Appellate courts • Local ballot measures • School boards • Municipal • Recalls • How to run for office |
The table below contains links to all school board elections within Ballotpedia's regular coverage scope in this state, which included all school districts in the 100 largest cities by population, the 200 largest school districts by student enrollment.
Editor's note: Some school districts choose to cancel the primary election, or both the primary and general election, if the number of candidates who filed does not meet a certain threshold. The table below does not reflect which primary or general elections were canceled. Please click through to each school district's page for more information.
2023 Washington School Board Elections | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Primary | General Election | General Runoff Election | Regular term length | Seats up for election | Total board seats | 2022-2023 enrollment |
Cheney School District | 8/1/2023 | 11/7/2023 | N/A | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5,540 |
Lake Washington School District | 8/1/2023 | 11/7/2023 | N/A | 4 | 3 | 5 | 30,991 |
Seattle Public Schools | 8/1/2023 | 11/7/2023 | N/A | 4 | 4 | 7 | 51,238 |
Spokane Public Schools | 8/1/2023 | 11/7/2023 | N/A | 6 | 1 | 5 | 28,714 |
Ballotpedia is covering all other school board elections in Washington, including those outside of our regular coverage scope. Use the links below to view all covered elections in Washington.
The sections below do not contain the most recently published data on this subject. If you would like to help our coverage grow, consider donating to Ballotpedia.
Education terms |
---|
|
For more information on education policy terms, see this article. |
![]() |
The National Center for Education Statistics provides state-by-state data on student achievement levels in mathematics and reading in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). The table below presents the percentage of fourth and eighth grade students that scored at or above proficient in reading and math during school year 2012-2013. Compared to three neighboring states (Idaho, Montana, and Oregon), Washington had the highest percentage of students score at or above proficient in all categories.[1]
Percent of students scoring at or above proficient, 2012-2013 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Math - Grade 4 | Math - Grade 8 | Reading - Grade 4 | Reading - Grade 8 | |
Washington | 48% | 42% | 40% | 42% |
Idaho | 40% | 36% | 33% | 38% |
Montana | 45% | 40% | 35% | 40% |
Oregon | 40% | 34% | 33% | 37% |
United States | 41% | 34% | 34% | 34% |
Source: United States Department of Education, ED Data Express, "State Tables" |
The following table shows the graduation rates and average composite ACT and SAT scores for Washington and surrounding states during the 2012-2013 school year. All statements made in this section refer to that school year.[1][2][3]
In the United States, public schools reported graduation rates that averaged to about 81.4 percent. About 54 percent of all students in the country took the ACT, while 50 percent reported taking the SAT. The average national composite scores for those tests were 20.9 out of a possible 36 for the ACT, and 1498 out of a possible 2400 for the SAT.[4]
Washington schools reported a graduation rate of 76.4 percent during the 2012-2013 school year, second highest among its neighboring states.
In Washington, more students took the SAT than the ACT in 2013, earning an average SAT score of 1537.
Comparison table for graduation rates and test scores, 2012-2013 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | Graduation rate, 2013 | Average ACT composite, 2013 | Average SAT composite, 2013 | ||||
Percent | Quintile ranking** | Score | Participation rate | Score | Participation rate | ||
Washington | 76.4% | Fourth | 22.8 | 21% | 1537 | 60% | |
Idaho | N/A | N/A | 22.1 | 49% | 1364 | 99% | |
Montana | 84.4% | Third | 21.3 | 72% | 1595 | 25% | |
Oregon | 68.7% | Fifth | 21.5 | 34% | 1539 | 49% | |
United States | 81.4% | 20.9 | 54% | 1498 | 50% | ||
**Graduation rates for states in the first quintile ranked in the top 20 percent nationally. Similarly, graduation rates for states in the fifth quintile ranked in the bottom 20 percent nationally. Sources: United States Department of Education, "ED Data Express" ACT.org, "2013 ACT National and State Scores" The Commonwealth Foundation, "SAT scores by state, 2013" |
The high school event dropout rate indicates the proportion of students who were enrolled at some time during the school year and were expected to be enrolled in grades nine through 12 in the following school year but were not enrolled by October 1 of the following school year. Students who have graduated, transferred to another school, died, moved to another country, or who are out of school due to illness are not considered dropouts. The average public high school event dropout rate for the United States remained constant at 3.3 percent for both school year 2010–2011 and school year 2011–2012. The event dropout rate for Washington was higher than the national average at 4 percent in the 2010-2011 school year, and 3.8 percent in the 2011-2012 school year.[5]
Demographic data for Washington | ||
---|---|---|
Washington | U.S. | |
Total population: | 7,160,290 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 66,456 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 77.8% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 3.6% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 7.7% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 1.3% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0.6% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 5.2% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 12% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 90.4% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 32.9% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $61,062 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 14.4% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Washington. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
Washington voted for the Democratic candidate in all seven presidential elections between 2000 and 2024.
Ballotpedia identified 206 counties that voted for Donald Trump (R) in 2016 after voting for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012. Collectively, Trump won these Pivot Counties by more than 580,000 votes. Of these 206 counties, five are located in Washington, accounting for 2.43 percent of the total pivot counties.[6]
In 2020, Ballotpedia re-examined the 206 Pivot Counties to view their voting patterns following that year's presidential election. Ballotpedia defined those won by Trump won as Retained Pivot Counties and those won by Joe Biden (D) as Boomerang Pivot Counties. Nationwide, there were 181 Retained Pivot Counties and 25 Boomerang Pivot Counties. Washington had four Retained Pivot Counties and one Boomerang Pivot County, accounting for 2.21 and 4.00 percent of all Retained and Boomerang Pivot Counties, respectively.
More Washington coverage on Ballotpedia
Five of 39 Washington counties—12.8 percent—are Pivot Counties. Pivot Counties are counties that voted for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012 and for Donald Trump (R) in 2016. Altogether, the nation had 206 Pivot Counties, with most being concentrated in upper midwestern and northeastern states.
Counties won by Trump in 2016 and Obama in 2012 and 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Trump margin of victory in 2016 | Obama margin of victory in 2012 | Obama margin of victory in 2008 | ||||
Clallam County, Washington | 2.76% | 0.38% | 3.30% | ||||
Cowlitz County, Washington | 13.32% | 4.44% | 11.15% | ||||
Grays Harbor County, Washington | 6.99% | 14.11% | 14.56% | ||||
Mason County, Washington | 5.81% | 7.09% | 8.66% | ||||
Pacific County, Washington | 6.74% | 11.52% | 14.07% |
In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton (D) won Washington with 52.5 percent of the vote. Donald Trump (R) received 36.8 percent. In presidential elections between 1900 and 2016, Washington cast votes for the winning presidential candidate 73.3 percent of the time. In that same time frame, Washington supported Democratic candidates for president more often than Republican candidates, 53.3 to 43.3 percent. The state favored Democrats in every election between 2000 and 2016.
The following table details results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections by state House districts in Washington. Click [show] to expand the table. The "Obama," "Romney," "Clinton," and "Trump" columns describe the percent of the vote each presidential candidate received in the district. The "2012 Margin" and "2016 Margin" columns describe the margin of victory between the two presidential candidates in those years. Data on the results of the 2012 and 2016 presidential elections broken down by state legislative districts was compiled by Daily Kos.[7][8]
In 2012, Barack Obama (D) won 34 out of 49 state House districts in Washington with an average margin of victory of 25.4 points. In 2016, Hillary Clinton (D) won 30 out of 49 state House districts in Washington with an average margin of victory of 32.1 points. |
In 2012, Mitt Romney (R) won 15 out of 49 state House districts in Washington with an average margin of victory of 13.9 points. In 2016, Donald Trump (R) won 19 out of 49 state House districts in Washington with an average margin of victory of 14.9 points. |
2016 presidential results by state House district | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | Obama | Romney | 2012 Margin | Clinton | Trump | 2016 Margin | |
1 | 59.66% | 37.93% | D+21.7 | 61.73% | 30.36% | D+31.4 | |
2 | 47.71% | 49.88% | R+2.2 | 37.79% | 53.05% | R+15.3 | |
3 | 57.66% | 38.63% | D+19 | 51.82% | 38.12% | D+13.7 | |
4 | 40.00% | 57.37% | R+17.4 | 34.91% | 56.36% | R+21.4 | |
5 | 53.41% | 44.29% | D+9.1 | 54.74% | 37.12% | D+17.6 | |
6 | 46.76% | 50.72% | R+4 | 44.72% | 46.75% | R+2 | |
7 | 36.16% | 61.01% | R+24.9 | 29.00% | 63.45% | R+34.5 | |
8 | 36.10% | 61.49% | R+25.4 | 34.54% | 57.03% | R+22.5 | |
9 | 37.70% | 59.71% | R+22 | 35.13% | 56.40% | R+21.3 | |
10 | 50.21% | 47.38% | D+2.8 | 46.94% | 45.07% | D+1.9 | |
11 | 67.51% | 30.27% | D+37.2 | 67.74% | 25.40% | D+42.3 | |
12 | 39.91% | 57.67% | R+17.8 | 37.34% | 55.97% | R+18.6 | |
13 | 35.70% | 61.75% | R+26 | 31.04% | 61.91% | R+30.9 | |
14 | 42.63% | 54.97% | R+12.3 | 38.98% | 54.23% | R+15.2 | |
15 | 45.75% | 52.31% | R+6.6 | 42.51% | 51.74% | R+9.2 | |
16 | 38.20% | 59.21% | R+21 | 36.00% | 56.67% | R+20.7 | |
17 | 48.28% | 49.36% | R+1.1 | 45.51% | 46.88% | R+1.4 | |
18 | 43.85% | 54.12% | R+10.3 | 42.36% | 50.56% | R+8.2 | |
19 | 53.59% | 43.66% | D+9.9 | 41.57% | 50.52% | R+8.9 | |
20 | 40.98% | 56.26% | R+15.3 | 30.96% | 61.41% | R+30.4 | |
21 | 61.52% | 36.25% | D+25.3 | 62.27% | 30.19% | D+32.1 | |
22 | 63.17% | 33.68% | D+29.5 | 60.67% | 30.15% | D+30.5 | |
23 | 57.91% | 39.72% | D+18.2 | 56.69% | 34.37% | D+22.3 | |
24 | 54.21% | 42.81% | D+11.4 | 48.95% | 43.35% | D+5.6 | |
25 | 50.87% | 46.92% | D+4 | 45.23% | 46.56% | R+1.3 | |
26 | 49.33% | 48.06% | D+1.3 | 45.36% | 45.35% | D+0 | |
27 | 67.29% | 30.00% | D+37.3 | 65.15% | 26.43% | D+38.7 | |
28 | 54.44% | 43.37% | D+11.1 | 52.61% | 38.96% | D+13.7 | |
29 | 62.55% | 34.97% | D+27.6 | 54.47% | 36.76% | D+17.7 | |
30 | 58.70% | 39.18% | D+19.5 | 56.77% | 35.96% | D+20.8 | |
31 | 47.88% | 49.93% | R+2.1 | 41.61% | 50.16% | R+8.5 | |
32 | 70.64% | 26.92% | D+43.7 | 71.67% | 21.56% | D+50.1 | |
33 | 65.65% | 32.25% | D+33.4 | 64.85% | 28.57% | D+36.3 | |
34 | 77.41% | 20.25% | D+57.2 | 79.30% | 14.85% | D+64.4 | |
35 | 51.47% | 45.95% | D+5.5 | 44.25% | 46.59% | R+2.3 | |
36 | 81.82% | 15.34% | D+66.5 | 85.25% | 9.15% | D+76.1 | |
37 | 86.30% | 11.18% | D+75.1 | 87.06% | 8.13% | D+78.9 | |
38 | 59.99% | 37.08% | D+22.9 | 53.38% | 37.81% | D+15.6 | |
39 | 49.44% | 47.52% | D+1.9 | 40.00% | 50.75% | R+10.7 | |
40 | 62.09% | 34.70% | D+27.4 | 62.61% | 29.29% | D+33.3 | |
41 | 60.00% | 38.22% | D+21.8 | 67.76% | 26.09% | D+41.7 | |
42 | 49.67% | 47.37% | D+2.3 | 47.57% | 44.43% | D+3.1 | |
43 | 85.99% | 10.63% | D+75.4 | 88.74% | 5.96% | D+82.8 | |
44 | 54.08% | 43.61% | D+10.5 | 50.96% | 40.24% | D+10.7 | |
45 | 58.18% | 39.63% | D+18.6 | 64.80% | 28.03% | D+36.8 | |
46 | 78.25% | 19.15% | D+59.1 | 81.92% | 12.42% | D+69.5 | |
47 | 55.53% | 42.30% | D+13.2 | 54.37% | 38.29% | D+16.1 | |
48 | 61.67% | 35.86% | D+25.8 | 68.17% | 25.02% | D+43.2 | |
49 | 57.30% | 40.04% | D+17.3 | 54.21% | 37.87% | D+16.3 | |
Total | 56.16% | 41.29% | D+14.9 | 54.30% | 38.07% | D+16.2 | |
Source: Daily Kos |
Ballotpedia identified the November 7, 2023, general election as a battleground race. The summary below is from our coverage of this election, found here.
Incumbent Jill Oldson, Chelsie Beck, and Katrina Waters were elected to the Richland School District school board in Benton County, Washington, on November 7, 2023. Three districts were up for regular election: Position 3, Position 4, and Position 5.
The district had approximately 14,100 students during the 2022-2023 school year.[9]
Voters recalled three of the board's five members on the same day as the board's primary on August 1, 2023.[10][11] Kari Williams, one of the three members removed from office, ran in November for Position 4. Recall supporters said that the board members violated the Open Public Meetings Act; violated district policies, procedures, and code of ethics; and voted to make masks optional while a statewide mask requirement was in place.[12] All three board members denied any wrongdoing.[13] To learn more about the recall, click here.
The Washington Education Association (WEA) PAC endorsed Chelsie Beck (Position 3), Katrina Waters (Position 4), and incumbent Jill Oldson (Position 5). WEA "recommends and helps to elect pro-public education, pro-labor candidates to office."[14]
The Benton County Republican Party endorsed Nino Kapitula (Position 3) and Gene Nemeth (Position 5).[15]
Chelsie Beck and Nino Kapitula ran for Position 3. Beck was a chemist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.[16] She said, "My goal is to work with parents, students, and school staff to understand the needs of all students and work to support them. ... I understand that there is a limited budget. In my job I have experience managing multi-million-dollar budgets."[17] Kapitula was the director for project development and design for Providence Land LLC.[18] She said, "We should have the right to know what is being taught in the classroom, fully transparent about teaching and learning materials. ... I will work to close the gap between parents and teachers to rebuild a broken trust."[18]
Katrina Waters and Kari Williams ran for Position 4. Waters was a laboratory fellow and chief scientist at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.[19] She said, "... I have 25 years of experience working collaboratively with multidisciplinary teams and serving on federal advisory boards. I .... understand transparency and accountability. ..."[20] and "I will work to ensure that Richland School District meets the needs of all students and staff, ensure fiscal responsibility, lobby for sufficient funding and effective use of taxpayer money."[21] Williams previously worked as an elementary school teacher.[22] She said she would "continue to champion her initiative to overcome COVID learning losses by prioritizing every child reading on grade level. ... [and] support our community’s family values as she pushes the district to keep our classrooms a place where all children feel safe to learn and where the instruction is focused on teaching our children how to think — not what to think."[22]
Incumbent Jill Oldson and Gene Nemeth ran for Position 5. Oldson was elected to the board in 2018. She said, "I believe the parent/guardian has the ultimate say in their child's education. ... My core values include mental health, special education, academic success, transparency, accountability, fiscal responsibility, and local control."[23] Nemeth was the facility operations and maintenance group lead at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.[24] He said he was "committed to ... student achievement and special education, advocating for parent rights, implementing measurable goals, spending more time monitoring goals, increasing transparency and accountability ... , listening to educators and what they need to succeed, ensuring all stakeholders, including students, are engaged in the plan to achieve excellence, and tying budget priorities to student outcomes."[25]
Ballotpedia identified the November 7, 2023 as a battleground race. The summary below is from our coverage of this election, found here.
Incumbent Liza Rankin, incumbent Lisa Rivera Smith, Evan Briggs, and Gina Topp won four of the seven seats on the Seattle Public Schools School Board in Washington in the general election on November 7, 2023. Two candidates ran for each of the four seats up for election, for a total of eight general election candidates.
School board directors were elected to represent one of seven districts, and candidates were required to live in the district they would represent. In the primary, voters in each district nominated their district's candidates for the general election. On the general election ballot, all Seattle voters could vote for one candidate in each district.[26] Each winning candidate was elected to a four-year term.
Seattle Public Schools had approximately 51,000 students as of the 2021-22 school year and was the largest school district in Washington. As of October 2023, Washington was one of 41 states with state laws providing for nonpartisan school board elections.
Two incumbents in the four districts ran for re-election: Rankin in District 1 and Rivera Smith in District 2. The incumbents in Districts 3 and 6 did not run for re-election.
Candidates focused their campaigns on issues including declining enrollment, potential school closures, school safety, mental health services for students, equity of student outcomes, and board representation. The district's enrollment fell by more than 8% between the 2019-2020 and 2021-2022 school years and the district was facing a projected budget deficit of $104.4 million in the 2024-25 school year.[27][28] The district also experienced a school shooting that resulted in the death of a student in November 2022.[29]
Incumbent Rankin, who first assumed office in 2019 and was the vice president of the board, and Debbie Carlsen ran in District 1. In an interview with KUOW about the election, Rankin said, "I will continue to prioritize eliminating barriers to education for marginalized students and families and provide direction to the district in policy that is based on the vision and values of our communities."[30] Carlsen, also in an interview with KUOW, said, "To ensure our schools are fully funded, the board needs an independent party to examine the district’s spending, so we can show our state legislators that the state is not fulfilling its paramount duty of fully funding K-12 education."[30]
Incumbent Rivera Smith, who first assumed office in 2019, and Christina Posten ran in District 2. In an interview about the election, Rivera Smith said, "As a former reporter, I think that I came into this job really with an emphasis on communication and transparency."[31] Posten said that her experience as a former Seattle School Board employee gave her a unique perspective, and said, "We need to determine at each school in each neighborhood how the schools themselves are working together where the discretionary dollars are being spent."[32]
Briggs and Ben Gitenstein ran in District 3. In an interview with KUOW, Briggs said, "If elected to the school board, I am committed to ensuring transparency and responsible financial management."[33] Gitenstein, also in an interview with KUOW, said, "My number one priority will be returning the school board to its role of effective oversight of the District."[33]
Topp and Maryanne Wood ran in District 6. In an interview with KUOW, Topp said that her main priority was to, "Improve equity in education for all students, regardless of their background, so that every child has the opportunity to succeed."[34] Wood said that her priority was to, "Halt and dial back huge capitol expenditures for what I call 'mega schools.'"[34]
In June 2023, the board voted 5-2 to adopt a Student Outcomes Focused Governance (SOFG) model. According to the board's website, the model "sets goals for student outcomes, based on the community’s vision for the district, and guardrails, based on the community’s values for how the vision will be achieved." The SOFG model was developed and promoted by the Council of the Great City Schools. At least two candidates in the November 7 general election, Ben Gitenstein and Debbie Carlsen, criticized the change.[35][36] Both incumbents up for re-election, Liza Rankin and Lisa Rivera Smith, voted in favor of adopting the new governance model.[37]
According to The Stranger, a Seattle newspaper, Gitenstein "complained about the SOFG model eliminating opportunities for broader policy conversations with the public."[35] Carlsen, on their campaign website, said, "At the beginning of the pandemic, the school board voted in a new governance model, with little community engagement, that has lessened the board’s ability for oversight and accountability."[38] On the occasion of the vote to adopt the new governance model, Director Rankin said, "Part of this vote to me is the mutual commitment to building a better structure because the real root of the problem was inconsistent or inequitable access to information that the Board needs and that the public needs and wants."[39] Director Rivera Smith, speaking about the need for communication between the board and the district superintendent under the new governance model, said, "It is important for us to have that holistic view of our district beyond just the goals and guardrails."[39]
Washington | School Boards | News and Analysis |
---|---|---|
|
|
|