Selatra

Entirely non-notable company. Tagged as problematic, relative to NN and PROMO guidelines, since 2014 and 2010 respectively. No backlinks. Created as puff-piece by apparent SPA (with no other contributions). According to the sources that I can find (like bloomberg.com and others), this company has/had perhaps between 13 and 18 employees. While it received some trivial coverage (for its venture funding attempts and ultimate acquisition) these only establish that the company exists or existed. There is nothing to establish notability. And certainly nothing to indicate that it meets either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH or anything to make it standout from any other relatively small tech company. (I would note that the article on the company that seemingly acquired it in 2011 was also deleted for notability concerns.

If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it.

This message has remained in place for seven days, so the article may be deleted without further notice.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy.
Find sources: "Selatra" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTORPRODExpired+%5B%5BWP%3APROD%7CPROD%5D%5D%2C+concern+was%3A+Entirely+non-notable+company.+Tagged+as+problematic%2C+relative+to+NN+and+PROMO+guidelines%2C+since+2014+and+2010+respectively.+No+backlinks.+Created+as+puff-piece+by+apparent+SPA+%28with+no+other+contributions%29.+According+to+the+sources+that+I+can+find+%28%5Bhttp%3A%2F%2Farchive.is%2Fdcau7+like+bloomberg.com%5D+and+%5Bhttp%3A%2F%2Farchive.is%2Fppny5+others%5D%29%2C+this+company+has%2Fhad+perhaps+between+13+and+18+employees.+While+it+received+some+trivial+coverage+%28for+its+venture+funding+attempts+and+ultimate+acquisition%29+these+only+establish+that+the+company+exists+or+existed.+There+is+nothing+to+establish+notability.+And+certainly+nothing+to+indicate+that+it+meets+either+WP%3AGNG+or+WP%3ACORPDEPTH+or+anything+to+make+it+standout+from+any+other+relatively+small+tech+company.+%28I+would+note+that+the+article+on+the+company+that+%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.businesswire.com%2Fnews%2Fhome%2F20110512005691%2Fen%2F24MAS-Acquires-Award-Winning-Mobile-Applications-Service+seemingly+acquired+it+in+2011%5D+was+%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSpecial%3ALog%3Ftype%3Ddelete%26user%3D%26page%3D24MAS%26wpdate%3D%26tagfilter%3D+also+deleted+for+notability+concerns%5D.Expired [[WP:PROD|prod]], concern was: Entirely non-notable company. Tagged as problematic, relative to NN and PROMO guidelines, since 2014 and 2010 respectively. No backlinks. Created as puff-piece by apparent SPA (with no other contributions). According to the sources that I can find (like bloomberg.com and others), this company has/had perhaps between 13 and 18 employees. While it received some trivial coverage (for its venture funding attempts and ultimate acquisition) these only establish that the company exists or existed. There is nothing to establish notability. And certainly nothing to indicate that it meets either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH or anything to make it standout from any other relatively small tech company. (I would note that the article on the company that seemingly acquired it in 2011 was also deleted for notability concerns.