Iowa's 2014 elections U.S. Senate • U.S. House • Governor • Lt. Gov • Attorney General • Secretary of State • Other executive offices • State Senate • State House • Judicial • Candidate ballot access |
U.S. Senate, Iowa General Election, 2014 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Republican | Joni Ernst | 52.1% | 588,575 | |
Democratic | Bruce Braley | 43.8% | 494,370 | |
Independent | Rick Stewart | 2.4% | 26,815 | |
Libertarian | Douglas Butzier | 0.7% | 8,232 | |
Independent | Ruth Smith | 0.5% | 5,873 | |
Independent | Bob Quast | 0.4% | 4,724 | |
Write-in | Other | 0.1% | 1,111 | |
Total Votes | 1,129,700 | |||
Source: Iowa Secretary of State Official Results |
|
November 4, 2014 |
June 3, 2014 |
Joni Ernst |
Tom Harkin |
Cook Political Report: Toss Up[1] Sabato's Crystal Ball: Toss Up[2] |
|
|
Voters in Iowa elected one member to the U.S. Senate in the election on November 4, 2014. Republican nominee Joni Ernst (R) defeated Bruce Braley (D) in the general election.
The election filled the Senate seat held by Tom Harkin (D). Harkin was first elected in 1984. On January 26, 2013, Harkin announced that he would not seek re-election once his current term expires. Upon his retirement, he will have served in the U.S. Senate for 30 years. He said of his retirement, "I have mixed feelings. You know what, it's somebody else's turn. To walk away from this position and this power is not an easy thing. But I think it's the right thing."[3]
The political environment in Iowa made the outcome of the U.S. Senate race hard to determine. Both candidates had been actively attacking each other with accusations of missed committee meetings and votes.[4] The Cook Political Report designated the state as a "Toss Up" and most other polls showed each candidate gaining or losing leads by slim margins. Polls released in mid-October revealed that both candidates were in a dead heat for the seat.
Harkin, the retiring incumbent, withheld his campaign finances that totaled around $2.4 million. He refused to accept requests from top Democrats, such as Harry Reid, to transfer the money to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. The refusal shocked Iowa Democrats who struggled to keep Harkin's seat from switching over to the Republicans. Harkin stated that he intended to donate the money to the Harkin Institute for Public Policy and Citizen Engagement at Drake University. A Democratic aide stated: “It is ridiculous that Bruce Braley is getting outspent by Republicans when Tom Harkin is sitting on over $2 million in his campaign account."[5]
Absentee ballots played an important role in the general election as Republicans showed a strong turnout in early voting. There were 134,124 Republicans and 143,588 Democrats who requested absentee ballots. The numbers helped bolster Ernst's campaign and turned out strong voter enthusiasm among Republicans.[6]
Braley often voted within party lines and was strongly supportive of Democratic issues, such as Obamacare and reproductive rights. He received key endorsements from Vice President Joe Biden and Senator Elizabeth Warren. Financially, Braley proved himself as a competitive fundraiser having grossed over $3 million cash-on-hand.[7]
The establishment and tea party wings of the Republican party both rallied behind state Sen. Joni Ernst.[8] She was the Lieutenant Colonel of the Iowa National Guard and had spent most of her life in military service. She was a strong supporter of conservative issues, such as repealing Obamacare. She eventually became the first woman from Iowa to represent her state in the U.S. Senate. She received key endorsements from figures such as Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney.[9][10]
Braley ran unopposed in the Democratic primary and easily secured his nomination. Ernst had to face four other opponents in a congested Republican primary. She defeated her opponents by securing 56.2 percent of the preceding votes, more than the simple majority.
Libertarian candidate Douglas Butzier successfully made it onto the ballot. Butzier, however, died in a tragic plane crash on the night of October 13, 2014. He was flying solo in a single-engine airplane that crashed one mile north of Dubuque Regional Airport. Butzier's name still appeared on the ballot.[11]
Candidate Filing Deadline | Primary Election | General Election |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Primary: A primary election is an election in which registered voters select a candidate that they believe should be a political party's candidate for elected office to run in the general election. They are also used to choose convention delegates and party leaders. Primaries are state-level and local-level elections that take place prior to a general election. In Iowa, a voter must be affiliated with a party in order to participate in its primary. However, a voter can change his or her political party affiliation on Election Day, creating what is effectively an open primary.[12]
Voter registration: To vote in the primary voters were required to register by either May 26, 2014, to pre-register, or on election day. For the general election, the voter registration deadline was October 25, 2014 (10 days before election day).[13]
Incumbent: The election was for the seat held by Tom Harkin (D). Harkin was first elected in 1984. On January 26, 2013, Harkin announced that he would not seek re-election. He served in the U.S. Senate for 30 years. Prior to this, he served in the U.S. House for ten years. He said of his retirement, "I have mixed feelings. You know what, it's somebody else's turn. To walk away from this position and this power is not an easy thing. But I think it's the right thing."[14]
General election candidates
June 3, 2014, primary results
|
The FiscalTimes compiled a list of the seven most vulnerable Senate seats up for election in 2014. The seven included in the list are: Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, North Carolina, South Dakota and West Virginia. Going into the 2014 election, all seven seats were held by Democrats.[49]
The state of Iowa held an election for the U.S. Senate on November 4, 2014. Joni Ernst (R) defeated Bruce Braley (D), Douglas Butzier (L), Rick Stewart (I), Ruth Smith (I) and Bob Quast (I) in the general election.
U.S. Senate, Iowa General Election, 2014 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Republican | Joni Ernst | 52.1% | 588,575 | |
Democratic | Bruce Braley | 43.8% | 494,370 | |
Independent | Rick Stewart | 2.4% | 26,815 | |
Libertarian | Douglas Butzier | 0.7% | 8,232 | |
Independent | Ruth Smith | 0.5% | 5,873 | |
Independent | Bob Quast | 0.4% | 4,724 | |
Write-in | Other | 0.1% | 1,111 | |
Total Votes | 1,129,700 | |||
Source: Iowa Secretary of State Official Results |
U.S. Senate, Iowa Republican Primary, 2014 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes | ||
Joni Ernst | 56.2% | 88,535 | ||
Sam Clovis | 18% | 28,418 | ||
Mark Jacobs | 16.8% | 26,523 | ||
Matt Whitaker | 7.5% | 11,884 | ||
Scott Schaben | 1.4% | 2,233 | ||
Total Votes | 157,593 | |||
Source: Iowa Secretary of State |
Below are important votes the incumbent cast during the 113th Congress.
During the shutdown in October 2013, the Senate rejected, down party lines, every House-originated bill that stripped the budget of funding for the Affordable Care Act. A deal was reached late on October 16, 2013, just hours before the debt ceiling deadline. The bill to reopen the government, H.R. 2775, lifted the $16.7 trillion debt limit and funded the government through January 15, 2014. Federal employees also received retroactive pay for the shutdown period. The only concession made by Senate Democrats was to require income verification for Obamacare subsidies.[50] The final vote on H.R. 2775 was 81-18, with all 18 votes against the bill from Republican members. Harkin voted with the Democratic Party for the bill.[51]
Braley's campaign website listed the following issues:
“ | Jobs & Economy: Protecting the right to organize for better and safer working conditions is important to Bruce. He took a strong stance against attempts to curb collective bargaining rights and had voted for legislation in Congress to improve worker safety in numerous fields of work.
Bruce also understands that Iowa’s small businesses are the lifeblood of our economy. By helping to strengthen small businesses, we can strengthen job opportunities for every Iowan. Healthcare: All Iowans deserve quality, affordable healthcare that provides families with health security. Iowans can’t afford to go back to the days when insurance companies could deny people insurance based on pre-existing conditions, or kick people off their insurance when they got sick, or increase premiums with no justification. Veterans: Bruce Braley believes that our country should support our troops not only when they’re fighting abroad, but when they return home. That’s why he’s worked so hard for America’s military veterans. Braley introduced and passed a law to give tax breaks to companies that hire veterans returning from duty, unemployed veterans, and wounded warriors. Braley also successfully took on the Pentagon to secure overdue combat pay for 800 Iowa National Guard troops who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan, and helped secure full GI Bill education benefits that were initially denied to 600 Iowa National Guard soldiers[52] |
” |
Ernst's campaign website listed the following issues:
“ | Creating Jobs: Joni supports pro-growth tax and economic policies that will unleash the full potential of America’s free market economy and create new, better paying jobs so that more of our neighbors have jobs to go to each day in order to support their families. Joni believes the free market is the greatest job creating machine ever built, but only when the government gets out of the way. She supports rolling back Washington-created job-killing regulations that are crushing small business. Real and Meaningful Health Care Reform: Joni is staunchly opposed to the Obamacare law. Joni supports immediate action to repeal Obamacare and replace it with common sense, free-market alternatives that put patients first, and health care decisions back in the hands of each of us rather than Washington bureaucrats. Keeping America Strong in the World: Joni believes in a strong national defense because she knows the world is a safer place when America is the strongest nation on the planet. She believes that military readiness cannot be allowed to fall victim to Washington politics or bureaucratic maneuvering. Joni also believes that American foreign policy must be consistent and strong – never giving our enemies hesitation as to America’s resolve to defend herself and her interests across the globe, whether by diplomatic means or use of force.[52] |
” |
The October 4, 2014 debate helped clarify positions each candidate took on key issues leading up to the general election.
The Environment: Addressing the purview of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was one of the most prominent issues discussed during the debate, due to each candidate's stance on the issue. Ernst, who had previously campaigned to end the EPA, stated that her stance was logical because she advocated for allowing states to decide how to utilize their natural resources. Braley countered her position with the argument that the agency was originally created by a Republican president to prevent pollution in a time where state cooperation on the issue saw minimal success.
Gun Control: Braley, who advocated for increased background checks, went on the offensive stating that “Sen. Ernst doesn’t think you should even need to go through a permit process to carry a concealed weapon and should be able to carry guns in churches and bars.” He stated that the second amendment should be treated as a "balancing act" between having gun rights and providing equal protection for everyone. Ernst expressed her concern with gun violence but indicated that she would rather focus on improving mental healthcare and enforcing existing laws.
Foreign Policy: The discussion of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) dominated the debate of America's position in the world today. Both candidates were strongly in favor of combating the Islamic militants, but differed slightly in approach. Braley stated that more deliberations in Congress needed to take place in order to better coordinate strategy against ISIS while Ernst criticized that approach as unresponsive. Ernst was in favor of arming the Free Syrian Army, and other moderate rebel groups, to help combat ISIS while Braley noted about the uncertainty of providing weapons to groups we know little about.
Healthcare: "Obamacare" dominated the discussion when a voter asked Ernst if he would lose his medical coverage if the law was repealed. Ernst announced that she supported affordable access to healthcare, but Obamacare was not the way to implement it. Braley emphasized that coverage was less extensive before the law went into place and that the initiative had improved the quality and access to healthcare for millions of Americans.
Immigration: Ernst took a moderate stance on immigration through supporting the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Though opposed to amnesty for illegal immigrants, Ernst said she recognized that it was not fair to punish children who arrived in the United States not acting on their own will.
America's Biggest Hypocrite |
Campaign Finance: Both candidates agreed that more transparency was needed for campaign finances and outside group spending during elections. Braley called for banning "dark political money" being spent to sway voters in election. Ernst agreed and noted that Braley's campaign outspent her own during the course of the election. The two also debated each others' financial allegiances. Braley referenced the support Ernst received from David and Charles Koch. Ernst defended her support saying she never signed any pledges or promises to her donors to which Braley quickly pointed to her signing of the "no-new-taxes" pledge. Ernst would later connect Braley to the Senate Majority PAC and Tom Steyer's Super PAC, both of which have spent significant money on the election in Iowa.[53]
One day before the debate, the group American Commitment released an ad questioning Braley's attacks on Ernst's outside donations, specifically the money Braley received from Tom Steyer, a billionaire based out of California.
The candidates held their third debate on October 16, 2014. Both candidates took similar positions on previously discussed issues along with new issues being brought up by the moderator.
Healthcare: As in previous debates, both candidates sparred over the issue of Obamacare. Ernst attacked Braley for saying he previously was in full support of the new healthcare legislation, only to now support changing some aspects of it. She said this proves he either did not know the full extent of the legislation or he purposely mislead Iowa's voters when supporting it. Braley countered Ernst's claims through stating that when dealing with needed changes in our healthcare system, there are bound to be issues with implementation. He defended his support for changes by emphasizing that they will improve the bill and its ability to expand coverage to Iowans. Moreover, he opposed repealing the bill saying that it will cause premiums to increase for Americans, including Iowans.
Ebola: A new issue brought to both candidates was the spread of the Ebola virus throughout Africa and the danger that a global outbreak that could affect the United States. Ernst criticized Braley for supporting the Obama administration's action on Ebola, which she labeled as "reactive" instead of "proactive." Braley rebutted the statement by stating that the Obama administration took steps to protect the United States and that the Republicans, through control of the U.S. House, were in control of setting the hearing times on the matter. Both candidates indicated they would support some type of travel ban to curtail the spread of the virus.
Internal Revenue Service: As with many other federal programs, Ernst stated she was in support of dismantling the International Revenue Service and starting over with a "better tax code." Ernst emphasized that the system was too bureaucratic and adds unnecessary burdens to the lives of average Americans. She said, "Let's make life better for hardworking Americans. We can't tax them to death. And my opponent, Congressman Braley, that seems to be the answer for everything — is higher taxes and more spending." Braley attacked her position through pointing out her continued support for scrapping federal programs. He emphasized that removing the current infrastructure for existing federal initiatives would cause dismay and harm towards the citizens that benefit from them. He stated that: "Every solution she has is throwing darts at the board, trying to get rid of programs that have had significant impacts and made a difference in the lives of Iowans."[54]
According to an analysis by The Washington Post, the U.S. Senate election in Iowa was considered one of the top 10 Senate races of 2014. By late 2013 Republican candidate fundraising had not put up impressive fundraising. However, Rep. Braley had been continuing to put up high numbers.[55]
Braley v. Ernst (August 2014-Present) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Bruce Braley (D) | Joni Ernst (R) | Undecided | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen October 28-30, 2014 | 47% | 48% | 3% | +/-3.0 | 990 | ||||||||||||||
CNN/ORC October 27-30, 2014 | 47% | 49% | 1% | +/-3.0 | 1,005 | ||||||||||||||
Marist October 24, 2014 | 46% | 49% | 4% | +/-3.0 | 1,093 | ||||||||||||||
Loras College October 21-24, 2014 | 45.3% | 44.2% | 8.2% | +/-2.93 | 1,121 | ||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac University October 23, 2014 | 46% | 48% | 4% | +/-3.2 | 964 | ||||||||||||||
Monmouth University October 18-21, 2014 | 46% | 47% | 2% | +/-4.8 | 423 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling October 15-16, 2014 | 48% | 47% | 5% | +/-3.6 | 714 | ||||||||||||||
Selzer's October 3-8, 2014 | 46% | 47% | 5% | +/-2.9 | 1,107 | ||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac University September 10-15, 2014 | 44% | 50% | 6% | +/-2.9 | 1,167 | ||||||||||||||
CNN/ORC September 8-10, 2014 | 49% | 48% | 1% | +/-3.5 | 1,013 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling August 28-30, 2014 | 43% | 45% | 12% | +/-3.2 | 816 | ||||||||||||||
Suffolk University/USA Today August 23-26, 2014 | 40% | 40% | 15% | +/-4.4 | 500 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling August 22-24, 2014 | 41% | 40% | 14% | +/-3.2 | 915 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Braley v. Ernst (July 2013-August 2014) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Bruce Braley (D) | Joni Ernst (R) | Undecided | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen Reports August 11-12, 2014 | 43% | 43% | 8% | +/-4.0 | 750 | ||||||||||||||
CBS/NYT/YouGov July 5-24, 2014 | 47% | 48% | 4% | +/-3.0 | 2,007 | ||||||||||||||
Human Events/Gravis Marketing July 17-18, 2014 | 44% | 43% | 13% | +/-3.0 | 1,179 | ||||||||||||||
NBC News/Marist July 7-13, 2014 | 43% | 43% | 14% | +/-2.5 | 1,599 | ||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac University June 12-16, 2014 | 44% | 40% | 14% | +/-2.7 | 1,277 | ||||||||||||||
Vox Populi June 4-5, 2014 | 49% | 44% | 7% | +/-3.8 | 667 | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen Reports June 4-5, 2014 | 44% | 45% | 9% | +/-4.0 | 750 | ||||||||||||||
Loras College June 4-5, 2014 | 42% | 48% | 10% | +/-4.0 | 600 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling May 15-19, 2014 | 45% | 39% | 16% | +/-3.3 | 914 | ||||||||||||||
Suffolk University April 3-8, 2014 | 38% | 30% | 32% | +/-3.5 | 800 | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen Reports March 24-25, 2014 | 40% | 37% | 23% | +/-4.0 | 750 | ||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac University March 5-10, 2014 | 42% | 29% | 29% | +/-2.6 | 1,411 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling February 20-23, 2014 | 41% | 35% | 23% | +/-3.3 | 869 | ||||||||||||||
Harper Polling November 23-24, 2013 | 42% | 36% | 22% | +/-3.12 | 985 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling July 5-7, 2013 | 45% | 33% | 22% | +/-3.8 | 668 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
In a Quinnipiac University poll conducted June 12-16, 2014, men supported the female candidate and women supported the male contender. Women supported Bruce Braley (D) 47 percent to 36 percent, while men backed Joni Ernst (R) by a narrower 44 percent to 40 percent margin.[56]
Possible match-up: Braley v. Whitaker | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Bruce Braley (D) | Matt Whitaker (R) | Undecided | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling May 15-19, 2014 | 43% | 36% | 21% | +/-3.3 | 914 | ||||||||||||||
Suffolk University April 3-8, 2014 | 38% | 27% | 33% | +/-3.5 | 800 | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen Reports March 24-25, 2014 | 40% | 36% | 24% | +/-4.0 | 750 | ||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac University March 5-10, 2014 | 42% | 30% | 28% | +/-2.6 | 1,411 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling February 20-23, 2014 | 40% | 34% | 26% | +/-3.3 | 869 | ||||||||||||||
Harper Polling November 23-24, 2013 | 41% | 38% | 22% | +/-3.12 | 985 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling July 5-7, 2013 | 43% | 34% | 23% | +/-3.8 | 668 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Possible match-up: Braley v. Clovis | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Bruce Braley (D) | Sam Clovis (R) | Undecided | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling May 15-19, 2014 | 43% | 34% | 21% | +/-3.3 | 914 | ||||||||||||||
Suffolk University April 3-8, 2014 | 38% | 25% | 35% | +/-3.5 | 800 | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen Reports March 24-25, 2014 | 44% | 31% | 25% | +/-4.0 | 750 | ||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac University March 5-10, 2014 | 42% | 27% | 31% | +/-2.6 | 1,411 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling February 20-23, 2014 | 42% | 34% | 24% | +/-3.3 | 869 | ||||||||||||||
Harper Polling November 23-24, 2013 | 40% | 35% | 25% | +/-3.12 | 985 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling July 5-7, 2013 | 43% | 31% | 25% | +/-3.8 | 668 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Possible match-up: Braley v. Jacobs | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Bruce Braley (D) | Mark Jacobs (R) | Undecided | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Suffolk University April 3-8, 2014 | 37% | 31% | 32% | +/-3.5 | 800 | ||||||||||||||
Rasmussen Reports March 24-25, 2014 | 41% | 38% | 21% | +/-4.0 | 750 | ||||||||||||||
Quinnipiac University March 5-10, 2014 | 40% | 31% | 29% | +/-2.6 | 1,411 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling February 20-23, 2014 | 41% | 35% | 24% | +/-3.3 | 869 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling July 5-7, 2013 | 44% | 32% | 24% | +/-3.8 | 668 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Possible match-up: Braley v. Young | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Bruce Braley (D) | David Young (R) | Undecided | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Harper Polling November 23-24, 2013 | 41% | 35% | 24% | +/-3.12 | 985 | ||||||||||||||
Public Policy Polling July 5-7, 2013 | 45% | 32% | 24% | +/-3.8 | 668 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Possible match-up: Braley v. Schaben | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Bruce Braley (D) | Scott Schaben (R) | Undecided | Margin of Error | Sample Size | ||||||||||||||
Suffolk University April 3-8, 2014 | 38% | 25% | 36% | +/-3.5 | 800 | ||||||||||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Republican primary | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poll | Bob Vander Plaats | Sam Clovis | Matt Whitaker | Mark Jacobs | David Young | Scott Shaben | Paul Lunde | Joni Ernst | Someone else | Undecided | Margin of Error | Sample Size | |||||||
Des Moines Register May 27-30, 2014 | 0% | 11% | 13% | 18% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 38% | 0% | 16% | +/-4.9 | 400 | |||||||
Public Policy Polling May 15-19, 2014 | 0% | 14% | 6% | 18% | 0% | 1% | 2% | 34% | 0% | 26% | +/-3.3 | 914 | |||||||
Loras College May 12-13, 2014 | 0% | 10% | 7% | 19% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 31% | 0% | 29% | +/-4.0 | 600 | |||||||
Harper Polling April 30-May 1, 2014 | 0% | 14% | 0% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 0% | +/-4.4 | 500 | |||||||
Loras College April 7-8, 2014 | 0% | 7% | 4% | 19% | 0% | 3.5% | 0% | 18% | 0% | 46.5% | +/-4.0 | 600 | |||||||
Suffolk University April 3-8, 2014 | 0% | 7% | 4% | 23% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 25% | 0% | 40% | +/-3.5 | 800 | |||||||
Public Policy Polling February 20-23, 2014 | 0% | 8% | 11% | 20% | 0% | 3% | 3% | 13% | 0% | 42% | +/-3.3 | 869 | |||||||
Hill Research Consultants February 12-13, 2014 | 0% | 6% | 8% | 22% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 11% | 3% | 50% | +/-4 | 500 | |||||||
Kellyanne Conway November 22-23, 2013 | 28% | 8% | 7% | 5% | 4% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 39% | +/-4.9 | 400 | |||||||
Note: A "0%" finding means the candidate was not a part of the poll. The polls above may not reflect all polls that have been conducted in this race. Those displayed are a random sampling chosen by Ballotpedia staff. If you would like to nominate another poll for inclusion in the table, send an email to editor@ballotpedia.org |
Candidates for Congress were required to file up to seven main reports with the Federal Election Commission during the 2014 elections season.
Bruce Braley (2014) Campaign Finance Reports | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report | Date Filed | Beginning Balance | Total Contributions for Reporting Period | Expenditures | Cash on Hand | ||||
April Quarterly[57] | April 15, 2013 | $0.00 | $1,035,875.92 | $(31,259.28) | $1,004,606.64 | ||||
July Quarterly[58] | July 13, 2013 | $1,004,606.64 | $1,258,495.47 | $(257,324.01) | $2,005,778.10 | ||||
October Quarterly[59] | October 15, 2013 | $2,005,778.10 | $2,906,320.60 | $(582,969.55) | $2,323,351.05 | ||||
Year-end[60] | January 31, 2014 | $2,323,351 | $1,020,227 | $(732,786) | $2,610,791 | ||||
April Quarterly[61] | April 15, 2014 | $2,610,791 | $1,258,283 | $(756,501) | $3,112,574 | ||||
July Quarterly[62] | July 15, 2014 | $2,336,719 | $1,268,724 | $(882,492) | $2,722,951 | ||||
October Quarterly[63] | October 15, 2014 | $2,722,951 | $2,839,203 | $(4,318,146) | $1,244,008 | ||||
Running totals | |||||||||
$11,587,128.99 | $(7,561,477.84) |
Joni Ernst (2014) Campaign Finance Reports | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report | Date Filed | Beginning Balance | Total Contributions for Reporting Period | Expenditures | Cash on Hand | ||||
October Quarterly[64] | October 15, 2013 | $0.00 | $252,397 | $(28,112) | $224,285 | ||||
Year End[65] | January 31, 2014 | $224,285 | $202,774 | $(137,544) | $289,514 | ||||
April Quarterly[66] | April 15, 2014 | $289,514 | $285,664 | $(147,978) | $427,201 | ||||
July Quarterly[67] | July 15, 2014 | $351,849 | $1,334,633 | $(620,317) | $1,109,044 | ||||
October Quarterly[68] | October 15, 2014 | $1,109,044 | $6,022,042 | $(3,492,115) | $3,638,970 | ||||
Running totals | |||||||||
$8,097,510 | $(4,426,066) |
Scott Schaben (2014) Campaign Finance Reports | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report | Date Filed | Beginning Balance | Total Contributions for Reporting Period | Expenditures | Cash on Hand | ||||
October Quarterly[69] | October 15, 2013 | $0.00 | $8,291.00 | $(4,489.32) | $3,801.68 | ||||
Year End[70] | January 31, 2014 | $3,801 | $4,297 | $(2,158) | $5,940 | ||||
April Quarterly[71] | April 15, 2014 | $5,940 | $5,903 | $(4,627) | $7,215 | ||||
Running totals | |||||||||
$18,491 | $(11,274.32) |
Sam Clovis (2014) Campaign Finance Reports | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report | Date Filed | Beginning Balance | Total Contributions for Reporting Period | Expenditures | Cash on Hand | ||||
July Quarterly[72] | July 15, 2013 | $0.00 | $14,132.48 | $(2,328.62) | $11,803.86 | ||||
October Quarterly[73] | October 15, 2013 | $11,803.86 | $78,426.98 | $(51,660.18) | $38,570.66 | ||||
Running totals | |||||||||
$92,559.46 | $(53,988.8) |
Matt Whitaker (2014) Campaign Finance Reports | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report | Date Filed | Beginning Balance | Total Contributions for Reporting Period | Expenditures | Cash on Hand | ||||
July Quarterly[74] | July 15, 2013 | $0.00 | $115,332.07 | $(4,087.66) | $111,244.41 | ||||
October Quarterly[75] | October 15, 2013 | $111,244.41 | $104,557.61 | $(34,977.49) | $180,824.53 | ||||
Year End[76] | January 31, 2014 | $180,824 | $111,071 | $(59,803) | $232,092 | ||||
April Quarterly[77] | April 15, 2014 | $232,092 | $107,334 | $(50,340) | $289,087 | ||||
Running totals | |||||||||
$438,294.68 | $(149,208.15) |
In August 2013, the National Republican Senatorial Committee announced a new effort that targeted representative Bruce Braley called, “batting for Obamacare.”[78] The group planned on releasing seven billboards in Des Moines accusing Braley of hurting Iowans by supporting Obamacare.[78] The billboards had a baseball theme, with four versions of a scoreboard that cited families, farmers, seniors and small businesses as the losers when it comes to the federal healthcare law.[78] As part of the effort the group launched a website, WrongTeamBraley.com, which showed Braley wearing a baseball cap with the Obama campaign logo.[78]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following a May 2014 incident involving chickens, American Crossroads, a Karl Rove-backed conservative super PAC, released an online ad referencing the confrontation between Braley and his neighbor and attempted to portray him as "an arrogant trial lawyer-turned-politician who is anything but 'Iowa nice.'"[91]
The NextGen Climate Action released an ad in July 2014 that targeted state Sen. Joni Ernst for signing Grover Norquist's anti-tax pledge to oppose "any and all efforts to increase the marginal income tax rates for individuals and/or businesses."[92] The commercial was part of a five-week, $2.6 million ad buy and aimed to tie Ernst to oil companies and the billionaire industrialist Koch brothers.[92]
The Koch-backed group ConcernedVets released an ad, "AWOL," that attacked Bruce Braley (D) for missing Veterans Affair Committee hearings to attend campaign fundraisers in July 2014.[93]
A new Republican super PAC launched an ad attack against Mark Jacobs in May 2014. The ad accused Jacobs, the former CEO of Houston-based Reliant Energy who put more than $1.6 million of his own money into the race, of being a “Texas millionaire” who waffled in his political views. The PAC, which was incorporated in 2013, had not previously been active.[96]
|
|
The Iowa Broadcast News Association sponsored a 90 minute debate for Republican candidates on May 3, 2014. The debate was part of the group’s annual convention.[110]
U.S. Senate, Iowa General Election, 2014 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Republican | Joni Ernst | 52.1% | 588,575 | |
Democratic | Bruce Braley | 43.8% | 494,370 | |
Independent | Rick Stewart | 2.4% | 26,815 | |
Libertarian | Douglas Butzier | 0.7% | 8,232 | |
Independent | Ruth Smith | 0.5% | 5,873 | |
Independent | Bob Quast | 0.4% | 4,724 | |
Write-in | Other | 0.1% | 1,111 | |
Total Votes | 1,129,700 | |||
Source: Iowa Secretary of State Official Results |
<ref>
tag;
no text was provided for refs named hill