United States v. Lara

From Conservapedia - Reading time: 1 min


In United States v. Lara, 541 U.S. 193 (2004), the U.S. Supreme Court held (7-2) that the federal government was not barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause from prosecuting an Indian who had already been tried, convicted and punished by an Indian tribe for striking a federal officer.

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the majority opinion, and Justice David Souter wrote a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justice Antonin Scalia.


Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Source: https://www.conservapedia.com/United_States_v._Lara
8 views | Status: cached on March 11 2024 06:42:11
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF