, they will have enough votes to override any veto by Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo."[102] Gov. Joe Lombardo (R) said the prospect of a Democratic supermajority was "a huge concern and so much of a concern that I've been proactive in identifying candidates and supporting current candidates on the Republican side of the aisle."[103]
Lombardo vetoed a state record of 75 bills during the 2023 legislative session.[104] Democrats campaigned against Lombardo's vetoes, and said he vetoed legislation that voters supported.[105] Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager (D) said the legislative elections offered a choice between Democrats who he said "are actually trying to solve problems and make life better for Nevadans, or Republicans, who offer nothing but complaints with no real solutions to any of the challenges facing Nevadans."[106] Assemblyman Gregory Hafen (R) was critical of the prospect of a super majority saying "It makes me very nervous to have one party control because the Nevada Constitution requires a two-thirds majority to implement any new tax. So not only is the Governor’s veto at stake here, but we’re talking about any tax that could be passed with just one party control."[107]
At the time of the election, Nevada was one of 10 states that had a divided government. Republican Joe Lombardo (R) was governor while Democrats held majorities in both chambers of the Nevada Legislature. At the time of election, Democrats held 13 seats and Republicans held 7, with one vacancy in a seat previously held by a Republican.
Ballotpedia identified 5 Senate battleground districts. Democrats represented two of these districts, while Republicans represented two districts and one was an open seat a Republican vacated. Click here to read more about the battleground elections.
Nevada was one of two states where one party had the potential to gain a veto-proof supermajority with a governor from another party after the 2024 elections. The other state was Wisconsin. To read more about Ballotpedia's coverage of veto-proof legislatures and opposing party governors, click here.
Elections for the Nevada Assembly were held on November 5, 2024. All 42 seats were up for election.
At the time of the election, Nevada was one of 10 states that had a divided government. Republican Joe Lombardo (R) held the governorship while Democrats held both chambers of the Nevada Legislature.
Following the election, Democrats maintained a 27-15 majority. Nevada remained a divided government, with a Republican holding the governorship and Democrats maintaining majorities in the state legislature.
At the time of election, Democrats held 26 seats to Republicans' 14, with two vacancies in seats previously held by Democrats. The two vacant seats were in District 7 and District 10. To return to a 28-member supermajority, Democrats needed to win every currently held seat in addition to both vacancies. To block the supermajority, Republicans needed to win one Democratic-held seat.
Nevada Current's April Corbin Girnus wrote, "The end goal for Nevada Republicans this year is not to wrest control of the Assembly away from Democrats. ... But a handful of races will determine whether Democrats maintain their current two-thirds supermajority in the lower chamber."[108] Lombardo endorsed and campaigned for candidates in certain districts. In an interview, he said, "The super-majority has to be prevented, whatever partisan side of the aisle you’re looking at. ... [We are proactive] in identifying candidates, supporting candidates and helping them be successful."[109]
The Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC) included four Assembly races as part of a $10 million investment the party was making in state legislative races across the country.[110] Lombardo's Better Nevada PAC donated $5,000 to seven candidates in competitive districts.[111][112] To read more about campaign finance reports, click here.
The Las Vegas Review-Journal's Jessica Hill wrote, "If Democrats are successful in achieving supermajorities in the Assembly and Senate, they’d have enough votes to render the governor’s veto powers — and his legislative priorities — moot."[113] Lombardo set the state record for the most vetoes in a legislative session in 2023, vetoing 75 bills.[114]
Ballotpedia identified 13 Assembly battleground districts. As of October 3, 2024, Democrats represented 10 of these districts, while Republicans represented three districts. Click here to read more about the battleground elections.
Nevada was one of two states with the potential to have a veto-proof supermajority after the 2024 elections. The other state was Wisconsin. To read more about Ballotpedia's coverage of veto-proof legislatures and opposing party governors, click here.
The Nevada State Assembly was one of 85 state legislative chambers with elections in 2024. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
All 24 seats in the New Hampshire State Senate were up for election on November 5, 2024. Before the election, Democrats held 10 of the seats, and Republicans held 14. Following the election, Republicans gained a 16-8 veto-proof majority.
Control of the New Hampshire State Senate changed twice between 2012 and 2024. Democrats gained a majority in 2018, followed by Republicans in 2020.
New Hampshire maintained its Republican trifecta following this election, meaning one party held the governorship and both state legislative chambers. The results of these elections could have changed the state's trifecta status. The New Hampshire governor's race was open for the first time since 2016. Before the election, The Cook Political Report with Amy Walter, Inside Elections with Nathan L. Gonzales, and Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball all rated the governor's race a Toss-Up. Democrats needed to win three seats to take control of the Senate and seven to take control of the House. Click here for more information on trifecta vulnerability and how these ratings were determined.
In the 2020 general election, Republicans won a 14-10 majority, gaining four seats and reversing the 14-10 Democratic majority. In the 2022 general election, Republicans maintained that 14-10 majority.
Ballotpedia identified eight battleground elections in this chamber. Democrats represented two of these districts, while Republicans represented six.
At the time of the election, Republicans held a 197-191 majority in the chamber, with one independent and 11 vacancies. Republicans controlled the House since 2021. Following the election, Republicans maintained a 222-178 majority. The state also maintained a Republican trifecta.
The New Hampshire House of Representatives has a combination of single-member legislative districts, where a district elects one representative, and multi-member legislative districts, where a district elects multiple representatives. The number of seats per district is determined by population.[115] Multi-member districts in New Hampshire use a bloc with partial abstention voting method, where voters receive as many votes as there are seats, can only vote for a candidate once, and can choose to not use all of their votes.
Before the election, Politico reported that the New Hampshire Legislature was one of the most likely to change partisan control in 2024.[116] Since 2010, the House had changed partisan control six times. According to NBC News, House Democrats campaigned on passing legislation to guarantee abortion access in the state, while House Republicans campaigned on addressing crime and drug use.[117]
Ballotpedia identified 57 battleground districts heading into the election. Twenty-seven of the battleground races were in single-member districts, with Democrats representing 13 and Republicans representing 14. Thirty of the battleground races were in multi-member districts, with Democrats representing two, Republicans representing 11, and 17 split between parties. Incumbents ran in 48 of these races, while the other nine were in open districts, meaning no incumbents ran. To read more about the battleground elections, click here.
Eight incumbents lost in primaries. Ninety-one incumbents did not seek re-election. To read more about incumbents who did not advance to the general election, click here.
New Hampshire was one of 23 states that had a Republican trifecta, since Republicans controlled the governorship and both legislative chambers. Ballotpedia identified New Hampshire's Republican trifecta as highly vulnerable. To read more about trifecta vulnerability in the 2024 elections, click here.
The New Hampshire House of Representatives was one of 85 state legislative chambers with elections in 2024 across 99 chambers throughout the country. The primaries were held on September 10, 2024.
All 50 seats in the North Carolina Senate were up for election on November 5, 2024. Heading into the elections, there were 30 Republicans and 20 Democrats in the Senate. Republicans maintained a 30-20 majority following the elections.
One incumbent lost in the primaries. Click here to learn more.
Republicans won a veto-proof majority in the state Senate after the 2022 elections. North Carolina requires a three-fifths vote from both of its legislative chambers to override a gubernatorial veto. Assuming no vacancies, that amounts to 72 of the 120 members in the state House and 30 of the 50 members in the state Senate. In 2023, Republicans also gained a veto-proof majority in the House when Rep. Tricia Cotham switched parties from Democrat to Republican.[118] While Republicans maintained enough Senate seats for their supermajority, they lost a House seat, meaning they lost their veto-proof supermajority.
Because Gov. Roy Cooper was a Democrat, North Carolina was one of 10 states with a divided government and one of four states with a veto-proof state legislature and an opposing party governor. North Carolina had a divided government since Cooper assumed office in 2017. Because Republicans also controlled the House, the outcome of the Senate elections alone could not have changed North Carolina's trifecta status. North Carolina also held its gubernatorial election on November 5. North Carolina was one of two states, the other being Vermont, where either party could establish a state government trifecta.
The 2024 elections were the first state legislative elections after the General Assembly adopted new district boundaries following the 2020 census. In response to the new state legislative maps, State Rep. Tim Longest (D) said, “This map secures more Republican seats than 100,000 randomly generated maps. That is unexplainable by geography, deliberately designed to maximize advantage."[119]WUNC's Rusty Jacobs wrote that "Republican Sen. Ralph Hise, a co-chair of the Senate's redistricting committee, maintained that the maps were drawn applying traditional redistricting criteria, such as maintaining equal population across districts and minimizing the splitting of municipalities and precincts."[120] For more on North Carolina's redistricting process, click here.
Ballotpedia identified 10 Senate battleground districts. Of those seats, Democrats held six, and Republicans held 4.
All 120 seats in the North Carolina House of Representatives were up for election on November 5, 2024. Heading into the election, there were 70 Republicans, 48 Democrats, and two vacancies in the House. Republicans held a 71-49 majority following the elections.
Three incumbents — one Democrat and two Republicans — lost in the primaries. Click here to learn more.
Republicans won a veto-proof majority in the state Senate after the 2022 elections. North Carolina requires a three-fifths vote from both of its legislative chambers to override a gubernatorial veto. Assuming no vacancies, that amounts to 72 of the 120 members in the state House and 30 of the 50 members in the state Senate. In 2023, Republicans also gained a veto-proof majority in the House when Rep. Tricia Cotham switched parties from Democrat to Republican.[121] While Republicans maintained enough Senate seats for their supermajority, they lost a House seat, meaning they lost their veto-proof supermajority.
Because Gov. Roy Cooper was a Democrat, North Carolina was one of 10 states with a divided government and one of four states with a veto-proof state legislature and an opposing party governor. North Carolina had a divided government since Cooper assumed office in 2017. Because Republicans also controlled the Senate, the outcome of the House elections alone could not have changed North Carolina's trifecta status. North Carolina also held its gubernatorial election on Nov. 5. North Carolina was one of two states, the other being Vermont, where either party could establish a state government trifecta.
The 2024 elections were the first state legislative elections after the General Assembly adopted new district boundaries following the 2020 census. In response to the new state legislative maps, State Rep. Tim Longest (D) said, “This map secures more Republican seats than 100,000 randomly generated maps. That is unexplainable by geography, deliberately designed to maximize advantage."[122]WUNC's Rusty Jacobs wrote that "Republican Sen. Ralph Hise, a co-chair of the Senate's redistricting committee, maintained that the maps were drawn applying traditional redistricting criteria, such as maintaining equal population across districts and minimizing the splitting of municipalities and precincts."[123] For more on North Carolina's redistricting process, click here.
Ballotpedia identified 22 House battleground districts. Of those, Democrats held 10 and Republicans held 12.
There were 29 Republican primaries for the Ohio House of Representatives on March 19, 2024. An incumbent ran in 19 of those primaries. Five incumbents lost in the primaries, the most since at least 2012.
The 2024 elections took place in the context of a conflict within the House Republican caucus over the election of a speaker. After Republicans won a 67-32 margin in the 2022 elections, 22 Republicans joined with all 32 Democrats to elect Jason Stephens (R) speaker over the winner of the Republican caucus' internal vote, Derek Merrin (R). The Ohio Republican Party's central committee voted to censure all 22 House Republicans who voted for Stephens following his election.[124]
The 2024 legislative elections had 29 contested Republican primaries, the most in any year since 2018. Nineteen incumbents—more than one-third of those seeking re-election—faced primary challengers compared to 12 in 2018. This was the highest rate at which incumbent Ohio House Republicans faced primary challenges since at least 2012.
In the five election cycles between 2014 and 2022, 13.7% of Ohio House Republicans facing contested primaries lost re-election. The highest rate of incumbent defeats was 16.7% in 2020 and 2016 while the lowest was 8.3% in 2018. In 2024, 26.3% of incumbents facing contested primaries lost re-election—just under twice the average rate for the preceding decade.
Ohio was, at the time of the 2024 election, one of 23 states with a Republican trifecta. A state government trifecta is a term used to describe a single-party government where one political party holds the governor's office and a majority in both chambers of the state legislature.
General elections for the Pennsylvania State Senate occurred on November 5, 2024. There were 25 state Senate seats up for election. Republicans maintained the 28-22 majority they had before the elections.
If Democrats gained control of the state Senate and maintained control of the state House in 2024, Pennsylvania would have become a Democratic trifecta. If Republicans maintained control of the state Senate or gained control of the state House, Pennsylvania would have remained a divided government.
If Democrats gained three seats, the chamber would have been tied with 25 Democrats and 25 Republicans, with Lt. Gov. Austin Davis (D) breaking tie votes. If Democrats gained more than three seats, they would have controlled the chamber outright. If Republicans lost fewer than three seats, they would have retained control of the chamber and prevented a Democratic trifecta. Click here to read more about state government trifectas.
Ballotpedia identified six battleground districts. Democrats and Republicans represented three of those districts. Incumbents ran in four of these races, and the other two seats were open, meaning no incumbent ran. Click here to read more about the battleground elections.
Reporter Anna Gustafson wrote before the election, "Democratic lawmakers told the Pennsylvania Independent that they are paying particular attention to three districts in the Senate: the recently redrawn 15th District in central Pennsylvania, the 37th in Allegheny County, and the 49th in Erie County. Each of those districts is currently represented by a Republican. Democrats also said they’re looking to retain control of the 45th in Allegheny County."[126]
Pennsylvania Senate Republican Campaign Committee communications director Michael Straw said before the election, "While our candidates in these seats have proven records and have put themselves in a strong position, we are taking nothing for granted. As far as offensive pick-ups, ... we see some real opportunities in Western and Southeast Pennsylvania to expand our majority.”[126]
Pennsylvania was one of 10 states with a divided government. Democrats controlled the governor's office and the state House, and Republicans controlled the state Senate. The last Democratic trifecta in Pennsylvania was 1993. The last Republican trifecta in Pennsylvania was 2014.
Elections for all 203 seats in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives took place on November 5, 2024. Pennsylvania was one of 44 states that held legislative elections in 2024.
Democrats maintained a 102-101 majority in the state House following the election.[127] The state also remained a divided government, with a Democrat controlling the governorship and Republicans and Democrats holding majorities in the Senate and House, respectively.
Democrats had gained control of the state House in 2022.[128] Republicans had controlled the chamber since 2011.
Democrats needed to lose zero seats in 2024 to retain control of the chamber. Republicans needed to gain at least one seat to gain control of the chamber.
Pennsylvania was one of 10 states with a divided government at the time of the 2024 elections and the only state where the two legislative chambers were controlled by different parties.[129] According to the National Conference of State Legislatures before the elections, "if a single chamber flips in Pennsylvania and all else holds equal, there would be no states with divided legislatures for the first time since at least 1900."[129] Democrats controlled the governorship and the state House, while Republicans controlled the state Senate. If Democrats had gained control of the state Senate and maintained control of the state House in 2024, Pennsylvania's government would have become a Democratic trifecta. If Republicans had maintained control of the state Senate or gained control of the state House, Pennsylvania's government would have remained divided.
A pair of resignations on July 17, 2024, left Republicans with more seats than Democrats in the chamber. However, a rule adopted in July 2023 defined the majority party as “the political party that won the greater number of elections for the 203 seats in the House of Representatives in the general election preceding the term of service that began on the first day of December next after the general election.” Because of this rule, Democrats maintained their majority.[130] Two Democrats—Andre Carroll and Keith Harris—were elected unopposed in special elections to fill the vacancies.[131]
The Associated Press' Mark Scolforo wrote, "Pennsylvania’s legislative Republicans would like to pass additional voter ID requirements, restrict abortion and make election changes to improve their odds of winning judicial races. Democrats want to bump up the state’s minimum wage and widen civil rights for LGBTQ people. In the closely divided General Assembly, those proposals have gone nowhere."[132]
Ballotpedia identified 25 battleground districts. Democrats represented 12 of these battleground districts and Republicans represented 13. Incumbents ran in 20 of these races, while the other five were in open districts, meaning no incumbents ran. Click here to read more about the battleground elections.
The 2024 elections took place in the context of a conflict among House Republicans over a proposal to expand Tennessee's school voucher program. In the 2024 legislative session, Gov. Bill Lee (R) supported a proposal allowing all Tennessee families with school-age children access to vouchers to be applied towards the cost of private school.
The bill did not advance to a final vote before the end of the session owing to differences between the House and Senate drafts in what Chalkbeat described as "one of the biggest defeats of [Lee's] administration, now in its second term."[134] According to the Tennessee Lookout, with the legislature out of session until 2025, the primaries "are the next frontier in the debate over whether state lawmakers should adopt a universal plan to provide parents with $7,200 in cash to subsidize private school tuition."[135]
Ballotpedia identified 13 of the 19 contested Republican primaries as battlegrounds. All 13 featured $10,000 or more in spending from the nine Tennessee groups Ballotpedia identified as having a recent record of advocacy on school voucher-related issues. Nine also had competitive fundraising among the candidates where no single candidate raised more than two-thirds of the total fundraising across the entire candidate field. Gov. Bill Lee (R) endorsed eight candidates in contested primaries, including four candidates running in battleground primaries. Click here for more information on battleground primaries and here for more information on Lee's endorsements.
The 2024 legislative elections had 19 contested Republican primaries compared to 20 in 2022 and 19 in 2020. Thirteen of those primaries had an incumbent on the ballot compared to seven in 2022 and 14 in 2020. There were the same number of incumbents defeated (two) as in 2022. In the 2020 primaries, three incumbents were defeated.
Tennessee was, at the time of the election, one of 23 states with a Republican trifecta. A state government trifecta is a term used to describe a single-party government where one political party holds the governor's office and a majority in both chambers of the state legislature.
For more information on the November general elections for the Tennessee House, click here.
There were eight Republican primaries for the Tennessee State Senate on August 1, 2024. An incumbent ran in seven of those primaries. Two incumbents—Jon Lundberg (R) and Frank Niceley (R)—lost in the primaries.
The 2024 elections took place in the context of a conflict among House Republicans over a proposal to expand Tennessee's school voucher program. In the 2024 legislative session, Gov. Bill Lee (R) supported a proposal allowing all Tennessee families with school-age children access to vouchers to be applied towards the cost of private school.
The bill did not advance to a final vote before the end of the session owing to differences between the House and Senate drafts in what Chalkbeat described as "one of the biggest defeats of [Lee's] administration, now in its second term."[136] According to the Tennessee Lookout, with the legislature out of session until 2025, the primaries "are the next frontier in the debate over whether state lawmakers should adopt a universal plan to provide parents with $7,200 in cash to subsidize private school tuition."[137]
Ballotpedia identified the Republican primaries in Districts 2, 4, 8, and 18 as battlegrounds. Three primaries featured an incumbent and a single challenger. The fourth was for an open seat. All four battlegrounds featured $50,000 or more in spending from nine groups Ballotpedia identified as having a recent history of advocacy related to school vouchers. Gov. Bill Lee (R) endorsed a candidate in four contested primaries, including two battleground primaries. Click here for more on the four battleground primaries and here for more on Bill Lee's endorsements.
The 2024 legislative elections had eight contested Republican primaries compared to four in both 2022 and 2020. Seven of those primaries had an incumbent on the ballot compared to three in both 2022 and 2020. This was the first election cycle since 2014 where an incumbent lost in the primaries.
Tennessee was, at the time of the election, one of 23 states with a Republican trifecta. A state government trifecta is a term used to describe a single-party government where one political party holds the governor's office and a majority in both chambers of the state legislature.
For more information on the November general elections for the Tennessee Senate, click here.
Fifty-nine contested Republican primaries for the Texas House of Representatives took place on March 5, 2024. Forty-six of those (78.0%) involved incumbents facing primary challengers. Of those, 29 incumbents (63.0%) advanced to the general election, eight (17.4%) advanced to the May 28, 2024, primary runoffs, and nine (19.6%) lost to challengers. This was the largest number of incumbent defeats since 2012, when 10 House Republicans lost in the primaries. Click here for more on the May 28 Republican primary runoffs.
The 2024 legislative elections were Texas' most competitive since at least 2012. Forty-six incumbents—more than half of House Republicans seeking re-election (59.7%)—faced primary challengers in 2024. The previous high was 37 in 2012.
If all eight incumbents lost their runoffs, 37% of all contested incumbents would have been defeated. This would have been a decade high, with 2014 following at 30% of contested Republicans defeated. In the five election cycles between 2014 and 2022, 16.3% of Texas House Republicans facing contested primaries lost re-election.
The 2024 elections took place in the context of two votes in 2023 that divided the House GOP caucus.
One was the impeachment of Attorney General Ken Paxton (R). The House voted 121-23 to impeach Paxton. Sixty Republicans joined with 61 Democrats in support of impeachment.[138] Paxton had endorsed three incumbents who voted against impeachment and one incumbent who voted for impeachment as well as 35 challengers to Republican incumbents who voted for impeachment.[139] Click here for more on the impeachment.
In the other, the caucus split over removing a provision for school vouchers from an education bill. The vote removing the provision for school vouchers passed 84-63, with 21 Republicans joining 63 Democrats to remove vouchers.[140][141] Gov. Greg Abbott (R) supported the measure and said he would oppose legislators who voted against it.[142] Abbott had endorsed all 59 Republican incumbents who voted in favor of the proposal and ran for re-election. Abbott had endorsed 10 challengers to incumbents who voted against school vouchers.[143]
Of the eight incumbents defeated in the March 5 primaries, seven (87.5%) voted in favor of impeaching Paxton and six (75.0%) voted against the voucher proposal Abbott supported. No incumbent who both voted against impeaching Paxton and in favor of the Abbott-supported voucher proposal lost in a March 5 primary.
In general, Abbott's endorsements were more successful than Paxton's. Abbott had endorsed all 59 Republican incumbents who voted in favor of the school voucher proposal and ran for re-election. He also endorsed 10 challengers to incumbents who voted against school vouchers.[144] Five of those challengers won their primary, three advanced to a primary runoff, and two lost their primary.[145]
Paxton endorsed three incumbents who voted against impeachment and one incumbent who voted for impeachment as well as 35 challengers to Republican incumbents who voted for impeachment.[139] Seven of those challengers won their primary, seven advanced to a primary runoff, and 21 lost their primary.[145]
Paxton and former President Donald Trump (R) endorsed David Covey (R), who challenged House Speaker Dade Phelan (R) in the primary.[146] On February 10, 2024, the Texas Republican Party had voted to censure Phelan. The resolution of censure mentioned Phelan's vote for Paxton's impeachment and support for the impeachment process as two of the five counts against him.[147] Phelan and Covey headed to the primary runoff, the first for a house speaker since 1972.[145]
Of the 34 battleground districts Ballotpedia identified, 18 had incumbents who advanced from their primary, eight had incumbents who lost their primary, seven resulted in primary runoffs, and one was open, meaning no incumbents ran for re-election. To learn more about the battleground elections, click here.
As of the 2024 election, Texas was one of 23 Republican trifectas. A state government trifecta is a term used to describe a single-party government where one political party holds the governor's office and a majority in both chambers of the state legislature.
Thirteen Republican primary runoffs for the Texas House of Representatives took place on May 28, 2024. Eight primary runoffs had an incumbent on the ballot, and the incumbent lost in six of those runoffs.
There were 59 contested Republican primaries on March 5, 2024, 46 of which had an incumbent on the ballot. Nine incumbent House Republicans lost in the primaries and 29 advanced to the general election without going to a runoff. The 13 runoffs took place in districts where no candidate won more than 50% of the primary vote.
Ballotpedia identified 10 of the 13 primary runoffs as battlegrounds. Click here for more on those races.
The primaries took place in the context of two votes in 2023 that divided the House GOP caucus.
One was the impeachment of Attorney General Ken Paxton (R). The House voted 121-23 to impeach Paxton. Sixty Republicans joined with 61 Democrats in support of impeachment.[148] As of April 4, 2024, Paxton had endorsed three incumbents who voted against impeachment and one incumbent who voted for impeachment as well as 35 challengers to Republican incumbents who voted for impeachment.[139] Click here for more on the impeachment.
In the other vote, the caucus split over removing a provision for school vouchers from an education bill. The vote removing the provision for school vouchers passed 84-63, with 21 Republicans joining 63 Democrats to remove vouchers.[149][150] Gov. Greg Abbott (R) supported the measure and said he would oppose legislators who voted against it.[151] As of April 4, 2024, Abbott had endorsed all 59 Republican incumbents who voted in favor of the proposal and ran for re-election. Abbott had endorsed 11 challengers to incumbents who voted against school vouchers.[152]
On February 10, 2024, the Texas Republican Party voted to censure House Speaker Dade Phelan (R). Phelan voted "present" on vouchers and voted in favor of impeaching Paxton. The censure resolution mentioned Phelan's vote for impeachment and support for the impeachment process as two of the five counts against him. This was the fourth time in history the state party voted to censure a Republican elected official.[153] Former President Donald Trump (R) endorsed David Covey (R), who challenged Phelan in the primary runoff, on January 30, 2024.[154] Phelan defeated Covey by a margin of 366 votes out of more than 25,000 cast.
All eight incumbents who ran in primary runoffs voted in favor of impeaching Paxton. Four voted in favor of school vouchers, three voted against, and Phelan voted "present".
Six of the eight incumbents who ran in primary runoffs finished second in the March 5 primaries. Incumbents DeWayne Burns (R) and Frederick Frazier (R) finished 7.7 percentage points behind their runoff opponents, the largest vote margin of any incumbents in the runoff.
As of the 2024 election, Texas was one of 23 Republican trifectas. A state government trifecta occurs when one political party holds the governor's office and a majority in both chambers of the state legislature.
Following the election, Democrats lost a Senate veto-proof majority but maintained a 16-13-1 majority. The state remained a divided government, with a Republican controlling the governorship and Democrats holding majorities in both chambers of the state legislature. When combined with Democratic losses in the Vermont House of Representatives, Democrats lost more seats in the Vermont state legislature than any other legislature in the country in 2024.[155]
All 30 seats were up for election. Democrats held 21 seats, and Republicans held seven.
Before the election, Vermont was one of 29 states where one party had a large enough majority in both legislative chambers to override gubernatorial vetoes without needing support from members of the other party. Democrats lost their veto-proof majority because they fell below the required 20 Senate seats.
This election also determined Vermont's trifecta status. Before the election, Vermont was one of 10 states without a state government trifecta because the governor was a Republican and Democrats had majorities in both chambers of the state legislature. Because Republicans held the governorship and Democrats held their majorities in both legislative chambers, Vermont maintained its divided government. Click here for more on potential changes to trifecta status in the 2024 elections.
Since his election in 2016, Gov. Phil Scott (R) had, as of the 2024 elections, vetoed 52 bills, more than any other governor in state history, according to Seven Days.[156] The majority-Democratic legislature had overridden six vetoes in 2024, surpassing the previous record of five vetoes set in 2023. The legislature's 2024 overrides included vetoes of bills requiring state utilities to provide energy from renewable sources only by 2035, prohibiting the sale of seeds treated with certain pesticides, and increasing property taxes.[157]
Scott actively campaigned with Republican challengers in person and asked voters through television and radio ads to “elect more common-sense legislators who will work with me to make Vermont more affordable.” Jason Maulucci, Scott's policy director, told The New York Times that the governor's "endorsements of lesser-known Republicans provided a 'permission slip' for Trump-averse Democrats and independents inclined to vote for change, but wary of electing MAGA candidates."[155]
Ballotpedia identified four districts with a combined seven seats as battleground districts. Democrats and Republicans held three seats each in the battleground districts. The seventh seat was vacant at the time of the election. Three of the four battleground districts had at least one incumbent who did not run for re-election. Before the election, CNalysis rated four of the seats in battleground districts as favoring Democrats and three as favoring Republicans.[158] Click here for more on the battleground districts.
The Vermont State Senate was one of 85 state legislative chambers with elections in 2024. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
All 150 seats were up for election. Democrats held 105 seats, and Republicans held 37, with four seats held by members of the Vermont Progressive Party, two by independents, one by a Libertarian, and one vacancy. After the election, Democrats held 87 seats, Republicans held 55, Vermont Progressive Party members held four, independents three, and one seat was vacant. When combined with Democratic losses in the Vermont State Senate, Democrats lost more seats in the Vermont state legislature than any other legislature in the country in 2024.[155]
Heading into the election, Vermont was one of 29 states where one party had large enough majorities in both chambers of the state legislature to override gubernatorial vetoes without needing support from members of the other party. Democrats needed 100 seats in the House in order to override gubernatorial vetoes. Republicans gained a net 19 seats, more than the eight they needed to gain to break the Democratic veto-proof majority.
This election also determined Vermont's trifecta status. Heading into the election, Vermont was one of 10 states without a state government trifecta because the governor was a Republican and Democrats had majorities in both chambers of the state legislature. The governorship and both chambers of the state legislature were all up for election in 2024. Because Republicans held the governorship and Democrats maintained their majorities in both legislative chambers, neither party gained a trifecta in Vermont in 2024. Click here for more on potential changes to trifecta status in the 2024 elections.
Since his election in 2016, Gov. Phil Scott (R) had, as of the 2024 elections, vetoed 52 bills, more than any other governor in state history, according to Seven Days.[159] The majority-Democratic legislature had overridden six vetoes in 2024, surpassing the previous record of five vetoes set in 2023. The legislature's 2024 overrides included vetoes of bills requiring state utilities to provide energy from renewable sources only by 2035, prohibiting the sale of seeds treated with certain pesticides, and increasing property taxes.[160]
Scott actively campaigned with Republican challengers in person and asked voters through television and radio ads to “elect more common-sense legislators who will work with me to make Vermont more affordable.” Jason Maulucci, Scott's policy director, told The New York Times that the governor's "endorsements of lesser-known Republicans provided a 'permission slip' for Trump-averse Democrats and independents inclined to vote for change, but wary of electing MAGA candidates."[155]
Ballotpedia identified 17 districts with a combined 25 seats as battleground districts. Heading into the election, Democrats held 16 seats in battleground districts and Republicans held nine. Eleven of the 17 battleground districts had at least one incumbent who did not run for re-election. Before the election, CNalysis rated 20 of the seats in battleground districts as favoring Democrats and five as favoring Republicans.[158] Click here for more on the battleground districts.
The Vermont House of Representatives was one of 85 state legislative chambers with elections in 2024. There are 99 chambers throughout the country.
Wisconsin was one of 44 states that held regular legislative elections across 85 of 99 state legislative chambers.
Republicans maintained a 54-45 majority in the state House following the election. The state also remained a divided government, with a Democrat controlling the governorship and Republicans holding majorities in the state legislature.
On Feb. 19, 2024, Gov. Tony Evers (D) signed Senate Bill 488 into law, adopting new Wisconsin legislative maps.[161] Gov. Evers originally proposed the newly adopted legislative maps in 2021. Both chambers of Wisconsin's state legislature approved the maps on Feb. 13. The Wisconsin Senate passed the new maps 18-14, and the Assembly passed the new maps 63-33.
According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "Under the new boundaries, the state Assembly and state Senate will likely see more balance between the two parties. Republicans currently hold 64 out of 99 state Assembly seats under the Republican-drawn maps. Under the new state Assembly map, the districts are more evenly split. The new map has 46 districts that lean Republican and 45 districts that lean Democratic. The eight districts left are likely to be a toss-up between Democratic and Republican candidates."[162]
The general election for the Wisconsin Senate took place on Nov. 5, 2024.
Following the election, Republicans lost a Senate veto-proof majority but maintained an 18-15 majority. The state remained a divided government, with a Democrat controlling the governorship and Republicans holding majorities in both chambers of the state legislature.
Sixteen out of 33 Senate seats were up for election, including eight in districts with Republican incumbents who ran for re-election, four in districts with Democratic incumbents who ran for re-election, and four in open districts. Before the election, Republicans held a 22-10 veto-proof majority, with one vacancy. Democrats needed to gain seven seats to change partisan control of the chamber.
Wisconsin elects half of its senators to four-year terms every two years. 2024 was the first year Wisconsin held state legislative elections under its new legislative maps. According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "Under the new boundaries, the state Assembly and state Senate will likely see more balance between the two parties...Under the previous maps, Republicans hold 22 out of 33 state Senate seats. Under the new state Senate map, 14 out of 33 districts are Democratic-leaning, while 15 are Republican-leaning."[163]
There were 42 contested primaries for the Wyoming House of Representatives on August 20, 2024. An incumbent ran in 33 of those primaries, and nine of those primaries were open, meaning an incumbent did not seek re-election in those districts.
Ballotpedia identified the Republican primaries in districts 7, 9, 24, 30, 43, 50, and 57 as battleground primaries. The primaries in districts 24 and 30 were for open seats, while incumbents faced primary challengers in districts 7, 9, 43, 50, and 57.
The 2024 elections took place in the context of a conflict among House Republicans. While 57 of 62 House members were Republican, 26 voted with the Freedom Caucus, and 12 officially identified with the Freedom Caucus.[164][165] This was a significant increase from 2017 when just five members identified with the Freedom Caucus. According to the Cowboy State Daily's Leo Wolfson, "While Republicans have a supermajority in Wyoming, there’s a growing division between the Freedom Caucus and others in the party who say they’re too far right. Conversely, members of the Freedom Caucus have said these more centrist Republicans as being 'liberals' and couch them as adversaries who side with Democrats. There are 25-26 Republican members of the Wyoming House who are politically aligned with the Freedom Caucus. That leaves about 31 other Republicans and the five Democrats. Based on those numbers, the Freedom Caucus could gain as few as three seats to claim a majority of the Republican seats in the House. It would have to gain at least five or six seats to take a full majority."[166]
According to WyoFile's Maya Shimizu Harris, "In recent years, Republicans in Wyoming’s GOP-dominated Legislature have calcified into two distinct factions. That’s particularly the case in the House of Representatives where, last year, a group of lawmakers called the Wyoming Freedom Caucus staked their claim after partnering with a Washington, D.C.-based organization — the State Freedom Caucus Network — that aims to establish similar groups across the nation.... The partnership provides the group with a state director — Jessica Rubino, the spouse of Secretary of State Chief Policy Officer and Hageman nephew Joe Rubino — to research bills and provide vote recommendations."[164]
Over the past two years, the Wyoming Freedom Caucus has supported legislation to lower taxes, eliminate gun-free zones, ban abortions, ensure the state has closed primaries, and prohibit certain medical procedures for minors.[164][167][168][169][170] Because two-thirds of the chamber must approve measures for them to be included in the budget, the Freedom Caucus had sufficient numbers to block measures from being proposed in the budget.
Freedom Caucus chairman Rep. John Bear (R) said the group "will not be deterred from exposing waste at all levels of government, nor the loss of our society’s moral compass by so many in the name of progress. It is what our voters sent us to Cheyenne to do."[171][172]
Freedom Caucus opponents formed a group called the Wyoming Caucus. State Rep. Clark Stith (R), a member of the Wyoming Caucus, said, "The most striking feature of the House Freedom Caucus this last session was they were voting in lockstep in accordance with text-message instructions that they would receive...The interesting effect of that is that it, to some extent, forced the remaining members of the House to become slightly more organized."
Some Democratic representatives expressed alignment with the Wyoming Caucus during budget negotiations. Rep. Karlee Provenza (D) said, "Team Wyoming and the Democrats were voting on how to spend government money to benefit the people of Wyoming, knowing that some money has to be spent. The other side doesn’t think any money should be spent on anything and that churches and private organizations should save us."[173]
There were 11 contested Republican primaries for the Wyoming State Senate that took place on August 20, 2024. Ballotpedia identified eight of those primaries as battlegrounds. Click here for a breakdown of the individual battleground primaries.
The primaries took place in the context of disagreements between two legislative caucuses. According to WyoFile, the state Republican Party was, at the time of the election, "divided between traditionalist and hard-line factions," with the Wyoming Caucus representing the former and the Wyoming Freedom Caucus representing the latter. Since its founding, the Wyoming Freedom Caucus "managed to push through measures that initially appeared destined to die, such as legislation to restrict crossover voting and an abortion ban that’s now held up in court."[174]
Wyoming's 2024 legislative primaries were more competitive than any in the preceding decade. There were the highest numbers of contested Republican primaries (54), Republican candidates running (141), and contested primaries involving Republican incumbents (41) than in any year since at least 2010. Click here for more details on primary election competitiveness.
The Prosperity and Commerce PAC, associated with Gov. Mark Gordon (R), and the Wyoming Hope PAC supported candidates aligned with the Wyoming Caucus.[175][176] Former state legislator Allen Jaggi's (R) Constitutional Issues PAC supported candidates aligned with the Wyoming Freedom Caucus.[177]
The eight primaries Ballotpedia identified as battlegrounds included two elections where Wyoming Caucus-aligned and Wyoming Freedom Caucus-aligned candidates ran for open seats. The six battlegrounds with an incumbent on the ballot included four where the incumbent faced a Wyoming Caucus-aligned challenger and two where the incumbent faced a Wyoming Freedom Caucus-aligned challenger.
All six incumbents running in battleground districts won their primaries. The Wyoming Freedom Caucus-aligned candidate won both battleground primaries without an incumbent on the ballot.
As of August 18, 2024, Republicans controlled the Wyoming Senate with a 29-2 majority. Fifteen seats were up for election. A Democratic candidate filed to run in three of those seats, meaning Republicans maintained their Senate majority regardless of the election outcome.
As of the 2024 election, Wyoming was one of 23 Republican trifectas. A state government trifecta is a term used to describe a single-party government where one political party holds the governor's office and a majority in both chambers of the state legislature.
In state legislative general elections, 134 incumbents lost to challengers—2.9% of incumbents running for re-election and 4.4% of incumbents in contested general elections. This was the lowest percentage of incumbents defeated in general elections since at least 2010.
In 2024 general elections:
93 Democratic incumbents lost, 4.3% of the 2,176 Democratic incumbents who ran and 7.0% of the 1,324 contested Democratic incumbents.
39 Republican incumbents lost, 1.6% of the 2,491 Republican incumbents who ran and 2.3% of the 1,721 contested Republican incumbents.
Two minor party or independent incumbents lost, 18.2% of the 11 minor party or independent incumbents who ran and 28.6% of the seven contested independent or minor party incumbents.
The total number of incumbents defeated in general elections—134—represented a 40.4% decrease from the number of incumbents defeated in 2020.
The chart below shows a partisan breakdown of incumbents defeated in general elections from 2010 to 2024.
Click [show] on the header below to see a full list of incumbents defeated in general elections by state. Winners marked with (i) were incumbents from the same chamber.
List of incumbents defeated in state legislative general elections, 2024
In primaries, 169 incumbents lost to primary challengers, 3.5% of incumbents who ran for re-election and 16.3% of incumbents in contested primaries.
In 2024 primaries:
34 Democratic incumbents lost, 1.5% of the 2,216 Democratic incumbents who ran and 9.3% of the 365 contested Democratic incumbents.
135 Republican incumbents lost, 5.1% of the 2,626 Republican incumbents who ran and 20.0% of the 674 contested Republican incumbents.
The total number of incumbents defeated in primaries—169—is less than in 2022 (213) and more than in 2020 (157).
The chart below shows a partisan breakdown of incumbents defeated in primaries from 2010 to 2024.
Click [show] on the header below to see a full list of incumbents defeated in primaries by state. Winners marked with (i) were incumbents from the same chamber.
List of incumbents defeated in state legislative primaries, 2024
State legislative leaders defeated in primaries[edit]
As of June 30, 2024, 92 state legislative leaders in 25 states have had primaries.[178][179] Fifteen of those leaders (16.3%) faced contested primaries.[180] Of those, 11 were Republicans and four were Democrats. Three legislative leaders were defeated in their primaries, representing 20.0% of those who faced primaries and 3.3% of all legislative leaders seeking re-election.
The 15 state legislators who faced primary challengers included three Idaho legislators as well as two each from Nevada and West Virginia.
Click [show] on the table below for a table detailing the results of contested primaries involving state legislative leaders in 2024.
State legislative leaders facing contested primaries, 2024
Three legislative leaders who were defeated in primaries in 2024 were Republican state senators, and one was a Democratic House member. One Republican served as president, one as president pro tempore, one as majority leader, and one Democrat served as speaker.
First elected in 2003, Longhurst had served as Delaware's speaker of the House from 2023-2024.[183] Longhurst was previously the House Majority Whip from 2008-2012 and the House Majority Leader from 2012-2023.[183] Longhurst lost the Democratic primary to Kamela Smith (D) 53.3%-46.7%. During the primary, Longhurst's campaign website said, "Representative Valerie Longhurst has been diligently serving members of the 15th District since 2004 and has been instrumental in passing important, impactful legislation in various policy areas, including: mental and behavioral Health, quality public education, public safety and criminal justice reform, environment and energy, economic empowerment, health and quality of life, [and] women’s issues."[184]
Delaware Online's Shane Brennan said, "Voter turnout was consistently slow. Signs and workers representing state house representative candidates were not as common or visible as candidates for Wilmington, New Castle County and governor races."[185][186] Smith was endorsed by the Working Families Party during the primary, and said, "Once I’m in Dover, I’ll be pushing for government transparency, better education, health care, and housing, and the investments in our people that they deserve."[187][185]
First elected in 1994, Saiki had served as Hawaii's speaker of the House since May 2017. Saiki was previously the House majority leader from 2013-2017. Saiki lost the Democratic primary to Kim Coco Iwamoto (D) 49.3%-44.6%.[188] During the campaign, Saiki's campaign website said, "When I think about the future for Hawaiʻi, I think about how we can create a more affordable Hawaiʻi. I believe that we need to address the root causes of why so many local families struggle: cost of living, housing that can be affordable for all, and public safety so that our ʻohana can thrive."[189]
Spectrum News' Michael Tsai said local media expected a close race between Saiki and Iwamoto after the two candidates had competed against each other in the previous two election years. Tsai said, "Saiki had defeated Iwamoto by less than 200 votes in each of the last two elections...Iwamoto, an attorney and former state Board of Education member, previously fell short in races for state Senate District 13 and lieutenant governor in 2018. With her win on Saturday, she becomes the first transgender woman elected to the state Legislature."
First elected in 2008, Winder had served as Idaho's senate president pro tempore since December 2020.[190] Winder lost the Republican primary to Josh Keyser (R) 52.3%–47.7%. Winder ran on his experience, with his campaign website quoting an editorial describing the incumbent as a "force of stability...a true conservative," saying Winder had "stepped up to oppose extremism while many others have remained silent."[191] Keyser ran as a political outsider, saying he would "offer a fresh perspective to help navigate the complex challenges we face in our beautiful state."[192]
Idaho media identified Winder's opposition to the Idaho Freedom Caucus as an element in his defeat. Ahead of the 2024 legislative session, Winder removed two caucus members from committee leadership positions and disciplined a third, saying the members had posted content on social media that was defamatory to fellow legislative Republicans. Following the removal, the Republican Party of Ada County—Idaho's largest county—censured Winder.[193] In an interview with the Idaho Press, Winder said his opposition to the affiliated Idaho Freedom Foundation was a factor in his defeat.[194]
First elected in 2016, McCortney had served as Oklahoma's senate majority leader since October 2021 and was selected earlier in 2024 to serve as president pro tempore after the 2024 elections.[195][196] McCortney lost the Republican primary to Jonathan Wingard (R) 51.8%–48.2%. McCortney said he was running "to continue working for the things that make our area truly special things [sic] like our conservative values, strong schools, an improved economy, protecting our natural resources and promoting agriculture and energy."[197] Wingard ran on his military experience and values, saying he would "fight for you as a conservative, value-driven Oklahoman...It is my honor and privilege to ask you to join me as we fight the good fight of faith, freedom and rights."[198]
KFOR political analyst Mike Turpen said the earlier timing of the 2024 legislative primaries as well as McCortney's business as a legislative leader were factors in the election because they left the incumbent with less time to campaign: "Everybody’s telling me this move, moving the election up a week… It cost him and others the ability to go campaign at home...And that was critical time lost on the campaign trail."[199] In an interview with KGOU, political science professor and district resident Christine Pappas said the results were a surprise: "It just kind of seemed like a regular old campaign where you expect the incumbent to win with 65%, 70% of the vote. And it was just quite shocking to see the outcome, which had Wingard narrowly beating McCortney. In fact, McCortney won no counties."[200]
First elected in 2012, Blair had served as West Virginia's senate president since December 2020.[201] Blair lost the Republican primary to Tom Willis (R) 44.4%–32.2%. A third candidate, Michael Folk (R), received 23.4% of the vote. Blair ran on his experience in leadership, with his campaign website saying he "passed major reforms that led to more people working and being paid higher wages than ever before," "led the effort in the state legislature to pass the largest tax cut in history," and "passed the most pro-life legislation in state history which made abortion illegal in West Virginia."[202] Willis ran on his military experience and his involvement in the community, saying he was "the leader we need to build a better West Virginia."[203]
Local media coverage discussed Blair's loss in the context of other incumbent defeats in the state senate. Blair was one of four state senators to lose a primary out of the 14 who filed for re-election in 2024. West Virginia MetroNews correspondent Brad McElhinny said Blair emphasized different policies than his two challengers: "Blair was conservative but emphasized his passion for economic development, for growth in West Virginia...The other two guys, Willis and (Mike) Folk, were much more animated by cultural issues." In an interview with MetroNews, consultant Greg Thomas said the district's demographics worked against Blair: "It’s the fastest growing part or [sic] the state and you have a lot of new voters which diminishes the power of the incumbency."[204]
In 2024, 52 state legislative special elections were scheduled for 2024 in 22 states. Between 2011 and 2023, an average of 71 special elections took place each year.
In 2024, 179 state legislators—77 state senators and 102 state representatives—were term-limited in 2024. This represented 3.1% of the 5,807 total seats up for election in November 2024.[205]
There were fewer term-limited legislators in 2024 than in 2022 and 2020. In 2022 and 2020, there were 252 and 211 term-limited state legislators, respectively. Ballotpedia tracked the most term-limited legislators in 2010 when 375 legislators were termed out.
100 Republicans were term-limited, while 66 Democrats and 13 independents were term-limited. In even-numbered election years between 2010 and 2022, Democrats averaged about 99 term-limited legislators, while Republicans averaged 148 term-limited legislators.
The Nebraska State Senate and Montana House of Representatives had the highest percentage of term-limited legislators in 2024. In the Nebraska Senate, 52% of the incumbents up for election were term-limited, while 17% of the Montana House were term-limited.
Ballotpedia's 14th Annual State Legislative Competitiveness Report analyzed all 5,807 state legislative seats that were up for election on November 5, 2024, in 44 states.
State legislative competitiveness in 2024 was below average for even years from 2010 to 2024.
In 2024, the nationwide State Legislative Competitiveness Index was 33.2, down from the last three election cycles: 2022 (36.6), 2020 (33.4), and 2018 (36.1).
State legislative competitiveness in 2024 (33.2) was below the 14-year competitiveness index average of 34.0. This average was for even-year elections only. Looking at averages across the last three even-year election cycles: 2024 had fewer open seats, incumbents in contested primaries, and seats with major competition.
Key findings of this report include:
962 seats were open (16.6%). This was the second-smallest number of open seats since Ballotpedia began gathering data in 2010.
1,039 incumbents faced contested primaries (21.4%). This was roughly average compared to previous years, down from 26.8% in 2022 but higher than the 20.1% in 2020.
3,583 seats were contested by both major parties (61.7%), higher than in 2022 (59.2%) but lower than in 2018 (66.3%) and 2020 (65.2%).
Nationwide State Legislative Competitiveness Index, 2024
The graphic below combines these figures for every election cycle from 2010 to 2024, showing the change in competitiveness, and how each criterion affects the overall competitiveness indices, over time.
There were 5,807 state legislative seats up for election on November 5, 2024, in 44 states. Of that total, there were 962 open seats, guaranteeing at least 17% of all seats would be won by newcomers. This was the second-smallest number of open seats since Ballotpedia began gathering data in 2010.
Ballotpedia uses the number and percentage of open seats to help determine the overall competitiveness of an election cycle. A greater number of open seats guarantees more newcomers entering legislatures and typically results in more candidates running for office. A smaller number of open seats guarantees fewer newcomers and typically results in fewer candidates running for office.
In 2024:
There were 407 open Democratic seats, those most recently held by Democrats at the time of filing.
There were 545 open Republican seats, those most recently held by Republicans at the time of filing.
There were 10 other open seats. This includes those most recently held by minor party or independent officeholders at the time of filing.
The total number of open seats—962—was higher than in 2020 (876), the last time all 44 states held elections, representing a 10% increase.
Open state legislative seats, 2024
Chamber
Seats
Democratic
Republican
Other
Total
#
%
House
4,712
323
408
8
739
15.7%
Senate
1,095
84
137
2
223
20.4%
Total
5,807
407
545
10
962
16.6%
The chart below shows a breakdown of open seats from 2010 to 2024. The "Other" value includes seats left open by minor party and independent officeholders.
There were 5,470 state legislative districts up for election nationwide, creating 10,642 possible primaries. Of that total, there were 1,731 contested primaries, meaning 16% of all primaries were contested. This percentage is tied with 2014 (16%) as the lowest percentage of contested primaries since Ballotpedia began gathering data in 2010.
In 2024:
There were 608 contested Democratic primaries, representing 12% of all possible Democratic primaries and a 27% decrease from 2020, the last time all 44 states held elections.
There were 1,005 contested Republican primaries, representing 19% of all possible Republican primaries and a 14% increase from 2020, the last time all 44 states held elections.
There were 118 contested top-two/four primaries, representing 40% of all possible top-two/four primaries and an 8% increase from 2020, the last time all 44 states held elections.
The total number of contested primaries—1,731—was down from 2020 (1,827), the last time all 44 states held elections, representing a 5% decrease.
Contested state legislative primaries, 2024
Chamber
Districts
Democratic
Republican
Top-two/four
Total
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
House
4,389
484
11.6%
784
18.8%
79
36.2%
1,347
15.7%
Senate
1,081
124
12.4%
221
22.1%
39
48.8%
384
18.4%
Total
5,470
608
11.8%
1,005
19.4%
118
39.6%
1,731
16.3%
The chart below shows a breakdown of contested primaries from 2010 to 2024.
There were 5,807 state legislative seats up for election on November 5, 2024, in 44 states. Overall, 4,853 incumbents filed for re-election and were running at the time of their respective primaries. Of that total, 1,039 incumbents faced contested primaries, representing 21% of all incumbents who filed for re-election. This was roughly average compared to previous years, down from 27% in 2022 but higher than the 20% in 2020.
Ballotpedia uses the number and percentage of incumbents in contested primaries to help determine the overall competitiveness of an election cycle. A larger number of contested primaries indicates more opportunities for voters to elect a non-incumbent to office. A smaller number indicates fewer of those opportunities.
In 2024:
There were 365 Democratic incumbents in contested primaries, representing 17% of all Democratic incumbents who filed for re-election, a 26% decrease from 2020.
There were 674 Republican incumbents in contested primaries, representing 26% of all Republican incumbents who filed for re-election, a 32% increase from 2020.
The total number of incumbents in contested primaries—1,039—was higher than in 2020 (1,006), the last time all 44 states held elections, representing a 3% increase.
State legislative incumbents in contested primaries, 2024
There were 5,807 state legislative seats up for election on November 5, 2024, in 44 states. Of that total, 2,224 (38%) were uncontested and had no major party competition. This was roughly average compared to previous years, down from 41% in 2022 but higher than the 34% and 35% in 2018 and 2020, respectively. The remaining 3,583 (62%) seats were contested by both major parties.
Ballotpedia uses the level of major party competition to help determine the overall competitiveness of an election cycle. A larger number of seats without major party competition indicates fewer options on the ballot. A smaller number indicates more options.
In 2024:
Democrats were guaranteed to win 1,111 seats (19%) that lacked Republican competition, an 8% increase from 2020, the last time all 44 states held elections.
Republicans were guaranteed to win 1,109 seats (19%) that lacked Democratic competition, a 10% increase from 2020, the last time all 44 states held elections.
Overall, Democrats ran for 4,694 seats (81%) and Republicans ran for 4,692 (81%).
There were four seats guaranteed to minor party or independent candidates because no major party candidates ran.
The total number of seats without major party competition—2,224—was more than in 2020 (2,044), the last time all 44 states held elections, representing a 9% increase.
One of the two major parties was guaranteed a simple majority in 19 chambers across 14 states due to the lack of major party competition.
Major party competition in state legislative elections, 2024
Chamber
Seats
Uncontested
Contested
Only Democrats
Only Republicans
Total
#
%
#
%
#
%
#
%
House
4,712
902
19.1%
901
19.1%
1,807
38.3%
2,905
61.7%
Senate
1,095
209
19.1%
208
19.0%
417
38.1%
678
61.9%
Total
5,807
1,111
19.1%
1,109
19.1%
2,224
38.3%
3,583
61.7%
The chart below shows a breakdown of major party competition in state legislative elections from 2010 to 2024.
Across all 5,807 seats up for election, the average margin of victory was 27.3%. An electoral margin of victory (MOV) is the difference between the share of votes cast for the winning candidate and the second-place candidate in an election. Only races with more than one candidate were included in this average. The chart below displays the breakdown of races by the winner's partisan affiliation and margin of victory for each state legislative chamber with single-member districts which held elections in 2024. A darker shade of red or blue indicates a larger margin for that party.
The table below displays how many seats were up for election in each chamber and how many seats each party won. It also includes a breakdown of how many seats Democrats and Republicans won by 10% or less and without opposition in each chamber, as well as the average margin of victory for each party. Click on a particular header to sort the table.
Average MOV for state legislative elections, 2024
Chamber
Seats up for election
Seats won by Democrats
Seats won by Democrats by margins of 10% or less
Seats won by unopposed Democrats
Average margin of victory for Democrats
Seats won by Republicans
Seats won by Republicans by margins of 10% or less
Seats won by unopposed Republicans
Average margin of victory for Republicans
Seats won by independent and minor party candidates
Alaska House of Representatives
40
14
4
3
13.9%
21
7
5
15.1%
5
Alaska State Senate
10
5
1
2
17.7%
5
3
0
11.6%
0
Arizona House of Representatives
60
13
5
2
10.9%
17
7
0
10.3%
0
Arizona State Senate
30
13
2
5
25.9%
17
4
3
25.0%
0
Arkansas House of Representatives
100
19
4
13
16.4%
81
3
33
38.3%
0
Arkansas State Senate
18
2
0
2
16
0
9
42.9%
0
California State Assembly
80
60
5
1
26.4%
20
6
0
16.1%
0
California State Senate
20
16
4
0
22.3%
4
3
0
16.2%
0
Colorado House of Representatives
65
43
9
3
30.2%
22
5
4
19.1%
0
Colorado State Senate
18
12
3
1
34.6%
6
1
0
27.0%
0
Connecticut House of Representatives
151
102
14
28
28.2%
49
15
12
14.8%
0
Connecticut State Senate
36
25
5
3
25.7%
11
5
2
10.5%
0
Delaware House of Representatives
41
27
2
12
21.3%
14
2
8
16.0%
0
Delaware State Senate
10
7
1
5
47.3%
3
0
2
97.8%
0
Florida House of Representatives
120
35
8
15
27.0%
85
10
0
26.2%
0
Florida State Senate
20
6
1
2
32.7%
14
0
0
27.8%
0
Georgia House of Representatives
180
80
4
43
31.3%
100
4
47
33.8%
0
Georgia State Senate
56
23
1
15
44.5%
33
1
18
35.5%
0
Hawaii House of Representatives
51
42
0
14
36.9%
9
4
2
11.5%
0
Hawaii State Senate
12
10
0
4
38.8%
2
2
0
7.2%
0
Idaho House of Representatives
70
9
1
4
17.5%
61
3
14
46.1%
0
Idaho State Senate
35
6
1
2
14.7%
29
2
5
50.7%
0
Illinois House of Representatives
118
78
8
34
31.1%
40
6
23
17.9%
0
Illinois State Senate
20
17
0
6
21.3%
3
0
3
0
Indiana House of Representatives
100
30
4
12
28.4%
70
4
24
36.4%
0
Indiana State Senate
25
7
0
4
44.4%
18
0
8
36.2%
0
Iowa House of Representatives
100
33
6
15
24.4%
67
8
13
26.9%
0
Iowa State Senate
25
6
4
1
11.0%
19
2
3
27.6%
0
Kansas House of Representatives
125
37
5
18
21.3%
88
11
32
26.4%
0
Kansas State Senate
40
9
0
3
31.0%
31
6
5
28.7%
0
Kentucky House of Representatives
100
20
3
12
16.3%
80
3
43
34.3%
0
Kentucky State Senate
19
5
0
4
18.5%
13
0
7
42.3%
1
Maine House of Representatives
151
76
15
16
23.5%
73
15
12
21.2%
2
Maine State Senate
35
20
3
2
21.5%
15
3
0
24.2%
0
Massachusetts House of Representatives
160
134
8
103
29.4%
25
3
13
23.7%
1
Massachusetts State Senate
40
35
1
26
28.2%
5
1
2
17.0%
0
Michigan House of Representatives
110
52
13
1
28.2%
58
10
0
27.2%
0
Minnesota House of Representatives
134
67
11
5
31.5%
67
10
0
29.7%
0
Missouri House of Representatives
163
52
11
18
35.0%
111
8
28
41.6%
0
Missouri State Senate
17
7
1
1
33.1%
10
2
2
34.4%
0
Montana House of Representatives
100
42
16
0
16.5%
58
2
12
40.1%
0
Montana State Senate
25
9
2
0
18.4%
16
1
4
35.7%
0
Nebraska State Senate
25
8
3
2
13.1%
16
11
0
12.9%
1
Nevada State Assembly
42
27
12
4
13.1%
15
0
4
28.2%
0
Nevada State Senate
10
6
2
1
11.4%
4
2
1
8.4%
0
New Hampshire House of Representatives
400
100
52
18
11.4%
103
70
8
7.6%
0
New Hampshire State Senate
24
8
1
0
22.0%
16
3
0
14.4%
0
New Mexico House of Representatives
70
44
8
22
17.2%
26
4
16
18.1%
0
New Mexico State Senate
42
26
2
18
12.1%
16
3
9
17.3%
0
New York State Assembly
150
101
11
40
31.6%
49
5
18
23.0%
0
New York State Senate
63
40
4
11
32.4%
23
4
8
17.7%
0
North Carolina House of Representatives
120
49
6
21
30.8%
71
10
3
26.9%
0
North Carolina State Senate
50
20
4
5
32.4%
30
3
0
26.4%
0
North Dakota House of Representatives
46
2
0
1
27.6%
22
6
9
15.2%
0
North Dakota State Senate
23
2
1
1
1.8%
21
2
8
38.8%
0
Ohio House of Representatives
99
34
5
6
34.0%
65
6
6
32.0%
0
Ohio State Senate
16
3
1
0
12.0%
13
2
1
28.4%
0
Oklahoma House of Representatives
101
20
3
11
19.5%
81
3
58
38.5%
0
Oklahoma State Senate
24
2
0
1
18.4%
22
1
12
35.0%
0
Oregon House of Representatives
60
31
6
7
30.4%
29
3
9
29.1%
0
Oregon State Senate
15
6
0
1
41.3%
9
1
2
36.0%
0
Pennsylvania House of Representatives
203
101
9
48
19.0%
102
4
44
31.2%
0
Pennsylvania State Senate
25
10
1
4
17.0%
15
3
4
26.6%
0
Rhode Island House of Representatives
75
64
5
46
15.6%
10
3
2
19.8%
1
Rhode Island State Senate
38
34
1
21
21.5%
4
0
1
24.1%
0
South Carolina House of Representatives
124
36
6
20
25.2%
88
4
50
32.0%
0
South Carolina State Senate
46
12
3
6
26.0%
34
4
14
28.5%
0
South Dakota House of Representatives
70
3
2
0
8.7%
34
7
14
14.0%
0
South Dakota State Senate
35
3
2
1
4.4%
32
1
17
30.9%
0
Tennessee House of Representatives
99
24
3
10
39.0%
75
3
20
44.9%
0
Tennessee State Senate
16
2
0
0
36.8%
14
0
3
46.1%
0
Texas House of Representatives
150
62
6
36
25.9%
88
3
18
35.5%
0
Texas State Senate
15
7
0
5
26.0%
8
1
0
23.3%
0
Utah House of Representatives
75
14
3
1
29.8%
61
4
19
38.4%
0
Utah State Senate
14
2
0
0
13.9%
12
0
3
33.0%
0
Vermont House of Representatives
150
64
22
28
13.3%
43
11
19
12.8%
2
Vermont State Senate
30
6
4
1
6.3%
10
3
2
12.7%
0
Washington House of Representatives
98
59
5
12
33.3%
39
4
7
24.6%
0
Washington State Senate
25
13
3
2
25.1%
12
3
2
16.3%
0
West Virginia House of Delegates
100
9
3
2
20.8%
91
4
40
37.1%
0
West Virginia State Senate
17
1
1
0
8.8%
16
1
6
45.1%
0
Wisconsin State Assembly
99
45
16
14
15.6%
54
8
2
27.2%
0
Wisconsin State Senate
16
10
5
5
4.0%
6
0
0
28.8%
0
Wyoming House of Representatives
62
6
2
2
12.9%
56
2
45
43.2%
0
Wyoming State Senate
15
0
0
0
15
0
12
28.7%
0
Totals
5,807
2,421
409
894
25.1%
3,036
394
914
28.9%
13
State legislative races decided by 0.5% or less[edit]
In 2024, there were 47 races decided by margins of 0.5% or smaller.
State legislative races decided by 0.5% or less, 2024
In the previous election cycle, Democrats gained control of four chambers: the Michigan House and Senate, Minnesota Senate, and Pennsylvania House. Additionally, in Alaska, a bipartisan governing coalition comprised of Democrats and Republicans won control of the Alaska Senate. Republicans previously controlled all five chambers.
Changes in chamber partisan control, 2010 to 2023[edit]
From 2010 to 2023, 41 chambers switched control: 21 switched control once, 15 switched control twice, four switched control four times, and one—the New Hampshire House of Representatives—switched control five times. During that same time, there were 58 chambers that did not switch control.
Before the 2010 elections, Democrats controlled 60 of the country's 99 state legislative chambers, Republicans controlled 37, and neither party controlled the remaining two chambers. After the 2023 elections, Democrats controlled 41 chambers and Republicans controlled 56. Multipartisan majorities controlled the Alaska Senate and House.
Most changes in partisan control came from major elections, but some also came through special elections (Louisiana House in 2010; Washington Senate in 2017) and party-switching (Louisiana House in 2010; Mississippi Senate in 2011). In some cases, the party that gained control did not have a numerical majority but instead controlled the chamber through a bipartisan coalition (i.e., Alaska House in 2016). This table does not account for changes in party control or ties in a chamber that lasted for less than one year and were not the result of a regularly scheduled election. An example of this is the brief period of Democratic control in the Virginia State Senate in 2014.[207]
For this chart, a red box indicates that the chamber changed from Democratic to Republican control, and a blue box indicates that the chamber changed from Republican to Democratic control.[208]
A state government trifecta occurs when one political party controls the primary levers of power in a state: the governor's office, the state Senate, and the state House. From 2010 to 2018, the Republican Party increased its number of trifectas and the Democratic Party saw a decline in its trifectas. Democrats picked up six trifectas in the 2018 elections, and Republicans lost four trifectas. Following the 2021 elections, the Democratic trifecta in Virginia became a split government after Republicans gained control of the state House and governorship. After the 2023 elections, the divided government in Louisiana became a Republican trifecta when Jeff Landry (R) won election as governor.
This chart shows the number of trifectas each party held heading into elections from 2010 to 2023, and the number of trifectas following the 2023 elections.
In the 50 states, there are 99 state legislative chambers altogether. Across 44 states, 85 of those chambers held regular legislative elections in 2024. These elections were for 5,807 of the country's 7,386 state legislative seats (79%). The general election for state legislative races was held on November 5, 2024.
Two state legislative chambers, the Michigan and Minnesota state Houses, changed party control following the 2024 general election. Republicans won control of the Michigan House from Democrats, and won a tie in the Minnesota House.
To learn more about the state legislative races that were on your ballot, click here to use our Sample Ballot Lookup tool.
As of January 25th, 2026, Republicans controlled 55.12% of all state legislative seats nationally, while Democrats held 43.83%. Republicans held a majority in 57 chambers, and Democrats held the majority in 39 chambers. Two chambers (Alaska House and Alaska Senate) were organized under multipartisan, power-sharing coalitions. One chamber (Minnesota House of Representatives) was split evenly between both parties.
Partisan balance of all 7,386 state legislative seats
State legislative seats that changed party control in 2024: As a result of the Nov. 5, 2024, elections, partisan composition of all 7,386 state legislative seats changed by 0.7 percentage points. Democrats had a net loss of 54 seats, representing 0.7% of all state legislative seats. Republicans had a net gain of 55 seats, representing 0.7% of all state legislative seats. Independents and minor party officeholders had a net loss of one seat, representing 0.01% of all state legislative seats.
Annual State Legislative Competitiveness Report: Vol. 12, 2022: Competitiveness refers to the presence of choice throughout the election cycle. A greater level of competitiveness means voters have the ability to make more decisions. A lower level of competitiveness equals fewer choices. State legislative competitiveness in 2022 reached its highest level compared to all even-year election cycles since 2010. In 2022, the nationwide State Legislative Competitiveness Index is 36.2, beating out 2018 (36.1) and the 2012 post-redistricting cycle (35.2).
↑The term state legislative leader refers to any officeholder holding any of the following positions in a state legislature: president, president pro tem, speaker, speaker pro tem, majority leader or minority leader.
↑This figure includes officeholders whose primaries were canceled because no challenger filed.
↑A top-two primary is only considered to be contested if more than two candidates filed, meaning there was a chance for a candidate to be eliminated in the primary.
↑In a primary where only one candidate can advance, the margin of victory is the percentage difference in vote totals between the winner and the runner-up. In a primary where multiple candidates can advance, the margin of victory is the percentage difference in vote totals between the lowest-placing winner and the highest-placing loser.
↑Margin of victory for the runoff. Phelan and challenger David Covey (R) advanced to a runoff because neither received more than 50% of the vote in the primary. Phelan placed second in the primary with 43.3%.
↑Some of the 179 term-limited state legislators in 2024 may have resigned before their term ends. These legislators were still counted in the total number of term-limited legislators in 2024.
↑Totals may include minor party or independent officeholders.
↑2015 and 2013 are not included because no chambers changed those years.
↑The chamber first changed from Democratic to Republican control in a February 2011 special election. Republicans increased their majority to 24-15 in the 2011 elections.
↑Chamber went from being controlled by a Democratic-led bipartisan coalition to being led by a coalition with power split between the parties.
↑Chamber went from a Republican majority to a bipartisan governing coalition.
↑The chamber changed partisan control prior to the 2011 elections due to Democrats switching to the Republican Party and special election wins by Republicans. Republicans increased their majority in the 2011 elections to 31-21.
↑In the 2011 elections, the chamber changed from a 22-18 Democratic advantage to a 20-20 tie. Republicans effectively controlled the chamber because Lieutenant Gov. Bill Bolling (R) could cast tie-breaking votes.
↑Democrats won a majority of seats, but did not have a majority when the legislative session began due to vacancies created during the interim.
↑This chamber did not hold elections in 2010. It switched partisan control in December 2010 when Democrat Noble Ellington changed his party affiliation to Republican. In the regularly-scheduled 2011 elections, Republicans increased their majority to 58-45.