Myocarditis Microchapters |
Diagnosis |
---|
Treatment |
Case Studies |
Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy On the Web |
American Roentgen Ray Society Images of Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy |
Risk calculators and risk factors for Myocarditis endomyocardial biopsy |
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1] Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Varun Kumar M.B.B.S., Maliha Shakil, M.D. [2]
Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard test to evaluate for the presence of and to subclassify the type of myocarditis. A small tissue sample of the endocardium and myocardium is obtained via right sided cardiac catheterization. The sample is then evaluated by a pathologist using immunochemistry and special staining techniques as necessary. Histopathological features include abundant edema in the myocardial interstitium and an inflammatory infiltrate which is rich in lymphocytes and macrophages. Focal destruction of myocytes as a result of the inflammatory process results in left ventricular dysfunction.[1] Endomyocardial biopsy is recommended when the results would identify an underlying disease that is amenable to therapy. Routine performance of endomyocardial biopsy is not recommended in all patients with myocarditis.
Histologically, both active inflammatory infiltrate within the myocardium and associated myocyte necrosis (the Dallas pathologic criteria) are present in myocarditis. Despite its limitations, the Dallas criteria have established uniform histologic criteria diagnosing myocarditis and have substantially reduced the variability in diagnosing the disease. Some of the criteria are as follows:[7]
“ |
Active myocarditis:
Borderline myocarditis:
|
” |
Class III (No Benefit) |
" 1. Endomyocardial biopsy should not be performed in the routine evaluation of patients with heart failure.[14] (Level of Evidence: C) " |
Class IIa |
"1. Endomyocardial biopsy can be useful in patients presenting with heart failure when a specific diagnosis is suspected that would influence therapy.[14] (Level of Evidence: C) " |
Class I |
"1. EMB should be performed in the setting of unexplained, new-onset heart failure of less than 2 weeks’ duration associated with a normal-sized or dilated left ventricle and hemodynamic compromise. (Level of Evidence: B) " |
"2. EMB should be performed in the setting of unexplained, new-onset heart failure of 2 weeks’ to 3 months’ duration associated with a dilated left ventricle and new ventricular arrhythmias, second- or third-degree heart block, or failure to respond to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks. (Level of Evidence: B) " |
Class III (No Benefit) |
"1. EMB should not be performed in the setting of unexplained atrial fibrillation. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
Class IIa |
"1. EMB is reasonable in the clinical setting of unexplained heart failure of more than 3 months’ duration associated with a dilated left ventricle and new ventricular arrhythmias, second- or third-degree heart block, or failure to respond to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"2. EMB is reasonable in the setting of unexplained heart failure associated with a dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) of any duration associated with suspected allergic reaction and/or eosinophilia. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"3. EMB is reasonable in the setting of unexplained heart failure associated with suspected anthracycline cardiomyopathy. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"4. EMB is reasonable in the setting of heart failure associated with unexplained restrictive cardiomyopathy. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"5. EMB is reasonable in the setting of suspected cardiac tumors. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"6. EMB is reasonable in the setting of unexplained cardiomyopathy in children. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
Class IIb |
"1. EMB may be considered in the setting of unexplained, new-onset heart failure of 2 weeks’ to 3 months’ duration associated with a dilated left ventricle, without new ventricular arrhythmias or second- or third-degree heart block, that responds to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks. (Level of Evidence: B) " |
"2. EMB may be considered in the setting of unexplained heart failure of more than 3 months’ duration associated with a dilated left ventricle, without new ventricular arrhythmias or second- or third-degree heart block, that responds to usual care within 1 to 2 weeks. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"3. EMB may be considered in the setting of heart failure associated with unexplained hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"4. EMB may be considered in the setting of suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD/C). (Level of Evidence: C) " |
"5. EMB may be considered in the setting of unexplained unexplained ventricular arrhythmias. (Level of Evidence: C) " |
|http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=
ignored (help)
|http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=
ignored (help)
|http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=
ignored (help)