Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Sara Zand, M.D.[2] Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [4]
In the 2016 update of the stable chest pain guideline, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has dramatically changed its approach to new-onset stable chest pain aiming to find a more cost-effective strategy including NO use of pretest probability risk scores or NO use of functional tests such as stress echocardiography, as a first-line investigation. The suggestion is to use CT coronary angiography in patients with typical or atypical chest pain. In addition, there is no recommendation for any diagnostic testing if chest pain is non-anginal. Also, perfusion imaging is recommended in the setting of uncertainty about the functional significance of coronary lesions. However, the recommendation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC—2013) is performing functional tests as the initial investigation.
NICE Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Chest Pain[1][edit | edit source]
- Pain in the chest and/or other areas (for example, the arms, back or jaw) lasting longer than 15 minutes ·
- Chest pain associated with nausea and vomiting, marked sweating, breathlessness, or particularly a combination of these ·
- Chest pain associated with hemodynamic instability ·
- New onset chest pain, or abrupt deterioration in previously stable angina, with recurrent chest pain occurring frequently and with little or no exertion, and with episodes often lasting longer than 15 minutes
- If the patient is currently pain-free, but had chest pain in the last 12 hours, and resting 12-lead ECG is abnormal or not available or develops further chest pain after recent (confirmed or suspected) ACS, evaluation about ACS is warranted.
- Assessment of patients with suspected ACS in the hospital:
- Use of high-sensitivity troponin tests is not recommended, if ACS is not suspected
- For patients at high or moderate risk of MI (as indicated by a validated tool), performing high sensitivity troponin tests is reasonable.
- For patients at low risk of MI :
- Performing a second high-sensitivity troponin test
- Considering a single high-sensitivity troponin test only at presentation to rule out NSTEMI , if the first troponin test is below the lower limit of detection (negative).
- A detectable troponin on the first high-sensitivity test does not necessary for patients with confirmed MI.
- For diagnose of ACS use of biochemical markers such as natriuretic peptides and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein are not recommended.
.
- Factors should be considered for interpreting high-sensitivity troponin:
- the clinical presentation
- the time from onset of symptoms
- the resting 12-lead ECG findings
- the pre-test probability of NSTEMI
- the length of time since the suspected ACS
- the probability of chronically elevated troponin levels in some patients
- that 99th percentile thresholds for troponin I and T may differ between sexes.
- When a raised troponin level is detected in patients suspected ACS, other causes for raised troponin should be excluded (for example, myocarditis,aortic dissection or pulmonary embolism)
- In patients with chest pain without raised troponin levels and no resting 12-lead ECG changes, determine whether their chest pain is likely to be cardiac.
- Ifmyocardial ischemia is suspected, follow the recommendations on stable chest pain.
- Clinical judgment is important to decide on the timing of any further diagnostic investigations.
- Routinely use of non-invasive imaging or exercise ECG in the initial assessment of acute cardiac chest pain is not recommended.
- Chest computed tomography (CT) is recommended to rule out other diagnoses such as pulmonary embolism or aortic dissection, not to diagnose ACS.
- Chest X-ray is helpful to exclude complications of ACS such as pulmonary oedema, or other diagnoses such as pneumothorax or pneumonia.
- If an ACS has been excluded but patients have risk factors for cardiovascular disease, following appropriate guidance is recommended, for example, the NICE guidelines on cardiovascular disease and hypertension.
Clinical assessment
- Taking a detailed clinical history about:
- age and sex
- Characteristics of the pain, including location, radiation, severity, duration, frequency,
- Provoking and relieving factors
- Associated symptoms, such as breathlessness
- History of angina, MI, coronary revascularization, or other cardiovascular disease
- Cardiovascular risk factors
- Physical examination to
- identifying risk factors for cardiovascular disease
- identifying signs of another cardiovascular disease
- identifying non-coronary causes of angina ( severe aortic stenosis, cardiomyopathy)
- excluding other causes of chest pain
- Assessment of the typicality of chest pain as follows:
- Presence of three of the features below is defined as typical angina.
· Presence of two of the three features below is defined as atypical angina.
· Presence of one or none of the features below is defined as non-anginal chest pain.
Anginal pain is:
differently in men and women in ethnic groups.
- Features that make a diagnosis of stable angina unlikely are when the chest pain is:
- Continuous or very prolonged
- Unrelated to activity
- Increased by inspiration
- Associated with symptoms such as dizziness, palpitations, tingling or difficulty swallowing
- Considering causes of chest pain other than angina (such as gastrointestinal or musculoskeletal pain)
- Investigating other causes of angina, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, in patients with typical angina-like chest pain and a low likelihood of CAD is considered.
- Factors that exacerbate angina, such as anemia, for all patients with stable angina should be considered.
- Only consider chest X-ray if other diagnoses, such as a lung tumor, are suspected.
- If a diagnosis of stable angina has been excluded, but [[the] patients have risk factors for cardiovascular disease, follow the appropriate guidance, for example the NICE guideline on hypertension.
- For suspected stable angina on the basis of the clinical assessment alone, taking a resting 12-lead ECG as soon as possible after the presentation is recommended.
- The diagnosis of stable angina is not ruled out on the basis of a normal resting 12-lead ECG.
- For patients with non-anginal chest pain on clinical assessment, diagnostic testing is not recommended, unless there are resting ECG ST-T changes or Q waves.
- Resting 12-lead ECG changes consistent with CAD are:
- Ischaemia or previous infarction
- Pathological Q waves
- LBBB
- ST-segment and T wave abnormalities ( flattening or inversion).
- Any resting 12-lead ECG changes together with people’s clinical history and risk factors should be considered.
- Consider aspirin only if the chest pain is likely to be stable angina until a diagnosis is made.
- If the patient is already taking aspirin or is allergic to it, do not offer additional aspirin.
- The Guideline Development Group emphasized that the recommendations in this guideline are to make a diagnosis of chest pain, not to screen for CAD.
- Most people diagnosed with non-anginal chest pain after clinical assessment need no further diagnostic testing. However in a very small number of
people, there are remaining concerns that the pain could be ischaemic.
contraindications (for example, disabilities, frailty, limited ability to exercise) when deciding on the
imaging method.
adenosine or dipyridamole for first-pass contrast-enhanced MR perfusion.
wall motion abnormalities.
disease in the epicardial coronary arteries.
NICE Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Chest Pain [1][edit | edit source]
| | | | | | | | Assessment of acute chest pain in hospital
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Normal resting ECG or non-diagnostic | | | | | ECG changes consistent with NSTEMI | | | | | ECG changes consistent with STEMI |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Low risk patient with undetectable hs-troponin level: Reassurance, discharge | | Consider ACS by clinical judgment even in the presence of normal ECG
- Repeat hs-troponin level after 3 hours of arrival in hospital while diagnosis is not clear
- Serial ECG taken and clinically assessment of patient and considering the ECG changes
- Investigation regarding other life-threatening causes of chest pain
- NO need for routin non-invasive cardiac imaging or EX-ECG for initial evaluation
- Consider other differential diagnosis
- Consider hs-troponin level 3 hours after initiation of symptoms
- Consider an alternative diagnosis
| | | NSTEMI, ACS Guideline follow-up | | | | STEMI Guideline follow-up | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | hs-troponin concentration on arrival and at 3 hours bellow the cut-off measurement: Low risk patient, discharge | | | hs-troponin concentration on arrival and at 3 hours higher than cut-off measurement | | Diagnostic criteria for MI | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Yes:
| | | NO:
Consider CXR or Chest CT scan for evaluation of alternative diagnosis | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| The above algorithm adopted from 2016 NICE Guideline
|
NICE guidelines for the management of patients with stable chest pain[1][edit | edit source]
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has dramatically changed its guideline on approach to stable chest pain aiming to find a more cost-effective strategy including NO use of pretest probability risk scores or NO use of functional tests, such as stress echocardiography, as a first-line investigation in patients with new-onset stable chest pain. The suggestion is to use CT coronary angiography in the majority of patients. However, the recommendation of the European
Society of Cardiology (ESC—2013) is functional tests as the initial investigation.[2]
| The above algorithm adopted from 2016 NICE Guideline
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | ECG changes associated with CAD:
❑ LBBB ❑ Pathologic Q waves ❑ ST-T abnormalities
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Definition of significant CAD:
❑Coronary CT angiography:
❑ Factors associated with intensifying ischemia in the lesions less than 50%
❑ Factors associated reduced ischemia in significant lesion ≥70 %:
- Well developed collateral supply
- Small ischemia region of myocardium due to fiat ally location of lesion
, old infarction the territory of coronary supply | | | | |
| The above algorithm adopted from 2016 NICE Guideline
|
Template:WikiDoc Sources