California Proposition 8

Gay free zone Homophobia

Fighting the gay agenda

77 Non-religious Reasons to Support Man/Woman Marriage Heterophobia Pray the gay away Westboro Baptist Church

Judge not

Nazi Germany The Church at Kaweah National Bolshevism Islamism

That ye be not judged

Robert Bork Marco Rubio Benny Hinn Notch v - t - e

Divinely-translated articles about Mormonism

Restoration by interpretation

Mormonism Joseph Smith The Book of Mormon

Even by study and also by faith

Book of Mormon Brigham Young University Pearl of Great Price Sound of Freedom Branton Files

Following the needle of the Liahona

Orson Scott Card Brigham Young Jon McNaughton Jon Huntsman v - t - e

California Proposition 8, aptly known as "Proposition Hate," is was a proposed state constitutional amendment passed by the voters of California on November 4, 2008, defining marriage as between a man and a woman. It was part of a wave of such state constitutional amendments across the U.S. during the 2000s, all of which were eventually nullified.^[1] The passage of Proposition 8 (by 52 to 48%^[2]) effectively ended same-sex marriage in California for the time being, which had been legal since the state Supreme Court struck down California's statutory ban on same-sex marriage on May 15, 2008.

Mormon involvement[edit]

The Mormon church was heavily involved in funding and promoting the "Yes on 8" campaign.^[3] As a result, there have been several calls for the revocation of the Mormon Church's tax-exempt status, though the involvement of religious groups on both sides of the initiative was prominent.

At least one of the "Vote Yes on Proposition 8" TV ads they backed used an odd scare tactic: "If same-sex marriage is legal, our kids will have to learn about same-sex marriage in school!"^[4] The horror!

Development[edit]

On May 26, 2009, it was announced that the California Supreme Court upheld the proposition, but, at the same time, still recognized the 18,000 same-sex marriages performed in California prior to the ban.^[5]

On August 4, 2010, a Federal District Court overturned the amendment in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger.

On February 7, 2012, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit upheld the District Court's decision on appeal by a 2-1 vote.^[6]

On December 7, 2012, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to hear the case and heard oral arguments on March 26, 2013. The justices appeared to focus largely on the question of whether or not the groups which sponsored Prop 8 have standing to defend the law when the state has refused to do so.^[7] A decision is expected in June 2013 Apparently some gay couple getting married in the state does not constitute enough of "an injury that affects him in a 'personal and individual way'" for the petitioners to have standing. As such, the lower court ruling is upheld.^[8]

Effects of ruling[edit]

With the upholding the ruling of the lower courts, Proposition 8 is effectively dead, allowing gay marriage to resume in California. Right on cue, many, mainly Republicans, angered at the ruling and gutting of the Defense of Marriage Act by the Supreme Court, resulted in anger at the state refusing to continue imposing their will on others as well as having the audacity to overrule mob rule that sought to take away people's rights.

A notable example occurred almost immediately after the rulings when a group of Republican politicians, including the Wicked Witch of Minnesota Minnesota representative Michele Bachmann, held a press conference to reply to the court's ruling. As expected, they thumped the Bible as justification for their homophobia and showed their usual dislike of how functional representative republics are supposed to operate in guaranteeing human rights. Not many people bothered to show up in person, especially the media as not many reporters showed up to cover the conference; that's very likely because a group of people with opposing sexual orientations rightfully gaining back their natural rights was an apparently bigger story to report on.^[9]

The Perry v. Schwarzenegger decision resulted in many state restrictions on same-sex marriage being challenged in every U.S. state. Despite its previous history of legislative defeat, same-sex marriage was consistently upheld as a fundamental right based on the logic of the Perry decision and the United States v. Windsor (another court case which overturned components of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act).

As to be expected, such conflicts from Prop 8's death and the fights stemming for it resulted in gay marriage coming right back to the Supreme Court in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges. In a 5-4 ruling, on June 26, 2015, the majority ruling held it was unconstitutional to deny gay couples the right to be married, officially ending the saga of Prop 8 on a happy note.

Further and even more bloody hair ripping, foot stamping, and bible thumping by gay marriage opponents followed.

In 2024[edit]

With the nullification of the 1973 Supreme Court decision legalizing abortion (Roe v. Wade) with the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision by a far-right-dominated Supreme Court, many state anti-abortion statutes became enforceable again.^[10] After the Court showed its blatant disregard for stare decisis with this ruling, abortion rights supporters became concerned that Proposition 8 could become enforceable again if the Supreme Court decided to annul Obergefell v. Hodges, as Justice Clarence Thomas had indicated his desire to do so.^[11] In 2024 California Proposition 3 legalizing marriage equality won passage, thus nullifying 2008's Proposition 8.^[12]

External links[edit]

• Proposition 8: The Musical

References[edit]