2016 Utah House Elections | |
---|---|
Primary | June 28, 2016 |
General | November 8, 2016 |
2016 Election Results | |
2014・2012・2010・2008 2006・2004・2002・2000 | |
2016 Elections | |
---|---|
Choose a chamber below: | |
All 75 seats in the Utah House of Representatives were up for election in 2016. Democrats gained three seats in the November 2016 general election.
Elections for the Utah House of Representatives took place in 2016. The primary election took place on June 28, 2016, and the general election was held on November 8, 2016. The candidate filing deadline was March 17, 2016.
Heading into the election, the Republican Party held the majority in the Utah House of Representatives:
Utah House of Representatives | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | As of November 7, 2016 | After November 8, 2016 | |
Democratic Party | 12 | 13 | |
Republican Party | 63 | 62 | |
Total | 75 | 75 |
The following incumbents did not run for re-election in 2016. Those incumbents were:
Name | Party | Current Office |
---|---|---|
David Lifferth | Republican | House District 2 |
Jack Draxler | Republican | House District 3 |
Jake Anderegg | Republican | House District 6 |
Brad Dee | Republican | House District 11 |
Curtis Oda | Republican | House District 14 |
Johnny Anderson | Republican | House District 34 |
Rich Cunningham | Republican | House District 50 |
Kraig Powell | Republican | House District 54 |
Kay McIff | Republican | House District 70 |
Don Ipson | Republican | House District 75 |
Utah sees a decline in general election competition.
Ballotpedia conducts a yearly study of electoral competitiveness in state legislative elections. Details on how well Utah performed in the study are provided in the image below. Click here for the full 2016 Competitiveness Analysis »
Ballotpedia identified five notable Utah state primary races in 2016, three of which were state House contests.
Click here to read more about Ballotpedia's coverage of notable Utah races »
2016 Utah House general election candidates | |||
---|---|---|---|
District | Democrat | Republican | Other |
1 | No candidate | Scott Sandall: 11,268 (I) | Sherry Phipps: 2,333 (Constitution) |
2 | No candidate | Jefferson Moss | |
3 | No candidate | Val Potter | |
4 | No candidate | Edward Redd (I) | |
5 | David L. Clark: 3,059 | Curt Webb: 12,522 (I) | |
6 | Donna Gibbons: 2,673 | Cory Maloy: 12,776 | Aaron Davis: 888 (L) |
7 | Floyd Handley: 4,363 | Justin Fawson: 10,182 (I) | |
8 | Matthew Frandsen: 4,563 | Gage Froerer: 8,923 (I) | |
9 | Kathie Darby: 4,426 | Jeremy Peterson: 5,561 (I) | |
10 | Jesse Garcia: 4,252 | Dixon M. Pitcher: 6,228 (I) | Derryck Gordon: 788 (L) |
11 | Amy Morgan: 5,161 | Kelly Miles: 9,521 | |
12 | No candidate | Mike Schultz (I) | |
13 | Bob Buckles: 3,706 | Paul Ray: 9,843 (I) | |
14 | No candidate | Karianne Lisonbee | |
15 | Rich Miller: 3,361 | Brad R. Wilson: 13,864 (I) | |
16 | Tiffany Kopp: 3,383 | Stephen Handy: 9,778 (I) | Brent Zimmerman: 1,214 (L) |
17 | Christine Stenquist: 4,775 | Stewart Barlow: 12,716 (I) | |
18 | No candidate | Timothy Hawkes (I) | |
19 | Kurt Weiland: 5,154 | Raymond Ward: 13,239 (I) | |
20 | Jon Marsh: 4,686 | Becky Edwards: 12,223 (I) | |
21 | Rick Pollock: 4,375 | Douglas Sagers: 7,912 (I) | |
22 | Sue Duckworth: 5,411 (I) | Jamie White: 5,002 | |
23 | Sandra Hollins: 5,464 (I) | Scott Hawkins: 2,458 | |
24 | Rebecca Chavez-Houck (I) | No candidate | |
25 | Joel Briscoe (I) | No candidate | |
26 | Angela Romero (I) | No candidate | |
27 | No candidate | Mike Kennedy (I) | |
28 | Brian King (I) | No candidate | |
29 | Angela Urrea: 2,751 | Lee B. Perry: 13,315 (I) | |
30 | Frank Bedolla: 4,441 | Mike Winder: 6,306 | |
31 | Elizabeth Weight: 4,234 | Sophia DiCaro: 3,994 (I) | |
32 | Suzanne Harrison: 8,534 | LaVar Christensen: 8,537 (I) | |
33 | Peter Tomala: 4,160 | Craig Hall: 4,279 (I) | |
34 | Karen Kwan: 6,558 | Macade Jensen: 5,485 | |
35 | Mark Wheatley: 6,186 (I) | Patricia Phaklides: 2,841 | Chelsea Travis: 941 (L) |
36 | Patrice Arent (I) | No candidate | |
37 | Carol Moss: 10,637 (I) | Kris Kimball: 7,186 | |
38 | Charles Henderson: 4,049 | Eric Hutchings: 4,971 (I) | |
39 | Paul R. Schulte: 5,342 | Jim Dunnigan: 7,081 (I) | |
40 | Lynn Hemingway: 10,404 (I) | Joseph F. Breault: 5,058 | |
41 | Chad S. Harrington: 3,927 | Dan McCay: 13,291 (I) | |
42 | No candidate | Kim Coleman (I) | |
43 | Edgar Harwood: 4,674 | Adam Gardiner: 7,511 | |
44 | Christine Passey: 7,267 | Bruce Cutler: 7,544 (I) | |
45 | Nikki Cunard: 6,842 | Steven Eliason: 8,390 (I) | |
46 | Marie Poulson: 12,547 (I) | No candidate | Lee Anne Walker: 3,932 (L) |
47 | John Rendell: 5,263 | Ken Ivory: 7,345 (I) | |
48 | No candidate | Keven Stratton (I) | |
49 | Zach Robinson: 8,134 | Robert Spendlove: 10,901 (I) | |
50 | Patty Rich: 5,121 | Susan Pulsipher: 15,538 | |
51 | Kyle Waters: 5,007 | Gregory Hughes: 10,146 (I) | |
52 | Garr K. Smith: 4,417 | John Knotwell: 13,020 (I) | |
53 | Cole R. Capener: 5,993 | Logan Wilde: 13,111 | |
54 | Rudi Kohler: 9,163 | Tim Quinn: 10,042 | |
55 | Wayne Stevens: 1,534 | Scott H. Chew: 12,666 (I) | |
56 | No candidate | Kay Christofferson (I) | |
57 | No candidate | Brian Greene (I) | |
58 | No candidate | Derrin Owens (I) | |
59 | Rachel Nelson: 2,861 | Val Peterson: 11,065 (I) | |
60 | Brooke Swallow-Fenton: 2,738 | Bradley Daw: 10,283 (I) | Tommy Williams: 541 (Independent American) |
61 | No candidate | Keith Grover (I) | |
62 | No candidate | Jon Stanard (I) | |
63 | Nathan Smith Jones: 1,428 | Dean Sanpei: 5,437 (I) | |
64 | No candidate | Norm Thurston (I) | |
65 | No candidate | Francis Gibson (I) | |
66 | No candidate | Mike McKell (I) | |
67 | No candidate | Marc Roberts (I) | |
68 | Cindee Beard: 2,819 | Merrill Nelson: 10,714 (I) | Kirk Pearson: 1,597 (Constitution) |
69 | Brad King: 6,610 (I) | Christine Watkins: 6,976 | |
70 | William J. Groff: 3,237 | Carl R. Albrecht: 11,764 | |
71 | Chuck Goode: 2,892 | Brad Last: 12,844 (I) | |
72 | No candidate | John Westwood (I) | |
73 | Ty Markham: 5,043 | Michael Noel: 10,193 (I) | |
74 | No candidate | Lowry Snow (I) | |
75 | No candidate | Walt Brooks (I) | |
Notes:
|
The following candidates were defeated in the Republican and Democratic conventions:
|
|
The average margin of victory for contested races in the Utah House of Representatives in 2016 was higher than the national average. Out of 75 races in the Utah House of Representatives in 2016, 49 were contested, meaning at least two candidates competed for that seat in the general election. The average margin of victory across these races was 34.5 percent. Across contested single-winner state legislative elections in 2016, the average margin of victory was 29.01 percent.[3]
Republican candidates in the Utah House of Representatives saw larger margins of victory than Democratic candidates in 2016. Republicans won 62 races. In the 41 races where a winning Republican faced a challenger, the average margin of victory was 36.5 percent. Democrats won 13 races in 2016. In the eight races where a winning Democrat faced a challenger, the average margin of victory was 24.2 percent. |
More Republican candidates than Democratic candidates saw margins of victory that were less than 10 percentage points. Eight of the 49 contested races in 2016—16.3 percent—saw margins of victory that were 10 percent or less. Seven races saw margins of victory that were 5 percent or less. Republicans won five races with margins of victory of 10 percent or less. |
Utah House of Representatives: 2016 Margins of Victory Less than 10 Percent | ||
---|---|---|
District | Winning Party | Margin of Victory |
District 22 | D | 3.9 percent |
District 31 | D | 2.9 percent |
District 32 | R | 0.02 percent |
District 33 | R | 1.4 percent |
District 34 | D | 8.9 percent |
District 44 | R | 1.9 percent |
District 54 | R | 4.6 percent |
District 69 | R | 2.7 percent |
The average margin of victory for incumbents in the Utah House of Representatives who ran for re-election and won in 2016 was higher than the national average. 61 incumbents who ran for re-election in 2016 won. The average margin of victory for the 38 winning Utah House of Representatives incumbents who faced a challenger in 2016 was 36.7 percent. The average margin of victory for all winning incumbents in contested single-winner state legislative elections in 2016 was 31.8 percent. |
Republican incumbents in the Utah House of Representatives saw larger margins of victory than Democratic incumbents. 50 Republican incumbents won re-election. In the 32 races where a winning Republican incumbent faced a challenger, the average margin of victory was 37.9 percent. 11 Democratic incumbents won re-election. In the six races where a winning Democratic incumbent faced a challenger, the average margin of victory was 30.3 percent. |
Utah House of Representatives: 2016 Margin of Victory Analysis | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Elections won | Average margin of victory[4] | Races with incumbent victories | Average margin of victory for incumbents[4] | Unopposed incumbents | Unopposed races | Percent unopposed |
Democratic | 13 | 24.2 percent | 11 | 30.3 percent | 5 | 5 | 38.5 percent |
Republican | 62 | 36.5 percent | 50 | 37.9 percent | 18 | 21 | 33.9 percent |
Total | 75 | 34.5 percent | 61 | 36.7 percent | 23 | 26 | 34.7 percent |
Click [show] on the tables below to see the margin of victory in Utah House of Representatives districts in 2016.
Utah House of Representatives: 2016 Margin of Victory by District | ||
---|---|---|
District | Winning Party | Margin of Victory |
District 1 | R | 65.7 percent |
District 2 | R | Unopposed |
District 3 | R | Unopposed |
District 4 | R | Unopposed |
District 5 | R | 60.7 percent |
District 6 | R | 61.8 percent |
District 7 | R | 40.0 percent |
District 8 | R | 32.3 percent |
District 9 | R | 11.4 percent |
District 10 | R | 17.5 percent |
District 11 | R | 29.7 percent |
District 12 | R | Unopposed |
District 13 | R | 45.3 percent |
District 14 | R | Unopposed |
District 15 | R | 61.0 percent |
District 16 | R | 44.5 percent |
District 17 | R | 45.4 percent |
District 18 | R | Unopposed |
District 19 | R | 44.0 percent |
District 20 | R | 44.6 percent |
District 21 | R | 28.8 percent |
District 22 | D | 3.9 percent |
District 23 | D | 37.9 percent |
District 24 | D | Unopposed |
District 25 | D | Unopposed |
District 26 | D | Unopposed |
District 27 | R | Unopposed |
District 28 | D | Unopposed |
District 29 | R | 65.8 percent |
District 30 | R | 17.4 percent |
District 31 | D | 2.9 percent |
District 32 | R | 0.0 percent |
District 33 | R | 1.4 percent |
District 34 | D | 8.9 percent |
District 35 | D | 33.6 percent |
District 36 | D | Unopposed |
District 37 | D | 19.4 percent |
District 38 | R | 10.2 percent |
District 39 | R | 14.0 percent |
District 40 | D | 34.6 percent |
District 41 | R | 54.4 percent |
District 42 | R | Unopposed |
District 43 | R | 23.3 percent |
District 44 | R | 1.9 percent |
District 45 | R | 10.2 percent |
District 46 | D | 52.3 percent |
District 47 | R | 16.5 percent |
District 48 | R | Unopposed |
District 49 | R | 14.5 percent |
District 50 | R | 50.4 percent |
District 51 | R | 33.9 percent |
District 52 | R | 49.3 percent |
District 53 | R | 37.3 percent |
District 54 | R | 4.6 percent |
District 55 | R | 78.4 percent |
District 56 | R | Unopposed |
District 57 | R | Unopposed |
District 58 | R | Unopposed |
District 59 | R | 58.9 percent |
District 60 | R | 55.6 percent |
District 61 | R | Unopposed |
District 62 | R | Unopposed |
District 63 | R | 58.4 percent |
District 64 | R | Unopposed |
District 65 | R | Unopposed |
District 66 | R | Unopposed |
District 67 | R | Unopposed |
District 68 | R | 52.2 percent |
District 69 | R | 2.7 percent |
District 70 | R | 56.8 percent |
District 71 | R | 63.2 percent |
District 72 | R | Unopposed |
District 73 | R | 33.8 percent |
District 74 | R | Unopposed |
District 75 | R | Unopposed |
The calendar below lists important dates for political candidates in Utah in 2016.
Dates and requirements for candidates in 2016 | |||
---|---|---|---|
Deadline | Event type | Event description | |
January 4, 2016 | Ballot access | Declaration of intent to gather signatures period opens | |
March 11, 2016 | Ballot access | Declaration of candidacy period opens | |
March 17, 2016 | Ballot access | Declaration of candidacy and intent to gather signature period closes | |
June 21, 2016 | Campaign finance | Candidate financial disclosure report due | |
June 28, 2016 | Election date | Primary election | |
September 9, 2016 | Ballot access | Final day for a write-in candidate to declare candidacy | |
September 30, 2016 | Campaign finance | Candidate financial disclosure report due | |
November 1, 2016 | Campaign finance | Candidate financial disclosure report due | |
November 8, 2016 | Election date | General election | |
January 10, 2017 | Campaign finance | Candidate financial disclosure report due | |
Source: Utah Lieutenant Governor, "2016 Election Information," accessed January 11, 2016 |
In 28 (37.3%) of the 75 districts up for election, there was only one major party candidate running for election. A total of six Democrats and 22 Republicans were guaranteed election in November barring unforeseen circumstances.
Two major party candidates faced off in the general election in 47 (62.6%) of the 75 districts up for election.
A total of 18 incumbents faced primary competition on June 28. Nine incumbents did not seek re-election and another 48 incumbents advanced past the primary without opposition.
Nine incumbent representatives did not run for re-election, while 66 (88%) ran for re-election. A list of those incumbents, all Republicans, can be found above. One other incumbent, Don Ipson (R), resigned his term early after he was appointed to the state Senate. Walt Brooks (R) was appointed to the seat on September 21, 2016.
There were 6,057 seats in 87 chambers with elections in 2014. All three aspects of Ballotpedia's Competitiveness Index—the number of open seats, incumbents facing primary opposition, and general elections between partisan candidates—showed poor results compared to the prior election cycle. States with elections in 2014 held fewer general elections between partisan candidates. Additionally, fewer incumbents faced primary opposition and more incumbents ran for re-election than in recent years.
Since 2010, when the Competitiveness Index was established, there had not been an even-year election cycle to do statistically worse in any of the three categories. See the following chart for a breakdown of those scores between each year.
Overall Competitiveness | |||
---|---|---|---|
2010 | 2012 | 2014 | |
Competitiveness Index | 36.2 | 35.8 | 31.4 |
% Open Seats | 18.6% | 21.2% | 17.0% |
% Incumbent with primary challenge | 22.7% | 24.6% | 20.1% |
% Candidates with major party opposition | 67.3% | 61.7% | 57.0% |
The following table details Utah's rates for open seats, incumbents that faced primary challenges, and major party competition in the 2014 general election.
Utah Legislature 2014 Competitiveness | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
% Open Seats | % Incumbent with primary challenge | % Candidates with major party opposition | Competitiveness Index | Overall rank |
13.5% | 24.7% | 79.8% | 39.3 | 11 |
Uncontested elections: In 2014, 32.8 percent of Americans lived in states with an uncontested state senate election. Similarly, 40.4 percent of Americans lived in states with uncontested house elections. Primary elections were uncontested even more frequently, with 61 percent of people living in states with no contested primaries. Uncontested elections often occur in locations that are so politically one-sided that the result of an election would be a foregone conclusion regardless of whether it was contested or not.
Open seats: In most cases, an incumbent will run for re-election, which decreases the number of open seats available. In 2014, 83 percent of the 6,057 seats up for election saw the incumbent running for re-election. The states that impose term limits on their legislatures typically see a higher percentage of open seats in a given year because a portion of incumbents in each election are forced to leave office. Overall, the number of open seats decreased from 2012 to 2014, dropping from 21.2 percent in 2012 to 17.0 percent in 2014.
Incumbent win rates: Ballotpedia's competitiveness analysis of elections between 1972 and 2014 documented the high propensity for incumbents to win re-election in state legislative elections. In fact, since 1972, the win rate for incumbents had not dropped below 90 percent—with the exception of 1974, when 88 percent of incumbents were re-elected to their seats. Perhaps most importantly, the win rate for incumbents generally increased over time. In 2014, 96.5 percent of incumbents were able to retain their seats. Common convention holds that incumbents are able to leverage their office to maintain their seat. However, the high incumbent win rate may actually be a result of incumbents being more likely to hold seats in districts that are considered safe for their party.
Marginal primaries: Often, competitiveness is measured by examining the rate of elections that have been won by amounts that are considered marginal (5 percent or less). During the 2014 election, 90.1 percent of primary and general election races were won by margins higher than 5 percent. Interestingly, it is usually the case that only one of the two races—primary or general—will be competitive at a time. This means that if a district's general election is competitive, typically one or more of the district's primaries were won by more than 5 percent. The reverse is also true: If a district sees a competitive primary, it is unlikely that the general election for that district will be won by less than 5 percent. Primaries often see very low voter turnout in comparison to general elections. In 2014, there were only 27 million voters for state legislative primaries, but approximately 107 million voters for the state legislative general elections.
The following chart shows how many candidates ran for State House in Utah in past years and the cumulative amount of campaign contributions in State House races, including contributions in both primary and general election contests.[5]
Utah House of Representatives Donations | ||
---|---|---|
Year | Candidates | Amount |
2014 | 200 | $4,198,290 |
2012 | 245 | $3,724,836 |
2010 | 209 | $3,728,166 |
2008 | 236 | $3,534,188 |
2006 | 175 | $3,283,158 |
The map below shows the average contributions to 2014 candidates for state houses. The average contributions raised by state house candidates in 2014 was $59,983. Utah, at $20,991 per candidate, is ranked 35 of 45 for state house chambers with the highest average contributions. Hover your mouse over a state to see the average campaign contributions for that state’s house candidates in 2014.[5][6]
To be eligible to serve in the Utah House of Representatives, a candidate must be:[7]