Bound (video game)

From HandWiki - Reading time: 8 min


Bound
Developer(s)Santa Monica Studio
Plastic
Publisher(s)Sony Interactive Entertainment
Composer(s)Oleg Shpudeiko
Platform(s)PlayStation 4
ReleaseAugust 16, 2016
Genre(s)Platform
Mode(s)Single-player

Bound is a platform video game developed by Santa Monica Studio and Plastic and published by Sony Interactive Entertainment for the PlayStation 4 on August 16, 2016.

The game received mostly positive reviews, with critics praising its art style and originality, but the gameplay was criticized as shallow.

Gameplay

Gameplay showing the princess navigating a narrow beam

The player controls an unnamed princess[1] and ballet dancer as she makes her way through surreal, dreamlike environments. She must complete platforming challenges and has the ability to repel enemies with her dancing.

The game uses an "Edge Guard" to prevent the player from falling off certain platforms. This was because the developer believed that being able to fall off detracted from the game experience by forcing players to pay closer attention to the character's legs than to the world.[1] There are some places where the princess can fall and die, but she will respawn nearby.[1]

Plot

The game takes place inside the mind of a pregnant woman who is revisiting her childhood home and memories. In the woman's mind world, the main character is a Princess who is following the orders of her mother, the Queen, to vanquish a monster that is destroying the world. According to the game's creative director, "everything in the game is a big metaphor", and there are scenes in the game that show real life and not the game's world.[1]

Development

The creative director of Bound, Michal Staniszewski, said that the game took three and a half years to develop.[1] The game was designed to be best played in a single sitting, and he suggested that investigating too much of the game before playing it would cause the experience to be spoiled, comparing it to the games Journey and Firewatch.[1]

Inspiration for the game's idea also came from the game Ico.[1] The game was directed at a target audience of older gamers who have been playing games "their whole life" and are tired of solving puzzles, instead simply wanting an audiovisual experience without frustrating or repetitive gameplay.[1] However, the developers still wanted to include some challenge to the game, so that it was not simply a walking simulator.[2] It was meant to be a short experience as the creative director noted that, like other adults, he lacked the time to play larger, 100-hour games such as The Witcher 3.[1]

The game's aesthetics were largely inspired by modern art and its development from the beginning of the 20th century.[1] The game developer Tale of Tales was also cited as an influence in the design of the game, as well as the digital art of the demoscene.[1]

The idea of a dancing main character was not added from the beginning of development. Rather, after one and a half years in development, the developers were disappointed with how similar to a typical game character her movements looked, and were inspired by a video of a modern jazz dance to change their movements to those of a dancer.[1] Motion capture was used on the dancer Maria Udod, who was chosen due to her experience both in ballet and contemporary dance, in order to record her movements for use by the protagonist.[1] Her choreographer was Michał Adam Góral.[1] Every animation of the character was changed to a dance move.[1]

The game's developers were forced to sacrifice visual effects for performance, because they did not want the game to run with motion blur or framerate drops, due to the hardware limitations of the PlayStation 4.[1] The game runs at a stable 60 frames per second (FPS), and Staniszewski believes that games that run at lower FPS than 60 are not the "proper way that games should look on TVs".[1]

On October 13, 2016, Plastic released a patch that enabled PlayStation VR compatibility. Later, on November 10, 2016, another patch was published, enabling PlayStation 4 Pro support, including 4K resolution and increased pixel density in VR mode.

Reception

Reception
Aggregate score
AggregatorScore
Metacritic71/100[3]
Review scores
PublicationScore
Destructoid6/10[4]
Edge8/10[5]
EGM7/10[6]
Game Informer7.75/10[7]
GameRevolution8/10[8]
GameSpot7/10[9]
Hardcore Gamer3.5/5[10]
IGN7/10[11]
Polygon7.5/10[12]
Push SquareStarStarStarStarStarStar[13]
Digital SpyStarStarStarHalf star[14]
Slant MagazineStarStarStarHalf star[15]

Bound received above-average reviews according to the review aggregation website Metacritic.[3] Chris Carter of Destructoid said that its graphics are "gorgeous" and "stunning", but calling the movement "stiff" and combat too easy, believing the game leans "too hard" on the platforming aspect.[4] Matt Peckham of Time (magazine) said that while the game is fun to watch, it is boring to play because it is so easy to navigate the world.[16] James Stephanie Sterling of The Jimquisition said that, while beautiful, playing it is a "messy, obstructive hassle" with poor controls and camera movement, as it is unable to commit to either being a walking simulator or a fully realized puzzle platformer and is instead a hybrid of both.[17]

Justin Clark of GameSpot said that while its gameplay is "rudimentary", this is made up for by the graphical details of the game, calling each stage a "cubist marvel" and the idea of a dancing main character deserving of praise and saying that it "displays immense amounts of contemplation and ambition in every aspect except gameplay".[9] He claimed that "[to] decry it for its overly simplistic mechanics is to ultimately miss the forest for the trees", and that "Bound is digital art installation" whose full impact is only evident in its final moments.[9]

Stuart Andrews of Digital Spy gave it three-and-a-half stars out of five, saying, "This isn't quite the indie, arthouse Ratchet & Clank, then, but it's distinctive, unusual and frequently inspired."[14] Aaron Riccio of Slant Magazine gave it a similar score of three-and-a-half stars out of five, saying, "Movement here isn't just treated as a necessity of the gameplay, but as an expression of joy and healing."[15] However, David Wolinsky of Common Sense Media gave it one star out of five, saying, "If the game is about exploration, it doesn't matter because you can go in any direction and there's nothing it necessarily offers you. So the beauty is in the eye of the beholder here, which means it's worth a look but [it] doesn't have much to say beyond that."[18]

The game was selected to appear in IndieCade 2016.[2]

References

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 Tamayo, Paul (2016-05-20). "How Dance Gave New Life to PS4 Platformer "Bound"". A Medium Corporation. https://the-optional.com/how-dance-gave-new-life-to-ps4-platformer-bound-aade798a9b5e#.192a3ulr0. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 "Bound (1P)". http://www.indiecade.com/games/selected/Bound-1P. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 "Bound (2016)". Fandom. https://www.metacritic.com/game/bound-2016/. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 Carter, Chris (2016-08-15). "Review: Bound". Gamurs. https://www.destructoid.com/reviews/review-bound/. 
  5. Edge staff (October 2016). "Bound". Edge (Future plc) (296): 118. 
  6. Carsillo, Ray (2016-08-15). "Bound review". EGMNow (EGM Media, LLC). https://www.egmnow.com/articles/reviews/bound-review/. Retrieved 2023-11-07. 
  7. Hilliard, Kyle (2016-08-15). "Bound Review". Game Informer (GameStop). https://www.gameinformer.com/games/bound/b/playstation4/archive/2016/08/15/game-informer-bound-playstation-4-review.aspx. Retrieved 2023-11-06. 
  8. Paras, Peter (2016-09-08). "Bound Review". CraveOnline. https://www.gamerevolution.com/review/70849-bound-review. 
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Clark, Justin (2016-08-18). "Bound Review". Fandom. https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/bound-review/1900-6416495/. 
  10. Estrada, Marcus (2016-10-16). "Review: Bound (PSVR)". Hardcore Gamer. https://hardcoregamer.com/reviews/review-bound-psvr/231086/. Retrieved 2023-11-07. 
  11. Sliva, Marty (2016-08-15). "Bound Review". Ziff Davis. https://www.ign.com/articles/2016/08/16/bound-review. 
  12. Campbell, Colin (2016-08-15). "Bound review". Vox Media. https://www.polygon.com/2016/8/15/12430588/bound-review-ps4-playstation-4-plastic-studios. 
  13. Barker, Sammy (2017-11-01). "Bound Review". Hookshot Media. https://www.pushsquare.com/reviews/ps4/bound. 
  14. 14.0 14.1 Andrews, Stuart (2016-08-15). "Bound review – A beautiful ballet dance with a few tumbles". Hearst Communications. https://www.digitalspy.com/videogames/a804750/bound-review/. 
  15. 15.0 15.1 Riccio, Aaron (2016-08-24). "Review: Bound". https://www.slantmagazine.com/games/bound-2016/. 
  16. Peckham, Matt (2016-08-15). "Review: 'Bound' Is Beautiful to Watch, But Not Very Interesting to Play". Time (magazine) (Dotdash Meredith). https://time.com/4451805/bound-review-playstation-4/. Retrieved 2023-11-06. 
  17. Sterling, James Stephanie (2016-08-16). "Bound Review – A Beautiful Mess". http://www.thejimquisition.com/bound-review/. 
  18. Wolinsky, David (2016). "Bound". https://www.commonsensemedia.org/game-reviews/bound. 
  • MobyGames is a commercial database website that catalogs information on video games and the people and companies behind them via crowdsourcing. This includes over 300,000 games for hundreds of platforms.[1] Founded in 1999, ownership of the site has changed hands several times. It has been owned by Atari SA since 2022.

Features

Edits and submissions to the site (including screenshots, box art, developer information, game summaries, and more) go through a verification process of fact-checking by volunteer "approvers".[2] This lengthy approval process after submission can range from minutes to days or months.[3] The most commonly used sources are the video game's website, packaging, and credit screens. There is a published standard for game information and copy-editing.[4] A ranking system allows users to earn points for contributing accurate information.[5]

Registered users can rate and review games. Users can create private or public "have" and "want" lists, which can generate a list of games available for trade with other registered users. The site contains an integrated forum. Each listed game can have its own sub-forum.

History

Logo used until March 2014

MobyGames was founded on March 1, 1999, by Jim Leonard and Brian Hirt, and joined by David Berk 18 months later, the three of which had been friends since high school.[6][7] Leonard had the idea of sharing information about computer games with a larger audience. The database began with information about games for IBM PC compatibles, relying on the founders' personal collections. Eventually, the site was opened up to allow general users to contribute information.[5] In a 2003 interview, Berk emphasized MobyGames' dedication to taking video games more seriously than broader society and to preserving games for their important cultural influence.[5]

In mid-2010, MobyGames was purchased by GameFly for an undisclosed amount.[8] This was announced to the community post factum , and the site's interface was given an unpopular redesign.[7] A few major contributors left, refusing to do volunteer work for a commercial website.{{Citation needed|date=June 2025} On December 18, 2013, MobyGames was acquired by Jeremiah Freyholtz, owner of Blue Flame Labs (a San Francisco-based game and web development company) and VGBoxArt (a site for fan-made video game box art).[9] Blue Flame Labs reverted MobyGames' interface to its pre-overhaul look and feel,[10] and for the next eight years, the site was run by Freyholtz and Independent Games Festival organizer Simon Carless.[7]

On November 24, 2021, Atari SA announced a potential deal with Blue Flame Labs to purchase MobyGames for $1.5 million.[11] The purchase was completed on 8 March 2022, with Freyholtz remaining as general manager.[12][13][14] Over the next year, the financial boost given by Atari led to a rework of the site being built from scratch with a new backend codebase, as well as updates improving the mobile and desktop user interface.[1] This was accomplished by investing in full-time development of the site instead of its previously part-time development.[15]

In 2024, MobyGames began offering a paid "Pro" membership option for the site to generate additional revenue.[16] Previously, the site had generated income exclusively through banner ads and (from March 2014 onward) a small number of patrons via the Patreon website.[17]

See also

  • IGDB – game database used by Twitch for its search and discovery functions

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Sheehan, Gavin (2023-02-22). "Atari Relaunches The Fully Rebuilt & Optimized MobyGames Website". https://bleedingcool.com/games/atari-relaunches-the-fully-rebuilt-optimized-mobygames-website/. 
  2. Litchfield, Ted (2021-11-26). "Zombie company Atari to devour MobyGames". https://www.pcgamer.com/zombie-company-atari-to-devour-mobygames/. 
  3. "MobyGames FAQ: Emails Answered § When will my submission be approved?". Blue Flame Labs. 30 March 2014. http://www.mobygames.com/info/faq7#g1. 
  4. "The MobyGames Standards and Practices". Blue Flame Labs. 6 January 2016. http://www.mobygames.com/info/standards. 
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Miller, Stanley A. (2003-04-22). "People's choice awards honor favorite Web sites". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. 
  6. "20 Years of MobyGames" (in en). 2019-02-28. https://trixter.oldskool.org/2019/02/28/20-years-of-mobygames/. 
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Plunkett, Luke (2022-03-10). "Atari Buys MobyGames For $1.5 Million". https://kotaku.com/mobygames-retro-credits-database-imdb-atari-freyholtz-b-1848638521. 
  8. "Report: MobyGames Acquired By GameFly Media". Gamasutra. 2011-02-07. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/game-platforms/report-mobygames-acquired-by-gamefly-media. 
  9. Corriea, Alexa Ray (December 31, 2013). "MobyGames purchased from GameFly, improvements planned". http://www.polygon.com/2013/12/31/5261414/mobygames-purchased-from-gamefly-improvements-planned. 
  10. Wawro, Alex (31 December 2013). "Game dev database MobyGames getting some TLC under new owner". Gamasutra. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/business/game-dev-database-mobygames-getting-some-tlc-under-new-owner. 
  11. "Atari invests in Anstream, may buy MobyGames". November 24, 2021. https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2021-11-24-atari-invests-in-anstream-may-buy-mobygames. 
  12. Rousseau, Jeffrey (2022-03-09). "Atari purchases Moby Games". https://www.gamesindustry.biz/atari-purchases-moby-games. 
  13. "Atari Completes MobyGames Acquisition, Details Plans for the Site's Continued Support". March 8, 2022. https://www.atari.com/atari-completes-mobygames-acquisition-details-plans-for-the-sites-continued-support/. 
  14. "Atari has acquired game database MobyGames for $1.5 million" (in en-GB). 2022-03-09. https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/atari-has-acquired-game-database-mobygames-for-1-5-million/. 
  15. Stanton, Rich (2022-03-10). "Atari buys videogame database MobyGames for $1.5 million". https://www.pcgamer.com/atari-buys-videogame-database-mobygames-for-dollar15-million/. 
  16. Harris, John (2024-03-09). "MobyGames Offering “Pro” Membership". https://setsideb.com/mobygames-offering-pro-membership/. 
  17. "MobyGames on Patreon". http://www.patreon.com/mobygames. 
  • No URL found. Please specify a URL here or add one to Wikidata.

Template:Atari





Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Source: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Software:Bound_(video_game)
21 views |
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF