A writing tool is software that helps people to write. Such tools are very popular in school teaching. One of the reasons may be that they empower teachers, i.e. allows them to orchestrate scenarios of their own design that engage learners with the computer, as opposed to learning through the computer.
In education, they can be considered as a kind of cognitive tool. See also: professionnal software since some writing tools have been made for and are used by real writers.
There are many kinds of tools.
Such tools can either be for individual use, for group use (e.g. integrated in a groupware application) or based on social computing, e.g. several social software includes note taking tools.
Computer supported writing tools provide rich possibilities to enhance written communication.
A review by Ulusoy (2006) outlines some specific effects computer-supported writing environments can have on the writing process.
Haas (1998) found that those writing with a computerized workstation wrote longer, spent less time planning, generated more text, but at a similar rate as writers using pen and paper. They also spent more time revising and attending to the medium than writers using pen and paper
It is believed that experienced writers are better able to effectively engage in planning their texts and this difference leads to better texts (Bereiter and Scardamalia 1987, Flower & Hayes 1980, Haas 1989), though some studies fail to show a connection between the planning methods and the quality of the text produced (Haas 1989, Isnard & Piolat 1993).
Haas used homogeneously experienced writers whose goal was to produce a quality persuasive text, not to learn about argumentation or about a a particular topic. Paper and pen may particularly favour experienced writers who are topic experts and do not need to search for ideas or engage in any knowledge constituting processes as they can move straight to planning with no need to develop ideas further through the text-generating part of the writing process. The order in which planning, text generation, structuring and revision processes occur during the writing process may vary for writers with different experience and learning styles (see Writing-to-learn. More planning may lead to better texts but not necessarily more learning, assumingif the purpose of the argumentation is to learn rather than simply a writing exercise of skills already developed. If trying to teach argumentation skills through writing then the idea generating activity of freeflow text encouraged by computer-supported argumentation tools is important. Planning can be done at any stage in the writing, catering to many learning styles.
The tool used in planning and writing can, however, influence the occurrence of the different writing processes. Isnard & Piolat (1993) found that types of planning can influence the number of ideas generated and the overal structural quality of a written text. Outlining during idea-organization phases resulted in more new ideas being generated than when ideas were organized using a freeflow form or a graphic organizational mode (e.g.: chart, graph, concept map)
Important notice: The initial author of this page (DSchneider) did not test any of these.
There are dozens of systems, but probably not many of them in use on a large scale.
See also idea managers (there is quite a lot of overlap)
Comprehensive, easy-to-use software for every fiction writer. Try it now!
Built for Windows Built for Mac Built for Linux Everything you need to write fiction
Writer's Café
telling stories with any of a variety of available multimedia tools, including graphics, audio, video animation, and Web publishing. Recent web 2.0 software like webtops may turn out to be repurposed for this.
See note taking for conceptual issues and specialized software.
See:
Sometimes guidelines for writing are also called tools, e.g.:
e.g. indexes of writing tools