Short description: Peer-reviewed academic open access journal
A mega journal (also mega-journal and megajournal) is a peer-reviewed academic open access journal designed to be much larger than a traditional journal by exercising low selectivity among accepted articles. It was pioneered by PLOS ONE.[1][2] This "very lucrative publishing model"[2] was soon emulated by other publishers.
accepting articles for publication based on whether they are technically sound rather than selecting for perceived importance;[1][2][3][4][5][6] and
using article processing charges to cover the costs of publishing,[1][3][5] although it is also possible for a mega journal to function as a non-profit (one example is Open Library of Humanities).
"academic editors",[6] even "a large editorial board of academic editors",[5] (instead of professional editors); and
value-added services such as reusable graphics and data through Creative Commons licenses.[7]
Mega journals are also online-only, with no printed version, and are fully open access, in contrast to hybrid open access journals.[7] Some "predatory" open access publishers use the mega journal model.[1]
Influence
It has been suggested that the academic journal landscape might become dominated by a few mega journals in the future, at least in terms of total number of articles published.[8]
Mega journals shift the publishing industry's funding standard from the subscription-based model common to traditional closed access publications to article processing charges.[9]
Their business model may not motivate reviewers, who donate their time to "influence their field, gain exposure to the most current cutting edge research or list their service to a prestigious journal on their CVs."[10]
Finally, they may no longer serve as "fora for the exchange ... among colleagues in a particular field or sub-field", as traditionally happened in scholarly journals.[11] To counter that indiscrimination, PLOS ONE, the prototypical megajournal, has started to "package relevant articles into subject-specific collections."[12]
↑Hayahiko Ozono, Okayama University, Participants' Report on The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011. "Burgeoning Open Access MegaJournals". National Institute of Informatics. [1]
↑Wellen, R. (2013). "Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling". SAGE Open3 (4): 215824401350727. doi:10.1177/2158244013507271.
↑Beall, Jeffrey (2013). "The Open-Access Movement is Not Really about Open Access". TripleC11 (2): 589–597. doi:10.31269/triplec.v11i2.525.
↑ 14.014.1"Beyond open access for academic publishers", 15 May 2014, Publishing Technology PLC [2]
↑ 15.015.115.215.3Dagmar Sitek & Roland Bertelmann, "Open Access: A State of the Art", 2 March 2014, Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_9 [3]
↑James MacGregor, Kevin Stranack & John Willinsky, "The Public Knowledge Project: Open Source Tools for Open Access to Scholarly Communication", 2 March 2014, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_11 [4]
↑ 17.017.117.217.317.417.517.6Rhodri Jackson and Martin Richardson, "Gold open access: the future of the academic journal?", Chapter 9 in Cope and Phillip (2014), p.223-248.
↑ 19.019.1Peter Binfield, "PLoS ONE and the Rise of the Open Access MegaJournal", The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011, National Institute of Informatics, The 5th SPARC Japan Seminar 2011 February 29, 2012 [5][6]
↑Transitioning from a Conventional to a 'Mega' Journal: A Bibliometric Case Study of the Journal Medicine, Publications 2017, 5(2), 7; doi:10.3390/publications5020007 [7]
↑Open-access mega-journals: The future of scholarly communication or academic dumping ground? A review [8]