Some dare call it Conspiracy |
What THEY don't want you to know! |
Sheeple wakers |
A false flag operation is an operation conducted by one party or government and made to appear as though it were sponsored by another party or government. The term (although not the tactic) has its origins in the traditions of "honourable" naval warfare, where ships were required to sail under their own national flag in order that they could be identified. As people learned that being a sneaky bastard was much more fun much more effective than playing by the rules, ships began sailing under "false" colours, i.e. flying their enemy's flag in order to get close to their enemy, before swapping to their true colours and opening fire.[note 1]
In the modern use of false flag tactics and operations, this final step is avoided entirely, making it difficult to identify what is really a false flag operation, and what is just some conspiracy nuts not trusting their own government.
A list of such attacks either determined or widely held to be false flag attacks follows:
Literal false flag incidents:
Conspiracy theorists have claimed that the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were a false flag operation by the United States Government, notably in the "documentary" Loose Change. Their claims are not seen as credible by most investigators. It is interesting that the concept of a false flag operation is a staple of almost all conspiracy theories — that a government would attack their own people to justify something is appropriately dramatic and evil to be attractive to anyone already predisposed to the idea that the world is secretly being controlled by dark hidden forces. Similar claims were launched within an hour after the Boston Marathon bombing of 15 April 2013, and, two days later, after the West, TX fertiliser plant explosion, citing the monkey that jumps up and down in Alex Jones' head.[7]
On 11 January 2015, in the Project Camelot Portal blog, Kerry Cassidy wrote that the Charlie Hebdo massacre was obviously a False Flag operation by the French government.[8]
In fact, since the arrival of 9/11 truthers, no tragedy goes[9] by[10] without someone claiming it was a false flag.
Paranoid wackjobs on both the left[11] and the right[12] have argued that Edward Snowden is, or likely is, a limited hangout or a false flag operation. This is especially ironic given that Snowden's NSA documents have revealed actual false flag capabilities by the Canadian government,[13] and a British "dirty tricks" program — including false flag operations — shared with the U.S., New Zealand, and Australian (and Canadian) governments.[14]
The 1999 Russian apartment bombings, which killed 293 people, were generally blamed on Muslim terrorists, but the attacks are claimed by some to be a false-flag operation by the Russian government to get support for their war in Chechnya and Dagestan, justified as a war against Muslim terrorists.
The Washington Post reported on Elon Musk's false-flag propaganda operation to get Donald Trump elected president in 2024.[15] Historian Timothy Snyder labeled this operation as part of a pattern started by Russia in 2014. He labeled it as targeted demotivational propaganda, while citing and not disputing the Washington Post article's use of the term false-flag.[16]
Since 2014, Russia has pioneered a technique based on the mixing-of-lies-and-misrepresentation in the form of targeted demotivational propaganda. Snyder describes the technique as creating political advertisements that at first appear to be truthful and appealing characteristics for a particular demographic, but end with a very unappealing lie that is likely to be unappealing to the demographic. Different demographics are targeted with different ads. The technique was first known to have appeared with the 2014 Russian invasion of Ukraine, and was repeated in the 2016 U.S. presidential election election against Hillary Clinton and the 2024 presidential election against Kamala Harris. Snyder describes the structure behind the technique as: oligarchical money (Vladimir Putin and Elon Musk) + psychographic information about individuals + social media delivery system + demotivational message.[16][15][17] In the US, such dark money was enabled the highly-controversial Supreme Court 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that allowed unlimited corporate funds to influence elections.