From Edutechwiki - Reading time: 13 minRep IV and Rep V are the names for a series of tools for repertory grid technique (RepGrid) analysis and for building construct networks with visual syntactic structures (RepNet). Sinc Dec 2016, the main commercial web site is gone. However, there is a new website for a free online version:
As of June 2023, the somewhat buggy RepGrid Plus V2 software (Rep V?) is here:
We also suggest installing the old REP Plus V1 version (equivalent to commercial RPE IV?)
The next link includes articles (research) made with RepGrid.
(needs some updating / revision / suppressing )
As of Feb 2009 there were three versions according to the official Rep IV (RepGrid, SocioGrids, WebGrid & RepNet) page:
Update (dec 2010):
This section does by no means replace the well done official manual (available in the download), which contains much more details. Also, read repertory grid technique if you are not familiar with the concepts !
I (DKS) will use screen captures and other "data" from a quickly done elicitation regarding on-line environments for teaching and learning that I use myself (Moodle, Pageflakes, Edutechwiki, TecfaSeed, ELGG, Blackboard) or that are used by coworkers (Tiki, Dokeos, Acolad) and with which I am familiar. Some elements are missing, e.g. other wiki variants, web pages + forums or Ning. Also, constructs are not complete. This example was just used to discover this software and to gain some extra insight into repertory grid technique.
Rep IV is an application that will open several internal windows that you then can move around and change their size. Like some other programs, the mother window that opens is much too large at start, given today's 1900px (or even larger) screens.
At start you will see a an admin window. It has buttons for creating, opening or reusing repertry grids and nets.

.... The rest should be obvious
You also could administer an already made grid or enter data a with the simpler Edit Grid script that we will not discuss here.
Click on the Scripts tab and click Elicit Grid. The system now will elicit elements and constructs with the classical triadic method. It first asks for elements and then will start eliciting constructs.
It will stop when sufficient constructs have been entered to discriminate between all elements (no 2 elements should be the same) and when there are sufficient elements to discriminate constructs (no 2 constructs should be same).
At any time you can add or delete elements or constructs "manually" and then come back to this dialog.
An interesting feature of this system is "break construct match" warning and "dialog options". E.g. at some point in the elicitation process, you will get this kind of warning:

The system is telling the participant that two constructs (systems in our case) are nearly the same, i.e. that they they discriminate very little among elements (aspects in our case). It then prompts use to look for a system that has different combination on the scale, e.g in our case a system made for pedagogy and that also favors and open share space. We could for instance add a system like Knowledge Forum (but we don't use if for real at TECFA).
On a side note, Daniel K. Schneider simply would like to add that indeed pedagogical platforms are deficient in more than one aspect and systems made for other purposes share many aspects among themselves since they are often made to support a community and therefore include a typical toolset for writing, communication and social exchange.
In the same way, if two elements are too close, RepGrid IV will ask for another construct that might separate them. E.g. in our case it found Dokeos and Blackboard to be very similar systems:

The discriminating feature I found was simple: One is commercial and the other is free and open source.
At any point you also can add manually an element or a construct by clicking on the "Elements" or the "Constructs" panel (see below "fine tuning")
Since in our case it was difficult to enter absolute values for given constructs (aspects), we suggest that in similar cases, one has to go through each construct and adjust values for elements. In other words, values on an abstract 7 point scale only make sense when compared to each other. Best input method is to use the elements panel.
In the Elements panel you can select the construct on which you want to work with the pull-down menu. You then can change the values by typing or by using the right-click menu:

In the Constructs panel you can select the element for which you wish to enter values.
RepGrid IV personal edition will produce three graphics:
Almost no statistical data are available in the free personal version. The only information concerns explained variance of the two extracted factors.
In our testing example we got the following repertory grid, Focus and clusters, and principal component analysis:

There are three big clusters of elements: (a) LMS systems under foreign control + our own Moodle, (b) systems other than LMSs, and (3) a web 2.0 webtop.
Constructs that go together are: (a) commercial, under foreign control and hip (mhh..), (b) web 2.0, co-construction, not popular, made for other purposes, multi-purposes, etc. (c) Many tools, (d) Difficult interface.
The main factor (58%) could be named Isolated spaces made for teaching vs. Open shared multi-purpose systems. Factor two (26%) is Ugly, under control and free vs. hip and commercial/not controlled. I personally favor the systems in the upper right quadrant as you may guess ...
Disclaimer. This "test" analysis shows how Daniel K. Schneider perceived his use of systems within his research and teaching unit, but some constructs rather refer to generic properties of these systems. That, for example, should be made more clear in a publication. Nevertheless I find these pictures quite interesting, but will refrain from further analysis since this just was a test :)
Edit grid doesn't use a triadic method. It could be used, for example, by a researcher to create standardized grids. Here is a short summary of the procedure.
The rest (tuning) is like above. I.e. if you exit from the dialog by clicking on another tab, you will have to complete either through elements, constructs panel. If you hit "Enter Grid" again, you will be thrown in the typical knowledge elicitation dialog, i.e. the system will try to complete values of the constructs and then check break constructs and elements.
There are three possibilities for reusing a grid. In the main panel:
You then can either add/delete elements and constructs or edit the existing ones through any input panel (elements, constructs, scripts, i.e. the Elicit Grid Script' or the Edit Grid Script).
In an empirical situation, it is probably best to use the Elicit Grid script. It will do the "right thing" and provide explanations to the participant. E.g. in "exchange mode", ipt will prompt for each element construct to rate constructs. Users can click on the panel and a popup window with the values will appear.
Exporting is not available in the personal edition, but there are some workarounds. E.g. open the .rgrid file with Excel or a programming editor. Then copy/paste or write a filtering script.
Here is how to import manually a grid to the free Idiogrid software:
... I am soo proud of my Excel knowledge. More seriously, exporting data to Idiogrid is something you should consider if you need to do more sophisticated analysis. Unfortunately, graphics output of Idogrid's factor analysis is not as nice and it doesn't do cluster analysis (unless I didn't find it), but the program can export to SPPS that can. Alternativeley you also could use the freely available WebGrid IV service, but I didn't see an import feature for DataGrid IV files.
So, below is output from Idiogrid for factors 1 and 2 of a three-factor "Slater analysis" (probably the same technique). Not as pretty, but as I said, but you could get real statistics and plus other possibilities for analysis.

You can see that results are similar, but probably the parameters used were not exactly the same. Idiogrid users are expected to understand what they do and parametrize a lot, whereas RepGrid IV personal edition implements just a single typical (and well done) way of doing it ...
The free personal edition of Grid IV has some missing features that a researcher might need, but also some interesting capabilities that are not found in other systems. Overally speaking, after a single test, Daniel K. Schneider believes that this software would be useful for smaller projects or for teaching.
At least on Win Vista it is not easy to see the cursor and where exactly one should click. This may be a problem with some users. However, the manual explains the GUI.
Of course there is the "pro" version, but Daniel K. Schneider believes that a free version could support a few extra features:
WebGrid has an interpreter that can read scripts (and you can find these in the installation directory). The scripting language seems to be quite powerful (but we didn't try to understand it yet nor did we find a documentation for it).
Daniel K. Schneider found the Elicit Grid script well done. Since it is principled that is no surprise. It emulates the behavior of Shaw’s (1980) interactive repertory grid elicitation program, PEGASUS. According to the manual (available from the downloads page, it is programmed to:
Once steps 1 through 3 are complete the scripts loop between steps 4 and 5. At any time during the elicitation the user can click on the “Analysis” menu or the “Display,” “Focus,” or
“PrinGrid” buttons to display or analyze the grid, and then continue the elicitation.(Grid IV manual: 6-7)
The script can be run at any time, e.g. after manually changing the data in the elements or constructs panel. If steps 1-3 are complete, it will loop again between steps 4 and 5.
works in a similar way, except that
“The grid has been treated as if the elements were points plotted in an n-dimensional space defined by the constructs as axes centered on the means of the elements. The data has then been rotated through principal components analysis to spread the elements out as much as possible in a 2-dimensional plot. Slater (1976; 1977) is the definitive work on such analysis of grids. Joliffe (1986) is a good general source on principal components analysis. Gower (1966) is the definitive work on the spatial model involved, and Gower and Hand (1995) on the presentation of the analysis as a biplot.” (
The manual (Gains & Shaw, 2005: 7-2) refers to Shaw, 1980; Shaw, 1981; Shaw and McKnight, 1981; Denicolo and Pope, 2001; Jankowicz, 2003).
RepGrid files are saved as simple ascii files with the *.rgrid extension. Elements are separated by lines and TABs. The format is not really human readable, but it's nevertheless quite understandable. E.g. you can open it with a spreadsheet program like Excel. But to do "surgery" I suggest to use a real programming editor like Emacs.
This software is now freely available as repgrid plus
The experimental WebGrid 5 system was a much more powerful system than RepGrid IV personal edition. A later version has been renamed to WebGrid Plus (see below). In addition to the same features you get:
The service is still called experimental and it was down sometimes during our tests in Feb 2008, but otherwise it looks to be solid as let's say a MS product or any of those "Beta" web 2.0 services...
You can see some result screen captures in the repertory grid technique article in this wiki.
Tips for using WebGrid IV for projects:
The service is still called experimental (and it was down sometimes during our tests). You also can try WebGrid III (stable), but I found WebGrid IV more interesting.
As of 2018, try this: