| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of the first round by department and region | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of the second round by department and region | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The French Socialist Party held a two-round presidential primary to select a candidate for the 2017 presidential election on 22 and 29 January 2017. It was the second open primary (primaires citoyennes) held by the center-left coalition, after the primary in 2011 in which François Hollande defeated Martine Aubry to become the Socialist nominee. Hollande went on to defeat incumbent Nicolas Sarkozy in the 2012 presidential election. However, because of his low approval rating, he announced that he would not seek re-election, becoming the first president of the Fifth Republic to decide not to run for a second term. The primary was contested by seven candidates, four from the Socialist Party and three representing other parties part of the left-wing electoral alliance (la Belle Alliance populaire).
The three frontrunners in the first round of the primary were Manuel Valls, who served as Hollande's Prime Minister from 2014 to 2016 and interior minister from 2012 to 2014; Benoît Hamon, Minister of National Education in 2014; and Arnaud Montebourg, Minister of the Economy, Production Recovery and the Digital Sector from 2012 to 2014. On 22 January, Hamon received 36.03% and Valls 31.48% of the vote in the first round and advanced to the runoff, far ahead of all other candidates and well ahead of Montebourg, who was eliminated and immediately endorsed Hamon. In the runoff, Hamon easily defeated Valls, beating the ex-PM by nearly 20 percentage points, and officially took the mantle as nominee of the PS in the 2017 presidential election.
At the 2012 Toulouse Congress, the Socialist Party (PS) modified its statutes to guarantee the selection of a candidate of the left through open primaries, with the National Council of the Socialist Party announcing the timetable and organization of the primaries at least one year beforehand.[1] On 11 January, Libération published an editorial in favor of a "primary of the left and ecologists",[2] and on 9 April the National Council of the Socialist Party unanimously approved the idea of holding such a primary in early December.[3] The same day, Europe Ecology – The Greens (EELV) adopted a motion saying that it would "welcome with interest" such a primary, but withheld formal support.[2] On 18 June, the National Council finally confirmed that it would organize a primary to select a candidate for the 2017 presidential election. Applications could be submitted from 1 to 15 December, with two rounds of voting planned for 22 and 29 January 2017. Under the rules of the primary, candidates of the PS, Radical Party of the Left (PRG), and pro-government ex-EELV forces – i.e., the Ecologist Party (PE) and Union of Democrats and Ecologists (UDE) – in addition to all those who supported the primary process.[4]
The PRG suspended its participation in the Belle Alliance populaire (BAP) of left-wing forces on 29 June 2016, denouncing the Socialist Party's unilateral decision to run a primary,[5] and arguing that the BAP should not become a "simple satellite movement of the Socialist Party".[6] On 2 July, the delegates of the BAP unanimously approved the organization of the primary.[7] The PRG voted to support the candidacy of its party leader Sylvia Pinel, outside the primary, on 26 November,[8] but on 6 December Pinel announced that she would ultimately run in the primary of the left,[9] a decision the party's steering committee confirmed on 14 December.[10] Prospective PS candidates were required to sign the primary's charter of ethics requiring candidates to rally behind its winner and to secure the support of 5% of one of the following groups: members of the National Council; Socialist parliamentarians, regional and departmental Socialist councilors in at least 4 regions and 10 departments; or Socialist mayors representing more than 10,000 people in at least 4 regions and 10 departments.[11] The conditions for becoming a candidate of other member parties of the BAP – the PRG, UDE, PE, and Democratic Front (FD) – were determined by the respective parties' leadership.[12]
The EELV declared on 20 June that it would not participate in the primary,[13] and the French Communist Party (PCF) did likewise the following day.[14] After declaring his candidacy for the presidential election, Emmanuel Macron of En Marche! also declined to participate,[15] as did Jean-Luc Mélenchon under the banner of La France Insoumise, saying that he did not want to run in a primary with François Hollande since he would not be able to support Hollande if he won.[16] He later reaffirmed this by saying that with the exclusion of the EELV and PRG the primary was not truly "of the left" but a "primary of the Socialist Party".[17] On 1 December, Hollande declared that he would not seek a second term, becoming the first President of the Fifth Republic to renounce a reelection bid. His announcement reflected his high personal unpopularity and resentment among Socialist colleagues regarding remarks he made about cabinet members and other associates in the book Un président ne devrait pas dire ça... (A president should not say that...) by Gérard Davet and Fabrice Lhomme, journalists at Le Monde.[18]
On 17 December, the High Authority of the open primary declared that seven candidates qualified to appear on the ballot, including four from the Socialist Party – former Prime Minister Manuel Valls, Arnaud Montebourg, Benoît Hamon, and Vincent Peillon – the other three being François de Rugy of the PE, Sylvia Pinel of the PRG, and Jean-Luc Bennahmias of the PD.[19]
Former economy minister Arnaud Montebourg, who also ran for the nomination of the Socialists in 2011, was one of the first to declare interest in a speech at Mont Beuvray on 16 May 2016, widely viewed as indicating his interest in running for the presidency, in which he issued a "call" to "build" a "great alternative project for France" to an audience of 200 Socialist Party militants. Among those in attendance were former minister Aurélie Filippetti, as well as MPs Christian Paul, chief among the party's rebels, having had a part in the foundation of the New Socialist Party caucus along with Montebourg, Laurent Baumel and Patrice Prat.[20] Montebourg officially declared his candidacy on 16 August, decrying Hollande's betrayal of the "ideals of the left" in Frangy-en-Bresse in his home département of Saône-et-Loire, and laid out an anti-globalization campaign platform based on protectionism for French businesses, threats to nationalize predatory banks, and tax breaks for the middle class, themes which became central to his campaign.[21] These themes were reflective of his combative tenure as economy minister, in which he threatened to nationalize divisions of ArcelorMittal and attempted but ultimately failed to prevent General Electric's partial acquisition of French multinational Alstom.[22]
Former French education minister Benoît Hamon, another founder of the New Socialist Party caucus, declared his candidacy on the same day, arguing that Hollande could "no longer earn the French people's trust" and proposed to raise the minimum wage, to further reduce the 35-hour workweek instituted by the Socialists in 2000 to 32 hours, a €35 billion stimulus for the French economy,[23] and legalizing marijuana. His signature campaign plan, however, was his intention to introduce a €300–400 billion universal basic income program funded by a tax on robots, equivalent to a monthly income of approximately €750 per person.[24] Like Montebourg, he was ejected from the Socialist government by prime minister Manuel Valls in a wider purge of left-wing dissenters after the fall of the First Valls Government in August 2014.[22] On 1 December 2016, incumbent President François Hollande announced in a televised address from the Élysée Palace that he would not seek a second term in office, clearing the way for Valls to enter the race,[18] who subsequently announced his candidacy on 5 December.[25]
Valls, Montebourg, and Hamon ultimately became the main three contenders for the Socialist nomination, but several other candidates ultimately participated in the primary. Former Minister of National Education Vincent Peillon made a late bid to become the Socialist nominee, announcing his candidacy on 11 December, returning from a two-and-a-half-year residency in Switzerland in which he taught philosophy at the University of Neuchâtel and wrote novels; his bid contrasts with those of Montebourg and Hamon, representing the mainstream Socialist Party as opposed to its left-wing rebels.[26] Three other candidates, not of the Socialist Party, also ran in the primary as members of the parties of la Belle Alliance Populaire, a left-wing grouping. Among these were MP François de Rugy,[22] representing the Ecologist Party which he founded along with Senator Jean-Vincent Placé after leaving the EELV in August 2015 over concerns about the party pandering to its left wing;[27] Sylvia Pinel of the Radical Party of the Left (PRG), and Jean-Luc Bennahmias, who left the Democratic Movement to found his own centre-left party, the Democratic Front.[22]
Several other candidates also filed petitions to run in the primary, including Senator Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, Gérard Filoche, Fabien Verdier, and Pierre Larrouturou. Despite initially contemplating running, Lienemann decided not to run in the primary on 9 December, worried about the splitting of votes between candidates of the party's left wing – Montebourg and Hamon – and urging them to unite forces. Although she stated that she faced pressure to withdraw her candidacy, these pressures were not a factor in her recusal from the primary.[28] Filoche, a trade unionist, failed to secure the necessary number of sponsors to enter the primary (though he attempted to lodge a challenge against the decision of the High Authority),[29] as did Verdier. Both men claimed that, because they represented other left-wing parties (Parti politique Filoche2017 and Convictions, respectively), they were not bound by the requirement to seek sufficient support, as with Pinel, de Rugy, and Bennahmias; nevertheless, the decision to exclude both was reaffirmed.[30] Larrouturou's application was rejected because his New Deal party was not a member of the left-wing alliance for the primary, as were those of Bastien Faudot of the Citizen and Republican Movement and Sébastien Nadot of the Movement of Progressives.[31]
Polling: Who was the most convincing candidate during this debate? | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Debate | Poll source | Among all respondents | Among left-wing sympathizers | |||||
Valls | Montebourg | Hamon | Valls | Montebourg | Hamon | |||
1 | Elabe* | 26% | 29% | 20% | 28% | 23% | 27% | |
Odoxa** | 27% | 33% | 20% | 34% | 25% | 27% | ||
Harris**† | 29% | 20% | 22% | 31% | 17% | 32% | ||
2 | Elabe* | 26% | 29% | 25% | 28% | 24% | 30% | |
Harris**† | 23% | 30% | 26% | 27% | 24% | 36% | ||
3 | Elabe* | 21% | 28% | 29% | 24% | 23% | 34% | |
OpinionWay*†† | 19% | 20% | 24% | 25% | 23% | 32% | ||
Harris**† | 24% | 26% | 28% | 25% | 26% | 34% | ||
* conducted among viewers of the debate ** among those aware of the debate †excluding "none of these candidates" ††among those intending to vote in the primary as opposed to left-wing sympathizers |
The unpopularity of incumbent president Hollande led to widespread speculation as to whether he would choose to run for re-election, facing fierce competition within his own party in the Socialist primary; when he ultimately renounced his candidacy on 1 December 2016,[18] he cleared the way for prime minister Manuel Valls to enter the field on 5 December.[25] Valls, considered the "natural successor" to Hollande and whose attempts to modernize the Socialist Party have been characterized as similar to those of Tony Blair with the British Labour Party, earned a reputation for his law-and-order approach as prime minister, instituting business-friendly supply-side reforms and taking a tough position on migration, at one point even questioning whether Islam was compatible with the French Republic; all these views placed him well to the right wing of his party. Valls' important role in Hollande's government resulted in him becoming similarly unpopular, even within his own party and on the left.[22][32]
On 15 December, he declared that if elected president, he would abolish article 49-3, an executive degree enshrined within the Constitution of France. He controversially used it as prime minister to force laws through the National Assembly, bypassing legislative approval, to send them directly to the Senate,[33] and his repudiation of the 49-3 was met with derision, Valls having used it to force through controversial labour reforms in the El Khomri law and the reformist Macron law, moves often described as indicative of his authoritarian tendencies.[34] Valls further attempted to portray himself as a candidate "profoundly of the left" by backing down on his earlier tough tone towards labour, promising not to institute any further reforms to France's 35-hour workweek – beloved by the French left – nor its labour laws, instead taking an anti-austerity tone; despite this, his campaign was overshadowed by past policies such as the abolition of the wealth tax.[35]
