From Wikidoc - Reading time: 5 min
Editor-In-Chief: C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. [1]; Associate Editor(s)-In-Chief: Sara Zand, M.D.[2] Cafer Zorkun, M.D., Ph.D. [3]; Priyamvada Singh, M.B.B.S. [4]
In the 2016 update of the stable chest pain guideline, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has dramatically changed its approach to new-onset stable chest pain aiming to find a more cost-effective strategy including NO use of pretest probability risk scores or NO use of functional tests, such as stress echocardiography, as a first-line investigation. The suggestion is to use CT coronary angiography in [[patients] with typical or atypical chest pain. In addition, there is no recommendation for any diagnostic testing if chest pain is non-anginal. Also, perfusion imaging is offered in the setting of uncertainty about the functional significance of coronary lesions. However, the recommendation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC—2013) is functional tests as the initial investigation.
NICE Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Chest Pain [1][edit | edit source]
- If the patient is currently pain-free, but had chest pain in the last 12 hours, and resting 12-lead ECG is abnormal or not available or develops further chest pain after recent (confirmed or suspected) ACS, evaluation about ACS is warranted.
- Assessment of patients with suspected ACS in the hospital:
· Repeated resting 12-lead ECGs
· Checking pain relief
- Use of high-sensitivity troponin tests is not recommended, if ACS is not suspected
- For patients at high or moderate risk of MI (as indicated by a validated tool), performing high sensitivity troponin tests is reasonable.
- For patients at low risk of MI :
- Performing a second high-sensitivity troponin test
- Considering a single high-sensitivity troponin test only at presentation to rule out NSTEMI , if the first troponin test is below the lower limit of detection (negative).
- A detectable troponin on the first high-sensitivity test does not necessary for patients with confirmed MI.
- For diagnose of ACS use of biochemical markers such as natriuretic peptides and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein are not recommended.
.
- Factors should be considered for interpreting high-sensitivity troponin:
- the clinical presentation
- The time from onset of symptoms
- The resting 12-lead ECG findings
- The pre-test probability of NSTEMI
- The length of time since the suspected ACS
- The probability of chronically elevated troponin levels in some patients
- That 99th percentile threshold for troponin I and T may differ between sexes.
- When a raised troponin level is detected in patients suspected ACS, other causes for raised troponin should be excluded (for example, myocarditis,aortic dissection or pulmonary embolism)
- In patients with chest pain without raised troponin levels and no resting 12-lead ECG changes, determine whether their chest pain is likely to be cardiac.
- Ifmyocardial ischemia is suspected, follow the recommendations on stable chest pain.
- Clinical judgment is important to decide on the timing of any further diagnostic investigations.
- Routinely use of non-invasive imaging or exercise ECG in the initial assessment of acute cardiac chest pain is not recommended.
- Chest computed tomography (CT) is recommended to rule out other diagnoses such as pulmonary embolism or aortic dissection, not to diagnose ACS.
- Chest X-ray is helpful to exclude complications of ACS such as pulmonary oedema, or other diagnoses such as pneumothorax or pneumonia.
- If an ACS has been excluded but patients have risk factors for cardiovascular disease, following appropriate guidance is recommended, for example, the NICE guidelines on cardiovascular disease and hypertension.
Template:WikiDoc Sources