Categories
  Encyclosphere.org ENCYCLOREADER
  supported by EncyclosphereKSF

Cefadroxil microbiology

From Wikidoc - Reading time: 3 min

Cefadroxil
DURICEF® FDA Package Insert
Description
Clinical Pharmacology
Microbiology
Indications and Usage
Contraindications
Warnings and Precautions
Adverse Reactions
Overdosage
Dosage and Administration
How Supplied

Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Sheng Shi, M.D. [2]

Microbiology[edit | edit source]

In vitro tests demonstrate that the cephalosporins are bactericidal because of their inhibition of cell-wall synthesis. Cefadroxil has been shown to be active against the following organisms both in vitro and in clinical infections (see INDICATIONS AND USAGE):

Note: Most strains of Enterococcus faecalis (formerly Streptococcus faecalis) and Enterococcus faecium (formerlyStreptococcus faecium) are resistant to DURICEF. It is not active against most strains of Enterobacter species, Morganella morganii (formerly Proteus morganii), and P. vulgaris. It has no activity against Pseudomonas species and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (formerly Mima and Herellea species).

Susceptibility tests: Diffusion techniques[edit | edit source]

The use of antibiotic disk susceptibility test methods which measure zone diameter give an accurate estimation of antibiotic susceptibility. One such standard procedure1 which has been recommended for use with disks to test susceptibility of organisms to cefadroxil uses the cephalosporin class (cephalothin) disk. Interpretation involves the correlation of the diameters obtained in the disk test with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for cefadroxil.

Reports from the laboratory giving results of the standard single-disk susceptibility test with a 30 μg cephalothin disk should be interpreted according to the following criteria:

A report of “Susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited by generally achievable blood levels. A report of “intermediate susceptibility” suggests that the organism would be susceptible if high dosage is used or if the infection is confined to tissue and fluids (e.g., urine) in which high antibiotic levels are attained. A report of “Resistant’’ indicates that achievable concentrations of the antibiotic are unlikely to be inhibitory and other therapy should be selected.

Standardized procedures require the use of laboratory control organisms. The 30 μg cephalothin disk should give the following zone diameters:

Dilution Techniques[edit | edit source]

When using the NCCLS agar dilution or broth dilution (including microdilution) method2 or equivalent, a bacterial isolate may be considered susceptible if the MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) value for cephalothin is 8 μg/mL or less. Organisms are considered resistant if the MIC is 32 μg/mL or greater. Organisms with an MIC value of less than 32 μg/mL but greater than 8 μg/mL are intermediate.

As with standard diffusion methods, dilution procedures require the use of laboratory control organisms. Standard cephalothin powder should give MIC values in the range of 0.12 μg/mL and 0.5 μg/mL for Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213. ForEscherichia coli ATCC 25922, the MIC range should be between 4.0 μg/mL and 16.0 μg/mL. For Streptococcus faecalisATCC 29212, the MIC range should be between 8.0 and 32.0 μg/mL.[1]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. "http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/050512s046,050527s022,050528s020lbl.pdf" (PDF). External link in |title= (help)

Adapted from the FDA Package Insert.


Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Source: https://www.wikidoc.org/index.php/Cefadroxil_microbiology
19 views | Status: cached on July 23 2024 11:50:20
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF