Marriage prohibition

From HandWiki - Reading time: 10 min

Short description: Prohibitions against marriage

Throughout human history, there have been many prohibitions on those who can undergo marriage. These are for a variety of reasons, including the grounds of age, sex, consanguinity, coercion, previous or existing marital status, as well as religion, race, caste or disability. A marriage which is prohibited is called a void marriage; there are also categories of marriage which are voidable marriages, which may be annulled on request.

Many of these restrictions are enforced by law; however, some may be prohibited not by law but by religious or cultural customs.

Marriageable age

Marriageable age is the minimum legal age of marriage. Age and other prerequisites to marriage vary between jurisdictions, but in the vast majority of jurisdictions, the marriageable age as a right is set at the age of majority. Nevertheless, most jurisdictions allow marriage at a younger age with parental or judicial approval, especially if the female is pregnant. Among most indigenous cultures, people marry at fifteen, the age of sexual maturity for both the male and the female. In industrialized cultures, the age of marriage is most commonly 18 years old, but there are variations, and the marriageable age should not be confused with the age of majority or the age of consent, though they may be the same.

The 55 parties to the 1962 Convention on Consent to Marriage, Minimum Age for Marriage, and Registration of Marriages have agreed to specify a minimum marriageable age by statute law‚ to override customary, religious, tribal laws and traditions. When the marriageable age under a law of a religious community is lower than that under the law of the land, the state law prevails. However, some religious communities do not accept the supremacy of state law in this respect, which may lead to child marriage or forced marriage.

The 123 parties to the 1956 Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery have agreed to adopt a prescribed "suitable" minimum age for marriage. In many developing countries, the official age prescriptions stand as mere guidelines. UNICEF, the United Nations children's organization, regards a marriage of a minor (legal child), a person below the adult age, as child marriage and a violation of rights.[1]

Until recently, the minimum marriageable age for females was lower in many jurisdictions than for males, on the premise that females mature at an earlier age than males. This law has been viewed by some to be discriminatory, so that in many countries the marriageable age of females has been raised to equal that of males.[2]

Same-sex marriage

In most cultures, marriage has traditionally been restricted to marriage between a man and a woman. Same-sex marriage, also known as gay marriage or same-gender marriage, is the marriage of two people of the same legal sex or gender. As of 2025, marriage between same-sex couples is legally performed and recognized in 38 countries, with a total population of 1.5 billion people (20% of the world's population). The most recent jurisdiction to legalize same-sex marriage is Thailand.

Same-sex marriage is legally recognized in a large majority of the world's developed countries; notable exceptions are Italy, Japan, South Korea, and the Czech Republic. Adoption rights are not necessarily covered, though most states with same-sex marriage allow those couples to jointly adopt as other married couples can. Some countries, such as Nigeria and Russia, restrict advocacy for same-sex marriage.[3] A few of these are among the 35 countries (as of 2023) that constitutionally define marriage to prevent marriage between couples of the same sex, with most of those provisions enacted in recent decades as a preventative measure.

Consanguine marriage

Consanguine marriage is marriage between individuals who are closely related. Though it may involve incest, it implies more than the sexual nature of incest. In a clinical sense, marriage between two family members who are second cousins or closer qualifies as consanguineous marriage. This is based on the gene copies their offspring may receive.[4] Though these unions are still prevalent in some communities, as seen across the Greater Middle East region, many other populations have seen a great decline in intra-family marriages.[5]

Forced marriage

Forced marriage is a marriage in which one or more of the parties is married without their consent or against their will. A marriage can also become a forced marriage even if both parties enter with full consent if one or both are later forced to stay in the marriage against their will.[6]

A forced marriage differs from an arranged marriage, in which both parties presumably consent to the assistance of their parents or a third party such as a matchmaker in finding and choosing a spouse. There is often a continuum of coercion used to compel a marriage, ranging from outright physical violence to subtle psychological pressure.[7]

Though now widely condemned by international opinion, forced marriages still take place in various cultures across the world, particularly in parts of South Asia and Africa. Some scholars object to use of the term "forced marriage" because it invokes the consensual legitimating language of marriage (such as husband/wife) for an experience that is precisely the opposite.[8] A variety of alternative terms have been proposed, including forced conjugal association and conjugal slavery.[9][10]

