Cogito ergo sum Logic and rhetoric |
Key articles |
General logic |
Bad logic |
The fallacy of accent (also prosody, accentus, misleading accent) occurs when the meaning of a text is changed by what word or words are stressed, and either (1) a word different than the author's intent is stressed or (2) it's unknown which word should be stressed. The meaning of a word or set of words may be drastically changed by the way they are spoken, without changing the words themselves.
The fallacy was first coined by Aristotle, who pointed out that a word with one spelling could have different pronunciation and different meaning, which effectively created multiple words. Because the written Greek of Aristotle's time had no diacritical marks, it was occasionally impossible to tell the author's intent.[1][2][3]
It is an informal fallacy and a fallacy of ambiguity, in that it removes context that is necessary to understand the statement.
Situation 1:
Amy: I can imagine Cal doing that; it's possible.
Bob: Yes, it's possible to imagine him doing that.
Situation 2:
Amy: I can imagine Cal doing that; it's possible.
Bob: Yes, it's possible to imagine him doing that.
Situation 3:
Amy: I can imagine Cal doing that; it's possible.
Bob: Yes, it's possible to imagine him doing that.
At an ice-cream parlour c.1982C.E.:
I've never seen a woman eat a banana like that.
I've never seen a woman eat a banana like that.
It would be illegal to give away
Free Beer![5]
Accent 1 | Meaning 1 | Accent 2 | Meaning 2 |
---|---|---|---|
accent | an emphasis on a word | accent | to emphasize a word[3] |
increase | the act of becoming larger | increase | to become greater[3] |
insult | a disrespectful statement | insult | to speak disrespectfully[3] |
invalid | an ill person | invalid | (of an argument) faulty[2] |
record | a log of events | record | to keep track of events[3] |