Short description: Process to identify a disease or disorder
Radiography is an important tool in diagnosis of certain disorders.
Medical diagnosis (abbreviated as Dx,[1]Dx, or Ds) is the process of determining which disease or condition explains a person's symptoms and signs. It is most often referred to as a diagnosis with the medical context being implicit. The information required for a diagnosis is typically collected from a history and physical examination of the person seeking medical care. Often, one or more diagnostic procedures, such as medical tests, are also done during the process. Sometimes the posthumous diagnosis is considered a kind of medical diagnosis.
Diagnosis is a major component of the procedure of a doctor's visit. From the point of view of statistics, the diagnostic procedure involves classification tests. The study of patient outcomes following diagnosis is the field of survival epidemiology.[2]
A diagnosis, in the sense of diagnostic procedure, can be regarded as an attempt at classification of an individual's condition into separate and distinct categories that allow medical decisions about treatment and prognosis to be made. Subsequently, a diagnostic opinion is often described in terms of a disease or other condition. (In the case of a wrong diagnosis, however, the individual's actual disease or condition is not the same as the individual's diagnosis.) A total evaluation of a condition is often termed a diagnostic workup.[3]
Detection of any deviation from what is known to be normal, such as can be described in terms of, for example, anatomy (the structure of the human body), physiology (how the body works), pathology (what can go wrong with the anatomy and physiology), psychology (thought and behavior) and human homeostasis (regarding mechanisms to keep body systems in balance). Knowledge of what is normal and measuring of the patient's current condition against those norms can assist in determining the patient's particular departure from homeostasis and the degree of departure, which in turn can assist in quantifying the indication for further diagnostic processing.
A complaint expressed by a patient.
The fact that a patient has sought a diagnostician can itself be an indication to perform a diagnostic procedure. For example, in a doctor's visit, the physician may already start performing a diagnostic procedure by watching the gait of the patient from the waiting room to the doctor's office even before she or he has started to present any complaints.
Even during an already ongoing diagnostic procedure, there can be an indication to perform another, separate, diagnostic procedure for another, potentially concomitant, disease or condition. This may occur as a result of an incidental finding of a sign unrelated to the parameter of interest, such as can occur in comprehensive tests such as radiological studies like magnetic resonance imaging or blood test panels that also include blood tests that are not relevant for the ongoing diagnosis.
Procedure
General components which are present in a diagnostic procedure in most of the various available methods include:
Complementing the already given information with further data gathering, which may include questions of the medical history (potentially from other people close to the patient as well), physical examination and various diagnostic tests. A diagnostic test is any kind of medical test performed to aid in the diagnosis or detection of disease. Diagnostic tests can also be used to provide prognostic information on people with established disease.[4]
Processing of the answers, findings or other results. Consultations with other providers and specialists in the field may be sought.
There are a number of methods or techniques that can be used in a diagnostic procedure, including performing a differential diagnosis or following medical algorithms.[5]: 198 In reality, a diagnostic procedure may involve components of multiple methods.[5]: 204
The method of differential diagnosis is based on finding as many candidate diseases or conditions as possible that can possibly cause the signs or symptoms, followed by a process of elimination or at least of rendering the entries more or less probable by further medical tests and other processing, aiming to reach the point where only one candidate disease or condition remains as probable. The result may also remain a list of possible conditions, ranked in order of probability or severity. Such a list is often generated by computer-aided diagnosis systems.[6]
Pattern recognition
In a pattern recognition method the provider uses experience to recognize a pattern of clinical characteristics.[5]: 198, [7] It is mainly based on certain symptoms or signs being associated with certain diseases or conditions, not necessarily involving the more cognitive processing involved in a differential diagnosis.
The term diagnostic criteria designates the specific combination of signs and symptoms, and test results that the clinician uses to attempt to determine the correct diagnosis.
Clinical decision support systems are interactive computer programs designed to assist health professionals with decision-making tasks. The clinician interacts with the software utilizing both the clinician's knowledge and the software to make a better analysis of the patients data than either human or software could make on their own. Typically the system makes suggestions for the clinician to look through and the clinician picks useful information and removes erroneous suggestions.[8] Some programs attempt to do this by replacing the clinician, such as reading the output of a heart monitor. Such automated processes are usually deemed a "device" by the FDA and require regulatory approval. In contrast, clinical decision support systems that "support" but do not replace the clinician are deemed to be "Augmented Intelligence" if it meets the FDA criteria that (1) it reveals the underlying data, (2) reveals the underlying logic, and (3) leaves the clinician in charge to shape and make the decision.
Other diagnostic procedure methods
Other methods that can be used in performing a diagnostic procedure include:
An example of a medical algorithm for assessment and treatment of overweight and obesity
An "exhaustive method", in which every possible question is asked and all possible data is collected.[5]: 198
Adverse effects
Diagnosis problems are the dominant cause of medical malpractice payments, accounting for 35% of total payments in a study of 25 years of data and 350,000 claims.[9]
Overdiagnosis is the diagnosis of "disease" that will never cause symptoms or death during a patient's lifetime.[10] It is a problem because it turns people into patients unnecessarily and because it can lead to economic waste[11] (overutilization) and treatments that may cause harm. Overdiagnosis occurs when a disease is diagnosed correctly, but the diagnosis is irrelevant. A correct diagnosis may be irrelevant because treatment for the disease is not available, not needed, or not wanted.[12]
the manifestation of disease are not sufficiently noticeable
a disease is omitted from consideration
too much significance is given to some aspect of the diagnosis
the condition is a rare disease with symptoms suggestive of many other conditions
the condition has a rare presentation
Lag time
When making a medical diagnosis, a lag time is a delay in time until a step towards diagnosis of a disease or condition is made. Types of lag times are mainly:
Encounter-to-diagnosis lag time, the time from first medical encounter to diagnosis[15]
Long lag times are often called "diagnostic odyssey".
History
The first recorded examples of medical diagnosis are found in the writings of Imhotep (2630–2611 BC) in ancient Egypt (the Edwin Smith Papyrus).[16] A Babylonian medical textbook, the Diagnostic Handbook written by Esagil-kin-apli (fl.1069–1046 BC), introduced the use of empiricism, logic and rationality in the diagnosis of an illness or disease.[17] Traditional Chinese Medicine, as described in the Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon or Huangdi Neijing, specified four diagnostic methods: inspection, auscultation-olfaction, inquiry and palpation.[18]Hippocrates was known to make diagnoses by tasting his patients' urine and smelling their sweat.[19]
Word
Medical diagnosis or the actual process of making a diagnosis is a cognitive process. A clinician uses several sources of data and puts the pieces of the puzzle together to make a diagnostic impression. The initial diagnostic impression can be a broad term describing a category of diseases instead of a specific disease or condition. After the initial diagnostic impression, the clinician obtains follow up tests and procedures to get more data to support or reject the original diagnosis and will attempt to narrow it down to a more specific level. Diagnostic procedures are the specific tools that the clinicians use to narrow the diagnostic possibilities.
The plural of diagnosis is diagnoses. The verb is to diagnose, and a person who diagnoses is called a diagnostician.
Etymology
The word diagnosis/daɪ.əɡˈnoʊsɪs/ is derived through Latin from the Greek word διάγνωσις (diágnōsis) from διαγιγνώσκειν (diagignṓskein), meaning "to discern, distinguish".[20]
Society and culture
Social context
Diagnosis can take many forms.[21] It might be a matter of naming the disease, lesion, dysfunction or disability. It might be a management-naming or prognosis-naming exercise. It may indicate either degree of abnormality on a continuum or kind of abnormality in a classification. It is influenced by non-medical factors such as power, ethics and financial incentives for patient or doctor. It can be a brief summation or an extensive formulation, even taking the form of a story or metaphor. It might be a means of communication such as a computer code through which it triggers payment, prescription, notification, information or advice. It might be pathogenic or salutogenic. It is generally uncertain and provisional.
Relevant information should be added to the medical record of the patient.
A failure to respond to treatments that would normally work may indicate a need for review of the diagnosis.
Nancy McWilliams identifies five reasons that determine the necessity for diagnosis:
diagnosis for treatment planning;
information contained in it related to prognosis;
protecting interests of patients;
a diagnosis might help the therapist to empathize with his patient;
might reduce the likelihood that some fearful patients will go-by the treatment.[22]
Types
Sub-types of diagnoses include:
Clinical diagnosis
A diagnosis made on the basis of medical signs and reported symptoms, rather than diagnostic tests[23]
Laboratory diagnosis
Radiology diagnosis
Electrography diagnosis
Endoscopy diagnosis
Tissue diagnosis
Principal diagnosis
Admitting diagnosis
The diagnosis given as the reason why the patient was admitted to the hospital; it may differ from the actual problem or from the discharge diagnoses, which are the diagnoses recorded when the patient is discharged from the hospital.[24]
A process of identifying all of the possible diagnoses that could be connected to the signs, symptoms, and lab findings, and then ruling out diagnoses until a final determination can be made.
Diagnostic criteria
Designates the combination of signs, symptoms, and test results that the clinician uses to attempt to determine the correct diagnosis. They are standards, normally published by international committees, and they are designed to offer the best sensitivity and specificity possible, respect the presence of a condition, with the state-of-the-art technology.
A medical condition whose presence cannot be established with complete confidence from history, examination or testing. Diagnosis is therefore by elimination of all other reasonable possibilities.
The diagnosis of two related, but separate, medical conditions or comorbidities. The term almost always referred to a diagnosis of a serious mental illness and a substance use disorder, however, the increasing prevalence of genetic testing has revealed many cases of patients with multiple concomitant genetic disorders.[6]
The diagnosis or identification of a medical conditions in oneself. Self-diagnosis is very common.
Remote diagnosis
A type of telemedicine that diagnoses a patient without being physically in the same room as the patient.
Nursing diagnosis
Rather than focusing on biological processes, a nursing diagnosis identifies people's responses to situations in their lives, such as a readiness to change or a willingness to accept assistance.
Providing symptoms allows the computer to identify the problem and diagnose the user to the best of its ability.[25][6] Health screening begins by identifying the part of the body where the symptoms are located; the computer cross-references a database for the corresponding disease and presents a diagnosis.[26]
A vague, or even completely fake, medical or psychiatric label given to the patient or to the medical records department for essentially non-medical reasons, such as to reassure the patient by providing an official-sounding label, to make the provider look effective, or to obtain approval for treatment. This term is also used as a derogatory label for disputed, poorly described, overused, or questionably classified diagnoses, such as pouchitis and senility, or to dismiss diagnoses that amount to overmedicalization, such as the labeling of normal responses to physical hunger as reactive hypoglycemia.
Retrospective diagnosis
The labeling of an illness in a historical figure or specific historical event using modern knowledge, methods and disease classifications.
↑Thompson, C. & Dowding, C. (2009) Essential Decision Making and Clinical Judgement for Nurses.
↑ 5.05.15.25.3Langlois, John P. (2002). "Making a Diagnosis". in Mengel, Mark B.; Holleman, Warren L.; Fields, Scott A.. Fundamentals of Clinical Practice (2nd ed.). New York, N.Y.: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. ISBN0-306-46692-9.
↑ 6.06.16.2Wadhwa, R. R.; Park, D. Y.; Natowicz, M. R. (2018). "The accuracy of computer-based diagnostic tools for the identification of concurrent genetic disorders". American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A176 (12): 2704–09. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.40651. PMID30475443.
↑Johnson, P. E.; Duran, A. S.; Hassebrock, F.; Moller, J.; Prietula, M.; Feltovich, P. J.; Swanson, D. B. (1981). "Expertise and Error in Diagnostic Reasoning". Cognitive Science5 (3): 235–83. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0503_3.
↑ 15.015.1Chan, K. W.; Felson, D. T.; Yood, R. A.; Walker, A. M. (1994). "The lag time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis". Arthritis and Rheumatism37 (6): 814–20. doi:10.1002/art.1780370606. PMID8003053.
↑H. F. J. Horstmanshoff, Marten Stol, Cornelis Tilburg (2004), Magic and Rationality in Ancient Near Eastern and Graeco-Roman Medicine, pp. 97–98, Brill Publishers, ISBN90-04-13666-5.
↑Treasure, Wilfrid (2011). "Chapter 1: Diagnosis". Diagnosis and Risk Management in Primary Care: words that count, numbers that speak. Oxford: Radcliffe. ISBN978-1-84619-477-1.
↑Berner, E. S.; Webster, G. D.; Shugerman, A. A. et al. (1994). "Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems". New England Journal of Medicine330 (25): 1792–96. doi:10.1056/NEJM199406233302506. PMID8190157.
Paul Taylor, "A Way to Be a Person" (review of Suzanne O'Sullivan, The Age of Diagnosis: Are Medical Labels Doing Us More Harm Than Good?, Hachette, March 2026, 308 pp., ISBN978 1 3997 2766 2), London Review of Books, vol. 48, no. 4 (5 March 2026), pp. 23–26.