Cellular homology

From HandWiki - Reading time: 8 min

In mathematics, cellular homology in algebraic topology is a homology theory for the category of CW-complexes. It agrees with singular homology, and can provide an effective means of computing homology modules.

Definition

If X is a CW-complex with n-skeleton Xn, the cellular-homology modules are defined as the homology groups Hi of the cellular chain complex

Cn+1(Xn+1,Xn)Cn(Xn,Xn1)Cn1(Xn1,Xn2),

where X1 is taken to be the empty set.

The group

Cn(Xn,Xn1)

is free abelian, with generators that can be identified with the n-cells of X. Let enα be an n-cell of X, and let χnα:enαSn1Xn1 be the attaching map. Then consider the composition

χnαβ:Sn1enαχnαXn1qXn1/(Xn1en1β)Sn1,

where the first map identifies Sn1 with enα via the characteristic map Φnα of enα, the object en1β is an (n1)-cell of X, the third map q is the quotient map that collapses Xn1en1β to a point (thus wrapping en1β into a sphere Sn1), and the last map identifies Xn1/(Xn1en1β) with Sn1 via the characteristic map Φn1β of en1β.

The boundary map

n:Cn(Xn,Xn1)Cn1(Xn1,Xn2)

is then given by the formula

n(enα)=βdeg(χnαβ)en1β,

where deg(χnαβ) is the degree of χnαβ and the sum is taken over all (n1)-cells of X, considered as generators of Cn1(Xn1,Xn2).

Examples

The following examples illustrate why computations done with cellular homology are often more efficient than those calculated by using singular homology alone.

The n-sphere

The n-dimensional sphere Sn admits a CW structure with two cells, one 0-cell and one n-cell. Here the n-cell is attached by the constant mapping from Sn1 to 0-cell. Since the generators of the cellular chain groups Ck(Skn,Sk1n) can be identified with the k-cells of Sn, we have that Ck(Skn,Sk1n)=\Z for k=0,n, and is otherwise trivial.

Hence for n>1, the resulting chain complex is

n+20n+1\Zn0n1201\Z0,

but then as all the boundary maps are either to or from trivial groups, they must all be zero, meaning that the cellular homology groups are equal to

Hk(Sn)={Zk=0,n{0}otherwise.

When n=1, it is possible to verify that the boundary map 1 is zero, meaning the above formula holds for all positive n.

Genus g surface

Cellular homology can also be used to calculate the homology of the genus g surface Σg. The fundamental polygon of Σg is a 4n-gon which gives Σg a CW-structure with one 2-cell, 2n 1-cells, and one 0-cell. The 2-cell is attached along the boundary of the 4n-gon, which contains every 1-cell twice, once forwards and once backwards. This means the attaching map is zero, since the forwards and backwards directions of each 1-cell cancel out. Similarly, the attaching map for each 1-cell is also zero, since it is the constant mapping from S0 to the 0-cell. Therefore, the resulting chain complex is

03Z2Z2g1Z0,

where all the boundary maps are zero. Therefore, this means the cellular homology of the genus g surface is given by

Hk(Σg)={Zk=0,2Z2gk=1{0}otherwise.

Similarly, one can construct the genus g surface with a crosscap attached as a CW complex with 1 0-cell, g 1-cells, and 1 2-cell. Its homology groups areHk(Σg)={Zk=0Zg1\Z2k=1{0}otherwise.

Torus

The n-torus (S1)n can be constructed as the CW complex with 1 0-cell, n 1-cells, ..., and 1 n-cell. The chain complex is 0\Z(nn)\Z(nn1)\Z(n1)\Z(n0)0 and all the boundary maps are zero. This can be understood by explicitly constructing the cases for n=0,1,2,3, then see the pattern.

Thus, Hk((S1)n)\Z(nk) .

Complex projective space

If X has no adjacent-dimensional cells, (so if it has n-cells, it has no (n-1)-cells and (n+1)-cells), then HnCW(X) is the free abelian group generated by its n-cells, for each n.

The complex projective space PnC is obtained by gluing together a 0-cell, a 2-cell, ..., and a (2n)-cell, thus Hk(PnC)=\Z for k=0,2,...,2n, and zero otherwise.

Real projective space

The real projective space RPn admits a CW-structure with one k-cell ek for all k{0,1,,n}. The attaching map for these k-cells is given by the 2-fold covering map φk:Sk1RPk1. (Observe that the k-skeleton RPknRPk for all k{0,1,,n}.) Note that in this case, Ck(RPkn,RPk1n)Z for all k{0,1,,n}.

To compute the boundary map

k:Ck(RPkn,RPk1n)Ck1(RPk1n,RPk2n),

we must find the degree of the map

χk:Sk1φkRPk1qkRPk1/RPk2Sk1.

Now, note that φk1(RPk2)=Sk2Sk1, and for each point xRPk1RPk2, we have that φ1({x}) consists of two points, one in each connected component (open hemisphere) of Sk1Sk2. Thus, in order to find the degree of the map χk, it is sufficient to find the local degrees of χk on each of these open hemispheres. For ease of notation, we let Bk and B~k denote the connected components of Sk1Sk2. Then χk|Bk and χk|B~k are homeomorphisms, and χk|B~k=χk|BkA, where A is the antipodal map. Now, the degree of the antipodal map on Sk1 is (1)k. Hence, without loss of generality, we have that the local degree of χk on Bk is 1 and the local degree of χk on B~k is (1)k. Adding the local degrees, we have that

deg(χk)=1+(1)k={2if k is even,0if k is odd.

The boundary map k is then given by deg(χk).

We thus have that the CW-structure on RPn gives rise to the following chain complex:

0Zn2Z0Z2Z0Z0,

where n=2 if n is even and n=0 if n is odd. Hence, the cellular homology groups for RPn are the following:

Hk(RPn)={Zif k=0 and k=n odd,Z/2Zif 0<k<n odd,0otherwise.

Other properties

One sees from the cellular chain complex that the n-skeleton determines all lower-dimensional homology modules:

Hk(X)Hk(Xn)

for k<n.

An important consequence of this cellular perspective is that if a CW-complex has no cells in consecutive dimensions, then all of its homology modules are free. For example, the complex projective space CPn has a cell structure with one cell in each even dimension; it follows that for 0kn,

H2k(CPn;Z)Z

and

H2k+1(CPn;Z)=0.

Generalization

The Atiyah–Hirzebruch spectral sequence is the analogous method of computing the (co)homology of a CW-complex, for an arbitrary extraordinary (co)homology theory.

Euler characteristic

For a cellular complex X, let Xj be its j-th skeleton, and cj be the number of j-cells, i.e., the rank of the free module Cj(Xj,Xj1). The Euler characteristic of X is then defined by

χ(X)=j=0n(1)jcj.

The Euler characteristic is a homotopy invariant. In fact, in terms of the Betti numbers of X,

χ(X)=j=0n(1)jRank(Hj(X)).

This can be justified as follows. Consider the long exact sequence of relative homology for the triple (Xn,Xn1,):

Hi(Xn1,)Hi(Xn,)Hi(Xn,Xn1).

Chasing exactness through the sequence gives

i=0n(1)iRank(Hi(Xn,))=i=0n(1)iRank(Hi(Xn,Xn1))+i=0n(1)iRank(Hi(Xn1,)).

The same calculation applies to the triples (Xn1,Xn2,), (Xn2,Xn3,), etc. By induction,

i=0n(1)iRank(Hi(Xn,))=j=0ni=0j(1)iRank(Hi(Xj,Xj1))=j=0n(1)jcj.

References




Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Source: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Cellular_homology
10 views | Status: cached on November 15 2024 12:15:02
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF