A positive deviance approach has been recommended to identify and disseminate best organizational practices[4][5][6]Early description of this method was[4]:
"Develop case definitions"
"Identify four to six people who have achieved an unexpected good outcome despite high risk"
"Interview and observe these people to discover uncommon behaviours or enabling factors that could explain the good outcome"
"Analyse the findings to confirm that the behaviours are uncommon and accessible to those who need to adopt them"
"Design behaviour change activities to encourage community adoption of the new behaviours"
"Monitor implementation and evaluate the results"
Positive deviance is consistent with complexity leadership[7][8][9].
Quality measures and their benchmarks are available from several organizations including:
CQI Resource Center (coordinated by the Centers for Medicare & Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC); U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)
For reporting of quality measures:
eCQMs may be better than claims-based reporting[13] of quality. eCQMs could also be used for billing[14].
Goodhart's law is when measures become organizational goals, problems may ensue.
Simple audient and feedback with peer comparison may be toxic by creating zero-sum, competitive mindsets[17][18] andt may dcrease physician well-being[19].
Audit and feedback may be more effective if "providing specific suggestions for improvement, written, and more frequent feedback strengthened this effect," according to a meta-analysis[20]. A more recent meta-analysis concluded that audit and feedback is more successful when[21]:
"delivered by a supervisor or respected colleague
"presented frequently"
"featuring both specific goals and action-plans"
"aiming to decrease the targeted behavior
"baseline performance is lower"
"recipients are non-physicians"
Physicians may be less receptive to audit and feedback[21]. This may be in part due to a perception by physicians that metrics do not fully descibe the value of the physician.
Practice facilitation may help based on the experience of the American Academy of Family Physicians' (AAFP) National Demonstration Project (NDP)[22][23].
The Heart Health NOW Study found uncertain evidence from organizational leadership and Adaptive Reserve[24].
The VA's PACT used in-person[25] and online[26] collaborative methods.
A systematic review found an association with workplace culture and clinical outcomes[49]. However, this review did not provide details of attributes of positive culture. This review did not find any randomized trials.
A cross-sectional study of 537 American hospitals found that clinical improvement was associated with the following, ranked in descending order of impact[50]:
'having physician and nurse champions rather than nurse champions alone'
'fostering an organizational environment in which clinicians are encouraged to solve problems creatively'
'holding monthly meetings to review AMI cases between hospital clinicians and staff who transported patients to the hospital'
'effective inclusion of staff from different disciplines and levels in the organisational hierarchy in the team guiding improvement efforts (referred to as the ‘guiding coalition’ in each hospital)'
'authentic participation in the work of the guiding coalition'
'distinct patterns of managing conflict'
The Malcolm Baldrige Health Care version of the Criteria for Performance Excellence
(HCPE) award has been created to foster a culture of quality improvement across an organization. Two studies of the impact of the award have found:
"No significant difference in process of care results or outcomes between Baldrige recipients and their competitors, there was a significant difference in patient experience results" [52].
"Slight enhancements in clinical outcomes, while hospital financial and efficiency measures all showed overwhelmingly positive operating results"[53]
↑Danese, P., Manfè, V. and Romano, P. (2017), A Systematic Literature Review on Recent Lean Research: State-of-the-art and Future Directions. International Journal of Management Reviews. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12156
↑Lindberg, Curt; Schneider, Marguerite (2013). "Combating infections at Maine Medical Center: Insights into complexity-informed leadership from positive deviance". Leadership. 9 (2): 229–253. doi:10.1177/1742715012468784. ISSN1742-7150.
↑Chun, Jinseok S.; Sherf, Elad N.; Slepian, Michael L. (2023). "In it to win it? Comparative evaluation increases zero-sum beliefs". Motivation Science. American Psychological Association (APA). 9 (1): 31–41. doi:10.1037/mot0000287. ISSN2333-8121.
↑Kakkar, Hemant; Sivanathan, Niro (2022). "The impact of leader dominance on employees' zero-sum mindset and helping behavior". Journal of Applied Psychology. American Psychological Association (APA). 107 (10): 1706–1724. doi:10.1037/apl0000980. ISSN1939-1854.
↑Bruening, Rebecca A.; Sperber, Nina; Wang, Virginia; Mahanna, Elizabeth; Choate, Ashley; Tucker, Matthew; Zullig, Leah L.; Van Houtven, Courtney Harold; Allen, Kelli D.; Hastings, Susan N. (22 March 2022). "Self-Organization of Interprofessional Staff to Improve Mobility of Hospitalized Patients with STRIDE: a Complexity Science-Informed Qualitative Study". Journal of General Internal Medicine. 37 (16): 4216–4222. doi:10.1007/s11606-022-07482-9. eISSN1525-1497. ISSN0884-8734. PMID35319083Check |pmid= value (help).
↑Peelle, Henry E. (2006). "Appreciative Inquiry and Creative Problem Solving in Cross-Functional Teams". The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. SAGE Publications. 42 (4): 447–467. doi:10.1177/0021886306292479. ISSN0021-8863.