2020 Election Dates | |
---|---|
Deadline to file candidacy | |
January 7, 2020 | |
Primary election | |
February 18, 2020 | |
General election | |
April 7, 2020 |
2020 State Judicial Elections | |
---|---|
2021 »
« 2019
| |
Overview | |
Supreme Courts Overview | |
Appellate Courts Overview | |
View judicial elections by state: | |
Incumbent Daniel Kelly and challenger Jill Karofsky advanced from the February 18, 2020, nonpartisan primary for Wisconsin Supreme Court, while Ed Fallone was eliminated. Kelly received 50.1% of the vote to Karofsky's 37.2% and Fallone's 12.7%.[2] Kelly and Karofsky advanced to the general election on April 7, 2020.
Although the race was officially nonpartisan, Kelly was a member of the court's conservative majority and received support from conservative groups. Fallone and Karofsky said they would join the court's liberal minority and received support from liberal groups.
All three candidates said they were running to counter politicization on the court. Kelly said judges should decide cases based on their interpretation of the law rather than their political preferences, while Fallone said he was running to counter what he said was the politicization of the judiciary, and Karofsky said Kelly had a record of ruling in favor of conservative groups.[3][4][5]
Kelly was running for a full term on the court after Gov. Scott Walker (R) appointed him in 2016 to replace David T. Prosser, who retired.[6] He said he had a broader range of experience than either Fallone or Karofsky, including as a prosecutor, defense attorney, and litigator.[5]
Fallone is a Marquette University law professor who ran for state Supreme Court in 2013. He said his teaching experience and his work with the Hispanic community and low-income clients would bring new perspectives to the bench.[4]
Karofsky was first elected to the Dane County Circuit Court in 2017. She said her experience as a trial court judge made her the most qualified candidate since she had firsthand experience with seeing the effects of state Supreme Court rulings on residents.[5][7]
Karofsky and Fallone avoided direct criticism of one another. When asked why she and Fallone were not working to promote one another's candidacies, Karofsky responded, "It’s just the way Wisconsin is right now. The chances of both of us making it through the primary are very, very weak. I can’t imagine how that would happen."[8] Fallone criticized both Kelly's and Karofsky's demeanor during an exchange at a Jan. 30 candidate forum but did not repeat his criticism in subsequent forums.[9]
Recent election history suggested that either Fallone or Karofsky was likely to be eliminated in the Feb. 18 primary. Between 2005 and 2019, every contested Wisconsin Supreme Court election had a liberal and a conservative advance past the primary.
A Kelly win would have preserved the court's 5-2 conservative majority, while either a Fallone or a Karofsky win would have led to a 4-3 conservative majority, meaning that control of the court would be at stake in the next scheduled election in 2023. Click here to learn more about what's at stake in the general election.
Click on candidate names below to view their key messages:
Kelly |
Fallone |
Karofksy |
Jill Karofsky defeated incumbent Daniel Kelly in the general election for Wisconsin Supreme Court on April 7, 2020.
Candidate |
% |
Votes |
||
✔ |
|
Jill Karofsky (Nonpartisan) |
55.2
|
855,573 |
|
Daniel Kelly (Nonpartisan) |
44.7
|
693,134 | |
Other/Write-in votes |
0.1
|
990 |
Total votes: 1,549,697 | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Incumbent Daniel Kelly and Jill Karofsky defeated Edward A. Fallone in the primary for Wisconsin Supreme Court on February 18, 2020.
Candidate |
% |
Votes |
||
✔ |
|
Daniel Kelly (Nonpartisan) |
50.1
|
352,876 |
✔ |
|
Jill Karofsky (Nonpartisan) |
37.2
|
261,783 |
|
Edward A. Fallone (Nonpartisan) |
12.7
|
89,184 |
Total votes: 703,843 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
This section includes candidate profiles created in one of two ways. Either the candidate completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey or Ballotpedia staff created a profile after identifying the candidate as noteworthy.[10] Ballotpedia staff compiled profiles based on campaign websites, advertisements, and public statements.
Incumbent: Yes
Political Office: Wisconsin Supreme Court (Assumed office: 2016)
Biography: Kelly graduated from Carroll College in 1986 and obtained a law degree from Regent University School of Law in 1991. He was the founding editor-in-chief of the Regent University Law Review. Kelly clerked for Wisconsin Court of Appeals Judge Adam Fine before entering private practice. He worked for the firm of Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren before joining the Kern Family Foundation as vice president and general counsel in 2013. The following year, Kelly founded his own law firm. While in private practice, Kelly argued cases before the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of the United States. Gov. Scott Walker (R) appointed Kelly to fill a vacancy on the state Supreme Court in 2016.
Sources: Daniel Kelly's 2020 campaign website, "Judicial Philosophy," accessed January 23, 2020, WUWM, "Incumbent Daniel Kelly Touts Ability To 'Apply The Law' In Wisconsin Supreme Court Bid," January 3, 2020, Wisconsin Public Radio, "Wisconsin Supreme Court Candidates Debate Role Of Politics, Precedent," November 19, 2019; Daniel Kelly's 2020 campaign website, "About," accessed January 23, 2020, LinkedIn, "Daniel Kelly," accessed January 23, 2020
This information was current as of the candidate's run for Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2020
Incumbent: No
Political Office: None
Submitted Biography: "Ed Fallone is a constitutional law scholar who has devoted over 27 years of his life to the law and ensuring that the Wisconsin legal system works for all Wisconsinites. He has taught over 2,300 Wisconsin lawyers including judges and elected officials. Ed will be the first Latino to serve on our state's highest court and will bring expertise in corporate and criminal law to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. His mother was a Mexican immigrant and his father was a teacher, he comes from a working class family and has two children who attended Yale University and the American University School of International Service. Ed is running for Wisconsin Supreme Court to preserve the independence of the judiciary and defend our rights to equal treatment under the law and self-governance."
The messages below are the candidate’s own.
This information was current as of the candidate's run for Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2020
Incumbent: No
Political Office: Dane County Circuit Court (Assumed office: 2017)
Biography: Karofsky graduated from Duke University and obtained her master's and law degrees from the University of Wisconsin—Madison. After obtaining her law degree, she joined the Dane County District Attorney's office, where she served under four district attorneys. In 2001, Karofsky was named general counsel to the National Conference of Bar Examiners. She held that post until becoming Wisconsin's first Violence Against Women Resource Prosecutor in 2010. The following year, Karofsky was named director of the state's Office of Crime Victim Services, which she led until her election to the Dane County Circuit Court in 2017.
Sources: Jill Karofsky's 2020 campaign website, "Home," accessed January 23, 2020, WUWM, "Judge Jill Karofsky Wants To End 'Corruption' If Elected To Wisconsin Supreme Court," January 2, 2020; Jill Karofsky's 2020 campaign website, "About," accessed January 23, 2020, Teaching Assistants' Association, "Jill Karofsky - Spring 2017," accessed January 23, 2020
This information was current as of the candidate's run for Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2020
This section lists endorsements issued in this election. If you are aware of endorsements that should be included, please email us.
On February 3, 2020, Kelly, Fallone, and Karofsky participated in a candidate forum hosted by the Menard Center at the University of Wisconsin-Stout.
|
Click the links below for roundups of the candidate forum from:
On February 1, 2020, Fallone and Karofsky participated in a candidate forum hosted by the League of Women Voters of Greater Green Bay.
Click here for the official recording of the candidate forum. Click the links below for roundups of the candidate forum from:
On January 30, 2020, Kelly, Fallone, and Karofsky met for a candidate forum hosted by the Milwaukee Bar Association.
|
Click the links below for roundups of the candidate forum from:
On January 27, 2020, Kelly and Fallone participated in a candidate forum at St. Brendan's Inn in Green Bay.
On November 19, 2019, Kelly, Fallone, and Karofsky met for a candidate forum at the law offices of Foley & Lardner LLP sponsored by the American Constitution Society. Click here here for the official recording of the candidate forum. Click the links below for roundups of the candidate forum from:
Ballotpedia invites candidates to participate in its annual survey. |
The following campaign themes came from the candidates' campaign websites, where available.
Kelly's campaign website stated the following:
“ |
• Civilization depends on ordered liberty, functional economics, and individual rights; • The rule of law is an indispensable foundation for ordered liberty, functional economics, and individual rights; • The judiciary is uniquely positioned to protect and nurture the rule of law; and • None of the above matters unless those entrusted with care for the rule of law are willing and able to consistently apply its first principles in clear and certain terms, even when those principles conflict with their personal policy preferences. There is no end to the mischief the judiciary causes when it abandons its role of declaring what the law is, and instead arrogates to itself the power to develop new law in place of what it received from the ultimate lawgivers – the people of the State of Wisconsin and the United States. It is my desire to serve the people of this State by applying, protecting, and preserving the rule of law in the Wisconsin Supreme Court.[28][29] |
” |
Fallone's campaign website stated the following:
“ |
Justice Equality Independence |
” |
Karofsky's campaign website stated the following:
“ |
I have spent my career in the law working to help crime victims and to protect our rights, and now I’m running for the Wisconsin Supreme Court because we need to get our state and our country back on the right track. I’m a judge, I’ve been a local and state prosecutor, I directed the state’s Office of Crime Victim Services. No one knows better than me how important it is to have a legal system that works. Today, too many judges see themselves as on one political team or another. But I think we need strong leaders who will put our strong Wisconsin political tradition of independent and honest courts first. I believe in Wisconsin. I believe in our history of great public schools, protecting our beautiful natural resources, and protecting civil rights for all. As a prosecutor and a judge, I, have deep experience in state courtrooms, and have spent a career standing up for our rights and fighting to protect victims. Now, I need your help to win this race for the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Believe me, I know what it’s like to work hard and to run hard. I’ve completed two Ironman races, and now I run 50-mile ultra-marathons. I was a Division I athlete, and then I graduated with two degrees from UW-Madison. In my career prosecuting violent criminals, working as the top assistant attorney general on violence against women cases, and running the state’s victim services programs, I learned a lot about what works and doesn’t work in our system. I know that our judicial system is built on independent judges, not a system in which it matters what political team you’re on. So now I see the corroding effect of big money on our judicial system. It’s time to restore a sense of justice and honor to our legal system. I will follow the law, and I will protect our values. My dad, Peter, was a local pediatrician. My mom, Judy, was one of the first women in Wisconsin to serve as a city mayor. This country has made tremendous strides in extending equal rights to all, and I’m inspired by the example of my father, and how he cares for children every day, and by my mother and the groundbreaking path she forged. We can’t go backwards, and it’s distressing to me that rather than respecting our rights, we now see a moment in which political forces seek to roll back the advances in civil rights we’ve made in the last few generations. More than anything, our courts are about constitutional rights. We will serve the needs of crime victims, we will stand up for racial justice and civil rights, we will protect the right to marriage equality, and we will never allow for the rights of women to be rolled back. I look forward to getting around the state and carrying that message to voters in every corner of Wisconsin. Please join me on this journey. I look forward to staying in touch.[31][29] |
” |
This section shows advertisements released in this race. Ads released by campaigns and, if applicable, satellite groups are embedded or linked below. If you are aware of advertisements that should be included, please email us.
|
If you are aware of polls conducted in this race, please email us.
The following committees and groups either contributed to the candidate's campaign or made a recommendation or endorsement of the candidate.
Satellite spending, commonly referred to as outside spending, describes political spending not controlled by candidates or their campaigns; that is, any political expenditures made by groups or individuals that are not directly affiliated with a candidate. This includes spending by political party committees, super PACs, trade associations, and 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups.[37][38][39]
This section lists satellite spending in this race reported by news outlets in alphabetical order. If you are aware of spending that should be included, please email us.
The general election determined the size of the court's conservative majority. A win for Fallone or Karofsky would have reduced the conservative majority to 4-3, meaning that the next regularly scheduled election in 2023 would decide control of the court. A Kelly win would have preserved the court's 5-2 conservative majority. Assuming no justices leave the bench before their terms expire, a Kelly win would have prevented a liberal majority from forming on the court until 2026 at the earliest.
At the time of the election, Wisconsin was one of 14 states with divided government, where neither party held a trifecta. Democrat Tony Evers (D) was governor, while Republicans held majorities in both chambers of the state legislature.
Recent elections to the Wisconsin Supreme Court had been decided by narrow margins. In 2019, conservative Brian Hagedorn defeated liberal Lisa Neubauer by a 0.5 percent margin. Aside from the 2017 election in which incumbent Annette Ziegler was unopposed, the widest margin of victory in the preceding decade was liberal incumbent Ann Walsh Bradley's 16.2 percent win in 2015.
Wisconsin Supreme Court elections, 2005-2019 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Winning candidate | Ideological lean | Percent share of vote | Losing candidate | Ideological lean | Percent share of vote | Margin of victory | Majority on court | Turnout | Other statewide elections on ballot |
2019 | Brian Hagedorn | Conservative | 50.2% | Lisa Neubauer | Liberal | 49.7% | 0.5% | 5-2 | 26.6% | None |
2018 | Rebecca Dallet | Liberal | 55.8% | Michael Screnock | Conservative | 44.2% | 11.6% | 4-3 | 22.2% | None |
2017 | Annette Ziegler (incumbent) |
Conservative | 97.2% | Write-in | -- | 2.8% | 94.4% | 5-2 | ~16% | State Superintendent of Public Instruction |
2016 | Rebecca Bradley (incumbent) |
Conservative | 52.4% | JoAnne Kloppenburg | Liberal | 47.5% | 4.9% | 5-2 | 47.4% | Primary election - U.S. President |
2015 | Ann Walsh Bradley (incumbent) |
Liberal | 58.1% | James Daley | Conservative | 41.9% | 16.2% | 4-3 | 18.3% | None |
2013 | Patience Roggensack (incumbent) |
Conservative | 57.5% | Ed Fallone | Liberal | 42.5% | 15% | 4-3 | 20.5% | State Superintendent of Public Instruction |
2011 | David T. Prosser (incumbent) |
Conservative | 50.2% | JoAnne Kloppenburg | Liberal | 49.7% | 0.5% | 4-3 | 34.3% | None |
2009 | Shirley Abrahamson (incumbent) |
Liberal | 59.6% | Randy Koschnick | Conservative | 40.2% | 19.4% | 4-3 | 18.2% | None |
2008 | Michael Gableman | Conservative | 51.1% | Louis Butler (incumbent) |
Liberal | 48.5% | 2.6% | 4-3 | 19.3% | None |
2007 | Annette Ziegler | Conservative | 58.6% | Linda M. Clifford | Liberal | 41.1% | 17.5% | 4-3 | 19.4% | None |
2006 | N. Patrick Crooks (incumbent) |
Liberal | 99.4% | Write-in | -- | 0.6% | 98.8% | 4-3 | 11.8% | None |
2005 | Ann Walsh Bradley (incumbent) |
Liberal | 99.6% | Write-in | -- | 0.4% | 99.2% | 4-3 | 17.1% | State Superintendent of Public Instruction |
Wisconsin Court of Appeals Judge Brian Hagedorn defeated Wisconsin Court of Appeals Judge Lisa Neubauer in the nonpartisan election for a 10-year term on the Wisconsin Supreme Court on April 2, 2019. Hagedorn won with 50% support. The seat was previously held by Justice Shirley Abrahamson, a member of the court's 4-3 liberal minority at the time of the election. Abrahamson did not run for re-election.
Although the election was officially nonpartisan, groups associated with the Democratic Party tended to support Neubauer while groups associated with the Republican Party tended to support Hagedorn.
Candidate |
% |
Votes |
||
✔ |
|
Brian Hagedorn (Nonpartisan) |
50.2
|
606,414 |
|
Lisa Neubauer (Nonpartisan) |
49.7
|
600,433 | |
Other/Write-in votes |
0.1
|
722 |
Total votes: 1,207,569 | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Rebecca Dallet won the nonpartisan election for a 10-year term on the Wisconsin Supreme Court against Sauk County Circuit Judge Michael Screnock on April 3, 2018. Dallet won with 56 percent support. The seat was previously held by Justice Michael Gableman, a member of the court's 5-2 conservative majority at the time of the election, who did not seek re-election.
Although the election was officially nonpartisan, groups associated with the Democratic Party tended to support Dallet while groups associated with the Republican Party tended to support Screnock.
Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes |
Rebecca Dallet | 55.72% | 555,848 |
Michael Screnock | 44.19% | 440,808 |
Total Votes (3880/3880 precincts) | 996,656 | |
Source: Wisconsin Elections Commission |
■ Annette Ziegler (Incumbent/Unopposed)
One seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court was up for election in 2017. Justice Annette Ziegler was elected to the court in 2007 for a 10-year term and needed to stand for re-election in 2017 in order to serve another term. She ran unopposed.[40] Because she was unopposed, the seat did not appear on the ballot in Wisconsin's February primary election but instead appeared only on the ballot for the April 4 general election.
Wisconsin Supreme Court, Rebecca Bradley's Seat, 2016 | ||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes |
Rebecca Bradley Incumbent | 52.35% | 1,024,892 |
JoAnne Kloppenburg | 47.47% | 929,377 |
Write-in votes | 0.19% | 3,678 |
Total Votes (100% Reporting) | 1,957,947 | |
Source: Wisconsin Government Accountability Board Official Results |
One seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court was up for election in 2016. Following the death of Justice N. Patrick Crooks on September 21, 2015, Rebecca Bradley was appointed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court by Governor Scott Walker (R) on October 9, 2015. Earlier in September, Crooks had announced his plans to retire at the end of his term.[41] Bradley had already announced a run for Crooks' seat before his death.[42]
Bradley and opponent JoAnne Kloppenburg received the highest number of votes for Bradley's seat in the primary on February 16, 2016, knocking Joe Donald out of the race. Bradley and Kloppenburg then faced each other in the sharply contested April general election. Bradley won. The race had the highest voter turnout for a supreme court race in Wisconsin state history, with over 1,900,000 votes cast.[43][44]
General election, 2015 | ||
---|---|---|
Candidate | Vote % | Votes |
Ann Walsh Bradley Incumbent | 58.1% | 471,866 |
James Daley | 41.9% | 340,632 |
Total Votes | 813,200 |
One seat was open for election on the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2015. Incumbent Justice Ann Walsh Bradley defeated Rock County Circuit Court Judge James Daley in the general election on April 7, 2015. Although the election was nonpartisan, Bradley is considered to be part of the liberal minority on the court. If Daley won, conservatives would have held a five-member majority on the seven-member court.[47]
Justice Bradley was elected to the court in 1995 and re-elected in 2005. She previously served as a circuit court judge for 10 years in Marathon County. Judge Daley joined the Rock County Circuit Court since 1989.[48][49]
Candidate | Incumbency | Position | Primary Vote | Election Vote |
---|---|---|---|---|
Patience Roggensack | ||||
Ed Fallone | No | 29.8% | 42.47% | |
Vince Megna | No | 6.3% |
One seat was open for election on the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2013. Incumbent Justice Patience Roggensack defeated law professor Ed Fallone in the general election on April 2, 2013. Although the election was nonpartisan, Roggensack is considered to be a member of the court's conservative majority. If Fallone had won, control of the court would have gone to the liberal wing.
Justice Roggensack was first elected to the court in 2003. She previously served for seven years on the Wisconsin Court of Appeals and for 16 years as an attorney in private practice.
Candidate | Incumbency | Position | Primary Vote | Election Vote |
---|---|---|---|---|
JoAnne Kloppenburg | No | District IV | 49.70% | |
David T. Prosser | Yes | 50.192% | ||
Joel Winnig | No | |||
Marla J. Stephens | No |
One seat was open for election on the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2011. Incumbent Justice David T. Prosser defeated Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg in the general election on April 5, 2011. Although the election was nonpartisan, Prosser is considered to be a member of the court's conservative majority. If Kloppenburg had won, control of the court would have gone to the liberal wing.
Justice Prosser was first appointed to the court in 1998 by Gov. Tommy Thompson (R) and was elected to a full term in 2001. He had previously served on the Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission and in the Wisconsin State Assembly.
The following chart shows the vote totals for general election candidates in contested statewide races from 2012 through 2018. Although Wisconsin Supreme Court elections are nonpartisan, liberal and conservative groups typically coalesce around specific candidates. In those cases, Democratic and Republican refers to the preferred candidate of each party.
Partisan vote totals in statewide races in Wisconsin, 2012-2018 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Race | Democratic Votes | Democratic Percentage | Republican Votes | Republican Percentage | Other Votes | Other Percentage | Total votes |
2018 | U.S. Senate | 1,472,914 | 55.4% | 1,184,885 | 44.5% | 2,964 | 0.1% | 2,660,763 |
2018 | Governor | 1,313,836 | 49.6% | 1,284,786 | 48.5% | 52,480 | 2.0% | 2,651,102 |
2018 | State Supreme Court | 555,848 | 55.7% | 440,808 | 44.2% | 829 | 0.1% | 997,485 |
2016 | President | 1,382,536 | 46.5% | 1,405,284 | 47.2% | 188,330 | 6.3% | 2,976,150 |
2016 | U.S. Senate | 1,380,335 | 46.8% | 1,479,471 | 50.2% | 87,539 | 3.0% | 2,947,345 |
2016 | State Supreme Court | 929,377 | 47.5% | 1,024,892 | 52.3% | 3,678 | 0.2% | 1,957,947 |
2015 | State Supreme Court | 471,866 | 58.0% | 340,632 | 41.9% | 702 | 0.1% | 813,200 |
2014 | Governor | 1,122,913 | 46.6% | 1,259,706 | 52.3% | 27,698 | 1.1% | 2,410,317 |
2013 | State Supreme Court | 362,969 | 42.5% | 491,261 | 57.5% | 485 | 0.1% | 854,715 |
2012 | President | 1,620,985 | 52.8% | 1,407,966 | 45.9% | 39,483 | 1.3% | 3,068,434 |
2012 | U.S. Senate | 1,547,104 | 51.5% | 1,380,126 | 45.9% | 78,808 | 2.6% | 3,006,038 |
The Wisconsin Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in the state of Wisconsin. Seven justices, selected in nonpartisan elections for 10-year terms, sit on the state's court of last resort. The court has jurisdiction over all other Wisconsin courts and can also hear original actions.[50]
This is the political composition of the supreme court heading into the 2020 election. Justices are selected in nonpartisan elections. In the case of a mid-term vacancy, the governor appoints a replacement.
■ Brian Hagedorn | Elected in 2019 | |
■ Ann Walsh Bradley | Elected in 1995, 2005, and 2015 | |
■ Patience Roggensack | Elected in 2003 and 2013 | |
■ Annette Ziegler | Elected in 2007 and 2017 | |
■ Rebecca Dallet | Elected in 2018 | |
■ Rebecca Bradley | Appointed by Scott Walker (R) in 2015, elected 2016 | |
■ Daniel Kelly | Appointed by Scott Walker (R) in 2016 |
The seven justices of the Wisconsin Supreme Court are elected in nonpartisan elections. Justices serve 10-year terms.[51][52] In the event of a midterm vacancy, the governor appoints a replacement. If the vacancy occurs after that year's spring election and on or before December 1 of the same year, the appointee must stand for election in the next succeeding spring election in which no other justice is to be elected. If the vacancy occurs after December 1 but before the following spring's election, the appointee must stand for election in the next spring election—beginning with the second spring election from the time of the appointment—in which no other justice is to be elected.[51][52]
The governor solicits recommendations from an Advisory Council on Judicial Selection in making his or her appointments, but is not required to choose one of the suggested appointees.[51][53]
To serve on the supreme court, a justice must be:
The chief justice of the supreme court is elected by a majority of the justices serving on the Court to serve a two-year term.
Demographic data for Wisconsin | ||
---|---|---|
Wisconsin | U.S. | |
Total population: | 5,767,891 | 316,515,021 |
Land area (sq mi): | 54,158 | 3,531,905 |
Race and ethnicity** | ||
White: | 86.5% | 73.6% |
Black/African American: | 6.3% | 12.6% |
Asian: | 2.5% | 5.1% |
Native American: | 0.9% | 0.8% |
Pacific Islander: | 0% | 0.2% |
Two or more: | 2.1% | 3% |
Hispanic/Latino: | 6.3% | 17.1% |
Education | ||
High school graduation rate: | 91% | 86.7% |
College graduation rate: | 27.8% | 29.8% |
Income | ||
Median household income: | $53,357 | $53,889 |
Persons below poverty level: | 15% | 11.3% |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "American Community Survey" (5-year estimates 2010-2015) Click here for more information on the 2020 census and here for more on its impact on the redistricting process in Wisconsin. **Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here. |
Wisconsin voted for the Democratic candidate in four out of the five presidential elections between 2000 and 2016.
Ballotpedia identified 206 counties that voted for Donald Trump (R) in 2016 after voting for Barack Obama (D) in 2008 and 2012. Collectively, Trump won these Pivot Counties by more than 580,000 votes. Of these 206 counties, 23 are located in Wisconsin, accounting for 11.17 percent of the total pivot counties.[54]
In 2020, Ballotpedia re-examined the 206 Pivot Counties to view their voting patterns following that year's presidential election. Ballotpedia defined those won by Trump won as Retained Pivot Counties and those won by Joe Biden (D) as Boomerang Pivot Counties. Nationwide, there were 181 Retained Pivot Counties and 25 Boomerang Pivot Counties. Wisconsin had 21 Retained Pivot Counties and two Boomerang Pivot Counties, accounting for 11.60 and 8.00 percent of all Retained and Boomerang Pivot Counties, respectively.
More Wisconsin coverage on Ballotpedia
|
Federal courts:
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals • U.S. District Court: Eastern District of Wisconsin, Western District of Wisconsin • U.S. Bankruptcy Court: Eastern District of Wisconsin, Western District of Wisconsin
State courts:
Wisconsin Supreme Court • Wisconsin Court of Appeals • Wisconsin Circuit Courts
State resources:
Courts in Wisconsin • Wisconsin judicial elections • Judicial selection in Wisconsin