Categories
2010 United States Senate election in California
From Wikipedia - Reading time: 18 min
 | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 County results Boxer: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% 80–90% Fiorina: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 70–80% | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.jpg)
| Elections in California |
|---|
 |
The 2010 United States Senate election in California took place on November 2, 2010. The election was held alongside 33 other United States Senate elections in addition to congressional, state, and various local elections. Incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer won re-election to a fourth term.
Democratic primary
[edit]Candidates
[edit]- Barbara Boxer, incumbent U.S. Senator[1]
- Mickey Kaus, journalist/blogger[1]
- Brian Quintana, businessman/educator[1]
Controversies
[edit]Boxer
[edit]In 2009, Boxer was criticized for correcting a general who called her "ma'am". Brigadier General Michael Walsh was testifying on the Louisiana coastal restoration process in the wake of Hurricane Katrina and answered Boxer's query with "ma'am" when Boxer interrupted him. "Do me a favor," Boxer said. "can you say 'senator' instead of 'ma'am?'" "Yes, ma'am," Walsh interjected. "It's just a thing, I worked so hard to get that title, so I'd appreciate it. Thank you," she said. The Army's guide to protocol instructs service members to call members of the U.S. Senate "sir", "ma'am" or "senator".[2][3][4] Fiorina used this incident prominently in campaign ads, as did David Zucker, who directed a humorous commercial for RightChange.com titled 'Call Me Senator'.
Results
[edit]| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Barbara Boxer (incumbent) | 1,957,920 | 81.0 | |
| Democratic | Brian Quintana | 338,442 | 13.9 | |
| Democratic | Mickey Kaus | 123,573 | 5.1 | |
| Total votes | 2,419,935 | 100.0 | ||
Republican primary
[edit]Candidates
[edit]- Tom Campbell, former Director of the California Department of Finance (2004–2005), former U.S. Representative for California's 15th congressional district (1995–2001, 1989–1993), candidate in 1992 and nominee for the U.S. Senate in 2000[1]
- Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett-Packard[1]
- Chuck DeVore, state assemblyman from the 70th district (2004–2010)[1]
- Tim Kalemkarian[1]
- Al Ramirez, businessman[1]
Controversies
[edit]Fiorina
[edit]In February 2010, Carly Fiorina put out a campaign ad attacking Republican rival Tom Campbell featuring a "demon sheep", creating international, mostly negative, publicity.[5][6]
The Los Angeles Times research of public records indicated Fiorina had failed to vote in most elections. Fiorina responded by saying, "I'm a lifelong registered Republican but I haven't always voted, and I will provide no excuse for it. You know, people die for the right to vote. And there are many, many Californians and Americans who exercise that civic duty on a regular basis. I didn't. Shame on me."[7][8]
Campbell
[edit]Former State Senator and California Secretary of State Bruce McPherson alleged that during a telephone call with Carly Fiorina's campaign manager Marty Wilson, a longtime Sacramento political operative, Wilson expressed surprise that McPherson was endorsing Tom Campbell's candidacy, and called Campbell an anti-Semite.[9] Subsequently, Wilson strongly denied having made that charge against Campbell, thus leading to a controversy for the Fiorina campaign, where the credibility of Wilson was called into comparison with that of McPherson.
On March 5, the three principal Republican primary candidates, Campbell, DeVore, and Fiorina participated in a live, on-air debate, which was broadcast on KTKZ in Sacramento. The debate was called by Campbell, in order to respond to accusations of anti-Semitism and otherwise being unfriendly to the interests of Israel.[10]
Campbell had also been criticized for accepting campaign contributions (during his 2000 Senate race), from then-University of South Florida professor Sami Al-Arian.[11] On March 2, 2006, Al-Arian entered a guilty plea to a charge of conspiracy to help the Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine, a "specially designated terrorist" organization; he was sentenced to 57 months in prison and ordered deported following his prison term.[12][13] The usually subdued Campbell responded very strongly to the accusations from the Fiorina campaign, saying, "I called for this debate today so that both of my opponents can bring up absolutely any charge they want. Air it, and let me respond to it. But there’s no place for calling me anti-Semitic, then denying it. That whispering campaign, that 'silent slander,' stops today."[14]
A dispute had been triggered as well by Campbell's 2002 letter in defense of Al-Arian. Campbell said he had not been aware of the charges against Al-Arian when he wrote his January 21, 2002, letter to USF's president, asking USF not to discipline Al-Arian.[15][16][17]
He also said he had not been aware that Al-Arian had said, in a speech discussed in a 2001 television interview with Bill O'Reilly before Campbell wrote his letter: "Jihad is our path. Victory to Islam. Death to Israel."[18] Campbell said:
I did not hear, I did not read, I was not aware of statements Sami Al-Arian had made relative to Israel. And I would not have written the letter had I known about those. ... To say 'Death to Israel' is abhorrent, it's horrible.[18]
Campbell said he was sorry he wrote the letter, adding that he did not know about the statements at the time. He said he should have researched that matter more thoroughly, and he would have known.[15][18][19][20]
Initially, Campbell had maintained that Al-Arian had never contributed to his 2000 Senate campaign.[21] That turned out to be untrue.[21] Campbell also initially said his letter defending Al-Arian was sent before the O'Reilly broadcast where Al-Arian admitted saying "death to Israel," but that also turned out to be incorrect.[21] Campbell said his misstatements were the result of the events having taken place years prior.[21]
Polling
[edit]| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Tom Campbell | Carly Fiorina | Chuck DeVore | Other | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Field Poll (report) | Feb. 20 – March 1, 2009 | 298 | ±3.6% | — | 31% | 19% | — | 36% |
| The Field Poll (report) | Sept. 18 – October 6, 2009 | 373 | ±4.5% | — | 21% | 20% | — | 59% |
| Los Angeles Times (report) | Oct. 27 – November 3, 2009 | 499 | — | — | 27% | 27% | 2% | 40% |
| The Field Poll (report) | January 5–17, 2010 | 202 | ±7.1% | 30% | 25% | 6% | — | 39% |
| PPIC (report) | January 27, 2010 | 2,001 | ±2.0% | 27% | 16% | 8% | 1% | 48% |
| M4 Strategies (report) | February 26, 2010 | 427 | — | 32% | 19% | 11% | — | 39% |
| Research 2000 (report) | March 10, 2010 | 400 | ±5.0% | 33% | 24% | 7% | — | 36% |
| PPIC (report) | March 24, 2010 | 2,002 | ±2.0% | 23% | 24% | 8% | 1% | 44% |
| Los Angeles Times (report) | March 23–30, 2010 | 1,515 | ±2.6% | 29% | 25% | 9% | 4% | 33% |
| Survey USA (report) | April 19–21, 2010 | 538 | ±4.3% | 34% | 27% | 14% | 3% | 23% |
| Survey USA (report) | May 6–9, 2010 | 548 | ±4.3% | 35% | 24% | 15% | 3% | 23% |
| Research 2000 (report) | May 17–19, 2010 | 400 | ±5.0% | 37% | 22% | 14% | — | 27% |
| PPIC (report) | May 9–16, 2010 | 1,168 | ±3.0% | 23% | 25% | 16% | — | 36% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | May 21–23, 2010 | 417 | ±4.8% | 21% | 41% | 16% | — | 18% |
| Survey USA (report) | May 21–23, 2010 | 612 | ±4.3% | 23% | 46% | 14% | 6% | 11% |
| Los Angeles Times (report) | May 19–26, 2010 | 1,506 | ±2.6% | 23% | 38% | 16% | 23% | |
| Survey USA (report) | June 3–6, 2010 | 569 | ±4.2% | 22% | 48% | 16% | 9% | |
Results
[edit]
- 40–50%
- 50–60%
- 60–70%
- 40–50%
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | Carly Fiorina | 1,315,429 | 56.4 | |
| Republican | Tom Campbell | 504,289 | 21.7 | |
| Republican | Chuck DeVore | 452,577 | 19.3 | |
| Republican | Al Ramirez | 42,149 | 1.8 | |
| Republican | Tim Kalemkarian | 19,598 | 0.8 | |
| Total votes | 2,334,042 | 100.0 | ||
Third party primaries
[edit]Candidates
[edit]American Independent
- Don Grundmann, chiropractor and American Independent nominee for the U.S. Senate in 2006[1]
- Edward Noonan, small-business owner[1]
- Al Salehi, political analyst[1]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Independent | Edward Noonan | 16,704 | 39.5 | |
| American Independent | Don Grundmann | 14,170 | 33.5 | |
| American Independent | Al Salehi | 11,423 | 27.0 | |
| Total votes | 42,297 | 100.0 | ||
Green
- Duane Roberts, community volunteer[1]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green | Duane Roberts | 19,983 | 100.00% | |
| Total votes | 19,983 | 100.0 | ||
Libertarian
- Gail Lightfoot, retired nurse[1]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libertarian | Gail Lightfoot | 17,791 | 100.00% | |
| Total votes | 17,791 | 100.0 | ||
Peace and Freedom
- Marsha Feinland, retired teacher and Peace and Freedom nominee for president in 1996[1]
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peace and Freedom | Marsha Feinland | 4,070 | 100.00% | |
| Total votes | 4,070 | 100.0 | ||
General election
[edit]Candidates
[edit]The following were certified by the California Secretary of State as candidates in the general election for Senator.[22]
- Barbara Boxer (Democratic), incumbent U.S. Senator
- Carly Fiorina (Republican), former CEO of Hewlett-Packard
- Edward Noonan (American Independent Party), small business owner
- Duane Roberts (Green), community volunteer
- Gail Lightfoot (Libertarian), retired nurse
- Marsha Feinland (Peace and Freedom), retired teacher and Peace and Freedom nominee for president in 1996
Campaign
[edit]Boxer criticized Fiorina's choice "to become a CEO, lay off 30,000 workers, ship jobs overseas [and] have two yachts." A spokesman for Fiorina responded that the Fiorinas were a two-yacht family because they spent time in both California and Washington, D.C.[23] Boxer also claimed that Fiorina "skirted the law" by selling equipment to Iran during her tenure as HP's CEO, also claiming that the equipment may have ended up in the hands of the Iranian military.[24]
Debate
[edit]The only debate took place on September 1 at Saint Mary's College of California in Moraga. It was sponsored by San Francisco Chronicle, KTVU, and KQED.[25]
| No. | Date | Host | Moderator | Link | Democratic | Republican |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Key: P Participant A Absent N Not invited I Invited W Withdrawn |
||||||
| Boxer | Fiorina | |||||
| 1 | Sep. 1, 2010 | KQED-FM KTVU San Francisco Chronicle |
Randy Shandobil | C-SPAN | P | P |
Predictions
[edit] |
| Source | Ranking | As of |
|---|---|---|
| The Cook Political Report | Tossup | October 26, 2010 |
| Congressional Quarterly | Lean D | October 26, 2010 |
| FiveThirtyEight | Likely D | October 26, 2010 |
| New York Times | Tossup | October 26, 2010 |
| Rasmussen Reports | Tossup | October 26, 2010 |
| RealClearPolitics | Tossup | October 26, 2010 |
| Rothenberg | Tilt D | October 26, 2010 |
| Sabato's Crystal Ball | Lean D | October 26, 2010 |
Polling
[edit]| Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Barbara Boxer (D) | Carly Fiorina (R) | Other | Undecided |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Field Poll (report) | Feb. 20 – March 1, 2009 | 761 | ± 3.6% | 55% | 25% | — | 20% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | March 9, 2009 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 47% | 38% | 10% | 5% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | July 22, 2009 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 45% | 41% | 7% | 7% |
| Research 2000 (report) | August 9–12, 2009 | 600 | ± 4.0% | 52% | 31% | — | 17% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | September 23, 2009 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 49% | 39% | 4% | 8% |
| The Field Poll (report) | Sept. 18 – October 6, 2009 | 1,005 | ± 3.2% | 49% | 35% | — | 16% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | November 17, 2009 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 46% | 37% | 5% | 12% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | January 14, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 46% | 43% | 3% | 8% |
| The Field Poll (report) | January 5–17, 2010 | 1,005 | ± 3.2% | 50% | 35% | — | 15% |
| PPIC (report) | January 27, 2010 | 2,001 | ± 2.0% | 48% | 40% | — | 12% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | February 11, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 46% | 42% | 7% | 5% |
| Research 2000 (report) | March 10, 2010 | 600 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 40% | — | 11% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | March 11, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 46% | 40% | 4% | 10% |
| The Field Poll (report) | March 18, 2010 | 748 | ± 3.7% | 45% | 44% | — | 11% |
| PPIC (report) | March 24, 2010 | 2,002 | ± 2.0% | 44% | 43% | — | 13% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | April 12, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 42% | 38% | 7% | 13% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | May 12, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 45% | 38% | 4% | 12% |
| PPIC (report) | May 9–16, 2010 | 2,003 | ± 2.0% | 48% | 39% | — | 13% |
| Research 2000 (report) | May 17–19, 2010 | 600 | ± 4.0% | 48% | 39% | — | — |
| Los Angeles Times (report) | May 19–26, 2010 | — | — | 44% | 38% | — | — |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | May 21–23, 2010 | 921 | ± 3.2% | 45% | 42% | — | 13% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | June 9, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 48% | 43% | 5% | 5% |
| Reuters (report) | June 30, 2010 | 600 | ± 4.5% | 45% | 41% | 1% | 13% |
| Survey USA (report) | July 8–11, 2010 | 614 | ± 4.0% | 45% | 47% | 3% | 5% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | July 12, 2010 | 500 | ± 4.5% | 49% | 42% | 4% | 5% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | July 23–25, 2010 | 614 | ± 3.95% | 49% | 40% | — | 11% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | August 3, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 45% | 40% | 5% | 10% |
| Survey USA/CBS 5 (report) | August 9–11, 2010 | 602 | ± 4.0% | 42% | 47% | — | 11% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | August 24, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 44% | 43% | 5% | 8% |
| Survey USA (report) | August 31 – September 1, 2010 | 569 | ± 4.2% | 46% | 48% | 5% | 1% |
| CNN(report Archived September 9, 2010, at the Wayback Machine) | September 2–7, 2010 | 866 | ± 3.5% | 48% | 44% | 5% | 3% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | September 6, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 42% | 47% | — | — |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | September 6, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 47% | 48% | 2% | 3% |
| Fox News (report) | September 11, 2010 | 1,000 | ± 3.0% | 46% | 44% | 4% | 6% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | September 14–16, 2010 | 630 | ± 3.9% | 50% | 42% | — | 8% |
| Fox News/Pulse Opinion Research (report) | September 18, 2010 | 1,000 | ± 3.0% | 47% | 46% | 3% | 4% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | September 20, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 47% | 43% | 4% | 6% |
| Survey USA (report) | September 19–21, 2010 | 610 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 43% | 6% | 2% |
| CNN/Time/Opinion Research Corporation (report) | September 24–28, 2010 | 786 | ± 3.5% | 52% | 43% | 3% | 2% |
| PPIC report | September 19–26, 2010 | 1,104 | ± 3% | 42% | 35% | 6% | 17% |
| USC poll report | September 27, 2010 | 1,003 | — | 39% | 34% | — | 23% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | October 3, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 45% | 2% | 5% |
| Angus Reid Public Opinion (report) | October 6, 2010 | 501 | ± 4.5% | 55% | 39% | 6% | — |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | October 13, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 46% | 2% | 3% |
| Reuters (report) | October 12–14, 2010 | 601 | ± 4.0% | 46% | 45% | 2% | 6% |
| PPIC (report) | October 10–17, 2010 | 1,067 | ± 3.5% | 43% | 38% | 6% | 13% |
| Tarrance Group (report) | October 17–19, 2010 | — | ± 4.1% | 44% | 44% | 6% | 5% |
| USC/LA Times (report) | October 13–20, 2010 | 878 | ± 3.2% | 50% | 42% | 4% | 4% |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | October 21, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 48% | 46% | 3% | 3% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | October 21–23, 2010 | 622 | ± 3.2% | 52% | 43% | 0% | 5% |
| Fox/Pulse Opinion Research (report) | October 23, 2010 | 1,000 | ± 3.0% | 48% | 44% | 5% | 3% |
| Suffolk University (report Archived November 4, 2010, at the Wayback Machine) | October 21–24, 2010 | 600 | ± 4.0% | 52% | 43% | 4% | 2% |
| SurveyUSA (report) | October 21–25, 2010 | 594 | ± 4.1% | 45% | 40% | 7% | 8% |
| Field Poll (report) | October 14–26, 2010 | 1,501 | ± 3.2% | 49% | 41% | — | 10% |
| CNN/Time/Opinion Research (report) | October 20–26, 2010 | 1,527 | ± 2.5% | 50% | 45% | 1% | — |
| Rasmussen Reports (report) | October 27, 2010 | 750 | ± 4.0% | 49% | 46% | 2% | 3% |
| Angus Reid Public Opinion (report) | October 28–29, 2010 | 485 | ± 4.5% | 51% | 44% | 5% | — |
| SurveyUSA (report) | October 26–31, 2010 | 587 | ± 4.1% | 46% | 38% | 6% | 10% |
| Public Policy Polling (report) | October 29–31, 2010 | 882 | ± 3.3% | 50% | 46% | — | 3% |
| Poll source | Dates administered | Barbara Boxer | Chuck DeVore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research 2000[26] | August 9–12, 2009 | 53% | 29% |
| Rasmussen Reports[27] | September 23, 2009 | 46% | 37% |
| The Field Poll[28] | September 18 – October 6, 2009 | 50% | 33% |
| Rasmussen Reports[29] | November 17, 2009 | 46% | 36% |
| Rasmussen Reports[30] | January 14, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| The Field Poll[31] | January 5–17, 2010 | 51% | 34% |
| PPIC[32] | January 27, 2010 | 47% | 39% |
| Rasmussen Reports[33] | February 11, 2010 | 47% | 42% |
| Research 2000[34] | March 10, 2010 | 49% | 39% |
| Rasmussen Reports[35] | March 11, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Field Research[36] | March 18, 2010 | 45% | 41% |
| PPIC[37] | March 24, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Rasmussen Reports[38] | April 12, 2010 | 42% | 39% |
| Rasmussen Reports[38] | May 12, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Public Policy Institute of California (Report) | May 2010 | 50% | 39% |
| Research 2000[39] | May 17–19, 2010 | 47% | 38% |
| Public Policy Polling[40] | May 21–23, 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| USC/Los Angeles Times (Report) | May 19–26, 2010 | 46% | 36% |
| Poll source | Dates administered | Barbara Boxer | Tom Campbell |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rasmussen Reports[30] | January 14, 2010 | 46% | 42% |
| The Field Poll[31] | January 5–17, 2010 | 48% | 38% |
| PPIC[32] | January 27, 2010 | 45% | 41% |
| Rasmussen Reports[33] | February 11, 2010 | 45% | 41% |
| Research 2000[34] | March 10, 2010 | 47% | 43% |
| Rasmussen Reports[35] | March 11, 2010 | 43% | 41% |
| Field Research[36] | March 18, 2010 | 43% | 44% |
| PPIC[37] | March 24, 2010 | 43% | 44% |
| Rasmussen Reports[38] | April 12, 2010 | 42% | 41% |
| Rasmussen Reports[38] | May 12, 2010 | 42% | 41% |
| Public Policy Institute of California (Report) | May 2010 | 46% | 40% |
| Research 2000[39] | May 17–19, 2010 | 47% | 40% |
| Public Policy Polling[40] | May 21–23, 2010 | 47% | 40% |
| USC/Los Angeles Times (Report) | May 19–26, 2010 | 38% | 45% |
Fundraising
[edit]| Candidate (party) | Receipts | Disbursements | Cash on hand | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbara Boxer (D) | $20,314,189 | $22,178,746 | $2,271,034 | $0 |
| Carly Fiorina (R) | $17,935,605 | $16,664,055 | $1,271,550 | $805,844 |
| Jerry Carroll (I) | $140 | $140 | $10 | $1,305 |
| Marsha Feinland (P&F) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Neil Goldberg (I) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Gail Lightfoot (L) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Edward Noonan (AI) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| Duane Roberts (G) | $0 | $0 | $0 | $12,562 |
| Source: Federal Election Commission (FEC)[41] (Note that some candidates filed with the FEC, but did not pursue their candidacy.) | ||||
Results
[edit]Despite the last poll before the election showed Fiorina only trailing by 4 points, on election night Boxer defeated Fiorina by a ten-point margin, and around a one million vote majority. Boxer performed extremely well in Los Angeles County, and the San Francisco Bay Area. Boxer was declared the winner shortly after the polls closed. Fiorina conceded defeat to Boxer at 11:38 P.M.
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Barbara Boxer (incumbent) | 5,218,137 | 52.18% | −5.53% | |
| Republican | Carly Fiorina | 4,217,386 | 42.17% | +4.37% | |
| Libertarian | Gail Lightfoot | 175,235 | 1.75% | −0.05% | |
| Peace and Freedom | Marsha Feinland | 135,088 | 1.35% | −0.67% | |
| Green | Duane Roberts | 128,512 | 1.29% | N/A | |
| American Independent | Edward Noonan | 125,435 | 1.25% | +0.58% | |
| Write-in | 67 | 0.00% | ±0.00% | ||
| Total votes | 9,999,860 | 100.0% | |||
| Democratic hold | |||||
By county
[edit]Results from the Secretary of State of California.[43]
| County | Boxer | Votes | Fiorina | Votes | Noonan | Votes | Roberts | Votes | Lightfoot | Votes | Feinland | Votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alameda | 73.9% | 338,632 | 22.1% | 100,989 | 0.7% | 3,362 | 1.3% | 5,560 | 1.1% | 5,334 | 0.9% | 4,537 |
| Alpine | 50.9% | 282 | 44.0% | 244 | 0.7% | 4 | 0.7% | 4 | 2.5% | 14 | 1.2% | 7 |
| Amador | 31.9% | 5,137 | 59.6% | 9,617 | 2.3% | 364 | 1.2% | 209 | 3.0% | 480 | 2.0% | 334 |
| Butte | 37.0% | 27,827 | 54.5% | 40,958 | 1.8% | 1,393 | 1.9% | 1,435 | 2.9% | 2,181 | 1.9% | 1,456 |
| Calaveras | 32.1% | 6,294 | 58.6% | 11,495 | 3.0% | 593 | 1.6% | 326 | 3.1% | 617 | 1.6% | 324 |
| Colusa | 30.3% | 1,567 | 63.4% | 3,288 | 1.4% | 76 | 1.2% | 67 | 2.2% | 109 | 1.5% | 81 |
| Contra Costa | 59.8% | 206,270 | 35.9% | 123,934 | 1.0% | 3,492 | 1.0% | 3,607 | 1.4% | 4,996 | 0.9% | 3,181 |
| Del Norte | 39.4% | 3,212 | 52.0% | 4,240 | 2.1% | 177 | 1.8% | 154 | 3.0% | 245 | 1.7% | 139 |
| El Dorado | 32.7% | 25,085 | 61.0% | 46,771 | 1.3% | 1,043 | 1.1% | 910 | 2.4% | 1,822 | 1.5% | 1,129 |
| Fresno | 37.5% | 74,705 | 57.0% | 113,583 | 1.3% | 2,633 | 1.2% | 2,431 | 1.5% | 3,067 | 1.5% | 3,079 |
| Glenn | 25.5% | 2,020 | 66.3% | 5,257 | 2.1% | 174 | 1.6% | 128 | 2.7% | 208 | 1.8% | 143 |
| Humboldt | 54.6% | 27,081 | 37.6% | 18,659 | 0.8% | 420 | 3.2% | 1,574 | 2.5% | 1,284 | 1.3% | 653 |
| Imperial | 55.6% | 14,802 | 37.2% | 9,887 | 1.2% | 341 | 1.9% | 516 | 1.9% | 511 | 2.2% | 570 |
| Inyo | 33.8% | 2,353 | 56.2% | 3,909 | 2.4% | 169 | 1.7% | 120 | 3.5% | 241 | 2.4% | 170 |
| Kern | 30.0% | 51,364 | 62.0% | 106,448 | 1.9% | 3,302 | 1.4% | 2,435 | 2.6% | 4,522 | 2.1% | 3,641 |
| Kings | 30.0% | 7,816 | 62.7% | 16,362 | 2.2% | 560 | 1.1% | 309 | 1.9% | 520 | 2.1% | 542 |
| Lake | 49.0% | 10,265 | 40.8% | 8,534 | 2.8% | 585 | 2.4% | 505 | 3.0% | 625 | 2.0% | 440 |
| Lassen | 24.0% | 2,200 | 66.7% | 6,127 | 1.6% | 155 | 1.7% | 157 | 4.0% | 374 | 2.0% | 185 |
| Los Angeles | 62.3% | 1,432,450 | 32.6% | 749,353 | 1.0% | 23,198 | 1.2% | 29,323 | 1.5% | 33,431 | 1.4% | 32,168 |
| Madera | 30.3% | 10,308 | 62.9% | 21,413 | 1.7% | 601 | 1.3% | 462 | 1.9% | 632 | 1.9% | 630 |
| Marin | 69.3% | 78,236 | 27.5% | 31,001 | 0.6% | 756 | 0.9% | 982 | 1.1% | 1,237 | 0.6% | 710 |
| Mariposa | 31.8% | 2,593 | 60.4% | 4,939 | 1.9% | 158 | 1.7% | 147 | 2.8% | 223 | 1.4% | 118 |
| Mendocino | 61.6% | 19,422 | 29.9% | 9,426 | 2.0% | 643 | 2.8% | 867 | 2.3% | 749 | 1.4% | 472 |
| Merced | 40.2% | 19,058 | 53.4% | 25,280 | 1.7% | 827 | 1.2% | 576 | 1.8% | 854 | 1.7% | 831 |
| Modoc | 20.9% | 787 | 70.6% | 2,666 | 2.2% | 84 | 1.4% | 56 | 3.1% | 116 | 1.8% | 68 |
| Mono | 43.5% | 1,155 | 50.1% | 1,455 | 1.7% | 154 | 1.5% | 81 | 2.1% | 76 | 1.1% | 556 |
| Monterey | 59.1% | 58,574 | 35.0% | 34,721 | 1.1% | 1,182 | 1.3% | 1,315 | 2.0% | 1,914 | 1.5% | 1,497 |
| Napa | 56.2% | 26,194 | 38.1% | 17,743 | 1.4% | 658 | 1.5% | 732 | 1.8% | 836 | 1.0% | 511 |
| Nevada | 40.9% | 18,504 | 52.7% | 23,875 | 0.6% | 310 | 1.8% | 860 | 3.1% | 1,367 | 0.9% | 424 |
| Orange | 37.1% | 323,477 | 57.7% | 502,756 | 1.1% | 10,432 | 1.1% | 10,137 | 1.7% | 14,625 | 1.3% | 10,904 |
| Placer | 33.6% | 47,331 | 60.2% | 84,905 | 1.5% | 2,142 | 1.0% | 1,518 | 2.2% | 3,239 | 1.5% | 2,132 |
| Plumas | 32.1% | 2,934 | 60.3% | 5,521 | 1.7% | 161 | 1.4% | 131 | 2.8% | 257 | 1.7% | 160 |
| Riverside | 40.7% | 195,418 | 53.2% | 255,738 | 1.6% | 8,117 | 1.2% | 6,046 | 1.8% | 8,321 | 1.5% | 7,404 |
| Sacramento | 50.4% | 210,164 | 43.5% | 181,300 | 1.6% | 6,833 | 1.1% | 4,981 | 2.1% | 8,667 | 1.3% | 5,560 |
| San Benito | 49.7% | 7,909 | 43.8% | 6,977 | 1.3% | 215 | 1.1% | 191 | 2.2% | 337 | 1.9% | 307 |
| San Bernardino | 42.7% | 185,164 | 49.9% | 216,441 | 1.8% | 8,111 | 1.4% | 6,302 | 2.4% | 10,424 | 1.8% | 7,926 |
| San Diego | 43.5% | 389,806 | 50.7% | 454,301 | 1.3% | 11,725 | 1.3% | 11,808 | 1.8% | 16,578 | 1.4% | 12,585 |
| San Francisco | 80.0% | 213,252 | 16.2% | 43,108 | 0.6% | 1,630 | 1.5% | 3,863 | 1.0% | 2,780 | 0.7% | 1,937 |
| San Joaquin | 44.5% | 70,031 | 48.5% | 76,342 | 1.6% | 2,608 | 1.3% | 2,122 | 2.1% | 3,358 | 2.0% | 3,175 |
| San Luis Obispo | 42.8% | 44,799 | 51.2% | 53,695 | 1.2% | 1,347 | 1.1% | 1,250 | 2.5% | 2,521 | 1.2% | 1,293 |
| San Mateo | 66.5% | 146,537 | 29.9% | 65,803 | 0.8% | 1,866 | 1.0% | 2,208 | 1.2% | 2,605 | 0.6% | 1,480 |
| Santa Barbara | 49.8% | 64,771 | 45.2% | 58,817 | 1.0% | 1,425 | 1.0% | 1,432 | 1.8% | 2,243 | 1.2% | 1,578 |
| Santa Clara | 63.3% | 320,734 | 32.0% | 161,986 | 1.0% | 5,105 | 1.1% | 5,711 | 1.6% | 8,148 | 1.0% | 5,295 |
| Santa Cruz | 68.6% | 65,049 | 25.4% | 24,065 | 0.9% | 923 | 1.6% | 1,579 | 2.2% | 2,048 | 2.3% | 1,257 |
| Shasta | 26.4% | 17,204 | 66.1% | 43,056 | 2.0% | 1,266 | 1.3% | 902 | 2.6% | 1,683 | 1.6% | 1,060 |
| Sierra | 29.1% | 529 | 62.3% | 1,135 | 2.4% | 45 | 1.4% | 27 | 2.8% | 51 | 2.0% | 37 |
| Siskiyou | 33.7% | 6,132 | 57.2% | 10,430 | 2.2% | 405 | 1.4% | 270 | 3.6% | 648 | 1.9% | 360 |
| Solano | 55.1% | 64,658 | 39.2% | 45,995 | 1.3% | 1,600 | 1.2% | 1,429 | 2.0% | 2,289 | 1.2% | 1,460 |
| Sonoma | 64.3% | 116,996 | 29.5% | 53,678 | 1.4% | 2,686 | 1.5% | 2,806 | 2.1% | 3,720 | 1.2% | 2,281 |
| Stanislaus | 39.6% | 47,158 | 53.6% | 63,814 | 1.6% | 2,007 | 1.5% | 1,789 | 2.0% | 2,455 | 1.7% | 2,029 |
| Sutter | 31.9% | 8,121 | 61.2% | 15,606 | 1.9% | 487 | 1.1% | 292 | 2.4% | 607 | 1.5% | 408 |
| Tehama | 26.6% | 5,352 | 64.3% | 12,950 | 2.6% | 524 | 1.5% | 321 | 3.1% | 622 | 1.9% | 397 |
| Trinity | 37.1% | 2,029 | 51.4% | 2,813 | 2.0% | 112 | 3.5% | 192 | 4.4% | 242 | 1.6% | 90 |
| Tulare | 30.6% | 24,742 | 62.9% | 50,856 | 1.5% | 1,264 | 1.1% | 921 | 1.8% | 1,509 | 2.1% | 1,625 |
| Tuolumne | 33.4% | 7,430 | 58.6% | 13,057 | 2.6% | 576 | 1.6% | 359 | 2.5% | 564 | 1.3% | 304 |
| Ventura | 44.8% | 115,337 | 49.9% | 128,619 | 1.3% | 3,394 | 1.1% | 3,095 | 1.8% | 4,586 | 1.1 | 2,965 |
| Yolo | 59.0% | 34,925 | 35.9% | 21,263 | 1.1% | 683 | 1.2% | 764 | 1.7% | 973 | 1.1% | 677 |
| Yuba | 32.4% | 5,212 | 58.6% | 9,452 | 2.4% | 394 | 1.4% | 231 | 3.3% | 536 | 1.9% | 210 |
- Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican
- Merced (largest community: Merced)
- Mono (largest municipality: Mammoth Lakes)
- San Luis Obispo (largest town: San Luis Obispo)
- San Bernardino (largest town: San Bernardino)
- San Diego (largest community: San Diego)
- San Joaquin (largest city: Stockton)
- Santa Barbara (largest municipality: Santa Barbara)
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "2010 Gubernatorial Primary Official Certified List of Candidates" (PDF). California Secretary of State. April 9, 2010. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
- ^ "Sen. Boxer to officer: Don't call me ma'am". Washington Times. June 19, 2009. Retrieved May 25, 2010.
- ^ Sen. Boxer Offers No Apology for Rebuking Brigadier General Who Called Her 'Ma'am'
- ^ Barbara Boxer is a Senator, damn it, and don’t you forget it (video)
- ^ Garofoli, Joe (February 5, 2010). "Demon sheep' ad may be bad move, experts say". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved June 8, 2010.
- ^
snu (April 28, 2010). "Wackelnder demokratischer Senatssitz" [Uncertain Democratic Senate seat]. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (in German). Zürich. p. 9.
Sie dürfte sich indes mit ihren filmtechnisch stümperhaften, inhaltlich dümmlichen Werbespots gegen ihren innerparteilichen Widersacher Tom Campbell komprimittiert haben. Darin zeichnet Fiorina den allgemein als kompetent und freundlich geltenden Abgeordneten als gefährlichen Wolf im Schafspelz.
- ^ Hiltzik, Michael (November 5, 2009). "Carly Fiorina's Senate campaign an uninspiring product launch". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved November 8, 2009.
- ^ Lin, Judy (November 7, 2009). "Fiorina: 'Shame on me' for not voting more". KTVK. Associated Press. Archived from the original on June 16, 2011. Retrieved November 8, 2009.
- ^ Mehta, Seema (February 25, 2010). "GOP Senate race grows heated over Israel". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved June 8, 2010.
- ^ Freking, Kevin & Hindery, Robin (March 5, 2010). "Calif. Senate debate focuses on support for Israel". Boston.com. Associated Press. Retrieved December 11, 2022.
- ^ Mehta, Seema (March 4, 2010). "DeVore, Campbell face-to-face in GOP Senate debate; Fiorina to phone in". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 5, 2010.
- ^ "Plea Agreement; U.S. v. Al-Arian" (PDF). Nine Eleven Finding Answers Foundation. February 28, 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 1, 2012. Retrieved March 8, 2010.
- ^ MegLaughlin, In his plea deal, what did Sami Al-Arian admit to?, St. Petersburg Times, April 23, 2006.
- ^ Hogue News Archived August 19, 2010, at the Library of Congress Web Archives, "Spirited CA GOP Senatorial Debate," by Eric Hogue (March 5, 2010 – retrieved on March 5, 2010).
- ^ a b Mehta, Seema (March 15, 2010). "Letter on Muslim radical roils GOP Senate race; Website posts text contradicting Tom Campbell's claim of writing on behalf of donor Sami Al-Arian before 9/11". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 15, 2010.
- ^ "Fiorina aide accused of calling Campbell an anti-Semite – San Jose Mercury News". Mercurynews.com. February 25, 2010. Retrieved March 16, 2010.
- ^ The Associated Press. ""Calif. Senate candidate on defensive over Israel", Associated Press, March 9, 2010, accessed March 15, 2010". Mercurynews.com. Retrieved March 30, 2010. [dead link]
- ^ a b c "Tom Campbell letter stokes controversy over ties to jihadist". Mercury News. March 9, 2010. Retrieved March 14, 2010.
- ^ Marelius, John (March 14, 2010). "Fiorina lashes out at Boxer, 'destructive elitism'; Senate candidate, opponents squabble at GOP convention". San Diego Union Tribune. Retrieved March 17, 2010.
- ^ "McLaughlin, Ken, "Candidates for California governor promise to release income tax returns," Mercury News, March 13, 2010, accessed March 17, 2010". Mercurynews.com. March 12, 2010. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
- ^ a b c d Mehta, Seema (January 21, 2002). "Republican Senate candidate's professorial style may be out of step". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 30, 2010.
- ^ "Certified List of Candidates 2010 Gubernatorial General" (PDF). California Secretary of State. August 26, 2010. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
- ^ Matier, Phillip; Andrew Ross (July 19, 2010). "Boxer calls out Fiorina as multiple yacht owner". San Francisco Chronicle. San Francisco, California. Retrieved July 28, 2010.
- ^ "Fiorina-led HP sold to Iran, Boxer charges". Archived from the original on May 18, 2015. Retrieved May 16, 2015.
- ^ "Barbara Boxer for U.S. Senate – News – News Coverage | Boxer and Fiorina set to debate". Barbaraboxer.com. August 6, 2010. Archived from the original on August 19, 2010. Retrieved August 21, 2010.
- ^ Research 2000
- ^ Rasmussen Reports
- ^ The Field Poll
- ^ Rasmussen Reports
- ^ a b Rasmussen Reports
- ^ a b The Field Poll
- ^ a b PPIC
- ^ a b Rasmussen Reports
- ^ a b Research 2000
- ^ a b Rasmussen Reports
- ^ a b Field Research
- ^ a b PPIC
- ^ a b c d Rasmussen Reports
- ^ a b Research 2000
- ^ a b Public Policy Polling
- ^ "2010 House and Senate Campaign Finance for California". Federal Election Commission. Retrieved July 25, 2010.[permanent dead link]
- ^ "Statement of the Vote – November 2, 2010 General Election" (PDF). California Secretary of State.
- ^ "2010 General Election - United States Senator" (PDF). California Secretary of State.
External links
[edit]- California Secretary of State – Elections and Voter Information
- U.S. Congress candidates for California Archived June 10, 2010, at the Wayback Machine at Project Vote Smart
- California U.S. Senate from OurCampaigns.com
- Campaign contributions from Open Secrets
- 2010 California Senate Election graph of multiple polls from Pollster.com
- Election 2010: California Senate from Rasmussen Reports
- 2010 California Senate Race from Real Clear Politics
- 2010 California Senate Race from CQ Politics
- Race profile from The New York Times
Debates
- California Senate Republican Primary Debate, C-SPAN, May 8, 2010
- California Senate Debate Archived October 12, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, C-SPAN, September 1, 2010], San Francisco Chronicle, KQED KTVU-TV, full video (57:00)
- California Senate Debate, C-SPAN, September 29, 2010, full video (56:54)
Official campaign sites (Archived)
EncycloReader
is supported by the 
KSF