Oh no, they're talking about Politics |
Theory |
Practice |
Philosophies |
Terms |
As usual |
Country sections |
|
“”There is no nonsense so errant that it cannot be made the creed of the vast majority by adequate governmental action.
|
—Bertrand Russell[1] |
“”The point of modern propaganda isn't only to misinform or push an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate truth.
|
—Gary Kasparov[2] |
Propaganda is the use of media and other information sources in order to affect or control the perceptions and behavior of a population. It is best known for its frequent insidious attempt to sell ideas or policies through politically-rich marketing so that people accept or support ideas to which they would otherwise be resistant or skeptical. However, not all propaganda is designed to manipulate and it can sometimes be open and transparent, encouraging common and popular goals. In the early 20th century, propaganda as a term was synonymous with government marketing and did not have an inherent negative connotation. Its origins date even further back to religious marketing by the Catholic Church.
Propaganda is designed to influence emotion, hence the factual accuracy of the content is of little or no relevance. Propaganda is more versatile than advertising because it is not always about encouraging consumerism, name-recognition, and brand loyalty. Rather, it can be used to create and associate negative emotions with opponents. Individual pieces of advertising and propaganda share techniques including repetition, reliance on famous spokespeople, musical and lighting cues, and disguising content as innocuous information.
Religious and political movements of all types have used propaganda widely. For example, in World War II, the Allies, Soviets, and Nazis — all very different in their ideologies — all used propaganda to a great degree during the course of the conflict and after.[3][4][5]
The term goes back to the Thirty Years War (1622) and originally meant the spread or propagation of the Catholic faith (against filthy Protestant heresy), but wasn't applied to secular matters until the 1790s and didn't pick up its negative connotations until the mid-point of the 19th century.[6]:48-49 Even then, it wouldn't have been seen as a threat to democratic ways of life until the 1930s,[7] and during World War II became pejorative in common usage… ironically thanks to the Why We Fight propaganda films shown to soldiers and then the public.
Like many words, it has fallen victim to the euphemism treadmill – meaning, sometimes we only call that which we disagree with propaganda. The rest is considered PR (public relations), marketing, or awareness spreading.
Propaganda comes in three major flavors: white, grey, and black. White propaganda openly discloses its source and intent. Grey propaganda has an ambiguous or non-disclosed source or intent. Black propaganda purports to be published by the enemy or some organization besides its actual origins.
Propaganda often works by both presence (filling the space) and absence (of what existed before).[8]:108
Since 2014, Russia has pioneered a technique based on the mixing-of-lies-and-misrepresentation in the form of targeted demotivational propaganda. Historian Timothy Snyder describes the technique as creating political ads that at first appear to be truthful and appealing characteristics for a particular demographic, but end with a very unappealing lie that is likely to be unappealing to the demographic. Different demographics are targeted with different ads. The technique was first known to have appeared with the 2014 Russian invasion of Ukraine, and was repeated in the 2016 U.S. presidential election election against Hillary Clinton and the 2024 U.S. presidential election against Kamala Harris. Snyder describes the structure behind the technique as: oligarchical money (Vladimir Putin and Elon Musk) + psychographic information about individuals + social media delivery system + demotivational message.[9][10][11] In the US, such dark money was enabled the highly-controversial Supreme Court 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that allowed unlimited corporate funds to influence elections.
Agitprop is a particular kind of propaganda designed to arouse intense, even violent, emotions within people who are exposed to it. It is a portmanteau of the Russian words for "agitation" and "propaganda," and the term originated in the Soviet Union, whose information bureau was originally called the Department for Agitation and Propaganda.
The arts are often employed as a medium for presenting propaganda. Art can be used as propaganda to great effect, so much so that even the right-wing dipshit Jordan Peterson collects communist propoganda.[16] In the 1960s and 1970s, Chinese art students created much of the classical Maoist propaganda that is famous across the world, although in recent years, said style has given way to badly Photoshopped posters of tanks, planes, and soldiers, etc.
This isn't unique to communist nations. During the Japanese colonialist period, many woodblock prints were also produced; they echo the artistic quality seen from other ukiyo-e prints (named Senso-e, 戰爭絵).[17] If one looks past the political message and simply values the art, then it's mainly harmless… unless the person is a lamb to the slaughter.