|
November 8, 2016 |
March 15, 2016 |
Richard Burr |
Richard Burr |
Cook Political Report: Toss-up[1] Sabato's Crystal Ball: Toss-up[2] Rothenberg & Gonzales: Pure Toss-up[3] |
|
|
Voters in North Carolina elected one member to the U.S. Senate in the election on November 8, 2016.
The race for North Carolina's U.S. Senate seat was one of nine competitive battleground races in 2016 that helped Republicans maintain control of the upper chamber after the November 8 general election. Incumbent Sen. Richard Burr (R) won re-election, defeating former state Rep. Deborah Ross (D) and pizza delivery driver Sean Haugh (L) in the general election.
While most of his colleagues facing tough re-election campaigns were out on the trail, Burr, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, was focused on his duties as chairman and did not officially begin campaigning until October 7, 2016. He told The Associated Press, “I become a candidate on Oct. 7, when the United States Senate is adjourned. I don't want there to be any question between the separation of Senate business, so I have very few conversations with campaigns and it really plays no role in my actions." Some Republican strategists were worried that Burr’s failure to attack Ross early in the race would hurt him on Election Day, while others said “Burr’s low-key style fits the ethos of the state well.”[4][5]
Republican President-elect Donald Trump, who did not establish a strong ground game in the state, and North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory (R), who was unpopular because of his stance on the state’s “bathroom bill,” complicated Burr’s path to re-election. Referring to Trump and McCrory, North Carolina GOP consultant Carter Wrenn said, “If it was a normal year, and it was just Richard and Deborah, you’d have to say Richard had a solid advantage.”[5]
With the uncertain political landscape in North Carolina—it was the only state that The Cook Political Report rated as a “toss-up” for president, Senate, and governor—outside Republican groups spent more money on attack ads in the state than they had initially planned for in an effort to maintain control of the Senate. The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) ran ads attacking Ross for being "too liberal" for North Carolina by highlighting her career with the American Civil Liberties Union. The NRSC also created the site “Radical Ross” to showcase Ross’ stance on “countless radical, out-of-touch policies.”[6][7]
Ross’s campaign spokesman Cole Leiter, who attempted to portray Burr as a Washington insider, responded to the attacks saying, “It’s no surprise that, like a typical Washington politician, [Burr]’s turning to the same big money donors he’s put first all along. But North Carolina voters won’t be fooled — they know it’s time for a change, and no amount of special interest dark money can bail Richard Burr out.”[8]
Ultimately, Burr was not hurt by his late arrival to the campaign trail or by having Trump or McCrory on the ballot. Burr outperformed Trump by earning more votes than the president-elect. After winning re-election, Burr tweeted: “Thank you North Carolina! Honored to continue serving as your senator.”[9]
This election was one of Ballotpedia's top 10 congressional races in 2016. Click here to read the full list.
HISTORICAL FACTS | |
Candidate Filing Deadline | Primary Election | General Election |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Primary: A primary election is an election in which registered voters select a candidate that they believe should be a political party's candidate for elected office to run in the general election. They are also used to choose convention delegates and party leaders. Primaries are state-level and local-level elections that take place prior to a general election. North Carolina utilizes a semi-closed primary system. Parties decide who may vote in their respective primaries. Voters may choose a primary ballot without impacting their unaffiliated status.[10][11][12][13]
Incumbent: The election filled the Class 3 Senate seat held by Richard Burr (R). He was first elected in 2004.
U.S. Senate, North Carolina General Election, 2016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Republican | Richard Burr Incumbent | 51.1% | 2,395,376 | |
Democratic | Deborah Ross | 45.4% | 2,128,165 | |
Libertarian | Sean Haugh | 3.6% | 167,592 | |
Total Votes | 4,691,133 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
U.S. Senate Republican Primary, 2016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
Richard Burr Incumbent | 61.4% | 627,354 | ||
Greg Brannon | 25.2% | 257,331 | ||
Paul Wright | 8.5% | 86,940 | ||
Larry Holmquist | 4.9% | 50,507 | ||
Total Votes | 1,022,132 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
U.S. Senate Democratic Primary, 2016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
Deborah Ross | 62.4% | 607,802 | ||
Chris Rey | 16.5% | 160,663 | ||
Kevin Griffin | 11.7% | 114,180 | ||
Ernest Reeves | 9.4% | 91,694 | ||
Total Votes | 974,339 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
General election candidates: Deborah Ross Sean Haugh |
Primary candidates:[14] |
Democratic Ernest Reeves[15] Chris Rey - Spring Lake Mayor[15][17] Deborah Ross - Former State House Majority Whip [15][18] |
Republican Greg Brannon - 2014 challenger[15][20] Larry Holmquist[15] Paul Wright[15] |
Third Party/Other |
Not running: Duane Hall - State Representative[22] |
Burr provided a slight reverse coattails effect for President Donald Trump. Burr won 51.1 percent of the vote, while Trump won 50.5 percent of the vote, a 0.6 percent difference.
A full breakdown of the Republican presidential and Senate races appears below.
*Ballotpedia identified the highlighted races as battleground races and races to watch. The vote percentages are from CNN and will be updated after the final results are released.
2016 Republican Presidential and Senate election results | |||
---|---|---|---|
State | Presidential candidate vote % | Senate candidate vote % | Vote % Difference |
Alabama | Donald Trump | Incumbent Richard Shelby | |
Totals | 62.9% | 64.2% | Shelby +1.3% |
Alaska | Donald Trump | Incumbent Lisa Murkowski | |
Totals | 53.3% | 43.8% | Trump +9.5% |
Arizona | Donald Trump | Incumbent John McCain | |
Totals | 49.5% | 53.4% | McCain +3.9% |
Arkansas | Donald Trump | Incumbent John Boozman | |
Totals | 60.4% | 59.8% | Trump +0.6% |
Florida | Donald Trump | Incumbent Marco Rubio | |
Totals | 49.1% | 52.1% | Rubio +3.0% |
Georgia | Donald Trump | Incumbent Johnny Isakson | |
Totals | 51.4% | 55.1% | Isakson +3.7% |
Idaho | Donald Trump | Incumbent Mike Crapo | |
Totals | 59.0% | 66.0% | Crapo +7.0% |
Indiana | Donald Trump | Todd Young | |
Totals | 57.2% | 52.2% | Trump + 5.0% |
Iowa | Donald Trump | Incumbent Chuck Grassley | |
Totals | 51.7% | 60.1% | Grassley +8.4% |
Kansas | Donald Trump | Incumbent Jerry Moran | |
Totals | 57.2% | 62.4% | Moran +5.2% |
Kentucky | Donald Trump | Incumbent Rand Paul | |
Totals | 62.5% | +57.3% | Trump +5.2% |
Louisiana | Donald Trump | Multiple Republican candidates | |
Totals | 58.1% | (Race not called) | - |
Missouri | Donald Trump | Incumbent Roy Blunt | |
Totals | 57.1% | 49.4% | Trump +7.7% |
North Carolina | Donald Trump | Incumbent Richard Burr | |
Totals | 50.5% | 51.1% | Burr +0.6% |
North Dakota | Donald Trump | Incumbent John Hoeven | |
Totals | 64.1% | 78.6% | Hoeven +14.5% |
Ohio | Donald Trump | Incumbent Rob Portman | |
Totals | 52.1% | 58.3% | Portman +6.2% |
Oklahoma | Donald Trump | Incumbent James Lankford | |
Totals | 65.3% | 67.7% | Lankford +2.4% |
Pennsylvania | Donald Trump | Incumbent Pat Toomey | |
Totals | 48.8% | 48.9% | Toomey +0.1% |
South Carolina | Donald Trump | Incumbent Tim Scott | |
Totals | 55.6% | 61.2% | Scott +5.6% |
South Dakota | Donald Trump | Incumbent John Thune | |
Totals | 61.5% | 71.8% | Thune +10.3% |
Utah | Donald Trump | Incumbent Mike Lee | |
Totals | 45.5% | 67.4% | Lee +21.9% |
Wisconsin | Donald Trump | Incumbent Ron Johnson | |
Totals | 47.9% | 50.2% | Johnson +2.3% |
California | Donald Trump | No Republican on the ballot | |
Totals | 33.3% | No Republican on the ballot | - |
Colorado | Donald Trump | Darryl Glenn | |
Totals | 44.8% | 45.8% | Glenn +1.0% |
Connecticut | Donald Trump | Dan Carter | |
Totals | 41.6% | 35.3% | Trump +6.3% |
Hawaii | Donald Trump | John Carroll | |
Totals | 30.1% | 22.2% | Trump +7.9% |
Illinois | Donald Trump | Incumbent Mark Kirk | |
Totals | 39.4% | 40.2% | Kirk +0.8% |
Maryland | Donald Trump | Kathy Szeliga | |
Totals | 35.3% | 36.4% | Szeliga +1.1% |
Nevada | Donald Trump | Joe Heck | |
Totals | 45.5% | 44.7% | Trump +0.8% |
New Hampshire | Donald Trump | Incumbent Kelly Ayotte | |
Totals | 47.2% | 47.9% | Ayotte +0.7% |
New York | Donald Trump | Wendy Long | |
Totals | 37.5% | 27.5% | Trump +10.0% |
Oregon | Donald Trump | Mark Callahan | |
Totals | 41.3% | 33.9% | Trump +7.4% |
Vermont | Donald Trump | Scott Milne | |
Totals | 32.6% | 33.0% | Milne +0.4% |
Washington | Donald Trump | Chris Vance | |
Totals | 37.7% | 39.2% | Vance +1.5% |
Totals | Trump's average win: 55.4% | Republican senators' average win: 58.6% | Republican senators +3.2% |
Burr and Ross debated on October 13, 2016. It was the only debate scheduled between the two candidates. The full debate can be viewed here.[23]
On July 20, 2016, while attending the Republican National Convention, Burr announced that his race for re-election in 2016 would be his last. While speaking to the North Carolina delegation in attendance at the convention, Burr said, "It's real simple. I'm beginning to get old." He added that he eventually wants to return to "the private sector and spend more time with his family," according to Roll Call.[24]
Burr defeated Greg Brannon, Larry Holmquist, and Paul Wright in the Republican primary. Ross defeated Kevin Griffin, Ernest Reeves, and Chris Rey in the Democratic primary on March 15, 2016. Haugh was unopposed in the Libertarian primary.[15]
As insurers left North Carolina's healthcare market and residents saw rising healthcare premiums, the future of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, became a central issue in the Senate race. Burr repeatedly stated his opposition to the ACA and promoted his plan to replace to healthcare law. Ross stood by the ACA, arguing that the law needed to be improved.[25][26]
According to Forbes, "85% of North Carolinians needing Obamacare coverage will have only 1 insurance company to choose from in 2017. ... [P]rior to the implementation of Obamacare, North Carolina had 29 insurers offering coverage in the non-group market: for 2016, North Carolina has only 8 insurers who still issue such coverage and a handful of others who provide transitional and/or grandfathered coverage only. With the departure of Aetna and United Healthcare, that number is down to 6 insurers, with only 2 (BCBSNC and Cigna CI -2.14%) offering coverage on the Obamacare exchange."[27]
In September 2016, after UnitedHealthcare and Aetna pulled out of the ACA exchanges in North Carolina, Brad Wilson, CEO of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina said, “It’s clear something’s wrong. Something’s not working right. ... [The uninsured will] continue to need and to get health care services. (But) nothing is free. Uncompensated care is paid for somehow, some way. It will show up in health care premiums ultimately.” According to The Charlotte Observer, "Blue Cross, the state’s largest insurer, is seeking an 18.8 percent rate increase on average for 2017, and says it under-priced its ACA products in North Carolina because it underestimated the volumes of sick people who would enroll."[28]
On September 25, 2016, Burr wrote an op-ed explaining the ACA's failures and his proposal to replaces the president's signature healthcare law. Citing rising insurance premiums, insurers leaving the ACA exchanges, and disappearing healthcare options, Burr wrote, "Obamacare is imploding. With each passing day, we see more evidence that the program that promised Americans affordable health care is on the verge of total collapse."[25]
Burr wrote that healthcare costs were expected to increase in 2017 and more insurers were expected to leave the state. He wrote, "Based on the proposed rate increases submitted to the North Carolina Department of Insurance for approval, North Carolinians could experience an increase of 19 to 25 percent in the cost of their health insurance coverage for 2017. It remains to be seen how much more premiums will skyrocket once the final rates are announced this fall. To make matters worse, the Kaiser Family Foundation predicts that for next year, 90 percent of North Carolina counties will have only one choice of insurer. Enrollment for an Obamacare policy for 2017 begins on Nov. 1, and when North Carolinians log on to the Obamacare exchange this fall to shop for a plan, they will likely find only one choice of insurer and a steep price tag."[25]
He then explained his plan to replace the ACA. He wrote, "I have offered a solution called the Patient CARE Act that would take steps to make quality, affordable health care accessible to every American through commonsense, patient-focused reforms. I believe this plan could serve as a basis for working together to roll back Obamacare’s bureaucracy and red tape and give Americans greater freedom and more choices to select the plan that best fits their pocketbooks and health needs."[25]
He also argued against a public option. He wrote, "Some have suggested a 'public option,' which is government-run health care, as the solution to Obamacare’s collapse. But we must remember that it is Obamacare’s government-imposed mandates, bureaucracy and red tape that is driving up the cost of health insurance and limiting Americans’ choice of plans. Doubling down on government failure with even more government control will only make this situation far worse for individuals and families, not better."[25]
Ross supported improving the ACA. According to Ross' campaign website, "While Deborah knows the law isn’t perfect, she believes we should be working to improve it, not wasting time and tax dollars on countless repeal efforts. These repeals would bring us back to a time when insurance companies could kick people off their plans when they got sick, charge women more than men for the same coverage, and not cover young adults entering the workforce on their parents’ plans."[26]
When asked about how she would fix the problems with the ACA, Ross said, “What we need are more choices for consumers, and those choices can include nonprofit co-ops — in some states they have nonprofit co-ops — I would only look at the ones that work. In some states they haven’t worked as well. And they could include a public option. But I wouldn’t take other things off the table. Let’s put more things on the table for the consumer. I think that that would be more palatable to the consumer and it would be easier to deal with in a divided Congress."[29]
Ross also criticized Burr's plan to replace the ACA. In a campaign email, she wrote, "Richard Burr’s plan to replace the Affordable Care Act could tax the health care you get from your employer, and give insurance companies even more power to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions and charge women more than men. That is all the more interesting when you consider the fact that Burr accepts big-money donations from insurance companies. We need to stand up to Burr and tell him to stop putting special interest groups ahead of vulnerable Americans. Add your name if you agree. The only people Burr is thinking about are people that line his own pockets -- not North Carolina families. That’s why Deborah will work in the Senate to improve and strengthen ACA, not replace it and hand the bill to middle class families."[30]
Burr repeatedly criticized Ross for supporting the nuclear deal with Iran and for not quickly making her stance known on the Obama administration’s decision to use a $400 million cash payment as leverage to ensure that Iran released four Americans who were being held there as prisoners.[31]
Burr cast multiple votes opposing the nuclear agreement, which placed limits on Iran's nuclear program in exchange for economic sanctions relief, while Ross has expressed her support for the agreement.
On August 5, 2016, Burr released the following statement explaining his opposition to the nuclear deal: “The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action is dangerously limited in the safeguards it provides for America and its allies. The President’s plan inadequately addresses Iran’s technological nuclear advancement, which would need better monitoring than this plan provides. We owe the American people, the Israeli people, and our allies in the region our best possible effort to rein in a known state sponsor of terrorism. I will not support this agreement and, as the Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, I will continue my efforts to ensure that we fully understand Iran’s capabilities and intentions.”[32]
According to her campaign website, Ross supported the Iran nuclear deal but argued that military force should be an option if Iran violated the deal. Her website states, “Iran must not be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon. This would present an existential threat to our closest ally in the region, Israel, and escalate a deadly arms race in a region already overrun by turmoil and defined by bitter rivalries. I support the Iran nuclear deal because it was the only viable option on the table to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. However, nothing in this arrangement prevents the United States from taking military action against Iran in the future. If Iran cheats on the deal and attempts to acquire nuclear weapons, absolutely all options—including the use of military force—remain on the table.”[33]
After The Wall Street Journal reported that the Obama administration used a $400 million cash payment as leverage to ensure that Iran released four Americans who were being held there as prisoners, Burr, who is chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said, "This administration continues to endanger Americans at home and abroad by releasing known terrorists, conducting dangerous prisoner exchanges, and enabling the nefarious activities of a designated state sponsor of terrorism. Decisions like these are putting our nation and our allies at risk.”[34]
According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, "U.S. officials wouldn’t let Iranians take control of the money until a Swiss Air Force plane carrying four freed Americans departed from Tehran on Jan. 17. Once that happened, an Iranian cargo plane was allowed to bring the cash home from a Geneva airport that day." The payment was part of a $1.7 billion settlement the Obama administration reached with Iran to resolve a dispute over $400 million that Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi paid to the U.S. in 1979 "for military parts that were never delivered because of the Islamic revolution that toppled him." Although the payment and the return of the four Americans occurred in January 2016, the details of the payment did not receive attention until The Wall Street Journal published an article on August 3, 2016, explaining that the administration sent "[w]ooden pallets stacked with euros, Swiss francs and other currencies" to Iran "on an unmarked cargo plane" just before Americans Jason Rezaian, Amir Hekmati, Saeed Abedini, and Nosratollah Khosravi-Roodsari were released from an Iranian prison. The Obama administration also released seven Iran nationals and "agreed to drop the names of 14 Iranian nationals it has been seeking from the watch list of Interpol, the international police agency."[35][36]
Burr criticized Ross for not making her stance known on the administration’s payment. On September 11, 2016, Ross’ campaign spokesman Cole Leiter said, “Deborah does not support the U.S. paying ransom for the release of hostages, and she agrees with national security experts that even the appearance of ransom payments puts Americans abroad at risk.”[37]
Burr and Ross both opposed the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which is a trade deal between the United States and 11 Asia-Pacific countries. The deal seeks to promote trade and strengthen the relationships between the 12 nations by reducing and eliminating tariffs, fostering competition, and creating greater opportunities for businesses. The countries involved have also agreed to promote environmental protection practices and enforce laws protecting workers. Congress has not voted on the final agreement.
Their opposition was not surprising because, according to UNC-Chapel Hill’s Department of Public Policy adjunct faculty member Ferrel Guillory, North Carolina saw many job losses after the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed into law. Guillory said, “There are people here in economic distress who see a lot of reason to blame international trade deals as part of that.”[38]
On October 10, 2015, Burr announced his opposition to the TPP. He said in a statement, “While I believe that trade can open markets for American goods and services to be sold all over the world, the TPP is a bad deal for America. The Obama administration is rigging the system to pick winners and losers in favor of industries that he and his allies support. I cannot support a deal that singles out North Carolina’s agricultural industry unfairly. I am also concerned that this deal does not adequately protect intellectual property rights and fails to provide strong enough measures to address currency manipulation. Anything less than a level playing field is unacceptable, and this deal simply does not accomplish enough for Americans. I oppose it and will do what I can to defeat it.”[39]
Burr criticized Ross for not clearly stating her position on the TPP. Ross countered that she has always opposed the trade deal. She said, “I have always said that I am against TPP. We need to protect American workers and we need to stop trade agreements. It hurts the middle class.”[38]
Ross criticized Burr for voting to give President Barack Obama trade promotion authority to negotiate the TPP. Burr spokesperson Taylor Holgate explained the vote, saying, “This was passed before Obama had signed the TPP and the details of the deal were shared. The TPA legislation requires the administration to meet certain objectives when negotiating trade agreements, requires additional transparency measures, and also enables both Houses of Congress to revoke expedited procedures if the objectives are not met.”[38]
Ross, a strong opponent of North Carolina’s transgender “bathroom bill,” tried to make the potential impact of the law a central focus in the race. On May 13, 2016, Ross said, “My reaction to HB2 versus Richard Burr’s reaction is what we’ve been emphasizing. Richard Burr has started out by saying it doesn’t discriminate, it’s not a federal issue and it won’t hurt the economy. The answer to that is wrong, wrong, wrong.”[40]
In March 2016, North Carolina’s General Assembly passed House Bill 2, which overruled Charlotte, North Carolina’s local ordinance that would have allowed transgender individuals to use the bathroom of their choosing based on the gender with which they identify. It also prevented local governments from setting up their own anti-discrimination rules, including laws against LGBT employment discrimination.[41]
Burr initially said on March 29, 2016, that he would leave future of the bill “up to the courts to determine whether the state does this, but there's no room for discrimination in America, and I think this bill does not discriminate because it embraced what's in the Title 7 statute."[42]
On May 25, 2016, when asked if he had any problems with the law, Burr said, “Yeah, I’ve got issues. The legislature botched what they were trying to do. It was far too expansive. … It will be decided one of two ways: through the courts, where everybody’s chosen to place it now, or the General Assembly and the Charlotte City Council getting together and solving what was blundered on both sides.”[43]
Ross’ campaign accused Burr of speaking out against the law for political reasons. Ross spokesman Cole Leiter said, “Now that he thinks it’s hurting his re-election chances, he’s changing his tune. Burr’s Washington-style politics of self-interest haven’t worked for North Carolina, and it’s time for a change.”[43]
On June 1, 2016, Burr said that he disagreed with the provision of HB 2, which required transgender individuals to use the bathroom that corresponds with their birth sex, rather than the sex with which they identify. In addition, he said that he opposed the provision that prohibited individuals from suing for discrimination, according to Roll Call.[44]
Ross also highlighted the economic harm the law caused the state. She said, “It’s not just PayPal, but the long-term effects of things like the film industry in Wilmington, which just got back on its feet. People were coming back, but now they’re going. The talent drain in this state is going to be enormous.”[40]
Following Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's death and the nomination of Merrick Garland to replace him, Burr explained his opposition on holding a vote to confirm Garland. He said in a statement on March 16, 2016, "The American people deserve a voice in the nomination of the next Supreme Court Justice. This appointment could easily tip the balance of the court in a direction not supported by the American people as evidenced by 2014’s election results giving Republicans both the Senate and House."[45]
On March 29, 2016, Burr reiterated his stance against holding confirmation hearings for Garland. He said, "What we've chosen to do is put precedent over person. The precedent is for almost 80 years, we haven't allowed an administration to make a nomination and have a vote in the last year of their presidency. We believe the Supreme Court shouldn't be a political pawn and to protect that, we want to make sure no Republican or Democrat president in the future takes the opportunity to coerce justices to retire and stack a deck in their last year of an administration."[42]
Ross criticized Burr for his decision to oppose confirmation hearings. She said, "Some republican senators have met with the nominee. At the very least, there should be meetings and hearings. If the Senate doesn't think that nominee is qualified, then reject that nominee but to do it before doing your work, that's just wrong."[46]
During an interview with The Courier-Tribune, both candidates were asked if the minimum wage should be increased. Burr said that the decision to raise the minimum wage should be decided by state governments rather than the federal government. He opposed a federal minimum wage because, according to some studies, it would result in job losses. Ross said that, if elected, she would work to raise the federal minimum wage to $12 and hour and eventually to $15 an hour.[47]
“ | After being pummeled by the Obama economy for the last eight years, American workers are hurting, and they are frustrated that their wages are stuck.
However, economists have reached the same conclusion about the federal minimum wage: raising it reduces the availability of entry-level jobs. In North Carolina specifically, one study found that an increase to $15 per hour would result in the loss of 334,000 jobs. I do not object to states deciding for themselves what they want to do, but I do not believe a one-size-fits-all policy set by Washington makes sense. The cost of living in Asheboro is not the same as the cost of living in New York City. If small businesses are forced to pay higher wages regardless of where they are located, many of them will have to cut positions, which means fewer jobs for the people of North Carolina. No one wants fewer jobs. I want more jobs in North Carolina — good-paying jobs that pay way more than $15 an hour. The only way to do that is by improving education and getting our economy growing again.[48] |
” |
—Sen. Richard Burr[47] |
“ | In the wealthiest nation on earth, no one who works a full-time job should have to live in poverty. But right now, too many Americans who do an honest day’s work and pay their taxes simply can’t make ends meet.
That is why, as your U.S. Senator, I will work to increase the minimum wage from $7.25 to $12 an hour and allow cities to raise it further depending on their cost of living and needs. We should index the minimum wage to inflation, so that, in time, it will rise to $15. In the state House, I co-sponsored four bills to raise the state’s minimum wage and successfully pushed legislation that raised the minimum wage for North Carolina workers.[48] |
” |
—Deborah Ross[47] |
After reports revealed that "more than half the people outside the government who met with Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money, either personally or through companies or groups, to the Clinton Foundation," Ross was asked about the Clinton Foundation and Clinton's use of a private email server to handle official state business. She said, “I would tell Hillary Clinton to her face that she handled her email in the wrong way. I mean, it was wrong. No two ways about it. … It was wrong. She said it was wrong. The mess has to be cleaned up. I have a record on ethics legislation in the General Assembly, making sure that we have transparency, making sure that we don’t have a pay-to-play system, making sure that donors and special interests don’t get special access and special perks. When you are a representative of the people and you earn their trust, the people have to come first, not the big money, not the special interests."[29]
North Carolina Senate - Richard Burr vs. Deborah Ross (October 2016-Present) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Richard Burr | Deborah Ross | Margin of Error | Sample Size | |||||||||||||||
Civitas (R) October 14-17, 2016 | 45% | 37% | +/-4.0 | 600 | |||||||||||||||
SurveyUSA October 14-16, 2016 | 45% | 43% | +/-3.9 | 651 | |||||||||||||||
CNN/ORC October 10-15, 2016 | 48% | 47% | +/-3.5 | 788 | |||||||||||||||
NBC/WSJ/Marist October 10-12, 2016 | 46% | 46% | +/-3.6 | 743 | |||||||||||||||
Suffolk University October 10-12, 2016 | 40% | 36% | +/-4.4 | 500 | |||||||||||||||
Emerson College October 10-12, 2016 | 45% | 43% | +/-3.9 | 600 | |||||||||||||||
High Point University October 1-6, 2016 | 47% | 42% | +/-4.5 | 479 | |||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
North Carolina Senate - Richard Burr vs. Deborah Ross (2015-October 2016) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Richard Burr | Deborah Ross | Margin of Error | Sample Size | |||||||||||||||
WRAL-TV/SurveyUSA September 29-October 3, 2016 | 46% | 44% | +/-3.9 | 656 | |||||||||||||||
Bloomberg September 29-October 2, 2016 | 44% | 46% | +/-3.5 | 805 | |||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac University September 27-October 2, 2016 | 46% | 46% | +/-4.4 | 507 | |||||||||||||||
Elon University September 27-30, 2016 | 43% | 44% | +/-3.8 | 660 | |||||||||||||||
Gravis Marketing September 23, 2016 | 39% | 48% | +/-3.7 | 694 | |||||||||||||||
High Point University September 17-22, 2016 | 45% | 43% | +/-4.9 | 404 | |||||||||||||||
Fox News September 18-20, 2016 | 43% | 37% | +/-3.5 | 734 | |||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling September 18-20, 2016 | 41% | 41% | +/-3.1 | 1,024 | |||||||||||||||
New York Times/Siena College September 16-19, 2016 | 42% | 46% | +/-3.6 | 782 | |||||||||||||||
Elon University September 12-16, 2016 | 43% | 44% | +/-3.9 | 644 | |||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac University August 31-September 7, 2016 | 49% | 43% | +/-3.6 | 751 | |||||||||||||||
Suffolk University September 5-7, 2016 | 41% | 37% | +/-4.4 | 500 | |||||||||||||||
CBS News August 30-September 2, 2016 | 40% | 41% | +/-4.0 | 1,088 | |||||||||||||||
Emerson College August 27-29, 2016 | 45% | 41% | +/-3.4 | 800 | |||||||||||||||
Monmouth University August 20-23, 2016 | 45% | 43% | +/-4.9 | 401 | |||||||||||||||
CNN/ORC August 18-23, 2016 | 50% | 45% | +/-3.5 | 803 | |||||||||||||||
NBC/Wall Street Journal/Marist August 4-10, 2016 | 44% | 46% | +/-3.2 | 921 | |||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling August 5-7, 2016 | 41% | 37% | +/-3.4 | 830 | |||||||||||||||
NBC/Wall Street Journal/Marist July 5-11, 2016 | 48% | 41% | +/-3.3 | 907 | |||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling June 20-21, 2016 | 40% | 37% | +/-3.2 | 947 | |||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling May 20-25, 2016 | 39% | 36% | +/-3.2 | 928 | |||||||||||||||
Civitas April 23-25, 2016 | 39% | 38% | +/-4.0 | 600 | |||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling April 22-24, 2016 | 40% | 36% | +/-3.2 | 960 | |||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling March 18-20, 2016 | 40% | 35% | +/-3.4 | 843 | |||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may not represent all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer, and campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.
Presidential elections have a significant impact on congressional elections, the most obvious of which is increased voter interest and participation. In the last two decades, presidential elections have led to roughly 15 to 20 percent higher turnout rates than in the corresponding midterm elections.[65] The following chart shows the disparity between voter turnout in presidential elections and midterms.
In the past decade, presidential elections have benefited the Democratic Party, while midterms have helped Republicans. The Democratic Party gained an average of 5 Senate seats in the last two presidential elections, and the Republican Party picked up an average of 7.5 seats in the last two midterms.[66] The fact that 2016 was a presidential election cycle was a cause of increased Republican vulnerability in the Senate.
On November 4, 2014, Thom Tillis (R) won election to the United States Senate. He defeated incumbent Kay Hagan (D), Sean Haugh (L), and several write-in candidates in the general election.
U.S. Senate, North Carolina General Election, 2014 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Democratic | Kay Hagan Incumbent | 47.3% | 1,377,651 | |
Republican | Thom Tillis | 48.8% | 1,423,259 | |
Libertarian | Sean Haugh | 3.7% | 109,100 | |
Write-in | John Rhodes | 0% | 621 | |
Write-in | David Waddell | 0% | 201 | |
Write-in | Barry Gurney | 0% | 142 | |
Write-in | Write-in (miscellaneous) | 0.1% | 4,307 | |
Total Votes | 2,915,281 | |||
Source: North Carolina State Board of Elections |
On November 2, 2010, Richard Burr (R) won re-election to the United States Senate. He defeated Elaine Marshall (D) and Michael Beitler (L) in the general election.[67]
The calendar below lists important dates for political candidates in North Carolina in 2016.
Dates and requirements for candidates in 2016 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Deadline | Event type | Event description | |
December 1, 2015 | Ballot access | Filing period for partisan candidates opens | |
December 21, 2015 | Ballot access | Filing period for partisan candidates closes | |
March 7, 2016 | Campaign finance | First quarter report due | |
March 15, 2016 | Election date | Primary election (non-congressional offices) | |
June 7, 2016 | Election date | Congressional primary | |
June 9, 2016 | Ballot access | Unaffiliated candidates for federal, statewide, and state legislative offices that span more than one county must submit petitions to county boards of election for verification | |
June 24, 2016 | Ballot access | Unaffiliated candidates for federal, statewide, and state legislative offices that span more than one county must submit petitions to the state board of elections | |
June 24, 2016 | Ballot access | Unaffiliated candidates for state legislative offices that span only one county must submit petitions to the appropriate county board of elections | |
July 12, 2016 | Campaign finance | Second quarter report due | |
July 26, 2016 | Ballot access | Write-in candidates for federal, statewide, and state legislative offices that span more than one county must submit their petitions to county boards of election for verification | |
July 29, 2016 | Campaign finance | Mid-year semi-annual report due | |
August 10, 2016 | Ballot access | Write-in candidates for federal, statewide, and state legislative offices that span more than one county must submit their petitions to the state board of elections | |
August 10, 2016 | Ballot access | Write-in candidates for state legislative offices that span only one county must submit their petitions to the appropriate county board of elections | |
October 21, 2016 | Campaign finance | Third quarter report due | |
November 8, 2016 | Election date | General election | |
January 11, 2017 | Campaign finance | Fourth quarter report due | |
January 27, 2017 | Campaign finance | Year-end semi-annual report due | |
Sources: North Carolina State Board of Elections, "Candidate Filing," accessed June 12, 2015 North Carolina State Board of Elections, "Fact Sheet: Unaffiliated Candidates, 2016 Election," accessed June 12, 2015 North Carolina State Board of Elections, "Fact Sheet: Write-in Candidates, 2016 Election," accessed June 12, 2015 North Carolina State Board of Elections, "Reporting Schedules," accessed November 25, 2015 |
|
For information about public policy issues in the 2016 elections, see: Public policy in the 2016 elections!