The United Nations views forced marriage as a form of human rights abuse, since it violates the principle of the freedom and autonomy of individuals. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that a person's right to choose a spouse and enter freely into marriage is central to their life and dignity, and their equality as a human being.[11] The Roman Catholic Church deems forced marriage grounds for granting an annulment—for a marriage to be valid both parties must give their consent freely. The Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery also prohibits marriage without right to refusal by both parties[12] and requires a minimum age for marriage to prevent this.[13] Similarly, the International Labour Organization recognizes forced marriage as a form of modern slavery.[14]

Sham marriage

A sham marriage is one where the marriage is solely for some form of advantage, without any intention of a real relationship. A common reason for sham marriages is to enable immigration as the spous of a citizen.

Polygamy and bigamy

Polygamy is illegal and prosecuted as a crime in most of the countries of the world. Exceptions include numerous African and Asian countries with large Muslim populations. In some of these countries polygamous marriage is only allowed for Muslims.

Remarriage

TBD

Religion

Interfaith marriage, sometimes called interreligious marriage or mixed marriage,[15] is marriage between spouses professing and being legally part of different religions.[15] Although interfaith marriages are often established as civil marriages, in some instances they may be established as a religious marriage. This depends on the religious doctrine of each of the two parties' religions; some prohibit interfaith marriage, and among others there are varying degrees of permissibility.[15]

Racial and caste discrimination

In the U.S., civil laws that proscribed "the mixing of the races" were enforced until 1967, yet remained black-letter law until the year 2000;[16] in Nazi Germany (1933–1945) the Nuremberg Laws were effective from 1935 until 1945; in Fascist Italy (1922–1945) the Italian racial laws were in effect from 1938 until 1944 and in the successor Italian Social Republic in effect from 1943 until 1945; and in post-war Apartheid South Africa (1948-1994), the anti-miscegenation laws were in effect from 1949 until 1985.

Inter-caste marriage is disapproved of in many parts of the Indian subcontient and nearby countries, and some still regard it as socially taboo. This is a form of caste discrimination. In some cases, inter-caste marriage can result in "honour killings".

Eugenics

The eugenics movement of the 19th and 20th centuries led to a number of attempts to restrict marriage based on eugenic considerations. In the United States, "eugenic marriage laws" were passed in the 1930s based on eugenics principles, based on medical examinations before marriage.[17]

Public acceptance of eugenic ideas in the U.S. led to various state legislatures working to establish eugenic initiatives. Beginning with Connecticut in 1896, many states enacted marriage laws with eugenic criteria, prohibiting anyone who was "epileptic, imbecile or feeble-minded"[18] from marrying.[19]

A number of European nations followed suit, including Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Nazi Germany.[20]

Eugenics was also used as a justification for "anti-miscegenation laws" prohibiting interracial marriage.

Sexually transmitted disease

Mandatory premarital medical examination laws were created in some states of the United States and other countries. Some of these laws are still in effect. The two diseases that created the most concern among legislators were syphilis and HIV infection.

Non-human marriage

It is universally the case that marriage can only be between two human beings, and not between humans and animals or inanimate objects. Nevertheless, some people have stated that they wish to be married to non-human objects, or that they consider themselves to already be so. No such marriages are legal, and any attempt to create one is void.

References

  1. "Child marriage". https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/child-marriage/. 
  2. Jones, Jeffrey M. (2006-06-22). "Ideal Age for Marriage: 25 for Women and 27 for Men" (in en). https://news.gallup.com/poll/23404/Ideal-Age-Marriage-Women-Men.aspx. 
  3. VERPOEST, LIEN (2017). "The End of Rhetorics: LGBT policies in Russia and the European Union". Studia Diplomatica 68 (4): 3–20. ISSN 0770-2965. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26531664. 
  4. Hamamy, Hanan (November 22, 2011). "Consanguineous marriages". Journal of Community Genetics 3 (3): 185–92. doi:10.1007/s12687-011-0072-y. PMID 22109912. 
  5. Heidari F, Dastgiri S, Tajaddini N, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Consanguineous Marriage. European Journal of General Medicine [serial online]. December 2014;11(4):248-255. Available from: Academic Search Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed October 4, 2016.
  6. "Arranged/Forced Marriage". https://www.unchainedatlast.org/about-arranged-forced-marriage/. 
  7. Sharp, Nicola. "Forced Marriage in the UK: A scoping study on the experience of women from Middle Eastern and North East African Communities". Refuge (London): 6, 10. https://www.policyreview.tv/media/documents/LI294_NICOLA_SHARP.pdf. 
  8. Bunting, Annie. "'Forced Marriage' in Conflict Situations: Researching and Prosecuting Old Harms and New Crimes". Canadian Journal of Human Rights: 179. https://cjhr.ca/?page_id=1153. Retrieved 28 August 2022. "... the term marriage should be avoided because the crime in Sierra Leone was 'one of sexual slavery, poorly veiled by the euphemism marriage.'". 
  9. Jenni Millbank (7 February 2011). "Forced Marriage and the Exoticization of Gendered Harms in United States Asylum Law". Columbia Journal of Gender and Law. 
  10. Dauvergne, Catherine (2 March 2010). "Forced Marriage as a Harm in Domestic and International Law". Modern Law Review 73: 57–88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00784.x. 
  11. "Ethics – Forced Marriages: Introduction". BBC. 1 January 1970. https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/forcedmarriage/introduction_1.shtml. 
  12. Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, Article 1, (c)
  13. Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery, Article 2
  14. "Global Estimates of Modern Slavery". International Labour Organization and Walk Free Foundation. 2017. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_575479.pdf. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 "Religion in India: Tolerance and Segregation – Chapter 3: Religious segregation in India". Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. 29 June 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/06/29/religious-segregation/. "Very few Indians say they are married to someone who currently follows a different religion than their own. Indeed, nearly all married people (99%) report that their spouse shares their religion. This includes nearly universal shares of Hindus (99%), Muslims (98%), Christians (95%), Sikhs and Buddhists (97% each). (The survey did not include enough interviews with married Jains to report on the religion of their spouses.)
    Not only are interreligious marriages rare in India, but in recent years, some couples marrying outside their communities have experienced severe consequences, including being ostracized and even killed by family members. The Indian public prioritizes stopping the interreligious marriage of women and men at nearly equal rates. About two-thirds of Indians (65%) say it is very important to stop men from marrying into another religion, while roughly the same share (67%) say stopping interreligious marriage of women is a high priority.
    Most Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and Jains say it is very important to stop men and women in their community from marrying outside their religion. But considerably fewer Christians and Buddhists feel this way. Among Christians, 37% say it is very important to stop the interreligious marriage of women, and 35% say the same about men. Among Buddhists, 46% say stopping the interreligious marriage of women is a high priority, and 44% say this for men. Highly religious Indians are especially likely to prioritize stopping interreligious marriage. For example, among adults who say religion is very important in their lives, a majority (70%) give high priority to stopping the interreligious marriage of men, compared with 39% of those who say religion is less important to them."
     
  16. "Groundbreaking Interracial Marriage". ABC News. 14 June 2007. https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3277875. 
  17. Lombardo, Paul A. (2017). "A Child's Right to Be Well Born: Venereal Disease and the Eugenic Marriage Laws, 1913-1935". Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (2): 211–232. doi:10.1353/pbm.2017.0029. ISSN 1529-8795. PMID 29176084. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29176084. 
  18. "Public Health". JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association XXVI (23): 1138. 6 June 1896. doi:10.1001/jama.1896.02430750040011. 
  19. Lombardo, Paul A. (2010). Three generations, no imbeciles: eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell (Johns Hopkins pbk. ed.). Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-9824-2. 
  20. Nordstrom, Byron J. (2025-11-24). "Eugenics in the Nordic countries" (in en). https://nordics.info/show/artikel/eugenics-in-the-nordic-countries. 

See also




Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Source: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Social:Marriage_prohibition
1 views |
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF