Categories
  Encyclosphere.org ENCYCLOREADER
  supported by EncyclosphereKSF

Reverse sexism

From HandWiki - Reading time: 6 min

Short description: Sociological concept

Template:Masculism sidebar Reverse sexism is a controversial term for discrimination against men and boys, or for anti-male prejudice.[1][2][3] The term has been used to claim that men have become the primary victims of sexism.[4] Specifically, opponents of affirmative action argue that men and boys are systematically discriminated against in employment and school admissions.[5]

Reverse sexism has been compared by sociologists to the concepts of "reverse racism" and "reverse ethnocentrism" in that both are a form of backlash by members of dominant groups (e.g., men, whites, or Anglos).[6] Reverse sexism is rebutted by analogy with the criticism of reverse racism as a response to affirmative action policies that are designed to combat institutionalized sexism and racism.[7] In more rigid forms, this stance assumes that the historic power imbalance in favor of men has been reversed,[8] and that women are now viewed as the superior gender or sex.[9]

Feminist theorist Florence Rush characterizes the idea of reverse sexism specifically as a misogynist reaction to feminism; men's rights activists such as Warren Farrell promote the idea of reverse sexism to argue that the feminist movement has rearranged society in such a way that it now benefits women and harms men.[10] In the preamble to a study on internalized sexism, Steve Bearman, Neill Korobov and Avril Thorne describe reverse sexism as a "misinformed notion", stating that "while individual women or women as a whole may enact prejudicial biases towards specific men or toward men as a group, this is done without the backing of a societal system of institutional power".[11]

See also

References

  1. Liotzis, Vangelis (2025). "The ‘Reverse Sexism’ Thesis: A Re-appraisal". Journal of Human Values 31 (3): 278–290. doi:10.1177/09716858251322319. ISSN 0971-6858. "[T]o date, [reverse sexism] has not been theorized adequately but has principally been controversial in the context of the digital public sphere and everyday discourse.". 
  2. Suedfeld, Peter (2002). "Postmodernism, Identity Politics, and Other Political Influences in Political Psychology". in Monroe, Kristen R.. Political Psychology. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 320–321. ISBN 978-1-135-64661-5. https://books.google.com/books?id=itd4AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA315. 
  3. Johnson, Allan G. (1997) (in en). The Gender Knot: Unraveling Our Patriarchal Legacy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. p. 170. ISBN 978-1-56639-518-2. https://archive.org/details/genderknotunrave0000john/page/170/mode/1up?view=theater. 
  4. Roden, Jessica (2022). "#MeToo Movement Backlash: How Evaluations of Women Advocates as More 'Sexist' Weaken Movement Support". Media Psychology 25 (6): 763–778. doi:10.1080/15213269.2022.2064877. ISSN 1521-3269. "'Reverse sexism' is the notion that men have replaced women as the victims of gender discrimination, despite ample evidence showing otherwise.". 
  5. Renfrow, Daniel G.; Howard, Judith A. (2013). "Social Psychology of Gender and Race". in DeLamater, John; Ward, Amanda. Handbook of Social Psychology. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. p. 496. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_17. ISBN 978-94-007-6772-0. "There has also been some backlash, with members of majority categories sometimes asserting a reverse sexism (toward men), reverse racism (toward Whites), and/or reverse ethnocentrism (toward, say, Anglos)." 
  6. Garcia, J. L. A. (1997). "Racism as a Model for Understanding Sexism". in Zack, Naomi. Race/Sex: Their Sameness, Difference and Interplay (1st ed.). Routledge. p. 46. doi:10.4324/9780203760604. ISBN 978-0-203-76060-4. https://archive.org/details/racesextheirsame0000unse/page/46/mode/1up?view=theater. 
  7. "Sociological Abstracts: Supplement — Issues 67-77". International Review of Publications in Sociology: 202. 1977. ISSN 0038-0202. [full citation needed]
  8. Collins, Georgia; Sandell, Renee (1984). Women, art, and education. Reston, Va.: National Art Education Association. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-9376-5233-6. 
  9. Rush, Florence (1990). "The Many Faces of Backlash". The Sexual Liberals and the Attack on Feminism. Pergamon Press. pp. 168–169. ISBN 978-0-0803-7458-1. 
  10. Bearman, Steve; Korobov, Neill; Thorne, Avril (2009). "The Fabric of Internalized Sexism". Journal of Integrated Social Sciences 1 (1): 10–47. ISSN 1942-1052. http://www.jiss.org/documents/volume_1/issue_1/JISS_2009_1-1_10-47_Fabric_of_Internalized_Sexism.pdf. 




Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Source: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Social:Reverse_sexism
1 views |
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF