Syphilis serology

From Wikidoc - Reading time: 4 min

  • Common serologic tests used routinely include:
  • Sensitivity of serologic tests vary with the disease stage.
  • 78-86% sensitivity for primary syphilis
  • 100% sensitivity for secondary syphilis
  • 95-98% sensitivity for tertiary syphilis
  • Specificity is aprroximately 85-99%

Nontreponemal test[edit | edit source]

  • Nontreponemal test antibody titers may correlate with disease activity, and results should be reported quantitatively.
  • A fourfold change in titer, equivalent to a change of two dilutions (e.g., from 1:16 to 1:4 or from 1:8 to 1:32), is considered necessary to demonstrate a clinically significant difference between two nontreponemal test results that were obtained using the same serologic test.
  • Sequential serologic tests in individual patients should be performed using the same testing method (e.g., VDRL or RPR), preferably by the same laboratory.
  • The VDRL and RPR are equally valid assays, but quantitative results from the two tests cannot be compared directly because RPR titers frequently are slightly higher than VDRL titers.
  • Nontreponemal test titers usually decline after treatment and might become nonreactive with time; however, in some persons, nontreponemal antibodies can persist for a long period of time: a response referred to as the serofast reaction.
  • Most patients who have reactive treponemal tests will have reactive tests for the remainder of their lives, regardless of treatment or disease activity. However, 15%-25% of patients treated during the primary stage revert to being serologically non-reactive after 2-3 years.[1]
  • Treponemal test antibody titers should not be used to assess treatment response.

Treponemal test[edit | edit source]

  • Some clinical laboratories and blood banks have begun to screen samples using treponemal tests, typically by ELISA[2] or chemiluminescence immunoassays.[1] This strategy will identify both persons with previous treatment for syphilis and persons with untreated or incompletely treated syphilis. The positive predictive value for syphilis associated with a treponemal screening test result might be lower among populations with a low prevalence of syphilis.
  • Persons with a positive treponemal screening test should have a standard non-treponemal test with titer performed reflexively by the laboratory to guide patient management decisions.
  • If the non-treponemal test is negative, then the laboratory should perform a different treponemal test (preferably one based on different antigens than the original test) to confirm the results of the initial test.
  • If a second treponemal test is positive, persons with a history of previous treatment will require no further management unless sexual history suggests likelihood of re-exposure. Those without a history of treatment for syphilis should be offered treatment. Unless history or results of a physical examination suggest a recent infection, previously untreated persons should be treated for late latent syphilis.
  • If the second treponemal test is negative, further evaluation or treatment is not indicated.

Serologic test: HIV-infected persons[edit | edit source]

  • For most HIV-infected persons, serologic tests are accurate and reliable for the diagnosis of syphilis and for following a patient's response to treatment.
  • However, atypical syphilis serologic test results (i.e., unusually high, unusually low, or fluctuating titers) can occur in HIV-infected persons.

Serologic inconclusive[edit | edit source]

When serologic tests do not correspond with clinical findings suggestive of early syphilis, use of other tests (e.g., biopsy and darkfield microscopy) should be considered.

Resources[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Romanowski B, Sutherland R, Fick GH, Mooney D, Love EJ (1991). "Serologic response to treatment of infectious syphilis". Annals of Internal Medicine. 114 (12): 1005–9. PMID 2029095. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  2. Pope V, Hunter EF, Feeley JC (1982). "Evaluation of the microenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with Treponema pallidum antigen". Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 15 (4): 630–4. PMC 272158. PMID 7040460. Retrieved 2012-02-16. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. Workowski KA, Berman S (2010). "Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010". MMWR. Recommendations and Reports : Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations and Reports / Centers for Disease Control. 59 (RR-12): 1–110. PMID 21160459. Retrieved 2012-02-16. Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)


Template:WikiDoc Sources


Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 | Source: https://www.wikidoc.org/index.php/Syphilis_serology
3 views | Status: cached on September 17 2024 05:24:24
↧ Download this article as ZWI file
Encyclosphere.org EncycloReader is supported by the EncyclosphereKSF