Fibration of simplicial sets

From HandWiki - Reading time: 6 min


In mathematics, especially in homotopy theory, a left fibration of simplicial sets is a map that has the right lifting property with respect to the horn inclusions ΛinΔn,0i<n.[1] A right fibration is defined similarly with the condition 0<in.[1] A Kan fibration is one with the right lifting property with respect to every horn inclusion; hence, a Kan fibration is exactly a map that is both a left and right fibration.[2]

Examples

A right fibration is a cartesian fibration such that each fiber is a Kan complex.

In particular, a category fibered in groupoids over another category is a special case of a right fibration of simplicial sets in the ∞-category setup.

Anodyne extensions

A left anodyne extension is a map in the saturation of the set of the horn inclusions ΛknΔn for n1,0k<n in the category of simplicial sets, where the saturation of a class is the smallest class that contains the class and is stable under pushouts, retracts and transfinite compositions (compositions of infinitely many maps).[3] A right anodyne extension is defined by replacing the condition 0k<n with 0<kn. The notions are originally due to Gabriel–Zisman and are used to study fibrations for simplicial sets.

A left (or right) anodyne extension is a monomorphism (since the class of monomorphisms is saturated,[4] the saturation lies in the class of monomorphisms).

Given a class F of maps, let r(F) denote the class of maps satisfying the right lifting property with respect to F. Then r(F)=r(F) for the saturation F of F.[5] Thus, a map is a left (resp. right) fibration if and only if it has the right lifting property with respect to left (resp. right) anodyne extensions.[3]

An inner anodyne extension is a map in the saturation of the horn inclusions ΛknΔn for n1,0<k<n.[6] The maps having the right lifting property with respect to inner anodyne extensions or equivalently with respect to the horn inclusions ΛknΔn,n1,0<k<n are called inner fibrations.[7] Simplicial sets are then weak Kan complexes (∞-categories) if unique maps to the final object are inner fibrations.

An isofibration p:XY is an inner fibration such that for each object (0-simplex) x0 in X and an invertible map g:y0y1 with p(x0)=y0 in Y, there exists a map f in X such that p(f)=g.[8] For example, a left (or right) fibration between weak Kan complexes is a conservative isofibration.[9]

Theorem of Gabriel and Zisman

Given monomorphisms i:AB and k:YZ, let iA×Yk denote the pushout of i×idY and idA×k. Then a theorem of Gabriel and Zisman says:[10][11] if i is a left (resp. right) anodyne extension, then the induced map

iA×YkB×Z

is a left (resp. right) anodyne extension. Similarly, if i is an inner anodyne extension, then the above induced map is an inner anodyne extension.[12]

A special case of the above is the covering homotopy extension property:[13] a Kan fibration has the right lifting property with respect to (Y×I)(Z×0)Z×I for monomirphisms YZ and 0I=Δ1.

As a corollary of the theorem, a map p:XY is an inner fibration if and only if for each monomirphism i:AB, the induced map

(i*,p*):Hom_(B,X)Hom_(A,X)×Hom_(A,Y)Hom_(B,Y)

is an inner fibration.[14][15] Similarly, if p is a left (resp. right) fibration, then (i*,p*) is a left (resp. right) fibration.[16]

Model category structure

The category of simplicial sets sSet has the standard model category structure where [17]

  • The cofibrations are the monomorphisms,
  • The fibrations are the Kan fibrations,
  • The weak equivalences are the maps f such that f* is bijective on simplicial homotopy classes for each Kan complex (fibrant object),
  • A fibration is trivial (i.e., has the right lifting property with respect to monomorphisms) if and only if it is a weak equivalence,
  • A cofibration is an anodyne extension if and only if it is a weak equivalence.

Because of the last property, an anodyne extension is also known as an acyclic cofibration (a cofibration that is a weak equivalence). Also, the weak equivalences between Kan complexes are the same as the simplicial homotopy equivalences between them.

Under the geometric realization | - | : sSetTop, we have:

  • A map f is a weak equivalence if and only if |f| is a homotopy equivalence.[18]
  • A map f is a fibration if and only if |f| is a (usual) fibration in the sense of Hurewicz or of Serre.[19]
  • For an anodyne extension i, |i| admits a strong deformation retract.[20]

Universal left fibration

Let U be the simplicial set where each n-simplex consists of

  • a map p:XΔn from a (small) simplicial set X,
  • a section s of p,
  • for each integer m0 and for each map f:ΔmΔn, a choice of a pullback of p along f.[21]

Now, a conjecture of Nichols-Barrer which is now a theorem says that U is the same thing as the ∞-category of ∞-groupoids (Kan complexes) together with some choices.[22] In particular, there is a forgetful map

puniv:UKan = the ∞-category of Kan complexes,

which is a left fibration. It is universal in the following sense: for each simplicial set X, there is a natural bijection

[X,Kan] the set of the isomorphism classes of left fibrations over X

given by pulling-back puniv, where [,] means the simplicial homotopy classes of maps.[23] In short, Kan is the classifying space of left fibrations. Given a left fibration over X, a map XKan corresponding to it is called the classifying map for that fibration.

In Cisinski's book, the hom-functor Hom:Cop×CKan on an ∞-category C is then simply defined to be the classifying map for the left fibration

(s,t):S(C)Cop×C

where each n-simplex in S(C) is a map (Δn)op*ΔnC.[24] In fact, S(C) is an ∞-category called the twisted diagonal of C.[25]

In his Higher Topos Theory, Lurie constructs an analogous universal cartesian fibration.[26]

See also

  • small object argument

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Lurie 2009a, Definition 2.0.0.3.
  2. Beke, Tibor (2008). "Fibrations of simplicial sets". arXiv:0810.4960 [math.CT].
  3. 3.0 3.1 Cisinski 2023, Definition 3.4.1.
  4. Proof: Let l(F) = the class of maps having the left lifting property with respect to a class F of maps. Then l(F) can be shown to be saturated. By the axiom of choice, if F is the class of surjective maps, then l(F) is the class of injective maps. This implies the same is true for monomorphisms between preshaves.
  5. Proof: Since l(G), l for the left lifting property, is saturated and Fl(r(F)), we have: Fl(r(F)) and so r(F)=r(l(r(F))r(F)r(F).
  6. Cisinski 2023, Definition 3.2.1.
  7. Cisinski 2023, Definition 3.2.5.
  8. Cisinski 2023, Definition 3.3.15.
  9. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 3.4.8.
  10. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Theorem 3.2.2.
  11. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 3.4.3.
  12. Cisinski 2023, Corollary 3.2.4.
  13. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Proposition 3.2.2.
  14. Cisinski 2023, Corollary 3.2.8.
  15. Proposition 4.1.4.1. in https://kerodon.net/tag/01BS
  16. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 3.4.4.
  17. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Theorem 3.4.1, Proposition 3.4.2, Proposition 3.4.3.
  18. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Proposition 4.6.3.
  19. Joyal & Tierney 2008, § 2.1.
  20. Joyal & Tierney 2008, Proposition 4.6.1.
  21. Cisinski 2023, Definition 5.2.3.
  22. Cisinski 2023, Theorem 5.2.10.
  23. Cisinski 2023, Corollary 5.3.21.
  24. Cisinski 2023, § 5.6.1. and § 5.8.1.
  25. Cisinski 2023, Proposition 5.6.2.
  26. Lurie 2009a, § 3.3.2.

References

Further reading




Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Source: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Fibration_of_simplicial_sets
5 views |
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF