John-Nirenberg inequalities

From Encyclopedia of Mathematics - Reading time: 9 min


Functions in Hardy spaces and in BMO.[edit]

Let D={zC:|z|<1} be the unit disc and let, for 1p<, Hp denote the space of holomorphic functions on D (cf. also Analytic function) for which the supremum

fHpp:=12πsupr<1ππ|f(reiϑ)|pdϑ

is finite. If a function f belongs to Hp, p1, then there exists a function fLp(D,dϑ/(2π)) such that

f(z)=kϑ(z)f(eiϑ)dϑ2π.

Here, the function

eiϑkϑ(z)=1|z|2|zeiϑ|2

is the probability density (cf. also Density of a probability distribution) of a Brownian motion starting at zD and exiting D at eiϑ. It is the Poisson kernel (cf. also Poisson integral) for the unit disc. A function φ, defined on [π,π], belongs to BMO if there exists a constant c such that I|φφI|2dϑc2|I|, for all intervals I (cf. also BMO-space). Here, φI=Iφdϑ/|I| and |I| denotes the Lebesgue measure of the interval I. Let φ1 and φ2 be bounded real-valued functions defined on the boundary D of D, and let φ~2 be the boundary function of the harmonic conjugate function of the harmonic extension to D of φ2 (cf. also Conjugate harmonic functions), so that φ2+iφ~2 is the boundary function of a function which is holomorphic on D. Then the function φ1+φ~2 belongs to BMO: see [a4], p. 200, or [a9], p. 295. The function

φ(ϑ):=|log|tan12ϑ||

belongs to BMO, but is not bounded; see [a6], Chap. VI. Composition with the biholomorphic mapping

wi1w1+w

turns BMO-functions of the line into BMO-functions of the circle; see [a6], p. 226.

Martingales in Hardy spaces and in BMO.[edit]

Let Bt, t0, be Brownian motion starting at 0 and let F be the filtration generated by Brownian motion (cf. also Stochastic processes, filtering of). Notice that Bt, t0, is a continuous Gaussian process with covariance EBsBt=min(s,t). Define, for 0<p<, the space of local martingales Mp by

Mp={X:X a local martingale with respect to F,E|X|P<}.

Here, X=supt0|Xt|. Since the martingales are F-martingales, they can be written in the form of an Itô integral:

Xt=X0+0tHsdBs.

Here, H is a predictable random process. Let A be a (2×2)-matrix, and define the A-transform of X by (AX)t=0tAHs.dBs. Then the martingale X belongs to M1 if and only all transformed martingales AX have the property that

supt>0E[|(AX)t|]

is finite; this is Janson's theorem [a8]. A martingale AM1 is called an atom if there exists a stopping time T such that

i) At=0 if tT; and

ii)

A=supt0|At|1P[T<].

Since for atoms A=0 on the event {T=}, it follows that A1=E[A]. Moreover, every XM1 can be viewed as a limit of the form

X=M1limNn=Nn=NcnAn,

where every An is an atom and where xN|cn|X1. A local martingale Y is said to have to bounded mean oscillation (notation YBMO) if there exists a constant c such that

E|YYT|cP[T<]

for all F-stopping times T. The infimum of the constants c is the BMO-norm of Y. It is denoted by Y. The above inequality is equivalent to

E[|YYT||FT]c almost surely.

Let X be a non-negative martingale. Put X=sups0Xs. Then X belongs to M1 if and only if E[Xlog+X] is finite. More precisely, the following inequalities are valid:

E[X0]+E[Xlog+XE[X0]]

E[X]

2E[X0]+2E[Xlog+XE[X0]].

For details, see e.g. [a4], p. 149. Let Yt=Bmin(t,1). Then Y is an unbounded martingale in BMO. Two main versions of the John–Nirenberg inequalities are as follows.

Analytic version of the John–Nirenberg inequality.[edit]

There are constants C, γ(0,), such that, for any function φBMO for which φ1, the inequality

|{ϑI:|φ(eiϑ)φI|λ}|Ceγλ|I|

is valid for all intervals I[π,π].

Probabilistic version of the John–Nirenberg inequality.[edit]

There exists a constant C such that for any martingale XM1 for which X1, the inequality P[X>λ]Ceλ/e is valid. For the same constant C, the inequality

P[suptT|XtXT|>λ]Ceλ/eP[T<]

is valid for all F-stopping times T and for all XM1 for which X1.

As a consequence, for φBMO integrals of the form Dexp(ε|φ(eiϑ)φI|)dϑ are finite for ε>0 sufficiently small.

Duality between H1 and BMO.[edit]

The John–Nirenberg inequalities can be employed to prove the duality between the space of holomorphic functions H01 and BMO and between M1 and BMO.

Duality between H01 and BMO (analytic version).[edit]

The duality between H01={fH1:f(0)=0} and BMO is given by

(f,h)Du(eiϑ)h(eiϑ)dϑ2π,

where u(eiϑ)=limr1Ref(reiϑ) (fH01, hBMO).

Duality between M1 and BMO (probabilistic version).[edit]

Let X be a martingale in M1 and let Y be a martingale in BMO. The duality between these martingales is given by E[XY]. Here, X=limtXt and Y=limtYt.

There exists a more or less canonical way to identify holomorphic functions in H1 and certain continuous martingales in M1. Moreover, the same is true for functions of bounded mean oscillation (functions in BMO) and certain continuous martingales in BMO. Consequently, the duality between H1 and BMO can also be extended to a duality between M1-martingales and BMO-martingales.

The relationship between H1 (respectively, BMO) and a closed subspace of M1 (respectively, BMO) is determined via the following equalities. For fH1 one writes u=Ref and Ut=u(Bmin(t,τ)), and for hBMO one writes Ht=h(Bmin(t,τ)), where, as above, Bt is two-dimensional Brownian motion starting at 0, and where τ=inf{t>0:|Bt|=1}. Then the martingale U belongs to M1, and H is a member of BMO. The fact that H1 can be considered as a closed subspace of M1 is a consequence of the following

cE[|Uτ|p]sup0<r<1D|f(reiϑ)|pdϑ2πCE[|Uτ|p],

fH0p, Ut=Ref(Bt), Uτ=sup0t<τ|Ut|.

An important equality in the proof of these dualities is the following result: Let f1=u1+iv1 and f2=u2+iv2 be functions in H02. Then

E[U1U2]=Du1u2dϑ2π=Dv1v2dϑ2π=E[V1V2].

Here, Utj=uj(Bmin(t,τ)), j=1,2. A similar convention is used for Vtj, j=1,2. In the first (and in the final) equality, the distribution of τ is used: P[τI]=|I|/(2π). The other equalities depend on the fact that a process like Ut1Ut20tu1(Bs).u2(Bs)ds is a martingale, which follows from Itô calculus in conjunction with the harmonicity of the functions u1 and u2. Next, let φ be a function in BMO. Denote by h the harmonic extension of φ to D. Put Yt=h(Bmin(t,τ)). Then Yt is a continuous martingale. Let T be any stopping time. From the Markov property it follows that E[|YYT|2|FT]=w(Bmin(T,τ)), where

w(z)=kϑ(z)|φ(eiϑ)h(z)|2dϑ2π,

with

kϑ(z)=1|z|2|zeiϑ|2.

As above, the Poisson kernel for the unit disc eiϑkϑ(z) can be viewed as the probability density of a Brownian motion starting at zD and exiting D at eiϑ. Since the inequality w(z)c2 is equivalent to the inequality

I|φφI|2dϑ2πc12|I|,

for some constant c1=c1(c), it follows that BMO can be considered as a closed subspace of BMO: see [a6], Corol. 2.4; p. 234.

The analytic John–Nirenberg inequality can be viewed as a consequence of a result due to A.P. Calderón and A. Zygmund. Let u be function in L1(I) (I is some interval). Suppose |I|α>I|u(ϑ)|dϑ. Then there exists a pairwise disjoint sequence {Ij} of open subintervals of I such that |u|α almost everywhere on IIj,

α1|Ij|Ij|u(ϑ)|dϑ<2α,

and

|Ij|1αI|u(ϑ)|dϑ.

In [a1], [a6], [a7] and [a10], extensions of the above can be found. In particular, some of the concepts can be extended to other domains in C (see [a6]), in Rd and in more general Riemannian manifolds ([a1], [a2], [a7], [a10]). For a relationship with Carleson measures, see [a6], Chap. 6. A measure λ on D is called a Carleson measure if λ(S)K.h for some constant K and for all circle sectors S={reiϑ:1hr<1,|ϑϑ0|h}. A function φ belongs to BMO if and only if

|u(z)|2log1|z|dxdy

is a Carleson measure. Here, u is the harmonic extension of φ. For some other phenomena and related inequalities, see e.g. [a3], [a10], and [a11].

References[edit]

[a1] M. Biroli, U. Mosco, "Sobolev inequalities on homogeneous spaces: Potential theory and degenerate partial differential operators (Parma)" Potential Anal. , 4 (1995) pp. 311–324
[a2] S.Y.A. Chang, R. Fefferman, "A continuous version of duality of H1 with BMO on the bidisc" Ann. of Math. (2) , 112 (1980) pp. 179–201
[a3] L. Chevalier, "Quelles sont les fonctions qui opèrent de BMO dans BMO ou de BMO dans L" Bull. London Math. Soc. , 27 : 6 (1995) pp. 590–594
[a4] R. Durrett, "Brownian motion and martingales in analysis" , Wadsworth (1984) (Contains Mathematica analysis and stochastic processes) MR0750829 Zbl 0554.60075
[a5] J.B. Garnett, "Two constructions in BMO" G. Weiss (ed.) S. Wainger (ed.) , Harmonic analysis in Euclidean spaces , Proc. Symp. Pure Math. , XXXV:1 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1979) pp. 295–301
[a6] J. Garnett, "Bounded analytic functions" , Acad. Press (1981) MR0628971 Zbl 0469.30024
[a7] R. Hurri-Syrjanen, "The John–Nirenberg inequality and a Sobolev inequality in general domains" J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 175 : 2 (1993) pp. 579–587
[a8] S. Janson, "Characterization of H1 by singular integral transformations on martingales and Rn" Math. Scand. , 41 (1977) pp. 140–152
[a9] P. Koosis, "Introduction to Hp-spaces: with an appendix on Wolff's proof of the corona theorem" , London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes , 40 , London Math. Soc. (1980)
[a10] Jia-Yu Li, "On the Harnack inequality for harmonic functions on complete Riemannian manifolds" Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B , 14 : 1 (1993) pp. 1–12
[a11] F.J. Martin–Reyes, A. de la Torre, "One-sided BMO spaces" J. London Math. Soc. (2) , 49 : 3 (1994) pp. 529–542
[a12] G. Weiss, "Weak-type inequalities for Hp and BMO" G. Weiss (ed.) S. Wainger (ed.) , Harmonic Analysis in Euclidean Spaces , Proc. Symp. Pure Math. , XXXV:1 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1979) pp. 295–301

How to Cite This Entry: John-Nirenberg inequalities (Encyclopedia of Mathematics) | Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. Source: https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/John-Nirenberg_inequalities
34 views |
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF