The bank's customers were primarily in the technology, life science/healthcare, private equity/venture capital and premium wine industries.[1][4][5] As of December 31, 2022, 56% of its loan portfolio were loans to venture capital firms and private equity firms, secured by their limited partner commitments and used to make investments in private companies, 14% of its loans were mortgages to high-net-worth individuals, and 24% of its loans were to technology and health care companies, including 9% of all loans which were to early and growth-stage startup companies.[6]
Via its SVB Capital division, it managed $9.5 billion in funds of both clients and the bank that was invested in venture capital funds.[1][7]SVB Securities provided investment banking services to companies in the technology and healthcare industries.[1]
The bank operated from offices in the United States, India, the United Kingdom, Israel, Canada, China, Germany, Hong Kong, Ireland, Denmark, and Sweden.[1][12][13]
Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) was founded as Silicon Valley Bancshares in 1983 by Bill Biggerstaff and Robert Medearis, who came up with the idea over a poker game.[14] Its first office opened in 1983 on North First Street in San Jose.
The bank’s main strategy was collecting deposits from businesses financed through venture capital. It then expanded into banking and financing venture capitalists themselves, and added services to allow the bank to keep clients as they matured from their startup phase.[15]
SVB merged with National InterCity Bancorp in 1986 and opened an office in Santa Clara.[6] In 1988, the bank holding company became a public company via an initial public offering, raising $6 million.[6] It opened its first office on the east coast in 1990, near Boston, to serve the Massachusetts Route 128 tech corridor.
During its early years the bank did a substantial real estate loan business, making up 50% of its portfolio in the early 1990s. A slump in the California real estate market resulted in a $2.2 million loss for the bank in 1992, and by 1995 the portfolio percentage had fallen to 10%. In 1993, John C. Dean was appointed CEO, with founding CEO Roger V. Smith becoming Vice Chairman.[16][17] The bank added a winery lending business in 1994.[18]
The wave of computer technology startups during the dot-com bubble provided an influx of business for the bank, which was noted for its willingness to lend to venture-stage companies that were not yet profitable. Among its approximately 2,000 clients in 1995 were networking innovators Cisco Systems and Bay Networks.[16] That year, the bank moved its headquarters from San Jose to Santa Clara.[16] The holding company's stock price soared through the bubble but fell 50% when the bubble burst.[19] The bank continued to add branches in technology hubs across the country and reincorporated its holding company in Delaware in 1999.[1][20] Ken Wilcox became CEO in 2000[21] and chose to continue the company's niche focus on technology companies rather than diversifying into a broader commercial bank.[20]
The company's investment banking arm, SVB Securities, expanded its business with the 2001 acquisition of Palo Alto Alliant Partners for $100 million.[22] In 2002 it formally entered the private banking business, building on prior experience and relationships with wealthy venture capitalists and entrepreneurs.[23] It announced an international expansion drive in 2004, with new operations in Bangalore, London, Beijing and Israel.[20]
During the 2007–2008 financial crisis, SVB Financial received a $235 million investment from the federal government in exchange for preferred stock and warrants under the Troubled Asset Relief Program.[24] Over the course of two years it paid $10 million in dividends to the U.S. Treasury, then used the proceeds of a $300 million stock sale to buy back the government's interest.[25] Greg Becker replaced Wilcox as CEO in April 2011.[21]
SVB partnered with Shanghai Pudong Development Bank (SPDB) in 2012 to create a separate Shanghai-based bank that would lend to local technology startups.[26] The new bank, owned 50–50 by the two companies, received approval from Chinese bank regulators to operate in renminbi (RMB), making it one of a handful of American-owned banks permitted to do so.[27]
In 2015 the bank stated that it served 65% of all U.S. startups. Its new offerings at the time included syndicated loans and foreign currency management, and it stood out as the only financial institution working with virtual currency startups.[19]
The bank's deposits increased from $62 billion in March 2020 to $124 billion in March 2021, benefitting by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on science and technology. Most of these deposits were invested in long-term bonds as the bank sought a higher return on investment than available on shorter-term bonds.[28] These long-term bonds fell in value as interest rates rose during the 2021-2023 inflation surge and they became less attractive as investments.[29] As of December 31, 2022, SVB had mark-to-market accounting unrealized losses in excess of $15 billion for securities held to maturity.[28] At the same time, startup companies withdrew deposits from the bank to fund operations as private financing became harder to come by. To raise needed cash to fund the withdrawals, by March 8, the bank sold all of its available-for-sale securities at a US$1.8 billion realized loss.[30] Some banking experts said that the bank would have managed its risks better had it not been for the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in 2018 and supported by SVB CEO Greg Becker, which reduced the frequency and number of scenarios of required stress testing implemented under the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act for banks with under $250 billion in assets.[31]
In the week before the collapse, Moody's Investors Service reportedly informed SVB Financial, the bank's holding company, that it was facing a potential downgrade of its credit rating because of its unrealized losses.[28] On March 8, 2023, SVB announced it had sold $21 billion worth of its investments, borrowed $15 billion, and would hold an emergency sale of its stock to raise $2.25 billion.[28] Despite the steps taken by the bank, Moody's downgraded SVB on March 8.[28][32] Investors at several venture capital firms, including Peter Thiel's Founders Fund,[33] urged their portfolio companies to withdraw their deposits from the bank.[34] On March 9, customers withdrew $42 billion, leaving the bank with a negative cash balance of about $958 million.[35] The value of the company's shares plummeted until a trading halt was implemented on the morning of March 10.[36][37][38][39][40]
The FDIC was appointed as receiver of the seized assets and liabilities from Silicon Valley Bank.
On the morning of March 10, 2023, agents from the Federal Reserve and the FDIC arrived at the offices of SVB to assess the company's finances.[41] Several hours later, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) issued an order taking possession of SVB,[42] citing inadequate liquidity and insolvency,[43] and appointed the FDIC as receiver.[44][45] The FDIC then established the Deposit Insurance National Bank of Santa Clara to re-open the bank's branches the following Monday and enable access to insured deposits.[8][46][47][48] The failure of SVB was the largest of any bank since the 2007–2008 financial crisis and the second-largest in U.S. history.[49]
Uninsured deposits represented 89% of total deposits at the bank;[50] however, Moody's Investor Service reported on March 10, that it expected a recovery rate for uninsured depositors of 80-90%.[51]
The Bank of England issued a statement that it sought a court order to place the United Kingdom subsidiary of the bank into a Bank Insolvency Procedure.[52][53]Shanghai Pudong Development Bank issued a statement that its joint operations with SVB were not affected by the collapse.[54]
The collapse of SVB has caused a minor ripple effect among some tech startups, in particular cryptocurrency-related companies.[55][56][57] In a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing, streaming media company Roku, Inc. revealed that around a quarter of the company's cash reserves—US$487 million—were held by SVB.[58] Other companies affected by the collapse include video game developer Roblox Corporation and video hosting service Vimeo.[59] Many startups were unable to retrieve money, resulting in companies taking out loans to make payroll.[57]Circle, the issuer of USD Coin (USDC), attested that SVB is one of the six banking partners used by the company to manage its cash reserves for USDC.[60]
Vox Media had a "substantial concentration of cash" at the bank.[57] The California wine industry was also affected by SVB's collapse, as it was "the leading bank for California wineries".[61]
Market capitalization of U.S. banks lost a combined US$100 billion in two days and European banks lost US$50 billion.[62] Several banks, such as First Republic Bank and Western Alliance Bancorporation, issued press releases seeking to calm investors.[63][64] Regulators said U.S. banks had unrealized losses totaling more than $620 billion on their securities.[65] Despite this, banking experts believe that other banks will remain stable as SVB was overly specialized in providing banking to a risky sector of the economy, and financial regulations have strengthened since the 2008 recession.[66]
^Cimilluca, Rachel Louise Ensign, Corrie Driebusch and Dana (March 10, 2023). "Silicon Valley Bank Closed by Regulators". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on March 10, 2023. Retrieved March 10, 2023.
^Cimilluca, Rachel Louise Ensign, Corrie Driebusch and Dana (March 10, 2023). "Silicon Valley Bank Closed by Regulators". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on March 10, 2023. Retrieved March 10, 2023.