Unveiling his platform on 3 January 2017, he proposed a 2.5% increase in public spending contingent on annual economic growth of 1.9% while keeping the deficit below the 3% of GDP requirement mandated by the Stability and Growth Pact, the creation a "decent income" of €800 for all adult French nationals, halving the gender pay gap in France, a "pause" in the enlargement of the European Union, the addition of a charter of secularism to the Constitution, and the consolidation of the nuclear industry.[36][37] Valls was physically attacked twice during the campaign; the first incident occurred on 22 December 2016, in which he was flour-bombed by a protester screaming "We do not forget the 49-3. We don't forgive it," a reference to his claim that he would abolish the constitutional provision he twice used to bypass legislative approval, during a visit to a Christmas market in Strasbourg.[38] The second incident, on 17 January 2017, involved an apparent Breton nationalist who slapped him during a campaign stop in Lamballe; although Valls initially brushed the episode off, saying "it's nothing,"[39] he later made to press charges, saying "Democracy cannot be about violence."[40]
Valls' most prominent opponent was initially considered to be former economy minister Arnaud Montebourg,[35] who formally unveiled his platform in Paris on 3 January. The left-wing firebrand proclaimed that French employees should receive wage rises equivalent to executives' in order to constrain corporate pay and called for a "supertax" on banks to raise €5 billion a year. Challenged by former education minister Benoît Hamon, who argued that the focus on economic growth and employment is misplaced, Montebourg argued that the prior was a "necessity" and claimed that he "challenged the theory of the end of work." He also criticized a perceived European obsession with austerity, condemning it as the cause of the country's persistently high rates of unemployment and dismal economic growth, promising to "liberate the French from European-imposed austerity."[41] He also pledged during the campaign that he would not comply with EU deficit rules, in contrast to Valls, embark upon an "economic patriotism" (described as protectionism by some observers), reserve 80 percent of government contracts for French small businesses, reinstate border controls, repeal the El Khomri jobs bill, defend small domestic businesses, warn that he might engage in a trade war against China, and support a €30 billion infrastructure plan.[42][43]
Montebourg's months-long position in second place, however, was challenged by a surge of support for Benoît Hamon, with the primary becoming a three-man race between Valls, Hamon, and Montebourg by mid-January. Hamon's strongly left-wing program of legalizing cannabis, taxing robots to fund a universal basic income, and reducing the 35-hour workweek to 32 hours, attracted many left-wing voters disillusioned by the Socialists' turn toward business-friendly policies, championed under Hollande's presidency by the likes of Valls and Macron. The former education minister's late rise was likened to that of François Fillon in the primary of the centre-right Republicans party, his rise propelled by his championing of left-wing values and vision of a society that spends less time working, enjoys higher pay, and emphasizes the importance GDP growth less. Hamon has also decried "neoconservatives" and "even those on the left" who wished to restrict the rights of French Muslims, a less-than-subtle denunciation of Valls's hardline stance on immigration.[24] His proposal for a universal income has been his signature policy; in the final primary debate, he insisted that it "creates work" and "allows employees to reduce their workdays, and it can further contract and eradicate poverty," and post-debate polls indicated left-wing voters consistently viewed Hamon as being the most convincing candidate.[43]
Three debates were held before the first round of the primary. The first, syndicated by TF1, Public Sénat, LCI, RTL, and co-organized by L'Observateur, aired at 21:00 CET on 12 January, moderated by Gilles Bouleau, Élizabeth Martichoux, and Matthieu Croissandeau; the second, by BFM TV, RMC, and I-TV, aired at 18:00 CET on 15 January, moderated by Ruth Elkrief, Laurence Ferrari, and Laurent Neumann; the third, by France 2, Europe 1, LCP, TV5Monde, and regional daily newspapers, aired at 21:00 CET on 19 January, moderated by David Pujadas, Léa Salamé, and Fabien Namias. The first debate attracted 3.83 million viewers, representing an audience share of 18.3%;[44] the second 1.75 million, representing a share of 7.9%;[45] and the third 3.07 million, a share of 15%.[46]
Hamon came on top in the first round of the primary, followed by Valls; as neither of the two secured more than 50% of the vote, a second round was held on 29 January. Montebourg, relegated to third place, conceded defeat and pledged to vote for Hamon in the second round. Peillon came fourth, de Rugy fifth, Pinel sixth, and Bennahmias last. Of these four candidates, Pinel backed Valls in the second round; Peillon did not endorse but encouraged voters to mobilize; and de Rugy also chose not to endorse immediately afterwards, hoping to meet the top two contenders on 23 January to decide. Only 7,350 polling stations were open during the primary, compared to 9,425 in the 2011 primary and 10,228 in the primary of the right.[48] Meanwhile, Bennahmias, with just over 1% of the primary vote, did not initially endorse any candidate and expressed his intent to announce a decision on 25 January;[49] he ultimately backed Valls.[50]
