From HandWiki - Reading time: 6 min
Kōkoku Shikan (皇國史観, lit. "Imperial State History View") is a historical view that regards the history of Japan as the unfolding of a divine plan centered on the Emperor, who is considered an unbroken lineage descended from the gods.[1]
There are various interpretations regarding the definition of Kōkoku Shikan.
There are also numerous views concerning its origins.
A precursor to Kōkoku Shikan is Jinnō Shōtōki (A Chronicle of Gods and Sovereigns), written by Kitabatake Chikafusa of the Southern Court during the Nanboku-chō period. During the Edo period, Mitogaku and Kokugaku emerged, and by the Bakumatsu period, the Sonnō jōi movement had become active.
After the Meiji Restoration, influenced by Mitogaku, the government established Kōkoku Shikan as the "orthodox historical view." The Meiji Constitution, enacted in 1889, stipulated that the "Empire of Japan shall be reigned over and governed by a line of Emperors unbroken for ages eternal" and that the Emperor is "sacred and inviolable" ( ).
In history textbooks from the Meiji period onward, Ashikaga Takauji was depicted as a rebel against the Imperial Court, whereas before the Eiroku era, Kusunoki Masashige had been considered the rebel (see also "Nanboku-chō Sejun Ronso" below).
During the 1880s, relatively free debate occurred, including criticism of the Kiki myths. Archaeology also developed, and textbooks began to include descriptions of primitive society instead of, or alongside, the Age of the Gods.
However, in 1891, Kume Kunitake, a professor at Tokyo Imperial University, was forced to resign after his thesis stating that "Shinto is an ancient custom of worshipping heaven" was criticized as constituting lèse-majesté. This shift coincided with the purge of the Izumo faction[Note 1] by the Ise faction[Note 2] within Shinto.
Later, during the 1920s, influenced by the rise of Taishō Democracy, historical discourse became more active. On the left, historical works based on Marxist materialist conception of history were published, but controls tightened alongside growing apprehension about socialism. In 1935, the Emperor Organ Theory Incident occurred. In 1940, criticism of the Kiki myths by historian Tsuda Sōkichi became an issue, leading to his works being banned. With the outbreak of World War II, the state-approved ethics textbook Yoiko-domo, which contained passages like "Japan is a strong country, the one and only divine land (omitted)," was distributed to elementary schools.
The current Imperial family descends from the Northern Court and also conducts rituals for the Northern Court emperors. However, the Mitogaku school, which regarded Ashikaga Takauji as a traitor, advocated for the legitimacy of the Southern Court. Additionally, the Confucian scholar Rai San'yō, who influenced Bakumatsu-era Sonnōron (Revere the Emperor ideology), argued that Emperor Go-Komatsu received the throne via abdication from Emperor Go-Kameyama, thus reconciling the Southern Court legitimacy theory with the lineage of the current imperial house. Following the Nanboku-chō legitimacy controversy, the Imperial Household Ministry also adopted the view that the Southern Court was legitimate.
Following the Surrender of Japan, during the Occupation of Japan, the Meiji Constitution was revised under the orders of the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, leading to the enactment of the Constitution of Japan, which explicitly established Popular sovereignty. Concurrently, the Marxist materialist conception of history also spread. Partly due to these changes, research in prehistory, ancient history, and archaeology advanced. Periodization terms such as "Ancient", "Medieval", "Early Modern", "Modern", and "Contemporary" came into common use. The historiography based on these developments is generally referred to as "Postwar Historiography."
Historians within this framework viewed Kōkoku Shikan as part of a ultra-nationalist state policy and criticized it as "a system of state-sanctioned false ideas, created on a carefully planned, national scale."[3]
Hongō Kazuto has argued that "Kōkoku Shikan was fabricated as a 'grand narrative,' where academic elements like individual verifications and consistency were ignored. It is a typical empty theory that cannot even properly depict the historical image of the Emperor, belonging more to the realm of religion than academia."[4]