Alaska's 2014 elections U.S. Senate • U.S. House • Governor • Lt. Gov • State Senate • State House • State ballot measures • School boards • Judicial • Candidate ballot access |
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Dan Sullivan | 48% | 135,445 | |
Democratic | Mark Begich Incumbent | 45.8% | 129,431 | |
Libertarian | Mark Fish | 3.7% | 10,512 | |
Independent | Ted Gianoutsos | 2% | 5,636 | |
N/A | Write-in | 0.5% | 1,376 | |
Total Votes | 282,400 | |||
Source: Alaska Secretary of State |
November 4, 2014 |
August 19, 2014 |
Dan Sullivan |
Mark Begich |
Cook Political Report: Toss Up[1] Sabato's Crystal Ball: Toss Up[2] |
Voters in Alaska elected one member to the U.S. Senate in the election on November 4, 2014. Incumbent Mark Begich (D) was defeated by Dan Sullivan (R) in the general election, putting an end to the most expensive campaign in state history at that time. Given that a combined total of $39 million of satellite spending was used to target approximately 500,000 potential swing voters, the race was also the most expensive race, per capita, in the 2014 election cycle.[3]
Begich held one of the most vulnerable Senate seats going into the 2014 election. He had only served one term in the Senate and was a Democrat seeking re-election in a red state. This, combined with the unpopularity of the Affordable Care Act and Begich's support for it, made this an uphill battle for the incumbent. Begich himself believed he lost the race due to voters' disapproval of Obama, not Begich's own record.[4]
Both Cook Political Report and Sabato's Crystal Ball rated the race as a toss up.[5][6] Additionally, FiscalTimes listed it as one of the seven most vulnerable seats in the country, and The Washington Post included it on their list of the top 10 races to watch in 2014.[7]
Four Republican candidates stepped up to challenge Begich: former Commissioner of Natural Resources Dan Sullivan, Lt. Gov Mead Treadwell, Joe Miller and John Jaramillo. Sullivan, the Republican front runner in the race, triumphed over the other candidates in the primary on August 19, 2014. Sullivan led the field in both fundraising totals and polling numbers throughout the months leading up to the primary.
Begich faced Sullivan and a number of minor party challengers in the general election. Minor party candidates were predicted to have a large impact in the race, as the winner of the Senate race in both 2008 and 2010 won without a majority of the vote. Begich won the seat over former incumbent Ted Stevens (R) by 1.3 percent in 2008, while minor party candidates took in more than 5 percent of the vote in that election. Minor party candidates again took in over 5 percent of the vote in 2014. However, it was not enough to swing the race back in Begich's favor.[8]
Candidate Filing Deadline | Primary Election | General Election |
---|---|---|
Primary: Alaska uses a top-four primary for congressional and state-level offices. Under Alaska's top-four primary system, all candidates for a given office run in a single primary election. The top four vote-getters, regardless of partisan affiliation, then advance to the general election.[9][10]
For information about which offices are nominated via primary election, see this article.
Voter registration: To vote in the primary, voters had to register by July 20, 2014.[11] For the general election, the voter registration deadline was October 5, 2014.[12]
Incumbent: The election filled the Senate seat held by Mark Begich (D). Begich was first elected in 2008.
August 19, 2014, primary results
ADL Primary[13]
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Republican | Dan Sullivan | 48% | 135,445 | |
Democratic | Mark Begich Incumbent | 45.8% | 129,431 | |
Libertarian | Mark Fish | 3.7% | 10,512 | |
Independent | Ted Gianoutsos | 2% | 5,636 | |
N/A | Write-in | 0.5% | 1,376 | |
Total Votes | 282,400 | |||
Source: Alaska Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Mark Begich Incumbent | 96.6% | 58,092 | ||
William Bryk | 3.4% | 2,024 | ||
Total Votes | 60,116 | |||
Source: Alaska Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dan Sullivan | 40.1% | 44,740 | ||
Joe Miller | 32.1% | 35,904 | ||
Mead Treadwell | 24.9% | 27,807 | ||
John Jaramillo | 2.9% | 3,246 | ||
Total Votes | 111,697 | |||
Source: Alaska Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Thom Walker | 61% | 3,167 | ||
Mark Fish | 24.9% | 1,290 | ||
Scott Kohlhaas | 14.1% | 734 | ||
Total Votes | 5,191 | |||
Source: Alaska Secretary of State |
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Vic Kohring | 57.8% | 2,557 | ||
Zachary Kile | 42.2% | 1,869 | ||
Total Votes | 4,426 | |||
Source: Alaska Secretary of State |
Begich was a Democratic senator in a red state, making his seat one of the most vulnerable in 2014. The unpopularity of President Obama's healthcare mandate, combined with its poor implementation, was a major issue that Begich needed to overcome in order to win re-election.
Sullivan, the Republican frontrunner throughout the race, won the primary election on August 19, 2014.[16][17][18][19] He then defeated Begich in the general election.
Begich's campaign spent considerable effort supporting Libertarian Mark Fish by making sure Fish was included in debates, highlighting issue positions that Begich and Fish shared and even spending money promoting Fish's campaign. Begich's communications director said in a statement, "Since many of the debate hosts won’t include Mr. Fish, Sen. Begich believes it is only fair to give Alaska voters all the information." The goal of this maneuver was to siphon away votes from Sullivan to Fish. Pollster Ivan Moore said of the strategy, "I think Begich is playing a game where if he can shake half a percent off of Sullivan and onto Fish, it’s half a percent that Sullivan hasn’t got. And that may well make the difference.”[20]
Sullivan's campaign responded to the strategy by stating, "Mark Begich is using a third-party candidate as a political tool in a shameless attempt to try and bolster his own sinking campaign. But, Alaskans know better -- they know that a vote for a third-party candidate is a vote for Mark Begich.”[20]
Begich's campaign employed a massive outreach program to Alaska's native population in an attempt to help him turn the tables in his difficult re-election bid. His campaign opened 16 field offices staffed by 90 people across the state, compared to Sullivan's five offices and 14 staffers which were clustered in the more heavily populated southern and eastern regions of the state. Begich said of the campaign, "We have knocked on every single door in rural Alaska. This is unbelievable. No one’s ever done it like this — ever." When polling numbers were brought up Begich responded, "I don’t care if we’re up or down. We’re winning on the ground because we will turn out more voters."[21]
Begich's campaign released an ad on August 29, 2014, accusing Sullivan of letting a sex offender be released from prison early due to a mistake missing his earlier felony conviction. The criminal then allegedly murdered a couple and sexually assaulted an elderly woman and an infant. The ad referred to the case of Jerry Active, who was awaiting trial at the time of the election.[22]
In response to Begich's ad, Sullivan released his own, accusing Begich of lying in his claim that Sullivan "let a lot of sex offenders get off with light sentences." Sullivan's campaign also showed that the mistake that led to Jerry Active's release happened before Sullivan became attorney general.[22]
After both candidates' ads began airing on television, the lawyer of the victims' family asked both candidates to take down their ads. He said that the ads could potentially affect the jury's decision in the upcoming trial. Sullivan's campaign agreed to remove the ad, stating, "Mark Begich began this distasteful and offensive debate, and our campaign is pleased we could play a role along with the victims' attorney to end it."[23] Begich, however, did not agree to take down his ad. Instead, the ad was altered to "remove any potential reference to the pending criminal case," according to Begich's campaign. In response to this, the family's lawyer, Bryon Collins, sent a letter to Begich's campaign asking to remove all ads and references to the case. The letter said, "You are tearing this family apart to the point that your ad was so shocking to them they now want to permanently leave the state as quickly as possible. Again, to be perfectly clear, it was your ad that shocked them."[24]
Begich and Sullivan participated in their first debate on August 27, 2014. The debate was hosted in Anchorage by the group United for Liberty. Begich presented himself as the more experienced candidate who knows how Congress operates, while Sullivan emphasized a distrust of Congress. A straw poll was taken following the debate, which showed Begich as the winner due to larger support from Independent voters.[25]
Put Alaska First, a super PAC that supported incumbent Begich, announced plans to buy over $4 million in ads prior to the general election.[26] In response to this news, a number of Republican groups reserved airtime following the primary. Sullivan bought $480,000 in ads from September 23 through November 4. American Crossroads reserved $5.5 million in ads, and the National Republican Senatorial Committee also reserved $2.2 million in ads.[27][28]
Minor party candidates were expected to play a large role in this election. In 2010 and 2008, a candidate won election to the U.S. Senate without a majority of the votes. Begich defeated incumbent Ted Stevens (R) to win the seat in 2008 by 1.3 percent, while minor party candidates took in over 5 percent of the vote. These candidates were ultimately not enough for Begich's re-election efforts to succeed, although minor party candidates did take in over 5 percent of the vote in 2014.[8]
On August 14, 2014, Joe Miller agreed to endorse the winner of the Republican primary in order to help defeat Begich in November. Prior to this announcement, Miller had not ruled out a potential run as an independent in November if he were defeated in the primary. Sullivan and Mead Treadwell had previously agreed to back the winner of the GOP primary.[29]
An outside group, Put Alaska First PAC, spent over $4 million in ads opposing GOP front-runner Sullivan. Republicans accused the group and Democrats of "meddling" in the GOP primary in an attempt to face an easier general election race. Supporters of incumbent Begich said that the ads were not meant for the primary and had general election appeal. Art Hackney, a Republican operative in Alaska, said of the ads, "They’re trying simply to make sure Dan Sullivan is damaged goods. They’ve put a lot of money behind it, and, frankly, they’ve turned it into a primary that’s possible to go almost any way."[30]
The Fiscal Times compiled a list of the seven most vulnerable Senate seats up for election in 2014. The seven included in the list were: Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Dakota and West Virginia. Going into the 2014 election, all seven seats were held by Democrats.[7]
Early polling indicated that Gov. Sean Parnell (R) could have been Begich’s strongest opponent, but Parnell decided not to enter the race. The seat was considered a toss-up.[7]
According to an analysis by The Washington Post, the U.S. Senate election in Alaska was considered one of the top 10 Senate races of 2014. When Alaska attorney general Dan Sullivan entered the race in late 2013, the Republican primary field became even more murky.[31]
Following President Barack Obama's speech on September 10, 2014, about military action against ISIS, incumbent Mark Begich said the following: "I just don’t believe the president’s right on funding the rebels. I still don’t come away with a feeling that we know who they are. We may know who they are today, but what are they going to be like six months from now?" He also said that other countries in the region should be the ones to fight the terrorist group on the ground. "They should be the ones putting boots on the ground. They should be the ones putting money on the table to support the weapons and the training and so forth. They are the most at risk.”[32]
Residency issues plagued Sullivan since his entry into the race. It was questioned whether Sullivan was eligible for a Maryland tax break known as the Homestead exemption that he had been receiving on his Maryland home. Sullivan was benefiting from the tax break in 2008, while at the same time voting in Alaska by mail. It was ruled that Sullivan properly received the tax breaks. In response to the investigation and ruling Sullivan's campaign said, "Mark Begich's liberal allies have made it abundantly clear he is willing to say or do anything to shamefully distort Dan's record, and this time was clearly no different."[33]
Begich's campaign website listed the following issues among others. For a full list of issue statements, click here.
“ |
|
” |
—Mark Begich's campaign website, http://www.markbegich.com/priorities/ |
Sullivan's campaign website listed the following issues among others. For a full list of issue statements, click here.
“ |
|
” |
—Dan Sullivan's campaign website, http://www.sullivan2014.com/ |
In a debate the week prior to the primary, candidate Joe Miller insisted that, "It’s time to impeach this president for dereliction of duty, selectively enforcing the law, and usurping powers that the Constitution does not authorize. He is willfully undermining the rule of law and creating chaos." Miller also called on the other Republican candidates in the race to join his support of the impeachment. Neither candidate took him up on his offer.[35]
As a result of his call for impeachment, Miller's popularity on Facebook surged. This popularity increase was measured by "People Talking About This" data or PTAT. Miller's PTAT statistic increased by over 30 times its average in the past several months and surpassed that of both Sullivan and Treadwell.[35] In the end, Miller was unable to overcome Sullivan's primary lead. However, he did take second place in the Republican primary.[36]
Miller emphasized immigration as a key issue in this race. During a debate held on August 10, 2014, Miller asked primary opponents Treadwell and Sullivan to sign an anti-amnesty pledge reading, "I will oppose any attempt by Congress or the President to grant amnesty (any pathway to citizenship) for illegal aliens." Both Treadwell and Sullivan refused to sign the pledge.[37]
Treadwell's campaign website listed the following issues among others. For a full list of issue statements, click here.
“ |
|
” |
—Mead Treadwell's campaign website, https://web.archive.org/web/2/http://www.treadwellalaska.com/issues |
Below are important votes the incumbent cast.
During the shutdown in October 2013, the Senate rejected, down party lines, every House-originated bill that stripped the budget of funding for the Affordable Care Act. A deal was reached late on October 16, 2013, just hours before the debt ceiling deadline. The bill to reopen the government, H.R. 2775, lifted the $16.7 trillion debt limit and funded the government through January 15, 2014. Federal employees also received retroactive pay for the shutdown period. The only concession made by Senate Democrats was to require income verification for Obamacare subsidies.[38] The final vote on H.R. 2775 was 81-18, with all 18 votes against the bill from Republican members. Mark Begich voted with the Democratic Party for the bill.[39]
Begich voted in favor of H.R. 3590 (The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act). The bill passed the Senate 60-39 on December 24, 2009.[40]
Governor Sean Parnell decided to stay neutral in the Republican primary and did not endorse either his lieutenant governor, Mead Treadwell, or his former director of natural resources, Dan Sullivan. He stated, "I think both could be excellent U.S. senators, so I’ve chosen to stay out of taking an official position."[41]
Begich released a radio ad on August 19, 2013, highlighting his opposition to the No Child Left Behind Act. The ad stated that the No Child Left Behind Act does not work with the diversity of Alaska's schools.[50]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Put Alaska First released four ads opposing Sullivan.[51] VoteVets.org also released an ad opposing Sullivan for not protecting the rights of Alaskans.[52]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Begich's campaign released the following ad referring to himself and fellow Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski as a great team that shouldn't be broken up. In response to the ad, Murkowski sent Begich a "cease and desist" letter in an attempt to get the ad taken down.[53]
|
Americans for Prosperity released an ad opposing Begich for not keeping his word.[54] The American Energy Alliance also released an ad targeting Begich for supporting the Carbon Tax.[55]
|
|
|
Mark Begich vs. Dan Sullivan | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Mark Begich | Dan Sullivan | Not Sure/Other | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen Reports (October 27-30, 2014) | 42% | 47% | 11% | +/-4 | 887 | ||||||||||||||
Moore Information - for Dan Sullivan (October 26-28, 2014) | 38% | 42% | 20% | +/-4 | 500 | ||||||||||||||
Harstad Research - for Senate Majority PAC and Put Alaska First (October 18-22, 2014) | 44% | 44% | 12% | +/-4 | 700 | ||||||||||||||
Hellenthal Associates (October 15-21, 2014) | 49% | 39% | 12% | +/-4.88 | 403 | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen Reports (October 8-12, 2014) | 45% | 48% | 7% | +/-4 | 700 | ||||||||||||||
Fox News Poll (October 4-7, 2014) | 40% | 44% | 16% | +/-3.5 | 707 | ||||||||||||||
CNN/ORC Poll (October 1-6, 2014) | 44% | 50% | 6% | +/-3.5 | 704 | ||||||||||||||
Hickman Analytics, Inc. (September 26-October 2, 2014) | 41% | 46% | 13% | +/-4.9 | 400 | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen Reports (September 23-24, 2014) | 43% | 48% | 9% | +/-4 | 750 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (September 18-21, 2014) | 41% | 43% | 16% | +/-3.6 | 880 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (May 8-11, 2014) | 43% | 37% | 20% | +/-4.1 | 582 | ||||||||||||||
Dan Sullivan internal poll (April 27-28, 2014) | 44% | 42% | 14% | +/-4 | 500 | ||||||||||||||
Harper Polling (September 24-25, 2013) | 43% | 41% | 16% | +/-3.62 | 731 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Mark Begich vs. Dan Sullivan/3rd Party candidates | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Mark Begich | Dan Sullivan | Zachary Kile | Ted Gianoutsos | Sidney Hill | Not Sure | Margin of Error | Sample Size | |||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (January 30-February 1, 2014) | 41% | 37% | 6% | 1% | 2% | 13% | +/-3.4 | 850 | |||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Republican primary | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Joe Miller | Daniel S. Sullivan | Mead Treadwell | Other/Undecided | Margin of Error | Sample Size | |||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (July 31-August 3, 2014) | 20% | 35% | 29% | 16% | +/-5.3 | 337 | |||||||||||||
Moore Information (July 29-31, 2014) | 16% | 35% | 27% | 22% | +/-5.5 | 375 | |||||||||||||
Mark Hellenthal (June 17-28, 2014) | 21% | 35% | 31% | 13% | +/-4.9 | 392 | |||||||||||||
Moore Information - for Dan Sullivan (June 16-18, 2014) | 17% | 42% | 25% | 16% | +/-4 | 500 | |||||||||||||
Dittman Research (May 27-29, 2014) | 12% | 37% | 35% | 16% | +/-4.4 | 500 | |||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (May 8-11, 2014) | 14% | 40% | 26% | 20% | +/-5.5 | 313 | |||||||||||||
Dan Sullivan internal poll (April 27-28, 2014) | 12% | 38% | 22% | 28% | +/-4 | 500 | |||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (January 30-February 1, 2014) | 20% | 30% | 25% | 23% | +/-4.7 | 442 | |||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Mark Begich vs. Mead Treadwell | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Mark Begich | Mead Treadwell | Not Sure/Other | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (May 8-11, 2014) | 41% | 33% | 26% | +/-4.1 | 582 | ||||||||||||||
Harper Polling (September 24-25, 2013) | 43% | 42% | 15% | +/-3.62 | 731 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Mark Begich vs. Mead Treadwell/3rd Party candidates | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Mark Begich | Mead Treadwell | Zachary Kile | Ted Gianoutsos | Sidney Hill | Not Sure | Margin of Error | Sample Size | |||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (January 30-February 1, 2014) | 43% | 37% | 5% | 1% | 1% | 13% | +/-3.4 | 850 | |||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Mark Begich vs. Joe Miller | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Mark Begich | Joe Miller | Not Sure | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (May 8-11, 2014) | 43% | 27% | 30% | +/-4.1 | 582 | ||||||||||||||
Harper Polling (September 24-25, 2013) | 55% | 28% | 18% | +/-3.62 | 731 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Mark Begich vs. Joe Miller/3rd Party candidates | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Mark Begich | Joe Miller | Zachary Kile | Ted Gianoutsos | Sidney Hill | Not Sure | Margin of Error | Sample Size | |||||||||||
Public Policy Polling (January 30-February 1, 2014) | 45% | 25% | 5% | 1% | 2% | 21% | +/-3.4 | 850 | |||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Candidate ballot access |
---|
Find detailed information on ballot access requirements in all 50 states and Washington, D.C. |
Begich maintained a fundraising edge over all Republican challengers in the weeks leading up to the primary. He had raised a grand total of $6,340,423 and had just over $2 million left on hand.[56] Sullivan led the Republican field with just over $4 million in total contributions and just under $1 million on hand.[57] Next up was Treadwell who had received $1.2 million in campaign contributions and reported $141,743 on hand.[58] Miller trailed behind the rest of the candidates with $327,781 in total contributions and $188,236 on hand.[59]
Mark Begich (2014) Campaign Finance Reports | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report | Date Filed | Beginning Balance | Total Contributions for Reporting Period | Expenditures | Cash on Hand | ||||
April Quarterly[60] | April 15, 2013 | $952,260.37 | $947,943.67 | $(382,271.15) | $1,517,932.89 | ||||
July Quarterly[61] | July 15, 2013 | $1,517,932.89 | $993,064.55 | $(462,594.51) | $2,048,402.93 | ||||
October Quarterly[62] | October 15, 2013 | $2,048,402.93 | $813,189.58 | $(428,646.86) | $2,432,945.65 | ||||
Year-End[63] | January 31, 2014 | $2,432,945 | $849,363 | $(473,012) | $2,809,296 | ||||
April Quarterly[64] | April 15, 2014 | $2,809,281 | $1,045,615 | $(1,035,974) | $2,819,472 | ||||
July Quarterly[65] | July 15, 2014 | $2,819,472 | $1,268,202 | $(1,933,882) | $2,153,792 | ||||
Pre-Primary[66] | August 4, 2014 | $2,153,792 | $423,046 | $(515,394) | $2,061,443 | ||||
October Quarterly[67] | October 12, 2014 | $2,061,443 | $1,515,166 | $(2,380,003) | $1,196,607 | ||||
Pre-General[68] | October 20, 2014 | $1,196,607 | $511,783 | $(986,884) | $721,505 | ||||
Running totals | |||||||||
$8,367,372.8 | $(8,598,661.52) |
Daniel Sullivan (2014) Campaign Finance Reports | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report | Date Filed | Beginning Balance | Total Contributions for Reporting Period | Expenditures | Cash on Hand | ||||
Year-End[69] | January 31, 2014 | $0 | $1,276,151 | $(158,723) | $1,117,427 | ||||
April Quarterly[70] | April 14, 2014 | $1,117,427 | $1,365,035 | $(549,140) | $1,933,335 | ||||
July Quarterly[71] | July 15, 2014 | $1,933,335 | $1,162,842 | $(1,385,667) | $1,710,510 | ||||
Pre-Primary[72] | August 4, 2014 | $1,710,510 | $264,329 | $(981,916) | $992,924 | ||||
October Quarterly[73] | October 15, 2014 | $992,924 | $2,547,472 | $(2,378,457) | $1,161,938 | ||||
Pre-General[74] | October 23, 2014 | $1,161,938 | $501,180 | $(1,213,612) | $449,506 | ||||
Running totals | |||||||||
$7,117,009 | $(6,667,515) |
Mead Treadwell (2014) Campaign Finance Reports | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report | Date Filed | Beginning Balance | Total Contributions for Reporting Period | Expenditures | Cash on Hand | ||||
April Quarterly[75] | July 15, 2013 | $10,000.00 | $10,300.00 | $(11,660.43) | $8,639.57 | ||||
July Quarterly[76] | July 15, 2013 | $8,639.57 | $170,270.51 | $(48,560.77) | $130,349.31 | ||||
October Quarterly[77] | October 15, 2013 | $130,349.31 | $196,307.58 | $(171,769.14) | $154,887.75 | ||||
Year-End[78] | January 29, 2014 | $154,887 | $229,056 | $(289,140) | $94,803 | ||||
April Quarterly[79] | April 15, 2014 | $94,803 | $344,507 | $(262,043) | $177,268 | ||||
July Quarterly[80] | July 16, 2014 | $177,268 | $164,468 | $(174,688) | $167,047 | ||||
Pre-Primary[81] | August 5, 2014 | $167,047 | $92,072 | $(117,376) | $141,743 | ||||
Running totals | |||||||||
$1,206,981.09 | $(1,075,237.34) |
**As of the Pre-Primary Report, Treadwell's campaign committee owed $248,445 in outstanding loans to Mead Treadwell.
Joe Miller (2014) Campaign Finance Reports | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report | Date Filed | Beginning Balance | Total Contributions for Reporting Period | Expenditures | Cash on Hand | ||||
April Quarterly[82] | April 15, 2013 | $426,783.51 | $47.14 | $(850.00) | $425,980.65 | ||||
July Quarterly[83] | July 15, 2013 | $425,980.65 | $18,394.34 | $(126,920.07) | $317,454.92 | ||||
October Quarterly[84] | October 15, 2013 | $317,454.92 | $13,691.00 | $(43,440.49) | $287,705.43 | ||||
Year-End[85] | January 31, 2014 | $287,705 | $30,490 | $(86,489) | $231,705 | ||||
April Quarterly[86] | April 15, 2014 | $231,705 | $101,400 | $(37,751) | $295,354 | ||||
July Quarterly[87] | July 15, 2014 | $295,354 | $129,504 | $(121,297) | $303,561 | ||||
Pre-Primary[88] | August 4, 2014 | $303,561 | $34,255 | $(149,580) | $188,236 | ||||
Running totals | |||||||||
$327,781.48 | $(566,327.56) |
As of October 2014, Alaska's U.S. Senate race had attracted roughly $25 million in satellite spending. Of this money, $4,863,634 went to support Begich while $8,271,708 was spent in opposition of him. Sullivan had $1,941,853 spent supporting him and $9,571,090 spent in opposition. The remaining money was spent prior to the primary on Treadwell and Miller.[89] A total of $39 million worth of outside money was ultimately spent on the race.[3]
On November 2, 2010, Lisa Murkowski won re-election to the United States Senate. She defeated Joe Miller (R), Scott T. McAdams (D), Frederick Haase (L), Tim Carter (Nonaffiliated) and Ted Gianoutsos (Nonaffiliated) in the general election.[90]
On November 4, 2008, Mark Begich won election to the United States Senate. He defeated Ted Stevens (R), Bob Bird (Alaskan Independence), Frederick Haase (L) and Ted Gianoutsos (NPA) in the general election.[91]