An overnight update of the official primary results published 10:00 CET on 23 January added approximately three hundred thousand votes, without any change in the vote share of any candidate, arousing suspicions among observers and the French press. Two hours later, an update to the total of votes obtained by Sylvia Pinel was published, increasing her vote share by 0.01% (i.e., 160 additional votes). However, the total number of votes for Pinel increased by 161, more than the total number of overall votes, with changes to no other candidates. The results were initially speculated to have been manipulated into inflate the apparent turnout, which was low compared to past primaries.[51] The PS initially attributed the results to a "bug", but later conceded that it had been a result of "human error." However, the French press remained skeptical, noting the improbability of a nearly-identical 28% increase in votes for all seven candidates.[47] There was also additional confusion, even prior to reports about the potential manipulation of vote totals, surrounding the number of polling stations open (which, according to PS, is fewer than 7,350 because many were merged with others) and the vagueness of PS officials on primary turnout, compounded by the fact that no comprehensive public record of primary results was published.[49]
The second round runoff was held on 29 January between Benoît Hamon and Manuel Valls. An additional debate was held before the second round, syndicated between France Inter, TF1, and France 2 at 21:00 CET on 25 January, moderated by Gilles Bouleau, David Pujadas, and Alexandra Bensaid, after which an Elabe poll found that 60% of viewers were most convinced by Hamon, compared to 37% for Valls; the margin was 61–36 among left-wing sympathizers.[52] In the second round of the primary on 29 January, Hamon defeated Valls, by a comfortable margin, with 58.69% of votes against 41.31%; turnout, at 2.05 million, was considerably higher than that in the first round. As the winner of the primary, Hamon was designated the Socialist nominee for the presidential election.[53]
On 22 February, François de Rugy announced his support for Emmanuel Macron, breaking the commitment requested of former candidates to back the winner of the primary, stating that he preferred "coherence to obedience," albeit acknowledging that Hamon was the legitimate nominee of the PS.[54] On 13 March, Le Parisien reported that Valls, rather than backing Socialist nominee Benoît Hamon, would urge voters to support Macron in the first round of the presidential election;[55] Valls denied the report at the time,[56] but declared on 29 March that he personally would vote for Macron, but did not rally behind his candidacy.[57] On 15 March, the PRG announced its support for Hamon's candidacy, securing concessions on issues pertaining to European governance, and confirmed an agreement with the Socialist Party for the legislative elections; this followed a period of hesitation after the primary in which the party contemplated the candidacy of Macron, who secured the support of several of its parliamentarians.[58]
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
Turnout | Hamon PS |
Valls PS |
Hollande PS |
Montebourg PS |
Peillon PS |
de Rugy PE |
Pinel PRG |
Bennahmias FD |
Filoche PS |
Lienemann PS |
Larrouturou ND |
Macron EM |
Aubry PS |
Royal PS |
Taubira PRG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 primary | 22 Jan 2017 | – | 1,655,919 | 36.03% | 31.48% | – | 17.52% | 6.81% | 3.83% | 2.00% | 1.02% | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
OpinionWay | 16–18 Jan 2017 | 536 | 2,000,000 | 28% | 37% | – | 24% | 5% | 1% | 3% | 2% | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
BVA | 13–16 Jan 2017 | 536 | 2,250,000 | 27% | 34% | – | 26% | 7% | 2% | 3% | 1% | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
OpinionWay | 9–11 Jan 2017 | 453 | 1,900,000 | 29% | 40% | – | 21% | 7% | 1% | 1% | 1% | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Kantar Sofres | 3–6 Jan 2017 | 488 | 2,600,000 | 21% | 36% | – | 23% | 10% | 2% | 6% | 2% | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Harris Interactive Archived 2017-01-06 at the Wayback Machine | 2–4 Jan 2017 | 478 | – | 22% | 43% | – | 25% | 7% | 1% | 2% | <0.5% | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Harris Interactive | 5–7 Dec 2016 | 541 | – | 11% | 45% | – | 28% | – | 1% | – | 1% | 6% | 5% | 3% | – | – | – | – |
BVA | 3–13 Nov 2016 | 4% of 9,206 | – | 13% | 44% | – | 32% | – | 1% | 3.5% | 1% | 2.5% | 3% | – | – | – | – | – |
13% | – | 40% | 34% | – | 2% | 3% | 1% | 3% | 4% | – | – | – | – | – | ||||
11% | 34% | – | 21% | – | 1% | 4% | 1% | 2% | 2% | – | 24% | – | – | – | ||||
11% | – | 27% | 24% | – | 1% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 3% | – | 28% | – | – | – | ||||
BVA | 13–20 Sep 2016 | 4% of 9,255 | – | 14% | 44% | – | 31% | – | 1.5% | 1% | 2% | 4% | 2.5% | – | – | – | – | – |
14% | – | 43% | 33% | – | 2% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 2% | – | – | – | – | – | ||||
Ipsos | 9–18 Sep 2016 | 1,017 | – | 16% | 41% | – | 32% | – | 1% | – | 1% | 5% | 4% | – | – | – | – | – |
16% | – | 43% | 31% | – | 1% | – | 1% | 4% | 4% | – | – | – | – | – | ||||
Ipsos | 1–4 Jul 2016 | 993 | – | 13% | 35% | – | 32% | – | 11% | 2% | – | – | 7% | – | – | – | – | – |
13% | – | 37% | 32% | – | 10% | 2% | – | – | 6% | – | – | – | – | – | ||||
– | – | 40% | 38% | – | 11% | 3% | – | – | 8% | – | – | – | – | – | ||||
13% | – | – | 30% | – | 11% | 2% | – | – | 6% | – | 38% | – | – | – | ||||
BVA | 6–15 Oct 2015 | 1,012 | – | 4% | 33% | 22% | 8% | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10% | 17% | 6% |
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
Hamon PS |
Valls PS |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 primary | 29 Jan 2017 | – | 58.69% | 41.31% |
OpinionWay | 16–18 Jan 2017 | 536 | 49% | 51% |
BVA | 13–16 Jan 2017 | 536 | 52% | 48% |
OpinionWay | 9–11 Jan 2017 | 453 | 47% | 53% |
Kantar Sofres | 3–6 Jan 2017 | 488 | 50% | 50% |
Harris Interactive Archived 2017-01-06 at the Wayback Machine | 2–4 Jan 2017 | 478 | 43% | 57% |
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
Valls PS |
Montebourg PS |
---|---|---|---|---|
OpinionWay | 16–18 Jan 2017 | 536 | 51% | 49% |
BVA | 13–16 Jan 2017 | 536 | 48% | 52% |
OpinionWay | 9–11 Jan 2017 | 453 | 54% | 46% |
Kantar Sofres | 3–6 Jan 2017 | 488 | 47% | 53% |
Harris Interactive Archived 2017-01-06 at the Wayback Machine | 2–4 Jan 2017 | 478 | 55% | 45% |
Harris Interactive | 5–7 Dec 2016 | 541 | 51% | 49% |
BVA | 3–13 Nov 2016 | 4% of 9,206 | 57% | 43% |
BVA | 13–20 Sep 2016 | 4% of 9,255 | 51% | 49% |
Ipsos | 9–18 Sep 2016 | 1,017 | 49% | 51% |
Ipsos | 1–4 Jul 2016 | 993 | 46% | 54% |
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
Hollande PS |
Montebourg PS |
---|---|---|---|---|
BVA | 3–13 Nov 2016 | 4% of 9,206 | 48% | 52% |
BVA | 13–20 Sep 2016 | 4% of 9,255 | 48% | 52% |
Ipsos | 9–18 Sep 2016 | 1,017 | 50% | 50% |
Ipsos | 1–4 Jul 2016 | 993 | 47% | 53% |
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
Hollande PS |
Hamon PS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ipsos | 1–4 Jul 2016 | 993 | 57% | 43% |
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
Valls PS |
Macron EM |
---|---|---|---|---|
BVA | 3–13 Nov 2016 | 4% of 9,206 | 58% | 42% |
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
Montebourg PS |
Macron EM |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ipsos | 1–4 Jul 2016 | 993 | 51% | 49% |
Polling firm | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
Hollande PS |
Macron EM |
---|---|---|---|---|
BVA | 3–13 Nov 2016 | 4% of 9,206 | 50.5% | 49.5% |
Candidates | Parties | 1st round | 2nd round | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Votes | % | ||||
Benoît Hamon | Socialist Party | PS | 596,647 | 36.03 | 1,181,872 | 58.69 | |
Manuel Valls | Socialist Party | PS | 521,238 | 31.48 | 831,871 | 41.31 | |
Arnaud Montebourg | Socialist Party | PS | 290,070 | 17.52 | |||
Vincent Peillon | Socialist Party | PS | 112,718 | 6.81 | |||
François de Rugy | Ecologist Party | PÉ | 63,430 | 3.83 | |||
Sylvia Pinel | Radical Party of the Left | PRG | 33,067 | 2.00 | |||
Jean-Luc Bennahmias | Democratic Front | FD | 16,869 | 1.02 | |||
Valid votes | 1,634,039 | 98.68 | 2,013,743 | 98.46 | |||
Spoilt and null votes | 21,880 | 1.32 | 31,600 | 1.54 | |||
Total | 1,655,919 | 100% | 2,045,343 | 100% | |||
List of candidates by High Authority.
Source: [1] Archived 2012-04-07 at the Wayback Machine [2] Archived 2017-04-02 at the Wayback Machine |
Twenty-four applications were filed with the High Authority for the left-wing primary, but not all were made public; of these, several were disqualified for not securing enough sponsors under the rules of the primary.
Several other individuals filed applications which were rejected as they were not members of PS, UDE, PE, or FD.