Categories
  Encyclosphere.org ENCYCLOREADER
  supported by EncyclosphereKSF

Feline coronavirus

From Wikidoc - Reading time: 11 min


Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]

Overview[edit | edit source]

Feline Coronavirus (FCoV) is a positive stranded RNA virus that is infectious to cats worldwide.[1] This virus is part of the coronavirus group 1, which includes the porcine gastroenteritis swine coronavirus (TGEV), the canine coronavirus (CCOV) and human coronavirus 229E.[1] It has two different forms; the FECV (Feline Enteric Coronavirus) that infects the intestines and the FIPV (Feline Infectious Peritonitis Virus) that causes the disease Feline infectious peritonitis.

Feline Coronavirus is typically shed in feces by health cats and transmitted by the fecal-oral route to other cats.[2] In environments with multiple cats, the transmission rate is much higher compared to single cat environments.[1] The virus is insignificant until mutations cause the virus to be transformed from FECV to FIPV.[1] FIPV causes Feline infectious peritonitis for which there is no known cure; treatment is generally symptomatic and palliative only.

Virology[edit | edit source]

Feline enteric coronavirus (FECV)[edit | edit source]

Feline enteric coronavirus is responsible for an infection of the mature gastrointestinal epithelial cells[3] (see also enterocytes, brush border, microvilli, villi). This intestinal infection has few outward signs, and is usually chronic. The virus is excreted in the feces of the healthy carrier, and can be detected by Polymerase Chain Reaction or "PCR" of feces or by PCR testing of rectal samples.[3]

Cats living in groups can contaminate each other with different strains of the virus during visits to a communal litter tray. Some cats are resistant to the virus and can avoid infection or even becoming carriers, while others may become FECV carriers.[3] Carriers may heal spontaneously, but acquired immunity may be short and they may go on to reinfect, usually within a few weeks, if they are living in a group with healthy, but persistent excretory carriers. Some cats never heal and the excretory phase remains permanently.

Feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV)[edit | edit source]

The virus becomes feline infectious peritonitis virus when random errors occur in the virus infecting an enterocyte causing the virus to mutate from FECV to FIPV.[3] FIPV causes a lethal, uncurable disease Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP). In one case study, a female cat diagnosed with FIP survived 26 months from the date of definitive diagnosis (Fall 2009).

In a large group of cats (n) the epidemiological risk of mutation (E) is higher and expressed theoretically as E = (n ²)-n. A house hosting 2 cats therefore has risk of mutation E = 2. When 4 kittens (6 cats in total) are born into this house, the risk increases exponentially from 2 to 30.

In their pre-domestication natural state cats are solitary animals and do not share space (hunting areas, rest areas, defecation sites, etc.). Domestic cats living in a group therefore have a much higher epidemiological risk of mutation. After this mutation, the FCoV acquires a tropism for macrophages [3] (see also: Immune cells, leucocyte, monocyte, dendritic cells, mononuclear cell, antigen-presenting cell) while losing intestinal tropism.[3]

Feline infectious peritonitis and FIPV[edit | edit source]

In a group of cats, overcrowding increases the risk of mutation and conversion from FECV to FIPV which constitutes a major risk factor for the development of feline infectious peritonitis(FIP) cases. FIP has been shown to develop in cats whose immunity is low; such as younger kittens, old cats, immunosuppression due to viral — FIV (Feline immunodeficiency virus) and / or FeLV Feline leukemia virus and stress, including the stress of separation and adoption.[3]

Infection of macrophages by FIPV is responsible for development of a fatal granulomatous vasculitis, or FIP (see granuloma).[3]

Development of FIP depends on two factors: virus mutation and low immunity where virus mutation depends on the rate of mutation of FECV to FIPV and the immune status depends on the age, the genetic pool and the stress level. High immune status will be more effective at slowing down the virus.[3]

Molecular Biology of Feline Coronavirus[edit | edit source]

Two forms of feline coronavirus are found in nature: enteric (FECV) and FIP (FIPV). There are also two different serotypes are found that have with different antigens that produce unique antibodies. FCoV serotype I (also called type I) is the most frequent. Type I, that can be defined as 'FECV that could mutate to FIPV type I', is responsible for 80% of the infections. Typically, serotype I FCoV cultures are difficult to perform, with few resulting studies. FCoV serotype II (also called type II) is less frequent and is described as 'FECV type II that can mutate to FIPV type II.' FCoV type II is a recombinant virus type I with spike genes (S protein) replacement from FCoV by the canine enteric coronavirus (CCOV) spikes.[4] The type II cultures are generally easier to perform, which has resulted in an imbalance of experiments performed with many studies about type II (even though it is a far less common form).

Molecular model of FCoV type II[edit | edit source]

Virus fusion[edit | edit source]

Coronaviruses are covered with several types of "S proteins" (or E2) forming a crown of protein spikes on the surface of the virus. Coronaviruses take their name from the observation of this crown by electron microscopy. These spikes of Cov (group 1 and serotype II) are responsible for the infection power of the virus by binding the virus particle to a membrane receptor of the host cell - the Feline Amino peptidase N (fAPN).[5][6][7]

The viral receptor: aminopeptidase N (APN)[edit | edit source]

fAPN (feline), hAPN (human) and pAPN (porcine) differ in some areas of N-glycosylation. All strains of the coronavirus study group 1 (feline, porcine and human) can bind to the feline aminopeptidase N fapn but the human coronavirus can bind to the human APN (HAPN) but not to the porcine type receptor (pAPN) and the pig coronavirus can bind to the porcine APN (pAPN) but not the human type receptor (hAPN). At the cellular level the glycosylation level of enterocytes APN is important for the binding of virus to the receptor.[8][9]

Viral spikes[edit | edit source]

The FECV spikes have a high affinity for enterocytes fAPN, while the mutant FIPV spikes have a high affinity for the macrophages fAPN. During the viral replication cycle, spikes proteins mature in the host cell Golgi complex with a high mannose glycosylation. This spike manno-glycosylation stage is vital for the acquisition of coronavirus virility.[3][10]

Molecular Model of FCoV type I[edit | edit source]

The receptor[edit | edit source]

In 2007, it was well established that serotype I did not work with the FCoV fAPN receptor. The FCoV type I receptor still is unknown.[11]

CoV receptor[edit | edit source]

The human CoV SARS binds to the Angiotensin-converting enzyme ACE II. The ACE II is also called 'L-SIGN' (liver/lymph node-specific intracellular adhesion molecules-3 grabbing non-integrin). Coronaviruses bind to macrophages via the Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular adhesion molecule-3-Grabbing Non-integrin (DC-SIGN) which is a trans-membrane protein encoded in humans by the CD209 gene..[12] ACE and DC-SIGN are two trans-membrane retrovirus receptors (mannose receptors) which can bind 'the plant lectins C-type mannose binding '.[13]


Aminopeptidase N has the same ability to interact with plant lectins C-type mannose-binding and also serves as a receptor for a retrovirus. Angiotensin-converting enzyme ACE, aminopetidase A and aminopeptidase N have cascading actions in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, which suggests a common phylogenetic origin between these molecules. Some advanced studies have shown a high homology between the Aminopeptidase N and the Angiotensin-converting enzyme.[14] It is more than likely that the unknown FCoV serotype I receptor is also a member of this receptor family and acts with mannose binding lectins.

Interactions between the viruses and sialic acid[edit | edit source]

Sialic acid is a component of the complex sugar glycocalix, which is the mucus protecting the gastrointestinal and respiratory mucosa. It is an important facilitating fusion factor of any viruses to its host cell which has been very well studied for flu.

Extensive data also shows that processes using sialic acid are directly involved in the interaction with the receptor's lectins.[15] It has also been demonstrated that swine enteric coronavirus (group 1) fusion to the enterocyte is accomplished via binding to the APN in the presence of the sialic acid.[9][16][17] Felin coronavirus infections are therefore sialic acid dependant.[18][19]


Effects of breast milk on kittens[edit | edit source]

Kittens born from mothers carrying FECV are protected from infection during their first weeks of life until weaned by maternal antibodies. It is recommended that the kittens are weaned early and segregated from their mother before they infect each other (at about 5 to 6 weeks). Kittens with no outside contamination and that are deprived of contact with their mother during their first 2 months of life (an important immunological period) may be protected.[20]

Antibodies[edit | edit source]

It is widely accepted that passive protection is passed on to kittens by immunoglobulins nursery (antibodies) provided by colostrum and the mother's milk. However, several questions arise:

  • If this protection is only supported by maternal antibodies, why don't these antibodies protect the mother herself?
  • If the kittens born to a mother's blood group B are removed from their mother for 24 hours (to avoid Hemolytic disease of the newborn) and thus have no systemic passage of maternal antibodies, why don't we see FCoV infection in these kittens more often than others?

Colostrum[edit | edit source]

Other molecules from colostrum and cat milk, could also bear this coverage: Lactoferrin, Lactoperoxidase, Lysozyme, Rich Proline polypeptide – PRP and alpha-lactalbumine. Lactoferrin has many properties that make it a very good candidate for this anti-coronavirus activity:

  1. As CoV group I, it binds to APN [21]
  2. As the SARS CoV, it binds to enzymes convert angiotensin[22]
  3. It also binds to DC-SIGN of macrophage,[23]
  4. The Lactoferrin anti-viral activity is sialic acid dependent.

The structures of the polypeptide chain and carbohydrate moieties of bovine lactoferrin (bLF) are well established. bLF consists of a 689-amino acid polypeptide chain to which complex and high-mannose-type glycans are linked (Pierce et al., 1991)

Other components[edit | edit source]

The colostrum and breast milk also contain:

  1. Many oligosaccharides (glycan) which are known for their anti-viral properties which is thought to be primarily due to their inhibition of pathogen binding to host cell ligands.[24]
  2. Many maternal immune cells
  3. Many cytokines (interferon ...); whose role by oro-mucosal route seems very important[25][26][27]
  4. Sialic acid: during lactation, neutralizing oligo-saccharides binding sialic acid decreases when it binds increasingly to glycoproteins.[28] (The APN is a glycoprotein). The anti-viral effect of lactoferrin is increased by the removal of sialic acid.[29]
  5. Mannan binding lectins.[30]

Other protective factors[edit | edit source]

Other assumptions may help to explain this resistance to FCoV infections by kittens. In the first weeks of life, APN could be immature because highly manno-glycosylated.[31] The spikes of CoV could then not be bound. Factors in breastmilk may inhibit the synthesis of fANP by enterocytes, as already described with fructose or sucrose.[32][33][34]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Taharaguchi, Satoshi (1 June 2012). "Prevalence of Feline Coronavirus Antibodies in Japanese Domestic Cats during the Past Decade". Virology. 74 (10): 1355–1358. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (help); |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  2. Hartmann, K. (Jan 2005). [www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15627627?dopt=Abstract "Feline infectious peritonitis"] Check |url= value (help). Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 35: 39–79. PMID 15627627. Retrieved November 23, 2012. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.9 Rottier PJ, Nakamura K, Schellen P, Volders H, Haijema BJ (2005). "Acquisition of macrophage tropism during the pathogenesis of feline infectious peritonitis is determined by mutations in the feline coronavirus spike protein". Journal of Virology. 79 (22): 14122–30. doi:10.1128/JVI.79.22.14122-14130.2005. PMC 1280227. PMID 16254347. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. Herrewegh AA, Smeenk I, Horzinek MC, Rottier PJ, de Groot RJ (1 May 1998). "Feline coronavirus type II strains 79-1683 and 79-1146 originate from a double recombination between feline coronavirus type I and canine coronavirus". Journal of Virology. 72 (5): 4508–14. PMC 109693. PMID 9557750.
  5. Tresnan DB, Holmes KV (1998). "Feline aminopeptidase N is a receptor for all group I coronaviruses". Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 440: 69–75. PMID 9782266.
  6. Tresnan DB, Levis R, Holmes KV (1 December 1996). "Feline aminopeptidase N serves as a receptor for feline, canine, porcine, and human coronaviruses in serogroup I". Journal of Virology. 70 (12): 8669–74. PMC 190961. PMID 8970993.
  7. Holmes KV, Tresnan DB, Zelus BD (1997). "Virus-receptor interactions in the enteric tract. Virus-receptor interactions". Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 412: 125–33. PMID 9192004.
  8. Wentworth DE, Holmes KV (2001). "Molecular determinants of species specificity in the coronavirus receptor aminopeptidase N (CD13): influence of N-linked glycosylation". Journal of Virology. 75 (20): 9741–52. doi:10.1128/JVI.75.20.9741-9752.2001. PMC 114546. PMID 11559807. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  9. 9.0 9.1 Schwegmann-Wessels C, Herrler G (2008). "Identification of sugar residues involved in the binding of TGEV to porcine brush border membranes". Methods in Molecular Biology. 454: 319–29. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-181-9_22. PMID 19057868.
  10. Regan AD, Whittaker GR (2008). "Utilization of DC-SIGN for entry of feline coronaviruses into host cells". Journal of Virology. 82 (23): 11992–6. doi:10.1128/JVI.01094-08. PMC 2583691. PMID 18799586. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  11. Dye C, Temperton N, Siddell SG (2007). "Type I feline coronavirus spike glycoprotein fails to recognize aminopeptidase N as a functional receptor on feline cell lines". The Journal of General Virology. 88 (Pt 6): 1753–60. doi:10.1099/vir.0.82666-0. PMC 2584236. PMID 17485536. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  12. Curtis BM, Scharnowske S, Watson AJ (1992). "Sequence and expression of a membrane-associated C-type lectin that exhibits CD4-independent binding of human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein gp120". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89 (17): 8356–60. doi:10.1073/pnas.89.17.8356. PMC 49917. PMID 1518869. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  13. Lozach PY, Burleigh L, Staropoli I, Amara A (2007). "The C type lectins DC-SIGN and L-SIGN: receptors for viral glycoproteins". Methods in Molecular Biology. 379: 51–68. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-393-6_4. PMID 17502670.
  14. error: {{lang}}: no text (%5b%5b:Category:lang and lang-xx template errors|help%5d%5d)%5b%5bCategory:lang and lang-xx template errors%5d%5dAnalyse "structurale du site actif de trois métallopeptidases à zinc: Endopeptidase Neutre-24. II, Aminopeptidase N et Enzyme de Conversion de l'Angiotensine}}" Check |url= value (help). Cat.inist.fr. Retrieved 2010-03-16.
  15. Lehmann F, Tiralongo E, Tiralongo J (2006). "Sialic acid-specific lectins: occurrence, specificity and function". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 63 (12): 1331–54. doi:10.1007/s00018-005-5589-y. PMID 16596337. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  16. Schwegmann-Wessels C, Zimmer G, Laude H, Enjuanes L, Herrler G (2002). "Binding of transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus to cell surface sialoglycoproteins". Journal of Virology. 76 (12): 6037–43. doi:10.1128/JVI.76.12.6037-6043.2002. PMC 136196. PMID 12021336. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  17. Schwegmann-Wessels C, Zimmer G, Schröder B, Breves G, Herrler G (2003). "Binding of transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus to brush border membrane sialoglycoproteins". Journal of Virology. 77 (21): 11846–8. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.21.11846-11848.2003. PMC 229351. PMID 14557669. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  18. Paltrinieri S, Gelain ME, Ceciliani F, Ribera AM, Battilani M (2008). "Association between faecal shedding of feline coronavirus and serum alpha1-acid glycoprotein sialylation". Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 10 (5): 514–8. doi:10.1016/j.jfms.2008.04.004. PMID 18701332. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  19. Paltrinieri S, Metzger C, Battilani M, Pocacqua V, Gelain ME, Giordano A (2007). "Serum alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) concentration in non-symptomatic cats with feline coronavirus (FCoV) infection". Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 9 (4): 271–7. doi:10.1016/j.jfms.2007.01.002. PMID 17344083. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  20. Addie, Diane D. "Prevention of Coronavirus Infection in kittens". Retrieved 30 June 2009.[self-published source?]
  21. Ziere GJ, Kruijt JK, Bijsterbosch MK, Berkel TJ (1996). "Recognition of lactoferrin and aminopeptidase M-modified lactoferrin by the liver: involvement of the remnant receptor". Zeitschrift Für Gastroenterologie. 34 (3): 118–21. PMID 8767485. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  22. Centeno JM, Burguete MC, Castelló-Ruiz M; et al. (2006). "Lactoferricin-related peptides with inhibitory effects on ACE-dependent vasoconstriction". Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 54 (15): 5323–9. doi:10.1021/jf060482j. PMID 16848512. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  23. Groot F, Geijtenbeek TB, Sanders RW; et al. (2005). "Lactoferrin prevents dendritic cell-mediated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission by blocking the DC-SIGN--gp120 interaction". Journal of Virology. 79 (5): 3009–15. doi:10.1128/JVI.79.5.3009-3015.2005. PMC 548463. PMID 15709021. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  24. Newburg DS, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Morrow AL (2005). "Human milk glycans protect infants against enteric pathogens". Annual Review of Nutrition. 25: 37–58. doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.25.050304.092553. PMID 16011458.
  25. Dec M, Puchalski A (2008). "Use of oromucosally administered interferon-alpha in the prevention and treatment of animal diseases". Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 11 (2): 175–86. PMID 18683548.
  26. Tovey MG (2002). "Oromucosal cytokine therapy: mechanism(s) of action". Taehan Kan Hakhoe Chi. 8 (2): 125–31. PMID 12499797. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  27. Schellekens H, Geelen G, Meritet JF, Maury C, Tovey MG (2001). "Oromucosal interferon therapy: relationship between antiviral activity and viral load". Journal of Interferon & Cytokine Research. 21 (8): 575–81. doi:10.1089/10799900152547830. PMID 11559435. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  28. Martín MJ, Martín-Sosa S, García-Pardo LA, Hueso P (1 May 2001). "Distribution of bovine milk sialoglycoconjugates during lactation". Journal of Dairy Science. 84 (5): 995–1000. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74558-4. PMID 11384055.
  29. Superti F, Siciliano R, Rega B, Giansanti F, Valenti P, Antonini G (2001). "Involvement of bovine lactoferrin metal saturation, sialic acid and protein fragments in the inhibition of rotavirus infection". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1528 (2–3): 107–15. doi:10.1016/S0304-4165(01)00178-7. PMID 11687297. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  30. Trégoat V, Montagne P, Béné MC, Faure G (2002). "Changes in the mannan binding lectin (MBL) concentration in human milk during lactation". Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 16 (6): 304–7. doi:10.1002/jcla.10055. PMID 12424804.
  31. Danielsen EM, Hansen GH, Niels-Christiansen LL (1995). "Localization and biosynthesis of aminopeptidase N in pig fetal small intestine". Gastroenterology. 109 (4): 1039–50. doi:10.1016/0016-5085(95)90561-8. PMID 7557068. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  32. Danielsen EM (1992). "Folding of intestinal brush border enzymes. Evidence that high-mannose glycosylation is an essential early event". Biochemistry. 31 (8): 2266–72. doi:10.1021/bi00123a008. PMID 1347233. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  33. Danielsen EM, Hansen GH, Wetterberg LL (1991). "Morphological and functional changes in the enterocyte induced by fructose". The Biochemical Journal. 280 (2): 483–9. PMC 1130574. PMID 1684104. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  34. Danielsen EM (15 August 1989). "Post-translational suppression of expression of intestinal brush border enzymes by fructose". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 264 (23): 13726–9. PMID 2569463.


Template:Baltimore classification Template:Viral diseases

de:Felines Coronavirus


Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Source: https://www.wikidoc.org/index.php/Feline_coronavirus
19 views | Status: cached on July 13 2024 01:21:03
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF