Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (also known as cervical dysplasia and CIN), is the potentially premalignant transformation and abnormal growth (dysplasia) of squamous cells on the surface of the cervix. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was first discovered by Dr. Georgios Nikolaou Papanikolaou, a Greek pathologist, in 1927. There are 4 cytological classifications for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Bethesda system, Papanicolaou classification, CIN nomenclature, and dysplasia nomenclature. The most common cytological classification systems for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is the Bethesda and CIN nomenclature. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia may be classified according to Bethesda system by cytology description into 3 subtypes: atypical squamous cells, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LGSIL or LSIL), and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HGSIL or HSIL). The pathogenesis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is characterized by the premalignant transformation and abnormal growth of squamous cells on the surface of the cervix. The presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) has a crucial role in the pathogenesis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The infection of human papillomavirus (HPV) leads to the first precursor lesion of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, also known as the koilocyte, which is a squamous epithelial cell that has undergone a number of structural changes. Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. According to the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines, indications for ablative surgery among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia should include: persistent low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade II and grade III. Common surgical procedures for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, include cryocautery, electrocautery, laser cautery, and cervical conization.
In 1988, the Bethesda system classification method was introduced to categorize histopathological findings of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia according to degrees of severity.
E6 in association with host E6-associated protein, which has ubiquitin ligase activity, acts to ubiquitinate p53, leading to its proteosomal degradation.
E7 (in oncogenic HPVs) acts as the primary transforming protein.
Prognosis is generally good if detected early, and the 5-year survival rate of patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is approximately 98%.
The total Swede Score ranges between 0 and 10.
A score of more than 5 is reported to identify all high grade lesions (HGL), and ≥8 to have a specificity of 90% for HGL.
A score less than <5 is suggested to not require biopsy because of low risk of cancer, a score between 5-7 to require biopsy
A score ≥8 again not to require biopsy because it is likely more efficient to intervene (e.g. excision directly)
Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.[11]
According to the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines, indications for ablative surgery among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia should include:
Once diagnosed and successfully treated, patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia are followed-up every 3, 6 or 12 months depending on the lesion grade.
↑ 7.07.17.27.3Dunne EF, Unger ER, Sternberg M, McQuillan G, Swan DC, Patel SS, Markowitz LE (2007). "Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States". JAMA. 297 (8): 813–9. doi:10.1001/jama.297.8.813. PMID17327523.
↑ 8.08.1Henk HJ, Insinga RP, Singhal PK, Darkow T (2010). "Incidence and costs of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a US commercially insured population". J Low Genit Tract Dis. 14 (1): 29–36. doi:10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181ac05e9. PMID20040833.
↑Brisson J, Morin C, Fortier M, Roy M, Bouchard C, Leclerc J, Christen A, Guimont C, Penault F, Meisels A (1994). "Risk factors for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: differences between low- and high-grade lesions". Am. J. Epidemiol. 140 (8): 700–10. PMID7942772.
↑García-Closas R, Castellsagué X, Bosch X, González CA (2005). "The role of diet and nutrition in cervical carcinogenesis: a review of recent evidence". Int. J. Cancer. 117 (4): 629–37. doi:10.1002/ijc.21193. PMID15912536.
↑Martin-Hirsch PL, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener H (2000). "Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD001318. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001318. PMID10796771.