Library and Information Science Abstracts

Library and Information Science Abstracts
Producer	ProQuest (United Kingdom)
History	1969-present
Access
Cost	Subscription
Coverage
Disciplines	library and information science
Update frequency	Continuously
Links
	Website;

The Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) is an international abstracting and indexing tool designed for library professionals and other information specialists. LISA covers the literature in Library and information science (LIS) since 1969 and currently abstracts 440+ periodicals from 68+ countries and in 20+ languages.

LISA was originally published by the Library Association. Bowker-Saur began publishing LISA in 1991.^[1] Cambridge Information Group acquired Bowker in 2001 and LISA began being produced by subsidiary Cambridge Scientific Abstracts.^[2] CSA merged with ProQuest in 2007.

Coverage

Meho & Spurgin (2005)^[3] found that in a list of 2,625 items published between 1982 and 2002 by 68 faculty members of 18 schools of library and information science, only 10 databases provided significant coverage of the LIS literature. Data showed that Library Literature and Information Science (LLIS) indexes the highest percentage of LIS faculty publications (31.2%), followed by INSPEC (30.6%), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)(29.6%), and LISA (27.2%). LISA is thus the fourth most comprehensive in this study.

Other important databases covering library and information science

Dissertations Abstracts
ERIC
INSPEC
Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA)
Library Literature and Information Science
Social Sciences Citation Index
Web of Science

References

↑ [https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/2488422 Library & information science abstracts - NLA Catalog]
↑ Cambridge Information Group Acquires R.R. Bowker. 2001-08-31. https://librarytechnology.org/document/24817. Retrieved 2020-08-16.
↑ Meho, Lokman I. & Spurgin, Kristina M. (2005). Ranking the Research Productivity of Library and Information Science Faculty and Schools: An Evaluation of Data Sources and Research Methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1314–1331.

Gilchrist, A. & Presanis, A. (1971). Library and information science abstracts: the first two years. ASLIB Proceedings, 23(5), 251-256.
Gonzalez-Alcaide, G.; Castello-Cogollos, L; Navarro-Molina, C; Aleixandre-Benavent, R; Valderrarna-Zurian, J.C. (2008). Library and information science research areas: Analysis of journal articles in LISA, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 150-154.
Kumar, T.V.R. & Parameswaran, M. (1998). Chain indexing and LISA. Knowledge Organization, 25(1-2), 13-15.
Montesi, M. & Owen, J.M. (2007). Revision of author abstracts: how it is carried out by LISA editors. ASLIB Proceedings, 59(1), 26-45.

External links

Factsheet from Proquest: http://www.csa.com/factsheets/lisa-set-c.php

0.00

(0 votes)

[1] [https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/2488422 Library & information science abstracts - NLA Catalog]

[2] Cambridge Information Group Acquires R.R. Bowker. 2001-08-31. https://librarytechnology.org/document/24817. Retrieved 2020-08-16.

[3] Meho, Lokman I. & Spurgin, Kristina M. (2005). Ranking the Research Productivity of Library and Information Science Faculty and Schools: An Evaluation of Data Sources and Research Methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1314–1331.

[1]

[2]

[3]