Learning Activity Management System (LAMS) is an open source learning design system for authoring, delivering and monitoring learning activities, i.e. a learning activity management software supporting pedagogical workflows. LAMS was originally released in 2003 and it is still available (as of March 2021). The LAMS team managed to survive a funding crisis in 2010 (due to general cutbacks in Australia) thanks to commercial activities and now operates also from Singapore. As of March 2019, the LAMS source code is on Github and LAMS International (Sydney) and LAMS Education Asia (Singapore) are commercial companies that provide development and support services for the LAMS platform.
See also:
LAMS provides:
According to a LAMS website, LAMS includes environments for user administration, student run-time delivery of sequences, teacher run-time monitoring of student sequences and, most importantly, teacher authoring/adaptation of sequences. LAMS is inspired by, and heavily based on, IMS Learning Design and EML. Originally, LAMS was not designed to be a reference implementation of either specification. We do not expect LAMS to be IMS Learning Design (IMS LD) conformant in the future, since this standard is basically dead and since IMS LD somehow forgot to specify interfaces to tools.
According to Krann (2003), “the heart of the system is a visual editor that allows educators to choreograph a whole learning activity around a particular topic. By dragging and dropping acts like synchronous discussion (chat), web polls, students posting material and structured debates, a series of online lessons can be planned much like a conventional lesson. The player part of the system then allows a group of students to take part in all these activities, and presents the right tools at the right time, and divides the group into smaller groups, if that's what the teacher designed.”
In our own experience, LAMS is a perfect tool to teach activity-based course design, i.e. good online pedagogy. The authoring interface is fairly easy to learn. As of 2018/early 2019, the only difficulty is to find a system administrator capable of installing the system. However, it is possible to use a free online service for smaller projects.
Basically, an author has to do the following tasks:
1) Assemble a learning sequence with a on-line visual authoring tool.
Here is a summary of the authoring steps:
2) Assign learning sequences to classes. In LAMS3 a sequence is called a "lesson". Administrator must create classes, then give the teachers the right to add lessons. LAMS also may be available through your LMS (e.g. Moodle) and rights will be transparently handled. E.g. A Moodle student of a Moodle course can use a LAMS activity of this course.
Best method is to look at examples.
This part is not obvious if you don't read the documentation.
MyGroups -> Group Mgmt
LAMS 2 clients were programmed with ActionScript (Flash)
LAMS 3.x, stable since late 2018 is programmed with HTML 5 and the authoring interface looks like this
LAMS initially adopted a very similar design rationale, i.e. authoring of scenarios that is based on learning activities. It particularly support a rich conversational framework à la Laurillard.
Plans are there to become IMS Learning Design compatible (DSchneider didn't look at details yet). LAMS 2.0 exports to learning design level A. Daniel K. Schneider thinks that this is only true at a very formal level, i.e. the LD export contains code like this:
<method> <play> <act> <role-part> <role-ref ref="Learner" /> <activity-structure-ref ref="A-Sequence" /> </role-part> </act> ....
<activity-structure xmlns="http://www.imsglobal.org/xsd/imscp_v1p1" structure-type="sequence" identifier="A-sequence"> <title>LAMS Learning design sequence</title> <learning-activity-ref ref="A-lanb11-109" />
.....
<learning-activity xmlns="http://www.imsglobal.org/xsd/imscp_v1p1" identifier="A-lanb11-109"> <title>Noticeboard</title> <environment-ref ref="E-lanb11-109" /> <complete-activity> <user-choice /> </complete-activity> <lams:lams-tool-activity> <lams:activityID>113</lams:activityID> <lams:activityUIID>64</lams:activityUIID> <lams:description>Read noticeboard</lams:description> <lams:activityTitle>Noticeboard</lams:activityTitle> <lams:helpURL>http://wiki.lamsfoundation.org/display/lamsdocs/lanb11</lams:helpURL> <lams:xCoord>106</lams:xCoord>
This means that the LD interpreter must know about LMS tools which is perfectly legal as far as I can tell (XML itself and all IMS specifications 'are' extensible. In practice however, this means that a Learning Design made with LAMS will only run within LAMS. However, this is not a LAMS issue in itself but instead a lack services definitions in the IMS Learning Design specification. To over come this limitation LAMS has proposed a Tool Contract.
I don't know if there is some sort of initiative to standardize vocabularies that describe activities with specific kinds of tools such as the ones that exist in LAMS.
LAMS 3.x is LTI compliant version 1.1 and 1.3. Read LAMS as LTI tool provider, but maybe (as of March 2019) this document would need some updating. Not tested.
LAMS can be integrated with MOODLE, i.e. offer single sign-on from Moodle. Read integrations and Installation instructions for the Moodle 3 Integration. However we have to confirm this - Daniel K. Schneider (talk) 19:24, 20 March 2019 (CET)
In the past, we easily managed to integrate LAMS 2.0 with our Moodle 2.x and 3.x.
One of the core components of the LAMS V2 architecture was the "Tools Contract". To be written, see this.
Masterman and Lee (2005:4) who ran an evaluation of LAMS 1.x with 34 participants in the UK reported the following findings:
i) LAMS is capable of supporting a range of pedagogical approaches, in that designers can select those activities that match their preferred style. However, the lack of support for images and graphics can be a hindrance to the design of appropriate learning tasks. The adoption of LAMS within an institution would almost certainly entail an increased workload for teachers, but with time and experience this load could be expected to lessen.
ii) LAMS appears neither to have compromised learning outcomes in comparison with the existing learning environment nor to have resulted in dramatic improvements in achievement. However, using LAMS to raise the level of learning outcomes was not a prime consideration for practitioners. Rather, they perceived its benefits to lie in increasing learners' motivation and in encouraging participation by more reticent students. Feedback obtained directly or indirectly from learners suggests that some appreciated the independence and freedom to work at their own pace, while others did not like the linearity of LAMS sequences or wanted more direct feedback on their progress.
iii) Several participants engaged in some form of reflective activity either while designing a LAMS sequence or afterwards. However, while they recognised the importance of sharing their practice with others, technical and cultural barriers need to be overcome.I tested LAMS with a social science methodology sequence over several years and the experience has been rather positive. This includes student's appreciation.
In another class, our educational technology students have to design small LAMS sequences and that always went rather well, i.e. students acquired some competency in learning design, including branching and combining content delivery with collaborative activities. I stopped using LAMS in 2017 and 2018 since adapting the old JBOSS server installation to an updated Linux system and new Java editions became too difficult. We now installed LAMS 3.1 on a virtual server machine and it seems to run smoothly. In addition the new HTML5 clients adapt much better to screen size.
However, LAMS is not very suitable for project-oriented learning designs. I wonder weather one could envision two LAMS interfaces in the future:
After my first encounter with LAMS over 10 years ago, I wrote down the following idea. As it is, LAMS is a learning design system and based on a play-act metaphor that you also have in IMS/LD. In addition, in LAMS there is some stuff that can be found in IMS/SS. While "LD" models in principle allow for "Go to" programming (level C in IMS-LD), it's not really meant for non-theatical scenarios. I now just wonder whether one could image a "LAMS project" version to allow for repetitive and cyclic scenarios. To do so, we need at least another tool I'd call "Teacher announce", i.e. a simple board that tells learners what to do next with what tool and also provide feedback.
Example: Announce-> Wiki->Announce->Wiki->Announce->Resource + Wiki (create a list) (revise list) (expand list)
Wiki is always the same.
Of course, visually, this should then be presented with different transitions (non-linear numbered arrows, only ONE node for the Wiki). The learner UI would also be different and look very much like the authoring interface. Steps that students did not take yet (e.g. announce #4 and beyound) could be hidden. Important also: teachers should be able to add stuff in real time, e.g. the monitoring interface = authoring interface.
This would take time to implement, BUT for starters one could just parametrize all the tools to get rid of the complicated sequencing stuff ;) ... a thought I need to expand - Daniel K. Schneider 23:56, 5 March 2010.
Below we describe two examples found on the the community home page. You can download them yourself in your own LAMS server.
Here is a copy of the description (retrieved 16:30, 9 December 2006 (MET)) and a screen dump of the imported sequence:
The course is designed to teach international students in an English Center. These students are graduated students whose first language is not English. They may come from many different countries and different majors. It is two months language skills and academic preparation course for studying at university. The course guides step by step to complete an academic research. Students are expected to acquire skills for university study like researching essay topics, writing assignments and reports. It also aims to help students become an independent and self-directed leaner. Besides, they also have chance to get knowledge on their major. In the course, students will do almost all activities online, but at some stages, teacher will stop and give some helps or consultations to help them complete their project. Some online activities require students to work asynchronously like discussion at a forum, but sometimes they have to work synchronously such as chatting with their friends at scheduled online discussion. The course is divided into 5 stages:
At the end of each stage, students have to submit assignments for teacher to know how students' progress. Then they will get feedback from the teacher at consultation. Consultation is also the time for teacher to correct, encourage, and give advices to help students sharpen their knowledge, increase motivation and improve at the next steps. Knowledge will be acquired and increase through the process. At the end of the course, students are required to have capability to write an academic research by themselves. The end result will be a portfolio of work that demonstrates students' achievement and progress during the course.
Here is a screendump of the authoring Window. DSchneider imported this LAMS 1.x sequence into LAMS 2.0 and rearranged the icons into a "serpent" position.
A stage 3 sequence which addresses some of the issues faced by the Stolen Generation of Australian Indigenous Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders during the 20th century.
This sequence could be adapted and modified by including a writing task where assessment can be made by submitting a file.
Here are the IMHO's most important getting started links:
As of early 2019, LAMS 2 tutorials are still being updated. However, since most tools are common with LAMS2 this should not inhibit people from using LAMS.
The LAMS project maintains several websites. Some materials below are fairly obsolete now.