From Wikidoc - Reading time: 2 minClinical benefit is a favorable effect on a meaningful aspect of how a patient feels (e.g., symptom relief), functions (e.g., improved mobility) or survives as a result of treatment.
1. Clarify the goal of the study drug – Understand the mechanism of action of the drug – Adjunct therapy to a gluten-free diet vs. sole therapy? – Prevention of a flare vs. symptom treatment 2. Identify the target population (e.g., new diagnosis, nonresponsive CeD, refractory CeD) – Should provide adequate assurance that enrolled patients have documented celiac disease and that their signs and symptoms are due to celiac disease – Should rule out other causes that mimic CeD
3. Identify signs/symptoms that would constitute a clinically meaningful benefit in the target population, if improved (e.g., abdominal pain or diarrhea; histological improvement) – What are key signs and symptoms experienced by celiac disease patients whom you intend to treat with the drug? – In other words, improvement in what signs and symptoms will convince you that celiac patients have benefitted clinically after treatment? – Encourage patient involvement in the process
Considerations when defining clinical benefit in celiac disease drug development Considerations when defining clinical benefit in celiac disease drug development 4. Select or develop clinical outcome assessment(s) (COAs) to assess clinical benefit (e.g., patientreported outcomes, histologic assessment) – How would you measure the key signs/symptoms experienced by celiac patients to demonstrate clinical benefit? – How would you ensure that the drug targeted signs/symptoms due to celiac disease and that underlying disease has not worsened despite symptom improvement?
Considerations when defining clinical benefit in celiac disease drug development 5. Establish a responder definition using selected COA(s) – What magnitude of change in score in the COA is considered clinically meaningful and will provide convincing evidence that the drug has shown clear benefit? 6. Determine appropriate timing of efficacy assessment(s) – Should be guided by the drug’s mechanism of action and the type of endpoint being assessed 14 Conclusions
substantial evidence of effectiveness through adequate and wellcontrolled investigations.
disease, acceptable endpoints, and tools/instruments to adequately assess the intervention.
patient feels, functions, or survives as a result of treatment; described in labeling as a claim.
challenges associated with defining appropriate efficacy endpoints and outcome measurement