Green Imperialism

Part of a series on
Green politics
Core topics Green politics Green party List of topics
Four pillars Ecological wisdom Social justice Grassroots democracy Nonviolence
Perspectives Bright green environmentalism Deep ecology Ecoauthoritarianism Eco-capitalism Ecofascism Ecofeminism Eco-nationalism Eco-socialism Green anarchism Green conservatism Green left Green liberalism Green libertarianism Green Zionism Social ecology Queer ecology
Organizations Asia Pacific Greens Federation European Green Party Federation of Green Parties of Africa Federation of the Green Parties of the Americas Federation of Young European Greens Global Greens Global Young Greens
Related topics Anti-environmentalism Climate change mitigation Conservation movement Eco-terrorism Ecocentrism Ecological economics Environmentalism Environmental issues Environmental justice Ecological modernization Environmental movement Green state Green theory Localism
v t e

Green imperialism or eco-imperialism or eco-colonialism or environmental imperialism is the meddling of Western mostly progressive forces in the internal affairs of mostly developing nations in the name of environmentalism.^{[1][2][3][4][5]} As a derogatory epithet,^[6][7] it denotes a type of imperialism, which uses the moral appeals of climate change and resource protection to facilitate the political and practical control of the resources of the global South by the global North.^[8] For instance, EU tries to regulate potential negative effects of biomass production also beyond its borders by transnational regulation.^[9]

Etymology

The sceptical perception of the Brundtland report by the Third World elites was summarized as green imperialism by Helge Ole Bergesen in 1988.^[10] In 1999, the same meaning was used by Deepak Lal in his book "Green Imperialism: A Prescription for Misery and War in the World's Poorest Countries".^[1] Nonetheless, the same term is used differently in Richard Grove's book "Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism 1600–1860" in 1995.^[11] In Grove's book, it means the impact of utopian tropical islands on European data-driven scientists resulting in early environmentalism.^[12]

The first mentions of the terms environmental colonialism or eco-colonialism appeared in connection with debt-for-nature swaps since 1989.^[13][5] It was feared that the however well-intentioned environmental protection programs could be perceived as middlesome and imperialistic.^[5] The establishment of national parks in Africa has in some cases led to the impoverishment and displacement of local populations.^[14]

Eco-imperialism also known as ecoimperialism^[15] was originally an abbreviation for ecological imperialism as in the book by Alfred Cosby, but changed its meaning after the publication of Paul Driessen's book "Eco-Imperialism: Green Power Black Death" in 2003.^[16] Cosby's eco-imperialism is interference with a degrading effect on the environment of targeted countries, while Driessen's eco-imperialism is interference with a degrading effect on the economy in the name of environmental improvement.^[16]

Potential examples

Several European governments announced boycotts of Malaysian timber due to unsustainable deforestation in Malaysia.^[17] Malaysia's Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamed, opposed the boycotts, arguing that "we are not exploiting the forests for no good reason. We need money. We have to export wood because we need the foreign exchange without which we cannot buy what we want"^[18]

During "Battle in Seattle" in 1999, media presented environmentalism as a new form of imperialism.^[19] The rich, developed countries impose their environmental preferences and priorities on the developing countries.^[20]

In 2009, Germany called French proposal of carbon tariffs as eco-imperialism.^[21] Back then, greenhouse tariffs have met strong opposition from developing countries such as India and China, since these tariff would impact their exports.^[21]

In 2014, Joji Morishita, a Japanese commissioner, expressed his concerns about calls of sustainable whaling from the International Whaling Commission by the words "The whaling issue is seen as a symbol of a larger issue sometimes in Japan... You might have heard the word 'eco-imperialism'".^[22]

The approval of the World Bank loan of $3.05bn (£2.4bn loan) for 4,764 MW Medupi Power Station drew criticism for supporting increased global emissions of greenhouse gases.^[23][24] If the coal plant was not built, there would have been significant limitations placed on industrial development in the country.^[24]

Relation to neoliberalism

It is sometimes described as a combination of global environmental and broad neoliberal agendas.^[7] Eco-imperialism is perceived to result in a policy of commodification of all resources of earth.^[25] This tendency of commodification of nature for environmental goals is also known as "selling nature to save it".^[26][27]

Polical debates

Critical voices depreciate environmentalism as an excuse for hindering economic development of developing countries.^[24] Critics see alternative energy sources as far from realistic, and fossil fuels as the key to lifting entire populations out of poverty.^[8] Developing nations, led by Brazil, India and Singapore, opposed entangling global trade with pollution controls in 1994, calling them hidden protectionism, which will keep jobs in the developed countries and deprive poor nations of their competitive advantages.^[28] The agenda of environmentalist NGOs is called neo-colonialism and eco-imperialism in 2022 by Japan, Peru, South Africa, Kenya and Bolivia.^[29]

According to Anil Agarwal, a 1990 study^[30] by the World Resources Institute allocated responsibility for global warming to developing countries.^[31] Agarwal considered this study to be flawed, politically motivated, and unjust, and saw it more as exacerbating the North-South divide.^[31] In his 1991 paper, he called this an example of environmental colonialism and blamed U.S. overconsumption for global warming.^[32]

Environmental colonialism became a subject in the book "Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All" by Michael Shellenberger. In The Wall Street Journal , John Tierney, a long-standing critic of environmentalism, wrote that "Shellenberger makes a persuasive case, lucidly blending research data and policy analysis with a history of the green movement and vignettes of people in poor countries suffering the consequences of “environmental colonialism.”"^[33]

Public opinion

A 1990s worldwide survey "Bicycles, Yes — Cheap Shoes, No" by WorldPaper showed that 66% of the participants did not agree to perceive debt-for-nature swaps as eco-colonialism.^[5]

See also

• Cultural imperialism
• Ecoauthoritarianism
• Ecological debt
• Ecofascism
• Environmental racism
• Greenpeace Arctic Sunrise ship case
• White savior

References

External links

• The West's Eco-Imperialism Against the Third World by Paul Driessen

0.00 (0 votes)