Siddhartha Gautama's Buddhism |
Dharma |
Buddhism is a philosophy[1] and religion native to the Indian subcontinent. It arose out of the local Shramanic tradition, and spread throughout South and East Asia. Buddhism was founded around 500 BCE by Siddhārtha Gautama, the "Awakened" (Buddha).[2] The purpose of Buddhism is to liberate oneself from suffering by understanding and accepting "things as they are".[3]
Buddhism began and developed in India and grew out of Brahmanism, the same religious and cultural context as Hinduism, but differs from the latter on three central doctrinal points, which are the following:
Buddhism is a Western term coined by scholars to describe religion and philosophy that grew out of Buddha's teachings.
The closest Sanskrit equivalents to this term are buddhadharma ("the teachings of the Buddha"),[6] dharmavinaya (combination of words dharma "teaching" and vinaya "discipline"),[7] buddhānuśāsana ("the dispensation of the Buddha"),[8] and śāsana ("dispensation", "teachings").[9]
Buddha described what he himself taught to his disciples as dharmavinaya, with vinaya referring to the rules of monastic discipline. Thus Sanskrit term dharma (derived from the root *dʰer- "to hold", "to mantain") is also used as a synonym for Buddhist teachings, with the distinction being made between teachings as something that is heard or studied (scriptural dharma or āgamadharma) and teachings as something that is made manifest in the consciousness of the practitioner (realized dharma or adhigamadharma). However, the Sanskrit word dharma has several meanings in Buddhist literature and as many as 10 meanings in the literature as whole (i.e. including Vedic texts).[10]
At its most basic level, Buddhist philosophy is built around a set of four axioms, the Four Noble Truths. This leads to the Eightfold Path, the code of conduct developed by the Buddha to combat the unpleasantness of existence. A Buddhist community is called a Sangha, the Buddhist teachings are referred to as Dharma. These two, along with the Buddha himself, make up the Three Jewels, the foundation of Buddhist tradition and practice.
The Four Noble Truths purport to describe the central problem of existence according to the historical Buddha. They aren't meant to be philosophical truths, but realizations.
Each Noble Truth has 3 parts — conceptual understanding, practice, and realization (fruition of practice)[11]:
The Eightfold Path can be summed up as follows:
These are not individual steps, but co-dependent factors. [12]
The Eightfold path can be condensed into three parts: pañña, sīla, and samādhi. Respectively, these translate as wisdom, virtue, and concentration.[13]
While there are hundreds of precepts which apply to monastic practitioners, for everyday use the list may be reduced to five:[14]
Practitioners can also observe the eight precepts, which would also include:
Lay devotees (anagarika) at a monastery will generally follow the ten precepts, which would also include:
With the eight and ten precepts, the third precept becomes a training rule to not to perform any sexual activity at all and the fourth precept extends to recommending against wrong or hateful speech.
Although karma is sometimes thought to be a teaching of cosmic justice unnecessary in Buddhism,[15] karma is defined by the Buddha as intention.[16] The results of karma are not supernatural, but entirely natural, no different than the way a good seed brings a good tree or a bad seed brings a bad tree.[17]
In Buddhism, the understanding of karma, or rather the understanding that wholesome or unwholesome actions have desirable or undesirable consequences, is a component of Right View.[18] Denying this teaching of karma is Wrong View,[19] and so the cultivation of wholesome karma (which comes from understanding it) is important to Buddhist practice.[20][21][22]
The Five Skandhas, or aggregates, are what makes up a sentient being's existence. To many westerners, these make up what's called the "ego", however it is important to realize that this concept of "ego" did not exist in the Buddha's time. The closest thing to ego in that time was "self", which is simply a word used to describe an "I". Since the Buddha taught the doctrine of "not-self", these Five Skandhas do not make up a self because they lack the inherent existence of "self", meaning you cannot find a "self" within these Five Skandhas because of their dependent origin.
The Six Sense Bases are used as a tool to aid in the understanding of the Five Skandhas. The six sense bases are composed of internal sense bases, external sense bases, and the type of consciousness which arises from the sense base. The consciousness that arises from the bases is just the ability to recognize things via the sense base, for example, using eye consciousness: "I see a rock".
The Buddha taught three characteristics of existence:
These are not meant to be metaphysical truths, but the characteristics of phenomena which we perceive with right view.[28] The Buddha taught that if we were to see things rightly, we would perceive their arising and ceasing, we would see the stress that comes from clinging to things, and we would see that all things are not fit to be called "me", "mine", or "myself". As a result of seeing the conditioned nature thing, one also understands karma, because karma refers to the truth that unwholesome actions are the condition for unpleasant experiences — it is not a metaphysical truth. One also understands rebirth, which refers specifically to new states of "becoming", caused by craving and clinging to experience. On what one would call a metaphysical level, the continuance of life after death refers to the continuance of the arising of conditioned consciousness along with the body.
In reality, the Buddha did more than sit around navel gazing — he founded what amounted to a university, and ran it until his death at a ripe old age. Not listening and then asking silly questions could get a student called "stupid" by the Buddha himself. In the Kalama Sutta, the Buddha encouraged some townspeople not to accept teachings blindly, but to see how they work in practice and to consult the wise about them. Two and a half thousand years later, there is an enormous body of oral tradition and written text about the teachings, but they may be neatly summarized with remarkably few notions:
“”O, Child of Buddha Nature, listen. It is due to your own past actions that you are now suffering in this way. No one else is responsible — this is solely the result of your own past actions.
|
—Blaming the victim in The Tibetan Book of the Dead[29]:279 |
The Tripitaka ("Three Baskets") contain what is regarded as the word of the Buddha. Its three divisions are Sutta (teachings), Vinaya (monastic codes), and Abhidharma (metaphysics). The Tripitaka exists in the form of the Pali, Tibetan, and Chinese canons. Historically speaking, none of these can be assumed to represent the teachings of the historical Buddha, who lived some 500 years before the earliest extant records. (For the sake of comparison, the earliest extant records of Jesus, an equally legendary figure, can be traced to mere decades after his death.)
In addition to the Tripitaka, a number of Buddhist schools recognize additional texts as canonical. These texts, typically called sutras (The Sanskrit rendering of sutta) range in content from examinations of psychology to the typical gods-and-monsters we've come to expect from religion. For instance, a number of sutras, including the famous Lotus Sutra, are said to be delivered or hidden in non-mundane worlds; in the case of the Lotus Sutra, hidden in the world of nagas (snake people) until the human realm was ready to receive it. Some sutras directly contradict others, or the Tripitaka. There is a long and storied tradition of monks "discovering" new sutras hidden in caves or received directly from a Buddha or other enlightened being. Make of this what you will.
In most Buddhist societies, these scriptures would be encountered in mediated form, through teachings by a monk. This makes it difficult to reduce Buddhism to a concise set of fundamental teachings, though the "Four Noble Truths" are widely emphasized.
Samadhi, known as meditation or concentration, is a crucial part of Buddhist practice. Here it refers to the samadhi of the threefold training. Many modern practitioners divide Buddhist meditation into two types: samatha and vipassana; jhana meditation and insight meditation. However, the framework of the eightfold path makes it clear that these two are not actually separate, but joined; right mindfulness leads to right concentration which leads to right view, and so on.[30]
Right effort is defined as putting forth effort to abandon and prevent the arising of unwholesome mental states.[31] In the case of meditation practice, these are the five hindrances that "overwhelm awareness and weaken discernment".[32] The mind must be devoid of the hindrances in order to develop jhana.[33][34]
The five hindrances which "overwhelm awareness and weaken discernment" are:
The Buddha has prescribed different antidotes for the hindrances:
The four foundations of mindfulness (satipatthana) are the four "frames of reference" used as bases of concentration for Buddhist meditators:
The four jhanas are the states of meditative absorption, which arise when the conditions are correct.[44] The most basic condition is the stilling of unwholesome qualities, but each jhana has its own factors which cease with progression in jhana. The jhanas and their factors are:
The jhanas are developed for different reasons among practitioners. Some develop them for a pleasant abiding, but the Buddha taught that the highest benefit of jhana development is insight.[45] It is also taught that the "ending of the fermentations" (enlightenment) depends on jhana practice.[46]
Buddhism, like other religions, enjoys a good schism and now has three main branches:
In Theravada Buddhism, when one attains enlightenment, one transcends to nirvana (the destruction of greed, anger and ignorance, not the grunge band). Theravada is considered the oldest branch, and is often pejoratively called Hinayana ("Lesser Vehicle", contrasted with the Mahayana "Greater Vehicle") by other schools of Buddhism.[note 1] Theravada Buddhism is the most popular form of Buddhism in Southeast Asian countries like Myanmar, Cambodia, and Thailand.
Proponents of Mahayana Buddhism argue that the Therevada focus on individual enlightenment is selfish, and so members of Mahayana sangha take what is called the "Boddhisattva vow", meaning that they voluntarily choose to forgo nirvana in order to aid others in their spiritual journeys. Individual Mahayana sects tend to appear much more similar to Abrahamic religions than other forms of Buddhism—sects such as Pure Land Buddhism believe in a semi-divine savior who intercedes on behalf of the faithful and allows them to be reborn into the Pure Land. Mahayana Buddhism tends to be more popular in East Asian countries like Japan, China, Korea, and Vietnam. Zen Buddhism lacks the focus on universal salvation of most Mahayana sects, but is still classified as Mahayana because of its historical development.
The third major school of Buddhism, Vajrayana (the "Thunderbolt vehicle") is the youngest[note 2] and smallest sect of Buddhism, and focuses primarily on esoteric practices. This includes various Tantra and Yogic practices, as well as elaborate rituals intended to replace the more abstract meditation practices of other sects. Mandala, elaborate pieces of sacred art, are typical of Vajrayana tools. Shingon Buddhism is the primary representative of Vajrayana thought in Japan. Shingon rituals are largely centered around setting things on fire in a practice derived from the proto-Hindu worship of Agni, god of fire. Depending on who you ask, Tibetan Buddhism is either one of the major sub-schools of Vajrayana Buddhism, or a Mahayana school that borrows heavily from Vajrayana teachings. Today four major schools of Tibetan Buddhism persist; Nyingma, Kagyu, Sakya and Geluk, in addition to indigenous Tibetan spiritual practices of Shen and Bön.
By the time of the Tang dynasty (唐朝, 618-907 CE) in China, Buddhism had already become so decadent that:[47][48]
Buddhism has successfully (and erroneously) marketed itself in the Western world as a very peaceful religion, devoted to internal contemplation and personal enlightenment.[49] The standard versions of Buddhism promoted in the West leave out much of the public ritual element, as well as traditional sexism and religious hierarchies.[50][51] Western-style Buddhism appeals instead to Western individualism and non-authoritarianism, importing much of the "personal growth and spirituality" features of religion while happily discarding its undesired institutional features. This rather selective approach thus bears at least a passing resemblance to the relation between more traditional versions of Christianity and the "prosperity gospel" variants.
Unlike the Abrahamic or Vedic religions, the existence of an all powerful god (deva) is either dismissed completely or denied/refuted[52] (although some Buddhist schools do not fully deny the existence of a god or gods and even have a metaphysical eternal Buddha).[53] The Buddha himself went to great lengths to make it clear he was not a god, merely “awake.”[54] Despite this, only 19% of American Buddhists say they do not believe in God. In fact, 39% claim to be "absolutely certain" of the existence of God and 28% are "fairly certain."[55]
The commonly held Buddhist stance on the matter is that any god(s) that may exist are trapped in the same cycle of birth, suffering, death and rebirth as all other living creatures (even if the lifespan of a god might be much longer than other forms of life). Hence these gods should be working on preventing their own suffering rather than inflicting it on the heathen masses below. Although Buddhists may accept the existence of numerous local gods, most Buddhist schools do not promote worshipping of most gods as it hinders a person from enlightenment, although virtuous gods are sometimes worshipped as bodhisattvas.
There are numerous heavens and hells in Buddhist cosmology, along with other planes such as that of animals. If you don’t achieve enlightenment in this lifetime you are reborn in one of these planes. In essence, you are effectively screwed over and have to start life all over again. This cycle to which all living creatures are bound is commonly referred to as samsara. The destination after death is determined not by past karma, but by the state of mind at death. Sometimes there is no Hell/Heaven in some Buddhist interpretations, instead you are reborn until you achieve nirvana.[56][57]
Nirvana translates as “snuffed out” or "cooled" and signifies the condition of an enlightened being who has obtained freedom from the cycle of rebirth and suffering. It is not an afterlife or realm of existence, but a state of mind to be achieved.[58] The Buddha described Nirvana as “incomprehensible, indescribable, inconceivable, unutterable”. In another text he described it as "the complete destruction of the underlying tendencies to greed, anger and ignorance.[59] So basically, with the lights out, it's less dangerous.
Buddhists deny the existence of any immaterial/eternal soul (the same as the Christian soul). What Buddhists posit is a being composed of five aggregates (skandhas) changing over time. If there's a self here, then it's only a conventional term, like "person". The Buddha taught that the notion of a self comes from ones own ignorant tendency to cling to conditioned phenomena without discernment, which gives rise to an assumption of self.
Buddhists believe in karma. Whereas karma in Hinduism has a divine presence, karma in Buddhism is a form of cause and effect.
Belief in what happens after an individual dies varies greatly between Buddhist schools of thought. Generally, Buddhists believe in rebirth rather than reincarnation, since the Buddhist doctrine of anatman means that the individual has no permanent "soul". The analogy below is a rough illustration of the difference.
Reincarnation is like pouring water from one cup into another. The water is the same but the vessel is different.
Rebirth is more like using a flame from one candle to light another. There is a deep connection between the two, but they exist independently of one another.
Many western adopters of Buddhism claim it is a peaceful alternative to Abrahamic religions with no judgement; this "exoticism" compared to western religions is why it is prefered over, say, Islam.[60] However, even a cursory skim of Buddhism's history reveals a plethora of religious violence and persecutions not unlike those of Abrahamic faiths; these conflicts remain to this day, as for instance Muslims are persecuted by Buddhist majorities in Sri Lanka and Myanmar. Buddhist beliefs and philosophy were adopted by the Nazi Thule Society, as well as terrorist groups like the Hare Krishna and Aum Shinrikyo. Likewise belief in reincarnation is seen differently by native Buddhists than western Buddhists; whereas the latter see reincarnation as an opportunity to start over, the former see it as a vicious cycle of suffering.
It has become popular to see Buddhism as some kind of "special" religion, that does not have the same trappings as other religions. This, to an extent, is valid in some points, because Buddhism, unlike other religions, advocates for:
However, Buddhism is also subject to critical points such as:
Suffice it to say that this has not led to a fundamental critique of Buddhist principles from within; nor does the existence of scholastic debate traditions or ancient monastic universities such as Nalanda indicate that Buddha was ever anything other than a successful preacher like Jesus or Muhammad. The Buddha was careful in conveying his opposition to dogma, and that any idea should be questioned rather than blindly accepted. Fundamentalist views existed among Buddhists and even today among western Buddhists, who perhaps bring with them the Judeo-Christian paradigm of interpreting scripture and religion, which is not traditionally open to multiple interpretations.[citation needed]
It's common for people to get confused on the topic of Buddhism and science. Some say they go together well, others say they don't. Really, it all depends on context - and the particular school/sect of Buddhism, some of which are much more focused on superstition than others.
Secular Buddhism (also known as Buddhist atheism, Buddhist agnosticism and pragmatic Buddhism) is an international movement of atheists and agnostics that identify themselves as Buddhists, focusing on the humanistic aspects of Buddhist philosophy and ethics but disregarding the ritualistic and religious elements of Buddhism[76] including the belief in the supernatural and metaphysical tenets that remain unproven by science.
Some followers of secular Buddhism often consider these aspects to be metaphorical or symbolic explanations of rational phenomena. For example, the karma is seen not as a literal supernatural force but — as described in some Buddhist text as “seeds in the mind” — the negative or positive emotions and memories caused by positive or negative actions that may affect the human psyche developing into psychological, social, mental or even legal consequences. The different realms not as literal places but as states of minds/positions in life, and rebirth as a symbolism for genetic memory or the always changing cycles in a person's life. Nevertheless rationalizing these elements is optional and a large number of followers just disregard these aspects entirely, focusing instead on on the philosophical, ethical and psychological teachings.[77]