Style over substance Pseudoscience |
Popular pseudosciences |
Random examples |
“”UCL has launched an investigation into how a senior academic was able to secretly host an annual conference on eugenics and intelligence that heard from white supremacists and was attended by Toby Young.
|
—Ellie Bothwell[1] |
London Conference on Intelligence is a pseudoscientific[2] invitation-only conference held annually at University College London (UCL) from 2014-2017, attended by far-right speakers, including white supremacists.[3][4][5][6]
The conferences were secretive since Toby Young was invited to attend as an observer, but was told to not to tell anyone, especially not the media. However, Toby Young did not keep quiet and wrote about attending the UCL conference in December 2017.[7] In January 2018,[8][9][10] there was news exposure of the conferences and UCL set up an inquiry and published a statement noting that none of the conferences were approved by the university.
The London Conference on Intelligence moved to Skanderborg, Denmark in 2018. In 2023, the conference was held in Budapest.[11] As of 2024, the annual conference is still active.
The UCL conferences potentially breached room bookings policy because the university had not been informed of the speakers or content in advance, so there was no background check of any the individuals who attended, with the exception of Dr. James Thompson, an honorary UCL senior lecturer:
“”UCL is investigating a potential breach of its room bookings process for events after being alerted to conferences on intelligence hosted by an honorary senior lecturer at UCL. Our records indicate the university was not informed in advance about the speakers and content of the conference series, as it should have been for the event to be allowed to go ahead. The conferences were booked and paid for as an external event and without our officials being told of the details. They were therefore not approved or endorsed by UCL.
|
—UCL statement on the London Conference on Intelligence, 10 January 2018[12] |
Dr. Thompson had organised the UCL conferences for two years (2015-2016) and was involved with advertising the first conference in 2014 on the website The Unz Review,[13] but it remains unclear who was the organiser for the 2014 and 2017 conferences, although Thompson attended all of them. Emil Kirkegaard designed the 2015 conference website.[14]
The sequence of events that led newspapers and the media to discover the London Conference on Intelligence:
Around 20 speakers attended each conference to present talks based on papers they had written or co-written in advance. Based on two of the conference publications 2015-2016 that list paper abstracts, a journalist writing for London Student[29] calculated that over 80% of speakers have published papers in the Mankind Quarterly, a pseudoscholarly racist journal. Its publisher, Ulster Institute for Social Research was founded by Richard Lynn, a white supremacist who has far-right political views and is a eugenicist; UISR has received grants from the Pioneer Fund — a hate-group set up by Nazi-sympathisers.[30][31] Papers presented at UCL conferences also included sexism.
No publication with paper abstracts is available for the first conference, although James Thompson lists the following on The Unz Review:
On 10 January 2018, UCL "suspended approval for any further conferences of this nature by the honorary lecturer and speakers pending our investigation into the case".
On 18 January 2018, UCL updated their statement concerning the London Conference on Intelligence:
UCL does not and has not endorsed the London Conference on Intelligence and formally complained to Youtube that the use of UCL’s logo with videos posted by the conference organisers constituted a trademark infringement. There is no record of a request for the conference, and the logo being used is a doctored version which is in breach of UCL brand guidelines, including terms and conditions. The videos are no longer publicly available on the conference’s Youtube channel. After requests from the university, the organiser said he would remove the entire channel from Youtube.[32]
There was an ongoing inquiry that "aims to complete its investigations as soon as possible, hopefully within weeks". However, their report was not published until February 2020 and many were disappointed with it because it did not investigate the London Conference on Intelligence meetings on eugenics.[33]
On 15 January 2018, Union UCL BME Students' Network organised a protest: "Decolonise: White Supremacists & Eugenicists out NOW".[34]
A related protest on the same day, "No to neo-Nazi eugenics at UCL"[35][36] was supported by Unite Against Fascism[37] and Socialist Worker.[38]
UCL Student Union have created an online petition to ban future London Conference on Intelligence at UCL.[39]
Young has since published a statement distancing himself from the London Conference on Intelligence he had attended:
Yes, I went to the 2017 London Conference on Intelligence – I popped in for a few hours on a Saturday and sat at the back. I did not present a paper or give a lecture or appear on a platform or anything remotely like that. I had not met any of the other people in the lecture room before, save for Dr Thompson, and was unfamiliar with their work. I was completely ignorant of what had been discussed at the same event in previous years. All I knew was that some of them occupied the weird and whacky outer fringe of the world of genetics.
My reason for attending was because I had been asked – as a journalist – to give a lecture by the International Society of Intelligence Researchers at the University of Montreal later in the year and I was planning to talk about the history of controversies provoked by intelligence researchers. I thought the UCL conference would provide me with some anecdotal material for the lecture – and it did. To repeat, I was there as a journalist researching a talk I had to give a few months later and which was subsequently published.[40]
He concludes by describing speakers at the conference he met as "right-wing fruitcakes":
“”Just because I sat at the back in a lecture room at UCL one afternoon, scribbling away in my reporter’s notepad, while some right-wing fruitcakes held forth about ‘dysgenics’ does not make me a Nazi.
|
Young himself is a hard right-wing conservative and has caused controversy for sending sexist tweets.[41][42] London School of Economics academic Simon Hix has defended Young: "By all means criticise [Young] for his insulting, misogynist and childish tweeting, and his friendship with Boris and Conservative chums. But the guy is not a neo-Nazi eugenicist."[43]
On 10 January 2018, Emil Kirkegaard appeared on white supremacist Tara McCarthy's YouTube channel to discuss the furore over the London Conference on Intelligence.[44]
McCarthy named the video "SJWs Declare WAR On Science!"[45]
Creationists such as the Institute for Creation Research have condemned the conferences for promoting eugenics and racism, which they claim is the result of scientific Darwinism.[46] In reality, creationist nutjobs and far-right eugenicists/proponents of social Darwinism (not to be confused with scientific Darwinism), are opposite sides of the same coin.
15 speakers who had attended the conferences cowrote a response in Intelligence complaining of "sensationalized" and "erroneous" media coverage.[50] They point out only 2.7% of talks were about eugenics. However, a fairly large percentage (38.7%) were on race and intelligence. Furthermore, they fail to rebut the accurate description of the conferences as far-right, racist, sexist, and/or white supremacist since many speakers who attended hold some of these extreme views, e.g. Richard Lynn, Helmuth Nyborg, Emil Kirkegaard, James Thompson, Adam Perkins, and Edward Dutton; additionally, Paul Irwing, a co-author of Woodley et al., is an infamous sexist who argues that women score on average 5 points lower than men in IQ tests and have higher conscientiousness and reading accuracy.[51] Irwing's studies haven't been replicated, and have been criticized as pseudoscience; any difference between sexes in IQ scores is actually negligible (by <0.5 IQ point).[52]
The London Conference on Intelligence moved to Skanderborg, Denmark in 2018 and is still active. In 2023, Helmuth Nyborg was a speaker at the conference in Budapest.[11] Edward Dutton was also a speaker.[53] Attendees included John Oliver Allen Rayner-Hilles.[53]
“”Science writer, geneticist and broadcaster Adam Rutherford told the London Student that, based on the titles and abstracts from the material presented at the UCL conference, the views being discussed appeared to be a “pseudoscientific front for bog-standard, old-school racism".
|
“”I discovered just how cautious scholars in this field can be when I was invited to attend a two-day conference on intelligence at University College London by the academic and journalist James Thompson earlier this year. Attendees were only told the venue at the last minute – an anonymous antechamber at the end of a long corridor called ‘Lecture Room 22’ – and asked not to share the information with anyone else. One of those present, on discovering I was a journalist, pleaded with me not to write about the fact that he was there – he didn’t want his colleagues to find out.
|
“”However London Student, a campaigning newspaper, called the event a “eugenics conference” dominated by “a secretive group of white supremacists” after it was reported by Private Eye, the satirical magazine.
|
“”But student journalists may have discovered another reason why Michael Gove and Boris Johnson's pal decided to step down: he had attended a secret conference on eugenics at UCL last year. Private Eye and London Student have the details.
|
“”UPDATE. David Bennun writes, on January 11 2018: This article was written and published just before and I and tQ's editors became aware of Private Eye's story about how Young had attended and endorsed a secretive 2017 conference at UCL, one of a series where papers had previously been presented in favour of practising racial and class-based eugenics, and promoting the notion of lower innate female intelligence; and where speakers included an extremist American white nationalist and an advocate of paedophilia. In light of which, the thought that he should ever have had any involvement with education in any form whatsoever is alarming; and which reminds us of the concerns of those who feared the Free School programme might open a door into British state education for the beliefs of malign cranks.
|
“”It is fast becoming clear that Toby Young’s controversialist career is far darker than first appeared, with Private Eye drawing attention to his attendance of a secret eugenics conference alongside white supremacists and advocates of paedophilia.
|
“”What Tobes knew, but many of his cheerleaders clearly did not, was that the contents of the latest Private Eye magazine (#1461, on sale at all good news outlets for just £2.00, and the story is on Page 11) would become known as Tuesday wore on. Those contents include the observation “Last year Young was invited by psychologist James Thompson to attend a secretive conference at UCL called the London Conference on Intelligence”.
|