A synchrotron is a particular type of cyclic particle accelerator, descended from the cyclotron, in which the accelerating particle beam travels around a fixed closed-loop path. The strength of the magnetic field which bends the particle beam into its closed path increases with time during the accelerating process, being synchronized to the increasing kinetic energy of the particles.[1]
The synchrotron is one of the first accelerator concepts to enable the construction of large-scale facilities, since bending, beam focusing and acceleration can be separated into different components. The most powerful modern particle accelerators use versions of the synchrotron design. The largest synchrotron-type accelerator, also the largest particle accelerator in the world, is the 27-kilometre-circumference (17 mi) Large Hadron Collider (LHC) near Geneva, Switzerland, completed in 2008 by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN).[2] It can accelerate beams of protons to an energy of 7 teraelectronvolts (TeV or 1012 eV).
Large synchrotrons usually have a linear accelerator (linac) to give the particles an initial acceleration, and a lower energy synchrotron which is sometimes called a booster to increase the energy of the particles before they are injected into the high energy synchrotron ring. Several specialized types of synchrotron machines are used today:
A collider is a type in which, instead of the particles striking a stationary target, particles traveling in two countercirculating rings collide head-on, making higher-energy collisions possible.[3][4]
A storage ring is a special type of synchrotron in which the kinetic energy of the particles is kept constant.[5]
A synchrotron light source is a combination of different electron accelerator types, including a storage ring in which the desired electromagnetic radiation is generated. This radiation is then used in experimental stations located on different beamlines. Synchrotron light sources in their entirety are sometimes called "synchrotrons", although this is technically incorrect.
Principle of operation
The synchrotron evolved from the cyclotron, the first cyclic particle accelerator. While a classical cyclotron uses both a constant guiding magnetic field and a constant-frequency electromagnetic field (and is working in classical approximation), its successor, the isochronous cyclotron, works by local variations of the guiding magnetic field, adapting to the increasing relativistic mass of particles during acceleration.[6]
A drawing of the Cosmotron
While the first synchrotrons and storage rings like the Cosmotron and ADA strictly used the toroid shape, the strong focusing principle independently discovered by Ernest Courant et al.[7][8] and Nicholas Christofilos[9] allowed the complete separation of the accelerator into components with specialized functions along the particle path, shaping the path into a round-cornered polygon. Some important components are given by radio frequency cavities for direct acceleration, dipole magnets (bending magnets) for deflection of particles (to close the path), and quadrupole / sextupole magnets for beam focusing.[10]
The synchrotron principle was proposed by Vladimir Veksler in 1944.[11]Edwin McMillan constructed the first electron synchrotron in 1945, arriving at the idea independently, having missed Veksler's publication (which was only available in a Soviet journal, although in English).[12][13][14]
The Birmingham proton synchrotron under construction
The first proton synchrotron was designed by Sir Marcus Oliphant[13][15] and constructed at the University of Birmingham in 1952.[13] In 1963, McMillan and Veksler were jointly awarded the Atoms for Peace Prize for the invention of the synchrotron.[13]
One of the early large synchrotrons is the Bevatron, constructed in 1950 at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. The Bevatron can accelerate a proton with an energy of 6.2 GeV[16](then called BeV for billion electron volts; the name predates the adoption of the SI prefixgiga-).[17] It can also accelerate heavier ions, such as deuterons, alpha-particles, and nitrogen.[18] A number of transuranium elements, unseen in the natural world, were first created with this instrument. This site is also the location of one of the first large bubble chambers are produced to examine the results of atomic collisions produced here.[19] In 1955, physicists Owen Chamberlain and Emilio Segrè had used the Bevatron to detect evidence for the existence of antiproton, for which they received the 1959 Nobel Prize in Physics.[20] The Bevatron was retired in February 1993.[21]
In the 1980s, detail about the second generation of synchrotrons began to emerge. These devices were constructed specifically for experiments with producing synchrotron radiation rather than particle physics research[23] The 2 GeV Synchrotron Radiation Source (SRS) at Daresbury, England, which operated in 1981, was the first of these "second-generation" synchrotron sources. Additionally, first generation synchrotrons are upgraded to become second generation sources.[24]
As part of colliders
Until August 2008, the highest energy collider in the world was the Tevatron, at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, in the United States. It accelerated protons and antiprotons to slightly less than 1 TeV of kinetic energy and collided them together. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC), which has been built at the European Laboratory for High Energy Physics (CERN), has roughly seven times this energy (so proton-proton collisions occur at roughly 14 TeV). It is housed in the 27.6 km tunnel which formerly housed the Large Electron Positron (LEP) collider.[25] The LHC will also accelerate heavy ions (such as lead) up to an energy of 1.15 PeV upon collision.[26] As of 2025, it is considered the largest and most powerful particle colldier.[27]
The largest device of this type seriously proposed was the Superconducting Super Collider (SSC), which was to be built in the United States. This design, like others, used superconducting magnets which allow more intense magnetic fields to be created without the limitations of core saturation.[28]: 10 While construction was begun, the project was cancelled in 1994, citing excessive budget overruns due to naïve cost estimation and economic management issues.[28]: 232–233 It can also be argued that the end of the Cold War resulted in a change of scientific funding priorities that contributed to its ultimate cancellation.[28]: 232–233 However, the tunnel built for its placement still remains, although empty.
Synchrotron radiation has a wide range of applications (see synchrotron light) and many second and third generation synchrotrons have been built especially to harness it. The largest of those 3rd generation synchrotron light sources are the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble, France, the Advanced Photon Source (APS) in Lemont, United States, and SPring-8 in Hyōgo, Japan, accelerating electrons up to 6, 7 and 8 GeV, respectively.[29][30][31]
Synchrotrons are large devices, costing tens or hundreds of millions of dollars to construct, and each beamline (there may be 20 to 50 at a large synchrotron) costs another two or three million dollars on average.[32][33] These installations also require a large footprint. More compact models, such as the Munich Compact Light Source, have been developed and tested.[34]
Among the few synchrotrons around the world, 16 are located in the United States. Many of them belong to national laboratories; few are located in universities.[35]
↑Muto, M.; Niki, K.; Mori, Y. (May 1997). "Magnets and their power supplies of JHF 50-GeV synchrotron". Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167). 3. pp. 3306–3308 vol.3. doi:10.1109/PAC.1997.753190. ISBN0-7803-4376-X.
↑ 28.028.128.2Riordan, Michael; Hoddeson, Lillian; Kolb, Adrienne W. (2015). Tunnel visions: the rise and fall of the superconducting super collider. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN978-0-226-29479-7.
A Miniature Synchrotron: room-size synchrotron offers scientists a new way to perform high-quality x-ray experiments in their own labs, Technology Review, February 4, 2008