Cogito ergo sum Logic and rhetoric |
Key articles |
General logic |
Bad logic |
Invincible authority is a fallacy that occurs when an authority's opinion on an idea is cited as if that authority's support was the only evidence necessary to uphold said idea.
The fallacy is an appeal to authority and thus a conditional fallacy.
Such an argument is fallacious because there is no given reason why the authority's word should be accepted as final. The fallacy also faces the issue that only the authority's opinion is considered, while no opposing arguments are.
The line between invincible authority and a valid argument from authority can be difficult to draw; this does not mean no distinction exists. A sound argument based on citing authorities requires:
Ultimately, however, this fallacy underscores the weakness of citing authorities instead of arguments.