Resident Survival Guide |
Acute Coronary Syndrome Chapters |
AHA/ACC Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndrome |
---|
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Mitra Chitsazan, M.D.[2] Yamuna Kondapally, M.B.B.S[3]; Tarek Nafee, M.D. [4]; Sabawoon Mirwais, M.B.B.S, M.D.[5]
Synonyms and keywords: acute coronary syndrome, acute coronary syndromes, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, unstable angina, STEMI, UA, , NSTEMI, NSTE-ACS
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) refers to a spectrum of conditions resulting from acute myocardial ischemia and/or infarction that is most often due to an abrupt reduction in coronary blood flow. The most common symptom prompting diagnosis of ACS is chest pain, often radiating to the left arm or angle of the jaw, pressure-like in character, and associated with nausea and sweating. ACS should be distinguished from stable angina, which is chest pain that develops during exertion and resolves at rest. Traditionally, ACS has been classified into non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ST-elevation MI (STEMI), and unstable angina. Unstable angina is differentiated from NSTEMI by the absence of elevated cardiac biomarkers. The basic pathology in both conditions involves a non-occlusive thrombus formation from a previously disrupted atherosclerotic plaque causing an inadequate blood supply to the heart muscle. Though ACS is usually associated with coronary thrombosis, it can also be associated with other causes such as cocaine use. Cardiac chest pain can also be precipitated by anemia, bradycardias or tachycardias.
Acute coronary syndromes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NTE-ACS) | ST elevation myocardial infarction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unstable angina | Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The standard procedure for defining coronary anatomy and assessing the degree of coronary artery stenosis is still coronary angiography[4].
For a complete list of causes for UA click here, for NSTEMI click here, and for STEMI click here.
Organ System | Diseases | Presentation | Diagnostic Tests | Past Medical History | Other Findings | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chest Pain | GI Symptoms | Pulmonary | Neck | |||||||||||||||||||||
On Palpation | On inspiration | Radiating to Extremeties | Radiating to Back | With Movement | Nausea or Vomitting | Epigastric Pain | Odynophagia or Dysphagia | Shortness of Breath | Jugular
Distention |
Cardiac Biomarkers | CBC Findings | ESR | D-Dimer | EKG
Findings |
CXR Findings | DM | Hyperlipidemia | Obesity | Trauma | Inxn* | Htn | |||
Cardiovascular | Acute Coronary Syndrome | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | •Palpitations | |||||||||||
Aortic Dissection | + | + | + | - | + | + | - | + | •Pain maximal upon onset •Pain difficult to treat with opiates
•Weak pulse in one arm compared to other •Symptoms similar to stroke | |||||||||||||||
Brugada Syndrome | No chest pain | + | •Syncope
•ST-segment elevation •F/H of sudden cardiac death | |||||||||||||||||||||
Takotsubo carditis | Sudden onset of chest pain mimicking myocardial infarction | + | + | + | + | + | - | •Extreme emotional or physical stress•syncope
•Women>men •ST segment elevation •Left ventricular apical ballooning on echo •Normal coronary arteries | ||||||||||||||||
Pericarditis | + | + | + | •Relieving factor: Sitting up and leaning forward
•Aggravating factor: Lying down and breathing deep |
+ | + | + | + | + | + | + | •Other causes:Malignancy, autoimmune disorders, chest trauma | ||||||||||||
Organ System | Diseases | Presentation | Diagnostic Tests | Past Medical History | Other Findings | |||||||||||||||||||
Chest Pain | GI Symptoms | Pulmonary | Neck | |||||||||||||||||||||
On Palpation | On inspiration | Radiating to Extremeties | Radiating to Back | With Movement | Nausea or Vomitting | Epigastric Pain | Odynophagia or Dysphagia | Shortness of Breath | Jugular
Distention |
Cardiac Biomarkers | CBC Findings | ESR | D-Dimer | EKG
Findings |
CXR Findings | DM | Hyperlipidemia | Obesity | Trauma | Inxn* | Htn | |||
Pulmonary | Pleuritis (pleurisy) |
+ | + | + | + | •Aggravating factor: Deep breathing | + | + | + | + | + | + | •Other causesPulmonary embolism, malignancy, autoimmune diseases | |||||||||||
Pulmonary Embolism | + | •Aggravating factors: Deep breathing, coughing, eating, bending and stooping | + | + | + | •Other causes: Immobility, pregnancy, oral contraceptive pills | ||||||||||||||||||
Pneumonia | + | + | + | + | + | + | •Complications: Sepsis, ARDS, Lung abscess | |||||||||||||||||
Gastrointestinal | GERD | + | + | + | •Other symptoms: Hoarseness, Dry cough at night, Sensation of lump in throat etc | |||||||||||||||||||
Esophageal Spasms | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | • Risk factors: Anxiety or depression and drinking wine, very hot or cold foods | ||||||||||||||||
Esophagitis | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | • Causes: Hiatal hernia, infection, medications, radiation therapy | ||||||||||||||||
Gastritis | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | • Causes: H.pylori infection, bile reflux, alcohol use, alcohol use | ||||||||||||||||
Organ System | Diseases | Presentation | Diagnostic Tests | Past Medical History | Other Findings | |||||||||||||||||||
Chest Pain | GI Symptoms | Pulmonary | Neck | |||||||||||||||||||||
On Palpation | On inspiration | Radiating to Extremeties | Radiating to Back | With Movement | Nausea or Vomitting | Epigastric Pain | Odynophagia or Dysphagia | Shortness of Breath | Jugular
Distention |
Cardiac Biomarkers | CBC Findings | ESR | D-Dimer | EKG
Findings |
CXR Findings | DM | Hyperlipidemia | Obesity | Trauma | Inxn* | Htn | |||
Musculoskeletal | Muscle sprain/Spasm | + | + | + | + | • Causes: Over use, dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities | ||||||||||||||||||
Costochondritis | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | • Risk factors: Rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Reiter's syndrome | ||||||||||||
Rib fracture/Trauma | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | • Complications: Pneumothorax, hemothorax, surgical emphysema | |||||||||||||
Psychiatry | Anxiety (Panic Attack) | Chest tightness | + | + | • Other symptoms: Palpitations, trembling, sweating, choking, light headed, hot or cold flashes. |
The following table summarizes the significant history, and diagnostic test findings that will help differentiate the acute coronary syndromes from one another, as well as from other coronary artery diseases:
Acute Coronary Syndromes | History and Symptoms | Pathology | Diagnostic tests | Treatment | Complications | Prognosis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chest pain | Duration of Chest pain | Coronary Artery | Plaque | Cardiac Biomarkers (e.g.CK-MB, Troponins) |
EKG Findings | Medical Therapy | Reperfusion (e.g. PCI, CABG, or Medical) | ||||
At Rest | Exertion | ||||||||||
Unstable Angina | + | + | <30 minutes | Partial occlusion | Erosion
or (39%) |
Normal | •Normal EKG findings (some cases)
|
+ | •Arrhythmias
•MI •Sudden death |
•1 year mortality rate is 1.7% | |
NSTEMI | + | + | >30 minutes | Partial or complete occlusion | Rupture
(56%) or Erosion |
Elevated | •No EKG findings (some cases)
|
+ | + | •Arrhythmias
•Sudden death |
•1 year mortality rate is 24.4%
• 30-day mortality rate is about 2% |
STEMI | + | + | >30 minutes | Complete occlusion | Rupture
(50%-75%) or Erosion |
Elevated | •ST elevation in at least 2
contiguous leads in V2-V3
two precordial leads V1-V4
leads plus ST elevation in lead aVR (suggestive of occlusion of the left main or proximal LAD artery)
|
+ | + | •Reinfarction
interventricular septum and LV free wall •Sudden death |
•30 day mortality rate is
1.1% in <45 yrs and 20.4% in >75 yrs patients |
Other Coronary Artery Diseases | |||||||||||
Chronic stable angina | - | + | ≤ 5 minutes | Severely narrowed | Stable plaque | Normal | •Normal EKG in 50% of cases
•Down sloping, up sloping or horizontal ST-segment depression •T wave inversion |
+ | •Heart failure | •Estimated annual mortality rate is 0.9%-1.4%
•Annual incidence of non-fatal MI between 0.5%-2.6% •1-year mortality rate is 1.3% | |
Prinzmetal's angina | •Occur at rest
(Mid night to early morning) •Not associated with exertion |
5-30 minutes | Coronary artery vasospasm | - | Normal | •Transient ST segment elevation | + | •Arrhythmias
•MI |
•5 year survival is excellent (90%-95%) |
Class IIb |
" 1. In patients with multivessel CAD, an assessment of CAD complexity, such as the SYNTAX score, may be useful to guide revascularization (Level of Evidence B-R)". |
Cardiac | Pulmonary | Vascular | Gastrointestinal | Orthopedic | Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Myopericarditis | Pulmonary embolism | Aortic dissection | Esophagitis | Musculoskeletal disorders | Anxiety disorders |
Tachyarrhythmias | (Tension)-Pneumothorax | Symptomatic aortic aneurysm | Peptic ulcer, gastritis | Chest trauma | Herpes zoster |
Acute heart failure | Bronchitis, pneumonia | Stroke | Pancreatitis | Muscle injury/inflammation | Anemia |
Hypertensive emergencies | Pleuritis | Cholecystitis | Costochondritis | ||
Aortic valve stenosis | Cervical spine pathologies | ||||
Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy | |||||
Coronary spasm | |||||
Cardiac trauma | |||||
Bold = Common and/or important differential diagnoses
aDilated, hypertrophic and restrictive cardiomyopathies may cause angina or chest discomfort |
Class I |
"1. In patients who require revascularization for significant left main CAD with high complexity CAD, it is recommended to choose CABG over PCI to improve survival (Level of Evidence: A) " |
Class IIa |
" 2. In patients who require revascularization for multivessel CAD with complex or diffuse CAD (eg, SYNTAX score >33), it is reasonable to choose CABG over PCI to confer a survival advantage (Level of Evidence B-R)". |
Class I |
"1. In patients with diabetes and multivessel CAD with the involvement of the LAD, who are appropriate candidates for CABG, CABG (with a LIMA to the LAD) is recommended in preference to PCI to reduce mortality and repeat revascularizations(Level of Evidence: A) " |
Class IIa |
" 2. In patients with diabetes who have multivessel CAD amenable to PCI and an indication for revascularization and are poor candidates for surgery, PCI can be useful to reduce long-term ischemic outcomes (Level of Evidence B-NR)". |
Class IIb |
" 3. In patients with diabetes who have left main stenosis and low- or intermediate-complexity CAD in the rest of the coronary anatomy, PCI may be considered an alternative to CABG to reduce major adverse cardiovascular out-comes. (Level of Evidence B-R)". |
Class IIa |
" 1. In patients with previous CABG with a patent LIMA to the LAD who need repeat revascularization, if PCI is feasible, it is reasonable to choose PCI over CABG (Level of Evidence B-NR)". |
'' 2. In patients with previous CABG and refractory angina on GDMT that is attributable to LAD disease, it is reasonable to choose CABG over PCI when an internal mammary artery (IMA) can be used as a conduit to the LAD (Level of Evidence C-LD) |
Class IIb |
" 3. In patients with previous CABG and complex CAD, it may be reasonable to choose CABG over PCI when an IMA can be used as a conduit to the LAD (Level of Evidence B-NR)". |
Class IIa |
" 1. In patients with multivessel CAD amenable to treatment with either PCI or CABG who are unable to access, tolerate, or adhere to DAPT for the appropriate duration of treatment, CABG is reasonable in preference to PCI(Level of evidence B-NR)". |
Class IIa |
" 1. In pregnant patients with STEMI not caused by spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD), it is reasonable to perform primary PCI as the preferred revascularization strategy. (Level of Evidence C-LD)". |
'' 2. In pregnant patients with NSTE-ACS, an invasive strategy is reasonable if medical therapy is ineffective for the management of life-threatening complications (Level of Evidence C-LD) |
Class I |
"1. In older adults, as in all patients, the treatment strategy for CAD should be based on an individual patient’s preferences, cognitive function, and life expectancy(Level of Evidence: B-NR) " |
Class I |
"1. In patients with CKD undergoing contrast media injection for coronary angiography, measures should be taken to minimize the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury(Level of Evidence: C-LD) " |
''2. In patients with STEMI and CKD, coronary angiography and revascularization are recommended, with adequate measures to reduce the risk of AKI.(Level of evidence C-EO )'' |
Class IIa |
" 3. In high-risk patients with NSTE-ACS and CKD, it is reasonable to perform coronary angiography and revascularization, with adequate measures to reduce the risk of AKI (Level of Evidence B-NR)". |
" 4. In low-risk patients with NSTE-ACS and CKD, it is reasonable to weigh the risk of coronary angiography and revascularization against the potential benefit(Level of Evidence C-EO)'' |
Class III (No Benefit) |
"5. In asymptomatic patients with stable CAD and CKD, routine angiography and revascularization are not recommended if there is no compelling indication. (Level of Evidence:B-R) " |
Class III (No Benefit) |
"1. In patients with non–left main or noncomplex CAD who is undergoing noncardiac surgery, routine coronary revascularization is not recommended solely to reduce perioperative cardiovascular events. (Level of Evidence:B-R) " |
Class I |
"1. In patients with ventricular fibrillation, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), or cardiac arrest, revascularization of significant CAD is recommended to improve survival. (Level of Evidence: B-NR) " |
Class III (No Benefit) |
"2. In patients with CAD and suspected scar-mediated sustained monomorphic VT, revascularization is not recommended for the sole purpose of preventing recurrent VT. (Level of Evidence:C-LD) " |
Class IIb |
" 1. In patients with SCAD who have hemody-namic instability or ongoing ischemia despite conservative therapy, revascularization may be considered if feasible (Level of Evidence C-LD)". |
Class III (Harm) |
"2. Routine revascularization for SCAD should not be performed (Level of Evidence:C-LD) " |
Class IIa |
" 1. In patients with cardiac allograft vasculopathy and severe, proximal, discrete coronary lesions, revascularization with PCI is reasonable (Level of Evidence C-LD)". |
Class I |
"1. In patients who have undergone revascularization, a comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program (home-based or center-based) should be prescribed either before hospital discharge or during the first outpatient visit to reduce deaths and hospital readmissions and improve quality of life (Level of Evidence: A) " |
''2. Patients who have undergone revascularization should be educated about CVD risk factors and their modification to reduce cardiovascular events. (Level of evidence C-LD)'' |
Class I |
"1. In patients who use tobacco and have undergone coronary revascularization, a combination of behavioral interventions plus pharmacotherapy is recommended to maximize cessation and reduce adverse cardiac events (Level of Evidence: A) " |
''2. In patients who use tobacco and have under-gone coronary revascularization, smoking cessation interventions are recommended during hospitalization and should include supportive follow-up for at least 1 month after discharge to facilitate tobacco cessation and reduce morbidity and mortality (Level of evidence A)'' |
Class I |
"1. In patients who have undergone coronary revascularization who have symptoms of depression, anxiety, or stress, treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy, psychological counseling, and/or pharmacological interventions is beneficial to improve quality of life and cardiac outcomes (Level of Evidence: B-R) " |
Class IIb |
" 2. In patients who have undergone coronary revascularization, it may be reasonable to screen for depression and refer or treat when it is indicated to improve quality of life and recovery. (Level of Evidence C-LD)". |
Class I |
"1. With the goal of improving patient outcomes, it is recommended that cardiac surgery and PCI programs participate in state, regional, or national clinical data registries and receive periodic reports of their risk-adjusted out-comes as a quality assessment and improvement strategy (Level of Evidence: B-NR) " |
Class IIa |
" 1. With the goal of improving patient outcomes, it is reasonable for cardiac surgery and PCI programs to have a quality improvement program that routinely 1) reviews institutional quality programs and outcomes
2) reviews individual operator outcomes 3) provides peer review of difficult or complicated cases 4) performs random case reviews (Level of Evidence C-LD)". |
Class IIb |
" 3. Smaller volume cardiac surgery and PCI programs may consider affiliating with a high-volume center to improve patient care. (Level of Evidence C-EO)". |
|pmid=
value (help).