Ysleta Independent School District |
---|
El Paso County, Texas |
District details |
Superintendent: Xavier De La Torre |
# of school board members: 7 |
Website: Link |
Ysleta Independent School District is a school district in Texas.
Click on the links below to learn more about the school district's...
This information is updated as we become aware of changes. Please contact us with any updates. |
Xavier De La Torre is the superintendent of the Ysleta Independent School District. De La Torre was appointed superintendent in March 2014. De La Torre's previous career experience includes working as the superintendent of the Socorro Independent School District and the county superintendent for the Santa Clara County Office of Education in California.[1]
The Ysleta ISD board of trustees consists of seven members elected to four-year terms. All board members are elected by district .[2]
Members of the board are elected biennially in May to overlapping four-year terms.
Four seats on the board were up for general election on May 1, 2021.
The Ysleta Independent School District board of trustees maintains the following policy on public testimony during board meetings:[3]
From 1993 to 2013, the Ysleta Independent School District had an average of $347,406,095 in revenue and $352,671,667 in expenditures, according to the United States Census Bureau's survey of school system finances. The district had a yearly average of $165,345,810 in outstanding debt. The district retired $17,921,619 of its debt and issued $25,884,286 in new debt each year on average.[4]
The table below separates the district's revenue into the three sources identified by the agency: local, state, and federal.
Revenue by Source | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year |
Local | State | Federal | Revenue Total | |||||||
Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue | Total | % of Revenue |
Click [show] on the right to display the revenue data for prior years. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | $55,069,000 | 19.78% | $202,602,000 | 72.76% | $20,787,000 | 7.47% | $278,458,000 | ||||
1994 | $61,307,000 | 24.47% | $165,190,000 | 65.92% | $24,083,000 | 9.61% | $250,580,000 | ||||
1995 | $66,063,000 | 26.58% | $158,633,000 | 63.82% | $23,880,000 | 9.61% | $248,576,000 | ||||
1996 | $69,291,000 | 25.52% | $176,114,000 | 64.87% | $26,095,000 | 9.61% | $271,500,000 | ||||
1997 | $71,415,000 | 25.98% | $177,558,000 | 64.60% | $25,900,000 | 9.42% | $274,873,000 | ||||
1998 | $66,054,000 | 23.29% | $187,677,000 | 66.17% | $29,891,000 | 10.54% | $283,622,000 | ||||
1999 | $67,462,000 | 22.93% | $190,472,000 | 64.73% | $36,302,000 | 12.34% | $294,236,000 | ||||
2000 | $66,492,000 | 21.69% | $204,668,000 | 66.77% | $35,374,000 | 11.54% | $306,534,000 | ||||
2001 | $70,466,000 | 22.01% | $213,706,000 | 66.76% | $35,933,000 | 11.23% | $320,105,000 | ||||
2002 | $68,598,000 | 20.87% | $216,992,000 | 66.02% | $43,098,000 | 13.11% | $328,688,000 | ||||
2003 | $68,631,000 | 19.72% | $230,039,000 | 66.09% | $49,392,000 | 14.19% | $348,062,000 | ||||
2004 | $68,709,000 | 20.11% | $217,554,000 | 63.66% | $55,481,000 | 16.23% | $341,744,000 | ||||
2005 | $82,559,000 | 22.76% | $227,593,000 | 62.74% | $52,616,000 | 14.50% | $362,768,000 | ||||
2006 | $92,054,000 | 24.34% | $231,623,000 | 61.23% | $54,579,000 | 14.43% | $378,256,000 | ||||
2007 | $95,138,000 | 25.92% | $220,324,000 | 60.03% | $51,557,000 | 14.05% | $367,019,000 | ||||
2008 | $84,463,000 | 19.94% | $284,344,000 | 67.14% | $54,679,000 | 12.91% | $423,486,000 | ||||
2009 | $85,792,000 | 20.34% | $278,604,000 | 66.06% | $57,316,000 | 13.59% | $421,712,000 |
2010 | $86,665,000 | 18.34% | $280,308,000 | 59.33% | $105,483,000 | 22.33% | $472,456,000 |
2011 | $86,260,000 | 18.74% | $270,046,000 | 58.68% | $103,922,000 | 22.58% | $460,228,000 |
2012 | $89,230,000 | 20.33% | $278,556,000 | 63.48% | $71,049,000 | 16.19% | $438,835,000 |
2013 | $89,747,000 | 21.18% | $272,495,000 | 64.30% | $61,548,000 | 14.52% | $423,790,000 |
Avg. | $75,784,048 | 22.14% | $223,099,905 | 64.53% | $48,522,143 | 13.33% | $347,406,095 |
The table below separates the district's expenditures into five categories identified by the agency:
Expenditures by Category | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year |
Instruction | Support Services | Capital Spending | Debt & Gov. Payments | Other | Budget Total | |||||
Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget | Total | % of Budget |
Click [show] on the right to display the expenditure data for prior years. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1993 | $125,593,000 | 52.94% | $82,348,000 | 34.71% | $23,246,000 | 9.80% | $5,070,000 | 2.14% | $1,000,000 | 0.42% | $237,257,000 |
1994 | $132,505,000 | 50.67% | $102,917,000 | 39.35% | $21,398,000 | 8.18% | $3,714,000 | 1.42% | $976,000 | 0.37% | $261,510,000 |
1995 | $138,893,000 | 52.47% | $87,149,000 | 32.92% | $33,162,000 | 12.53% | $3,897,000 | 1.47% | $1,591,000 | 0.60% | $264,692,000 |
1996 | $139,909,000 | 54.43% | $90,248,000 | 35.11% | $21,265,000 | 8.27% | $3,674,000 | 1.43% | $1,954,000 | 0.76% | $257,050,000 |
1997 | $142,892,000 | 54.36% | $89,517,000 | 34.05% | $25,265,000 | 9.61% | $3,323,000 | 1.26% | $1,872,000 | 0.71% | $262,869,000 |
1998 | $154,683,000 | 54.70% | $94,209,000 | 33.32% | $28,157,000 | 9.96% | $3,053,000 | 1.08% | $2,667,000 | 0.94% | $282,769,000 |
1999 | $160,856,000 | 54.08% | $100,939,000 | 33.93% | $29,658,000 | 9.97% | $2,692,000 | 0.90% | $3,322,000 | 1.12% | $297,467,000 |
2000 | $176,953,000 | 56.08% | $109,154,000 | 34.59% | $22,240,000 | 7.05% | $3,694,000 | 1.17% | $3,500,000 | 1.11% | $315,541,000 |
2001 | $175,979,000 | 55.72% | $105,188,000 | 33.31% | $24,677,000 | 7.81% | $6,980,000 | 2.21% | $3,007,000 | 0.95% | $315,831,000 |
2002 | $183,342,000 | 54.77% | $104,706,000 | 31.28% | $35,600,000 | 10.64% | $7,053,000 | 2.11% | $4,032,000 | 1.20% | $334,733,000 |
2003 | $196,113,000 | 56.80% | $119,422,000 | 34.59% | $21,511,000 | 6.23% | $3,486,000 | 1.01% | $4,741,000 | 1.37% | $345,273,000 |
2004 | $199,881,000 | 58.14% | $126,379,000 | 36.76% | $9,826,000 | 2.86% | $4,059,000 | 1.18% | $3,648,000 | 1.06% | $343,793,000 |
2005 | $208,445,000 | 55.35% | $132,725,000 | 35.25% | $24,736,000 | 6.57% | $7,509,000 | 1.99% | $3,147,000 | 0.84% | $376,562,000 |
2006 | $209,867,000 | 47.29% | $134,671,000 | 30.35% | $86,322,000 | 19.45% | $9,683,000 | 2.18% | $3,203,000 | 0.72% | $443,746,000 |
2007 | $205,227,000 | 45.92% | $134,113,000 | 30.01% | $87,305,000 | 19.54% | $16,176,000 | 3.62% | $4,071,000 | 0.91% | $446,892,000 |
2008 | $227,738,000 | 55.53% | $145,884,000 | 35.57% | $16,517,000 | 4.03% | $16,026,000 | 3.91% | $3,953,000 | 0.96% | $410,118,000 |
2009 | $232,142,000 | 54.57% | $142,297,000 | 33.45% | $26,300,000 | 6.18% | $21,128,000 | 4.97% | $3,522,000 | 0.83% | $425,389,000 |
2010 | $244,302,000 | 55.91% | $146,284,000 | 33.48% | $24,324,000 | 5.57% | $18,270,000 | 4.18% | $3,738,000 | 0.86% | $436,918,000 |
2011 | $258,209,000 | 53.61% | $152,382,000 | 31.64% | $45,656,000 | 9.48% | $21,137,000 | 4.39% | $4,300,000 | 0.89% | $481,684,000 |
2012 | $245,662,000 | 55.82% | $152,046,000 | 34.55% | $16,095,000 | 3.66% | $21,020,000 | 4.78% | $5,284,000 | 1.20% | $440,107,000 |
2013 | $237,199,000 | 55.69% | $150,295,000 | 35.29% | $13,772,000 | 3.23% | $19,060,000 | 4.48% | $5,578,000 | 1.31% | $425,904,000 |
Avg. | $190,304,286 | 54.04% | $119,184,429 | 33.98% | $30,334,857 | 8.60% | $9,557,333 | 2.47% | $3,290,762 | 0.91% | $352,671,667 |
The table below shows the amount of debt retired, issued, and outstanding in the district for each year.
Debt | |||
---|---|---|---|
Fiscal Year |
Retired | Issued | Outstanding |
Click [show] on the right to display the debt data for prior years. | |||
---|---|---|---|
1993 | $32,380,000 | $30,995,000 | $80,129,000 |
1994 | $42,908,000 | $38,827,000 | $76,049,000 |
1995 | $4,355,000 | $0 | $71,694,000 |
1996 | $4,575,000 | $0 | $67,119,000 |
1997 | $10,630,000 | $5,710,000 | $62,199,000 |
1998 | $5,135,000 | $0 | $57,064,000 |
1999 | $5,485,000 | $0 | $57,314,000 |
2000 | $10,580,000 | $78,733,000 | $125,439,000 |
2001 | $22,602,000 | $0 | $104,998,000 |
2002 | $5,565,000 | $0 | $98,358,000 |
2003 | $37,484,000 | $28,005,000 | $89,618,000 |
2004 | $6,724,000 | $69,890,000 | $154,869,000 |
2005 | $10,293,000 | $71,350,000 | $221,584,000 |
2006 | $14,568,000 | $1,700,000 | $207,362,000 |
2007 | $15,237,000 | $104,670,000 | $298,799,000 |
2008 | $11,815,000 | $1,520,000 | $290,039,000 |
2009 | $7,879,000 | $0 | $283,257,000 |
2010 | $8,115,000 | $16,805,000 | $291,677,000 |
2011 | $9,291,000 | $5,100,000 | $288,904,000 |
2012 | $50,285,000 | $39,015,000 | $277,827,000 |
2013 | $60,448,000 | $51,250,000 | $267,963,000 |
Avg. | $17,921,619 | $25,884,286 | $165,345,810 |
The following salary information was pulled from the district's teacher salary schedule. A salary schedule is a list of expected compensations based on variables such as position, years employed, and education level. It may not reflect actual teacher salaries in the district.
Year | Minimum | Maximum |
---|---|---|
2020[5] | $53,205 | $69,285 |
Each year, state and local education agencies use tests and other standards to assess student proficiency. Although the data below was published by the U.S. Department of Education, proficiency measurements are established by the states. As a result, proficiency levels are not comparable between different states and year-over-year proficiency levels within a district may not be comparable because states may change their proficiency measurements.[6]
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[7]
School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 58 | 70-74 | 50-54 | 58 | 60-69 | 50-59 | 66 |
2017-2018 | 56 | 70-74 | 45-49 | 56 | 40-59 | 60-69 | 65 |
2016-2017 | 84 | 90-94 | 80-84 | 84 | 60-79 | 85-89 | 88 |
2015-2016 | 81 | 90-94 | 76 | 81 | 70-79 | 85-89 | 88 |
2014-2015 | 78 | 90-94 | 70-74 | 78 | 70-79 | 80-84 | 84 |
2013-2014 | 80 | 90-94 | 74 | 80 | 70-79 | 85-89 | 83 |
2012-2013 | 79 | 75-79 | 75 | 78 | 60-69 | 80-84 | 84 |
2011-2012 | 82 | 80-89 | 74 | 82 | 80-89 | 85-89 | 85 |
2010-2011 | 84 | ≥90 | 81 | 84 | 80-89 | N/A | 88 |
The following table shows the percentage of district students who scored at or above the proficiency level each school year:[7]
School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 46 | 60-64 | 44 | 45 | 30-39 | 50-59 | 59 |
2017-2018 | 45 | 60-64 | 45-49 | 45 | 21-39 | 60-69 | 57 |
2016-2017 | 74 | 85-89 | 70-74 | 73 | 60-79 | 75-79 | 83 |
2015-2016 | 73 | 80-84 | 70 | 72 | 60-69 | 80-84 | 84 |
2014-2015 | 75 | 90-94 | 76 | 75 | 60-69 | 80-84 | 84 |
2013-2014 | 77 | 80-84 | 78 | 76 | 60-69 | 80-84 | 83 |
2012-2013 | 78 | 75-79 | 77 | 77 | 60-69 | 85-89 | 86 |
2011-2012 | 88 | ≥90 | 89 | 88 | 80-89 | 90-94 | 92 |
2010-2011 | 88 | ≥90 | 90 | 88 | 80-89 | N/A | 92 |
The following table shows the graduation rate of district students each school year:[7][8]
School year | All (%) | Asian/Pacific Islander (%) |
Black (%) | Hispanic (%) | Native American (%) |
Two or More Races (%) |
White (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017-2018 | 90 | ≥50 | 80-89 | 90 | ≥50 | PS | 90-94 |
2016-2017 | 89 | ≥50 | 80-84 | 89 | PS | ≥50 | 85-89 |
2015-2016 | 88 | ≥50 | 80-89 | 88 | PS | ≥50 | 90-94 |
2014-2015 | 88 | ≥50 | 80-89 | 88 | ≥50 | 60-79 | 85-89 |
2013-2014 | 86 | ≥50 | 70-79 | 86 | ≥50 | ≥80 | 85-89 |
2012-2013 | 86 | ≥50 | ≥90 | 86 | ≥50 | ≥80 | 80-84 |
2011-2012 | 86 | PS | ≥80 | 86 | PS | PS | 70-79 |
2010-2011 | 85 | PS | ≥50 | 85 | PS | N/A | 40-59 |
Year[9] | Enrollment | Year-to-year change (%) |
---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 41,064 | -0.3 |
2017-2018 | 41,204 | -0.8 |
2016-2017 | 41,536 | -1.7 |
2015-2016 | 42,266 | -0.5 |
2014-2015 | 42,488 | -1.3 |
2013-2014 | 43,063 | -1.4 |
2012-2013 | 43,680 | -1.6 |
2011-2012 | 44,376 | -0.8 |
2010-2011 | 44,746 | 0.3 |
2009-2010 | 44,620 | 0.1 |
2008-2009 | 44,592 | -1.0 |
2007-2008 | 45,049 | -0.4 |
2006-2007 | 45,242 | -1.9 |
2005-2006 | 46,115 | -0.5 |
2004-2005 | 46,349 | -0.7 |
2003-2004 | 46,668 | -0.2 |
2002-2003 | 46,745 | -0.1 |
2001-2002 | 46,811 | 0.9 |
2000-2001 | 46,394 | -1.2 |
1999-2000 | 46,950 | -0.6 |
1998-1999 | 47,238 | -0.8 |
1997-1998 | 47,616 | 0.5 |
1996-1997 | 47,366 | 0.5 |
1995-1996 | 47,144 | -0.9 |
1994-1995 | 47,572 | -3.7 |
1993-1994 | 49,399 | 0.3 |
1992-1993 | 49,273 | -1.5 |
1991-1992 | 50,036 | 0.1 |
1990-1991 | 49,974 | -0.1 |
1989-1990 | 50,009 | -0.4 |
1988-1989 | 50,209 | 1.8 |
1987-1988 | 49,316 | 1.4 |
1986-1987 | 48,653 | - |
During the 2018-2019 school year, 79.8% of the district's students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 25.7% were English language learners, and 12.6% of students had an Individual Education Plan (IEP) .[11]
Racial Demographics, 2018-2019 | ||
---|---|---|
Race | Ysleta Independent School District (%) | Texas K-12 students (%) |
American Indian/Alaska Native | 0.2 | 0.4 |
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander | 0.3 | 4.5 |
Black | 1.4 | 12.6 |
Hispanic | 94.7 | 52.5 |
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | 0.1 | 0.2 |
Two or More Races | 0.2 | 2.4 |
White | 3.1 | 27.4 |
Note: Percentages for race and ethnicity may add up to more than 100 percent because respondents may report more than one race and the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity may be selected in conjunction with any race. Read more about race and ethnicity in the census here.
Yselta Independent School District
9600 Sims Dr.
El Paso, TX 79925
Phone: 915-434-0000
Texas | School Board Elections | News and Analysis |
---|---|---|
|
State of Texas Austin (capital) | |
---|---|
Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2021 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |