Loeffler endocarditis

Loeffler endocarditis
HEART: An excellent example of Thrombotic Nonbacterial Endocarditis. Gross: Mitral valve Image courtesy of Professor Peter Anderson DVM PhD and published with permission © PEIR, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Pathology
ICD-10	I42.3
ICD-9	421.0
DiseasesDB	4291
eMedicine	med/1318

Template:Search infobox Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-in-Chief: Soroush Seifirad, M.D.[2]

Overview[edit | edit source]

Loeffler endocarditis, It is a restrictive cardiomyopathy characterized by eosinophilia and eosinophilic penetration leading to the fibrotic thickening of portions of the heart (similar to that of endomyocardial fibrosis) and development of mural thrombi. Common symptoms include edema and breathlessness.

Historical Perspective[edit | edit source]

• Loeffler endocarditis was first reported by , Wilhelm Loeffler, a Swiss clinician scientist, in 1936.^[1]

Classification[edit | edit source]

• Loeffler endocarditis is now regarded as a manifestation of eosinophilic myocarditis, a disorder that involves the infiltration of heart tissue by blood-born eosinophils that leads to three progressive clinical stages.^[2]

• The first or inflammatory stage involves acute inflammation and subsequent necrosis.
• This stage is dominated by signs and symptoms of acute coronary syndrome such as angina, heart attack, and congestive heart failure.
• In the second stage, the endocardium (i.e. interior wall) of the heart forms blood clots which break off and then travel through and block various arteries; this thrombotic stage may dominate the initial presentation in some individuals.
• The third stage is a fibrotic stage, i.e. Loeffler endocarditis, wherein scarring replaces damaged heart muscle tissue to cause a poorly contracting heart and/or cardiac valve disease. Recent publications commonly refer to Loeffler endocarditis as a historical term for the third stage of eosinophilic myocarditis. The exact pathogenesis of Loeffler endocarditis is not fully understood.

Pathophysiology[edit | edit source]

• The disorder develops because of eosinophilic penetration into the cardiac tissues.^[2][3]
• This leads to a fibrotic thickening of portions of the heart (similar to that of endomyocardial fibrosis) and heart valves.
• In consequence, the heart becomes rigid and poorly contractile while the heart valves may become stenotic or insufficient, i.e. reduced in ability to open or close, respectively.
• The damaged heart may also develop mural thrombi, i.e. clots which lay against ventricle walls, tend to break off, and flow through and block arteries; this condition often precedes the fibrotic stage of eosinophilic myocarditis and is termed the thrombotic stage.
• Eosinophilic states that may occur in and underlie Loeffler endocarditis (as well as the other stages of eosinophilic myocarditis) include primary and secondary eosinophilias or hypereosinophilias.
• Primary eosinophilias or hypereosinophilias (i.e. disorders in which the eosinophil appears to be intrinsically diseased) that lead to Loeffler endocarditis are clonal hypereosinophilia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia and the hypereosinophilic syndrome.
• Secondary causes (i.e. disorders in which other diseases cause the eosinophil to become dysfunctional) include:
• Allergic and autoimmune diseases;
• Infections due to certain parasitic worms, protozoa, and viruses;
• Malignant and premalignant hematologic disorders commonly associated with eosinophilia or hypereosinophilia;
• Adverse reactions to various drugs.

Causes[edit | edit source]

• The cause of Loeffler endocarditis has not been identified in most of the cases.^[4][3]
• Nevertheless, Loeffler endocarditis may be caused by hypereosinophilic syndrome, eosinophilic leukaemia, carcinoma, lymphoma, drug reactions, parasites.

Differentiating Loeffler endocarditis from Other Diseases[edit | edit source]

• Loeffler endocarditis must be differentiated from Other causes of restrictive cardiomyopathy such as amyloidosis, sarcoidosis and myeloma.^[3]
• In children, Loeffler endocarditis might be associated with rhabdomyosarcoma or tuberose sclerosis.

Epidemiology and Demographics[edit | edit source]

• The incidence of the hypereosinophilic syndrome is approximately 0.036 per 100,000 individuals worldwide.
• Cardiac involvement (Loeffler endocarditis) might be present in around 50% of the cases.^[5]
• Patients of all age groups may develop Loeffler endocarditis.
• Nevertheless, Loeffler endocarditis commonly affects individuals between 20 to 50 years old.
• There is no racial predilection to Loeffler endocarditis.
• Generally, hypereosinophilic syndrome and hence, Loeffler endocarditis is a rare condition in North America.
• The majority of Loeffler endocarditis cases are reported in tropical areas of Asia, Africa, and South America.
• Loeffler endocarditis affects men and women equally.
• Nevertheless, men are more commonly affected by primary hypereosinophilic syndrome than women.

Risk Factors[edit | edit source]

• There are no established risk factors for Loeffler endocarditis.
• Loeffler endocarditis is secondary to eosinophil-associated tissue damage
• Loeffler endocarditis is associated with hypereosinophilic conditions such as:

Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome

• Chronic eosinophilic leukemia
• Other malignancies
• Parasitic infections
• Drug reactions such as adalimumab.^[6]
• Autoimmune disorders and vasculites such Churg-Strauss.^[7]

Screening[edit | edit source]

• There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine screening for Loeffler endocarditis.

Natural History, Complications, and Prognosis[edit | edit source]

• The signs and symptoms of Loeffler endocarditis tend to reflect the many underlying disorders causing eosinophil dysfunction as well as the widely differing progression rates of cardiac damage.^[8]
• Before cardiac symptoms are detected, individuals may suffer symptoms of a common cold, asthma, rhinitis, urticarial, or other allergic disorder.
• Cardiac manifestations include life-threatening conditions such as cardiogenic shock or sudden death due to abnormal heart rhythms.^[9]
• More commonly, however, the presenting cardiac signs and symptoms of the disorder are the same as those seen in other forms of cardiomyopathy: the heart arrhythmia of ventricular fibrillation seen as an irregular pulse and heart rate, other cardiac arrhythmias, symptoms of these arrhythmias such as chest palpitations, dizziness, lightheadedness, and fainting; and symptoms of a heart failure such as fatigue, edema, i.e. swelling, of the lower extremities, and shortness of breath.
• Early cardiac involvement occurs in 20 to 50% of cases.
• Systemic emboli may cause renal or neurological problems.

• Prognosis is generally poor but depends upon the degree of involvement of the heart.^[10][11]
• The mean survival time of patients with Loeffler endocarditis is approximately 18 months.

Diagnosis[edit | edit source]

• The diagnosis of Loeffler endocarditis should be considered in individuals exhibiting signs and symptoms of poor heart contractility and/or valve disease in the presence of significant increases in blood eosinophil counts.
• Ancillary tests may help in the diagnosis.
• However, the only definitive test for Loeffler endocarditis is cardiac muscle biopsy showing the presence of eosinophilic infiltrates.

Diagnostic Study of Choice[edit | edit source]

• The definite diagnosis of Loeffler endocarditis is based on cardiac muscle biopsy, showing the presence of eosinophilic infiltrates and sometimes fibrosis.
• Since the disorder may be patchy, multiple tissue samples taken during the procedure improve the chances of uncovering the pathology but in any case negative results do not exclude the diagnosis.

History and Symptoms[edit | edit source]

• The most common symptoms of Loeffler endocarditis include weight loss, fever, cough, a rash (possibly pruritic) and symptoms of congestive heart failure.

Physical Examination[edit | edit source]

• Common physical examination findings of Loeffler endocarditis include peripheral oedema, elevated jugular venous pressure, tachycardia, murmur of mitral regurgitation, S3 gallop and possibly S4 sound. (physical findings of heart failure)

• Palpable apex beat and mitral regurgitation help to differentiate restrictive cardiomyopathy may be very similar to those of constrictive pericarditis.

Laboratory Findings[edit | edit source]

• Hypereosinophilia (i.e. blood eosinophil counts at or above 1,500 per microliter) or, less commonly, eosinophilia (counts above 500 but below 1,500 per microliter) are found in the vast majority of cases and are valuable clues pointing to this rather than other types of cardiomyopathies.
• However, elevated blood eosinophil counts may not occur during the early phase of the disorder.
• Other, less specific laboratory findings implicate a cardiac disorder but not necessarily eosinophilic myocarditis.
• These include elevations in blood markers for systemic inflammation (e.g. C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and cardiac injury (e.g. creatine kinase, troponins);
• Laboratory findings consistent with the diagnosis of Loeffler endocarditis include marked eosinophilia - at least 0.44 x 109/l.

Electrocardiogram[edit | edit source]

• An ECG may be helpful in the diagnosis of Loeffler endocarditis. Findings on an ECG suggestive of/diagnostic of Loeffler endocarditis include ST segment-T wave abnormalities, and sometimes evidences of atrial enlargement.

X-ray[edit | edit source]

• An x-ray may be helpful in the diagnosis of Loeffler endocarditis.
• Findings on an x-ray suggestive of Loeffler endocarditis include cardiomegaly and presentation of heart failure and pulmonary edema.
• Nevertheless, these findings are neither specific nor sensitive for the diagnosis of Loeffler endocarditis.

Echocardiography or Ultrasound[edit | edit source]

• Echocardiography may be helpful in the diagnosis of Loeffler endocarditis.
• Findings on an echocardiography suggestive of/diagnostic of Loeffler endocarditis include restrictive filling but pretty good left ventricular systolic function.
• Echocardiography typically gives non-specific and only occasional findings of endocardium thickening, left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricle dilation, and involvement of the mitral and/or tricuspid valves.
• Three‐dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography might provide additional information to conventional two‐dimensional transthoracic echocardiography alone in patients with Loeffler endocarditis.^[12]

Echocardiography[edit | edit source]

Improved detection is imparted by the use of a multi-modality investigation, including the use of transesophageal echocardiography and contrast agents.

A standard transthoracic echocardiogram will typically reveal the following features, which are characteristic of the restrictive cardiomyopathies:

• Normal left ventricular systolic function
• Normal LV cavity dimensions
• Diastolic dysfunction
  • Majority of cases advanced dysfunction, typically grade III, formerly known as the "restrictive filling" profile
    • Early, incidentally detected cases may have lesser degrees of dysfunction
  • Pulsed wave doppler (mitral inflow) and tissue doppler (mitral annuli) demonstrate:
    • An E/A ratio > 2
    • A deceleration time (DT) < 160 ms
    • A septal e' < 8 cm/s
    • An LVEDP (septal E/e') > 15

Features which are specific to the hypereosinophilic syndrome include:

• Left ventricular apical obliteration by laminar thrombosis
  • Diffuse and echogenic thrombus
  • Occurs in the absence of regional wall motion abnormalities
    • The key distinction from the far more common apical thrombosis due to e.g. ischemic heart disease and subsequent apical dyskinesis
• Thickening and increased echogenicity of subendocardial structures
  • Preferential involvement of the left ventricular posterobasal (inferolateral) wall and posterior leaflet of mitral valve
  • Consequent restricted excursion of mitral valve's posterior leaflet
• Eccentric mitral regurgitation
  

CT scan[edit | edit source]

• Although multimodality imaging is recommended in diagnosis and management of Loeffler endocarditis, but CT scan is barely used a an imaging modality.^[13]

• MRI and echocardiography were used extensively in diagnosis and management of these cases.

MRI[edit | edit source]

• Cardiac MRI may be helpful in the diagnosis of Loeffler endocarditis.^[14]
• Gadolinium-based cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the most useful non-invasive procedure for diagnosing eosinophilic myocarditis.
• Findings on MRI suggestive of/diagnostic of Loeffler endocarditis include at least two of the following abnormalities:
• An increased signal in T2-weighted images;
• An increased global myocardial early enhancement ratio between a myocardial and skeletal muscle in enhanced T1 images and
• One or more focal enhancements distributed in a non-vascular pattern in late enhanced T1-weighted images.
• Additionally, and unlike in other forms of myocarditis, eosinophilic myocarditis may also show enhanced gadolinium uptake in the sub-endocardium.
• Multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)^[11]

• Multiparametric CMR can not only diagnose Loeffler endocarditis but also reveal the patchy disease state.
• which could be helpful in prognosis assessment.
• Furthermore, Multiparametric CMR can also be used for treatment monitoring. and follow up.
• Compared to echocardiography, cardiac MRI allows multiple scanning planes with excellent spatial resolution and the possibility of tissue characterization.

Other Imaging Findings[edit | edit source]

• There are no other imaging findings associated with Loeffler endocarditis.

Other Diagnostic Studies[edit | edit source]

• There are no other diagnostic studies associated with Loeffler endocarditis.

Treatment[edit | edit source]

• Small studies and case reports have directed efforts towards:

• Supporting cardiac function by relieving heart failure and suppressing life-threatening abnormal heart rhythms

• Suppressing eosinophil-based cardiac inflammation

• Treating the underlying disorder

• In all cases of Loeffler endocarditis that have no specific treatment regimens for the underlying disorder, available studies recommend treating the inflammatory component of this disorder with non-specific immunosuppressive drugs, principally high-dosage followed by slowly-tapering to low-dosage maintenance corticosteroid regimens.
• Afflicted individuals who fail this regimen or present with cardiogenic shock may benefit from treatment with other non-specific immunosuppressive drugs such as azathioprine or cyclophosphamide, as adjuncts to, or replacements for, corticosteroids.
• However, individuals with an underlying therapeutically accessible disease should be treated for this disease; in seriously symptomatic cases, such individuals may be treated concurrently with a corticosteroid regimen.
• Examples of diseases underlying Loeffler's myocarditis that are recommended for treatments directed at the underlying disease include:

• Infectious agents: specific drug treatment of helminth and protozoan infections typically take precedence over non-specific immunosuppressive therapy, which, if used without specific treatment, could worsen the infection. In moderate-to-severe cases, non-specific immunosuppression is used in combination with specific drug treatment.

• Toxic reactions to ingested agents: discontinuance of the ingested agent plus corticosteroids or other non-specific immunosuppressive regimens.

• Clonal eosinophilia caused by mutations in genes that are highly susceptible to tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or possibly FGFR1: first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g. imatinib) are recommended for the former two mutations; a later generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ponatinib, alone or combined with bone marrow transplantation, may be useful for treating the FGFR1 mutations.

• Clonal hypereosinophilia due to mutations in other genes or primary malignancies: specific treatment regimens used for these pre-malignant or malignant diseases may be more useful and necessary than non-specific immunosuppression.

• Allergic and autoimmune diseases: non-specific treatment regimens used for these diseases may be useful in place of a simple corticosteroid regimen. For example, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis can be successfully treated with mepolizumab.

• Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome and lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilia: corticosteroids; for individuals with these hypereosinophilias that are refractory to or breakthrough corticosteroid therapy and individuals requiring corticosteroid-sparing therapy, recommended alternative drug therapies include hydroxyurea, Pegylated interferon-α, and either one of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib and mepolizumab).

Medical Therapy[edit | edit source]

• The mainstay of treatment for Loeffler endocarditis is congestive heart failure treatment.

• Diuretics
• Digoxin
• ACE inhibitors
• Drugs that reduce afterload.

• Immune suppression and cytotoxic drugs are recommended in the early disease phase of the patients who develop Loeffler endocarditis.

• Patients with acute myocarditis are treated with steroids, whereas prednisolone and hydroxycarbamide could be helpful to suppress eosinophilia in the patients.^[15]
• Imatinib treatment has been showed promising outcome in a case of hypereosinophilic syndrome.^[16]

• Once fibrosis has occurred, surgery may be of benefit. (See below)

Surgery[edit | edit source]

• The mainstay of treatment for Loeffler endocarditis is medical therapy. Surgery is usually reserved for patients with fibrosis.
• Removing fibrosed endocardium might be helpful to improve elasticity.
• Mitral and even tricuspid valve might be indicated in some patients.
• Common complication is complete heart block.
• Operative mortality is 15-30%

Primary Prevention[edit | edit source]

• There are no established measures for the primary prevention of Loeffler endocarditis.

Secondary Prevention[edit | edit source]

• Effective measures for the secondary prevention of Loeffler endocarditis include having a clinical impression about the disease and hence early diagnosis, application of multimodality imaging, early treatment of both complications and the underlying disease and appropriate follow-ups for relapses and complications.^[13]

References[edit | edit source]

Template:WH Template:WS