Schism

Preach to the choir Religion

Crux of the matter

Christianity Judaism Islam Hinduism Buddhism Zoroastrianism Sikhism Jainism

Speak of the devil

Satanism Atheism Antitheism Agnosticism Deism Secularism Humanism Paganism

An act of faith

Blasphemy Cargo cult Civil religion Prophecy Theology Relic Religious moderacy v - t - e

In the context of religion, a schism indicates a split between two or more movements or organizations within a larger religious body; the motivations for such a split are not necessarily any major differences of doctrine. In the development of religious practice as a part of cultural evolution, schisms offer an analog of speciation in biological evolution.^[1]

Generally, one can distinguish schisms from apostasy and heresy because the resultant shards remain part of the larger, (though unofficial) body of the religion.

Christianity[edit]

An overview of the evolutionary tree of Protestantism

The word schism has been used most in the context of Christianity. During the 1^st and 2^nd centuries, various churches were vying for the right to be the Christian Church. None could really be said to be schisms of another. However, once Paul's church got off and running as the church of the Roman Empire, schisms would define its future. In 431, the Assyrians broke off to form their own church; in 451, the Oriental Orthodox Church formed; the Great Schism of the 11^th century brought the Eastern Orthodox Church, and the Roman Catholic Church; in the Protestant Reformation in the 1500s, Martin Luther broke away to form the Protestant churches, while Henry VIII started the Church of England, and they have spent the last 500 years splintering into further denominations and sects (starting with Calvinism).

Some sects seem prone to schism (Anabaptists, most notoriously), while others manage to remain intact. Certain churches, like Anglicanism, can tolerate a wide variety of dissent without schism, while others punish minor doctrinal difference. In practice, schism almost always involves political and economic as well as doctrinal reasons: clergymen are reluctant to leave a church if it means losing their job and livelihood, unless a rich backer can be found. Hence the Great Schism, which initially seemed a minor theological disagreement, was exacerbated by a trade dispute between Italian states and the Byzantine Empire and political differences that culminated in the Fourth Crusade and sacking of Constantinople (1204 CE).^[2] The northern European Reformation in the 16^th century was closely linked to political struggles, with Dutch merchants, German dukes and princes, the English monarch, and Scottish landowners funding their various Reformations and stealing lots of church property. In contrast, in a low Protestant sect with non-professional preachers and few assets, it is trivial to set up a new church, needing little more than a new church sign.

Heresy vs. schism[edit]

In Christian theology, there exists some disagreement on the relationship between heresy and schism. While most Christians accept that heresy can lead to schism, beyond that opinion on the matter tends to differ between denominations. For example, Catholic doctrine holds that all heresy is accompanied by schism, because the heretic has by his beliefs severed himself from the Body of Christ, even if he has never in any way indicated those views to anyone save himself (well, himself and Skydaddy). The canons also take a somewhat murky position on those raised in certain other Christian churches, treating them not as schismatic but rather as something less than full members of the Church. On the opposite end, some denominations hold that any act of schism is heretical, as it wrongfully divides the Body of Christ, and yet others hold that all Christians are in communion with all other Christians. To add further complications, the growing trend of ecumenism has a habit of relabeling as schisms splits formerly considered (also) heresies.

Some apologists have claimed that there are actually no schisms and all Christians except presumably those with extreme doctrinal differences, such as the Mormons or the Jehovah's Witnesses, are in the same church under the leadership of Jesus Christ, no matter their denomination, even if they're conveniently silent against the too many to count times where blood has been spilled just because of differences in dogma.

Islam[edit]

Because the Qu'ran states that a Muslim is a person who has submitted to God, the Islamic faith does not formally recognize any schisms as more than just political or human distinctions. There is one primary schism that arose out of the mystical tradition in the late 7^th century CE, the Shi'a claiming that God does not give political power. The Shi'a do not recognize the religious and political leadership found in the Sunni traditions.

Buddhism[edit]

Chart of the major Buddhist schisms

There have been many schisms in Buddhism, including the major split from the strict Theravada Buddhism by the more welcoming Mahayana Buddhism. Though the date of this split is not agreed upon, it is thought to have happened between 100 BCE and 100 CE. From there, the Great Schools represent further schisms within Buddhism. Today there are hundreds of schools, following one of the two major paths, but each holding different views and seeing themselves as separate but complementary to the others.

Religions that encourage schisms[edit]

Some particularly mischievous religions actually encourage schisms. Two examples of this are Discordianism and theistic (traditional) Satanists, both of which refer to forming "cabals". Discordians (who arguably follow a parody religion) seem to take a more humorous approach to this,^[3] as with anything, yet on the other hand traditional Satanists are serious about it. Their guy is pretty well known for causing a big schism of his own, after all.

See also[edit]

• Denomination
• Protestant Reformation
• Sect
• Church of Scotland for its history of splits, including the Great Disruption of 1843

References[edit]